Shared decision-making in patients with multiple sclerosis

Decisional Conflict Regarding Disease-Modifying Treatment Choices Among Patients with Mid-Stage Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Purpose

Shared decision-making is critical in multiple sclerosis (MS) due to the uncertainty of the disease trajectory over time and the large number of treatment options with differing efficacy, safety and administration characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess patients' decisional conflict regarding the choice of a disease-modifying therapy and its associated factors in patients with mid-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Methods

A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS (2017 revised McDonald criteria) and disease duration of 3 to 8 years were included. The level of uncertainty experienced by a patient when faced with making a treatment choice was assessed using the 4-item Decisional Conflict Scale. A battery of patient-reported and clinician-rated measures was administered to obtain information on symptom severity, illness perception, illness-related uncertainty, regret, MS knowledge, risk taking behavior, preferred role in the decision-making process, cognition, and self-management. Patients were recruited during routine follow-up visits and completed all questionnaires online using electronic tablets at the hospital. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted.

Results

A total of 201 patients were studied. Mean age (Standard deviation) was 38.7 (8.4) years and 74.1% were female. Median disease duration (Interquartile range) was 6.0 (4.0-7.0) years. Median EDSS score was 1.0 (0-2.0). Sixty-seven (33.3%) patients reported a decisional conflict. These patients had lower MS knowledge and more illness uncertainty, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, subjective symptom severity, a threatening illness perception, and poorer quality of life than their counterparts. Lack of decisional conflict was associated with MS knowledge (Odds ratio [OR]=1.195, 95% CI 1.045, 1.383, p=0.013), self-management (OR=1.049, 95% CI 1.013, 1.093, p=0.018), and regret after a healthcare decision (OR=0.860, 95% CI 0.756, 0.973, p=0.018) in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Decisional conflict regarding the selection of a disease-modifying therapy was a common phenomenon in patients with mid-stage RRMS. Identifying factors associated with decisional conflict may be useful to implement preventive strategies that help patients better understand their condition and strengthen their self-management resources.

Real-world evidence and patient preference for subcutaneous versus intravenous natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis - initial results from the observational SISTER study

Background

The consideration of patient preference for a certain drug route of administration (RoA) plays an important role in promoting patient adherence in chronic diseases. Natalizumab is an established treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and can be administered as intravenous (IV) infusion or subcutaneous (SC) injection developed to enable a shorter and easier administration versus IV RoA.

Study objectives

Primary objective is to compare patients' preference for RoA and satisfaction with SC versus IV natalizumab at baseline and subsequent visits up to 12 months. Secondary objectives include drug utilization, clinical outcomes, safety, and treatment satisfaction in a usual care setting.

Design and methods

SISTER (Subcutaneous: Non-Interventional Study for Tysabri Patient Preference - Experience from Real World) is an ongoing, prospective, observational study where natalizumab is utilized according to local label. RRMS patients are included in three natalizumab cohorts: Patients switching from current IV to SC administration (switcher) and patients newly starting natalizumab on either SC or IV route (starter SC/IV). This interim analysis includes 262 patients (184 switchers, 39 SC starters, and 39 IV starters), median observation period was 9 months.

Results

80.8% IV starters and 93.9% SC starters reported at baseline that they prefer the assigned RoA. Although initial satisfaction with chosen RoA was maintained over time from baseline through Month 12 in all three cohorts, the wish for change of the current RoA after 6 and 12 months was more frequently expressed among IV starters than in either SC cohort. Consistently, six patients (23.1%) starting with IV changed their RoA from IV to SC route.Mean global treatment satisfaction according to TSQM-II score at baseline remained high in the switcher group and increased through Month 12 in both IV and SC starter cohorts.

Conclusion

Based on current data, there is a trend toward patients' preference for the natalizumab SC route over the IV route, which provides valuable insights into patients' preference for natalizumab RoA in routine care and complements available data from clinical studies with real-world data on SC natalizumab.

Trial registration

This observational (non-interventional) study was registered in the local German PEI register for non-interventional studies (NIS-No. 611) and in the international CTgov register (NCT05304520).

Shared decision-making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease and their parents: an exploratory study

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) face various healthcare choices to be made during the disease process that may impact their lives. Shared decision-making (SDM) could improve their health outcomes. We assessed if, and to what extent, paediatricians engage children with SCD and/or their parents in the decision-making process. In this observational cross-sectional study, paediatric SCD patients and their parents visiting the outpatient paediatrics clinic of a university hospital participated in a SDM baseline measurement. Two evaluators independently and objectively analysed the level of patient involvement in decision-making from the audio-recordings of the consultations using the OPTION-5 instrument, a 0-20-point scale from which scores are usually expressed as a percentage of ideal SDM. The level of SDM, as perceived by patients, parents and paediatricians, was appreciated using the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires, respectively. Scores could range from 0% (no SDM) to 100% (exemplary SDM). Twenty-four consultations in which a decision needed to be made about SCD treatment were audiotaped and analysed; six were from each paediatrician. The group consisted of 17 male and 7 female patients from various cultural backgrounds between 2 and 17 years old, with a mean age of 9.4 years (SD 4.2). Median OPTION-5 scores were 25.0% [IQR] 20.0-40.0%; range 0-55%). Median SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 56.7% (IQR 39.4-88.9%) and 68.9% (IQR 57.8-77.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although subjective scores of SDM were fair, the objectively scored level of SDM among children suffering from SCD leaves room for improvement. This may be realized by increasing knowledge about the benefits of SDM, child-centred SDM interventions and SDM-training for paediatricians that takes into account the complexity of intercultural challenges and risk communication between stakeholders.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Children that suffer from sickle cell disease (SCD) are more vulnerable to factors that negatively impact the care that they receive as well as suboptimal health outcomes. • Shared decision-making (SDM) can help children participate in a collaborative decision-making process about their preferred treatment options and improve their health outcomes.

