Pipeline Embolization Device for the Treatment of Ruptured Intracerebral Aneurysms: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Flow Diverter Combined with Coil Embolization for Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Extensive research has confirmed the safety and effectiveness of flow diverters in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. However, their use in cases of acute rupture remains a subject of debate.

METHODS

This study was conducted as a single-center retrospective investigation from January 2018 to January 2022 and included patients with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms (within three days of rupture) who were treated using the Pipeline Embolization Device with adjunctive coil embolization. Patient demographics, operative procedures, and outcomes were analyzed. Antiplatelet therapy included intra-arterial tirofiban and postoperative dual therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients (5 males, 16 females) diagnosed with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms were included in this study. The aneurysm types included 7 blood blister-like aneurysms (30.0%), 3 dissecting (14.3%), and 1 fusiform aneurysm (4.8%). Perioperative complications occurred in 2 patients (9.5%), and both cases involved thrombogenesis. Nineteen patients completed digital subtraction angiography during follow-up, with an average follow-up time of 8.7 months (5 - 18 months). Results showed a complete embolization rate of 94.7% (18/19), with a partial aneurysm still present in 1 patient. A total of 90.4% (19/21) of patients had a favorable prognosis (modified Rankin Scale score = 0 - 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The Pipeline Embolization Device with adjunctive coil embolization proved to be a viable option for managing acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms, notwithstanding the potential for ischemic complications.

Single-antiplatelet regimen in ruptured cerebral blood blister and dissecting aneurysms treated with flow-diverter stent reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms remains challenging due to the need for double-antiplatelet therapy. We report our experience with flow-diverter stent (FDS) reconstruction with single-antiplatelet therapy of ruptured cerebral blood blister and dissecting aneurysms.

METHODS

In this case series we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms who were treated with a phosphoryl-bonded FDS between 2019 and 2022 in a single center. Periprocedurally, all patients received weight-adapted eptifibatide IV and heparin IV. After 6-24 hours, eptifibatide was switched to oral prasugrel as monotherapy. We analyzed the rate of bleeding complications, thromboembolic events, occlusion rate and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Nine patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage were treated, eight within 24 hours of symptom onset. Seven patients were treated with one FDS and two patients received two FDS in a telescopic fashion. Two aneurysms were additionally coil embolized. Fatal re-rupture occurred in one case; eight patients survived and had no adverse events associated with the FDS. Six patients showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm after 3 months (n=2) and 1 year (n=4), respectively. Two patients showed subtotal occlusion of the aneurysm at the last follow-up after 3 months and 6 months, respectively. Favorable clinical outcome was achieved in five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-interventional single-antiplatelet therapy with eptifibatide followed by prasugrel was sufficient to prevent thromboembolic events and reduce re-bleeding using an anti-thrombogenic FDS. FDS with single-antiplatelet therapy might be a viable option for ruptured blood blister and dissecting cerebral aneurysms.

Combined open revascularization and endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: case series

Background and purpose

The treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms can be challenging with stand-alone open or endovascular techniques, particularly after rupture. A combined open and endovascular strategy can potentially limit the risk of extensive dissections with open-only techniques, and allow for aggressive definitive endovascular treatments with minimized downstream ischemic risk.

Materials and methods

Retrospective, single-institution review of consecutive patients undergoing combined open revascularization and endovascular embolization/occlusion for complex intracranial aneurysms from 1/2016 to 6/2022.

Results

Ten patients (4 male [40%]; mean age 51.9 ± 8.7 years) underwent combined open revascularization and endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The majority of aneurysms, 9/10 (90%), were ruptured and 8/10 (80%) were fusiform in morphology. Aneurysms of the posterior circulation represented 8/10 (80%) of the cases (vertebral artery [VA] involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery [PICA] origin, proximal PICA or anterior inferior cerebellar artery/PICA complex, or proximal posterior cerebral artery). Revascularization strategies included intracranial-to-intracranial (IC-IC; 7/10 [70%]) and extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC; 3/10 [30%]) constructs, with 100% postoperative patency. Initial endovascular procedures (consisting of aneurysm/vessel sacrifice in 9/10 patients) were performed early after surgery (0.7 ± 1.5 days). In one patient, secondary endovascular vessel sacrifice was performed after an initial sub-occlusive embolization. Treatment related strokes were diagnosed in 3/10 patients (30%), largely from involved or nearby perforators. All bypasses with follow-up were patent (median 14.0, range 4-72 months). Good outcomes (defined as a Glasgow Outcomes Scale ≥4 and modified Rankin Scale ≤2) occurred in 6/10 patients (60%).

Conclusion

A variety of complex aneurysms not amenable to stand-alone open or endovascular techniques can be successfully treated with combined open and endovascular approaches. Recognition and preservation of perforators is critical to treatment success.

Immediate flow-diversion characteristics of a novel primarily bioresorbable flow-diverting stent

OBJECTIVE

Flow-diverting stents with a resorbable component have significant theoretical benefits over full metal stents, although currently there are none in clinical use. In this study, the authors sought to determine the immediate flow-diversion characteristics of a novel primarily bioresorbable flow-diverting stent.

METHODS

Bioresorbable stents were deployed into glass tube models to determine porosity and pore density. In vitro flow diversion behavior was evaluated using high frame rate angiography under pulsatile flow conditions in a patient-specific silicone aneurysm model treated with the resorbable stent as well as the Surpass Evolve stent. In vivo flow diversion was characterized by deployment into 20 rabbit saccular aneurysm models, and grading was based on the O'Kelly-Marotta scale and the 4F-flow diversion predictive score.

RESULTS

Porosities and pore densities of the bioresorbable stent were in the flow-diverting range for all target vessel diameters. Quantified results of immediate angiography after placement of the bioresorbable stent into a silicone aneurysm model demonstrated greater flow diversion compared to the Evolve stent. Bioresorbable stent placement in saccular aneurysm models resulted in an immediate O'Kelly-Marotta grade of A3 or better and a 4F-flow diversion predictive score of 4 or better in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The bioresorbable stent has immediate flow-diversion characteristics that are comparable to commercially available metal stents. Longer-term studies are underway to determine the ability of the resorbable fibers to act as a neointimal scaffold and result in long-term aneurysm occlusion.