Virtual Flow-T Stenting for Two Patient-Specific Bifurcation Aneurysms

Treatment for middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms: in silico comparison of the novel Contour device and conventional flow-diverters

Endovascular treatment has become the standard therapy for cerebral aneurysms, while the effective treatment for middle cerebral artery (MCA) bifurcation aneurysms remains a challenge. Current flow-diverting techniques with endovascular coils cover the aneurysm orifice as well as adjacent vessel branches, which may lead to branch occlusion. Novel endovascular flow disruptors, such as the Contour device (Cerus Endovascular), are of great potential to eliminate the risk of branch occlusion. However, there is a lack of valid comparison between novel flow disruptors and conventional (intraluminal) flow-diverters. In this study, two in silico MCA bifurcation aneurysm models were treated by specific Contour devices and flow-diverters using fast-deployment algorithms. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were used to examine the performance and efficiency of deployed devices. Hemodynamic parameters, including aneurysm inflow and wall shear stress, were compared among each Contour device, conventional flow-diverter, and untreated condition. Our results show that the placement of devices can effectively reduce the risk of aneurysm rupture, while the deployment of a Contour device causes more flow reduction than using flow-diverters (e.g. Silk Vista Baby). Besides, the Contour device presents the flow diversion capability of targeting the aneurysm neck without occluding the daughter vessel. In summary, the in silico aneurysm models presented in this study can serve as a powerful pre-planning tool for testing new treatment techniques, optimising device deployment, and predicting the performance in patient-specific aneurysm cases. Contour device is proved to be an effective treatment of MCA bifurcation aneurysms with less daughter vessel occlusion.

Fusiform versus Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms-Hemodynamic Evaluation of the Pre-Aneurysmal, Pathological, and Post-Interventional State

Minimally-invasive therapies are well-established treatment methods for saccular intracranial aneurysms (SIAs). Knowledge concerning fusiform IAs (FIAs) is low, due to their wide and alternating lumen and their infrequent occurrence. However, FIAs carry risks like ischemia and thus require further in-depth investigation. Six patient-specific IAs, comprising three position-identical FIAs and SIAs, with the FIAs showing a non-typical FIA shape, were compared, respectively. For each model, a healthy counterpart and a treated version with a flow diverting stent were created. Eighteen time-dependent simulations were performed to analyze morphological and hemodynamic parameters focusing on the treatment effect (TE). The stent expansion is higher for FIAs than SIAs. For FIAs, the reduction in vorticity is higher (Δ35-75% case 2/3) and the reduction in the oscillatory velocity index is lower (Δ15-68% case 2/3). Velocity is reduced equally for FIAs and SIAs with a TE of 37-60% in FIAs and of 41-72% in SIAs. Time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) is less reduced within FIAs than SIAs (Δ30-105%). Within this study, the positive TE of FDS deployed in FIAs is shown and a similarity in parameters found due to the non-typical FIA shape. Despite the higher stent expansion, velocity and vorticity are equally reduced compared to identically located SIAs.