WHAT IS NEW

• The level of participation in the decision-making process for patients suffering from SCD and the families that they belong to leaves room for improvement. The impact of intercultural challenges and the quality and consistency of risk-communication between stakeholders in paediatric SDM needs further exploration. • Paediatricians are more confident about their ability to involve the child and parents compared to how children and their parents experience their level of involvement in a shared decision-making process.

Treatment Patterns and Unmet Need for Patients with Progressive Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: Survey Results from 2016 to 2021

INTRODUCTION

Much of the current literature on treatment patterns and disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) does not distinguish between the relapsing-remitting and progressive subtypes (including primary [PPMS] and secondary progressive MS [SPMS]), or between active/nonactive disease. Current treatment options for progressive MS are limited, with only one approved product for PPMS and none specifically for nonactive SPMS. Here we report treatment patterns, disability progression, and unmet needs among patients with active and nonactive PPMS and SPMS.

METHODS

The annual, cross-sectional survey from the Adelphi Disease Specific Program was used to collect physician-reported data on US adult patients with PPMS and SPMS, including active and nonactive disease. Treatment patterns (including the proportion of patients who were untreated with a disease-modifying therapy [DMT]), disability progression, and unmet need are described from 2016 to 2021.

RESULTS

Data were collected for 2067 patients with progressive MS (PPMS, 1583; SPMS, 484). A substantial proportion of patients were untreated across all groups, and this was highest for nonactive PPMS (~ 43%). The proportion of untreated patients generally declined over time but remained high in 2018-2021 (~ 10-38%). Among treated patients, the proportion receiving infusions increased over time to ~ 34-46%, largely driven by ocrelizumab use after approval. Disability progression was reported for most patients (> 50%), including many who were receiving a DMT. Across all disease subtypes, when physicians were asked about the greatest unmet need with current DMTs, they most frequently cited effectiveness (~ 63-87%), and specifically slowing disease progression (~ 32-59%).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of physician-reported data reveals that patients with progressive MS, particularly those with nonactive disease, frequently remain untreated or continue to decline despite treatment with available DMTs. Thus there is an enduring need for safe and effective treatments for this underserved population.

The importance of the patient's perspective in decision-making in multiple sclerosis: Results of the OwnMS patient perspectives study

BACKGROUND

Research is needed to identify the unmet disease education and communication needs of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) to support informed decision-making, enable self-management and maintain independence for PwMS for as long as possible.

METHODS

An Expert Steering Group co-developed two studies for PwMS aged 18 years and over: a qualitative, online, patient community activity and a quantitative anonymised online survey. The quantitative survey was conducted in the UK from 12 September 2019 to 18 November 2019 amongst PwMS recruited via the Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Trust newsletter and their closed Facebook group. Questions explored the goals, desires, and knowledge gaps of PwMS. Self-reported data from people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) were collated and reviewed, and discussed by the Steering Group. This paper presents descriptive statistics of the quantitative survey findings.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 117 participants with RRMS. Most respondents (73%) had personal goals related to lifestyle and many (69%) were concerned about maintaining independence. More than half of respondents were worried about planning for the future in relation to income (56%), housing (40%) and most respondents also indicated MS had a negative impact on their lives, including their work life (73%) and social life (69%). Limited occupational support was forthcoming (17% were not provided with any support and only 27% report their work environment being adjusted to suit their needs). The ability to plan for the future and to understand the course of MS were highlighted as key priorities by respondents. A positive trend was observed between those who felt able to plan for the future and their knowledge of MS progression. The proportion of patients who report knowing a 'great deal' about MS prognosis and disability progression was low (16% and 9%, respectively), suggesting an increased role for clinical teams to provide information and education for PwMS. Communication between respondents and their clinical teams highlighted the role of specialist nurses for PwMS to provide holistic, informative support and demonstrated the level of comfort that PwMS have in discussing less clinical topics with these providers.

CONCLUSION

This UK nationwide survey highlighted some of the unmet needs in disease education and communication in a subgroup of UK patients with RRMS, which can impact quality of life. Discussing goals and planning alongside prognosis and disability progression with MS care teams may enable people with RRMS not only to make informed treatment decisions, but also to self-manage and plan for the future, factors which are important to maintain independence.