Correlation Between Thrombus Signal Intensity and Aneurysm Wall Thickness in Partially Thrombosed Intracranial Aneurysms Using 7T Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Selective clipping of giant anterior communicating artery aneurysms remains a reliable therapeutic option

BACKGROUND

Giant anterior communicating artery (AcomA) aneurysm represent a significant surgical challenge. Our study aimed to discuss the therapeutic strategy in patients with a giant AcomA aneurysm treated by selective neck clipping through a pterional approach.

METHODS

Among all operated patients from an intracranial aneurysm between January 2015 and January 2022 (n = 726) in our institution, three patients with a giant AcomA aneurysm treated by neck clipping were included. Early (<7days) outcome was noted. Early postoperative CT scan was performed in all patients to detect any complications. Early DSA was also performed to confirm giant AcomA aneurysm exclusion. The mRS score was recorded 3 months after treatment. The mRS≤ 2 was considered as a good functional outcome. Control DSA was performed one year after treatment.

RESULTS

In the three patients, after a large frontopterional approach, a selective exclusion of their giant AcomA aneurysm was obtained after a partial pars orbitalis of the inferior frontal gyrus resection. Ischemic lesion was noted in 1 patient and chronic hydrocephalus in 2 patients with ruptured aneurysm. The mRS score after 3 months was good in 2 patients. Long term complete occlusion of the aneurysm were noted in the three patients.

CONCLUSION

Selective clipping of a giant AcomA aneurysm is a reliable therapeutic option after a careful evaluation of local vascular anatomy. An adequate surgical exposure is frequently obtained through an enlarged pterional approach with an anterior basifrontal lobe resection, especially in an emergency situation and/or in case of high position of anterior communicating artery.

Flow Diversion vs. Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Intradural Large Vertebrobasilar Artery Aneurysms

Objective

To compare the safety, angiographic, and long-term clinical outcomes of intradural large vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) aneurysms following flow diversion (FD) or conventional stent-assisted coiling (SAC).

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with intradural large VBA aneurysms between 2014 and 2021 who underwent FD or SAC. Patients' characteristics, postprocedural complications, and clinical and angiographic outcome details were reviewed.

Results

A total of 66 intradural large VBA aneurysms were included, including 42 (63.6%), which were treated with SAC (SAC group) and 24 (36.4%), which were treated with FD (FD group). Clinical follow-up was obtained at the median of 24.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 12.0–45.0] months, with 34 (81.0%) patients achieved the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 in the SAC group and 21 (87.5%) patients in the FD group. Thirteen (19.7%) patients experienced neurological complications, of which 9 (13.6%) patients first occurred during the periprocedural phase and 4 (6.1%) patients first occurred during follow-up. The overall complication rate and periprocedural complication rate were both higher in the SAC group, but did not reach statistical significance (23.8 vs. 12.5%, P = 0.430; 16.7 vs. 8.3%, P = 0.564). The mortality rates were similar between the groups (11.9 vs. 12.5%). Angiographic follow-up was available for 46 patients at the median of 7 (IQR 6–14) months, with a numerically higher complete occlusion rate in the SAC group (82.1 vs. 55.6%, P = 0.051) and similar adequate aneurysm occlusion rates between the groups (85.7 vs. 83.3%, P = 1.000). In the multivariate analysis, ischemic onset (P = 0.019), unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice (P = 0.008), and older age (≥60 years) (P = 0.031) were significantly associated with complications.

Conclusion

There was a trend toward lower complication rate and lower complete occlusion rate for intradural large VBA aneurysms following FD as compared to SAC. FD and SAC have comparable mortality rates and favorable outcomes. Ischemic onset, unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice, and older age could increase the risk of complications.