Making Every Step Count: Minute-by-Minute Characterization of Step Counts Augments Remote Activity Monitoring in People With Multiple Sclerosis

Digital remote monitoring of people with multiple sclerosis

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease that affects over 2.8 million people globally, leading to significant motor and non-motor symptoms. Effective disease monitoring is critical for improving patient outcomes but is often hindered by the limitations of infrequent clinical assessments. Digital remote monitoring tools leveraging big data and AI offer new opportunities to track symptoms in real time and detect disease progression.

Methods

This narrative review explores recent advancements in digital remote monitoring of motor and non-motor symptoms in MS. We conducted a PubMed search to collect original studies aimed at evaluating the use of AI and/or big data for digital remote monitoring of pwMS. We focus on tools and techniques applied to data from wearable sensors, smartphones, and other connected devices, as well as AI-based methods for the analysis of big data.

Results

Wearable sensors and machine learning algorithms show significant promise in monitoring motor symptoms, such as fall risk and gait disturbances. Many studies have demonstrated their reliability not only in clinical settings and for independent execution of motor assessments by patients, but also for passive monitoring during everyday life. Cognitive monitoring, although less developed, has seen progress with AI-driven tools that automate the scoring of neuropsychological tests and analyse passive keystroke dynamics. However, passive cognitive monitoring is still underdeveloped, compared to monitoring of motor symptoms. Some preliminary evidence suggests that application of AI and big data to other understudied aspects of MS (namely sleep and circadian autonomic patterns) may provide novel insights.

Conclusion

Advances in AI and big data offer exciting possibilities for improving disease management and patient outcomes in MS. Digital remote monitoring has the potential to revolutionize MS care by providing continuous, long-term granular data on both motor and non-motor symptoms. While promising results have been demonstrated, larger-scale studies and more robust validation are needed to fully integrate these tools into clinical practice and generalise their results to the wider MS population.

Psychometric measurement properties and reference values of the six-spot step test, the six-minute walk test, the 25-foot walk test, and the 12-item multiple sclerosis walking scale in people with multiple sclerosis

This review investigated the psychometric properties of the most commonly used short-, long-, complex- and patient-reported walking outcome measures in multiple sclerosis(MS): the timed-25-foot walk test (T25FW), the six-minute walk test (6MWT), the six-spot step-test (SSST), and the 12-item MS walking scale (MSWS-12), along with reported reference data of these tests.

METHODS

Based on PubMed and Embase searches, psychometric as well as descriptive data of T25FW, 6MWT, SSST, and MSWS-12 were extracted from studies evaluating persons with MS (pwMS). Descriptive data was also extracted from healthy controls (HC), if reported. Data was displayed as median [IQR].

RESULTS

A total of n=84 studies (N=36.929 pwMS, 64% females, age 49.6 [43;51] yrs; N=3.093 HC, 40.0 [37.5;47.5] yrs) were included. In pwMS, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) was 4.0 [3.0;4.8], patient determined disease scale (PDDS) 2.6 [2.0;3.0], time since diagnosis 11.6 [9.9;13.2] yrs, and MS-phenotypes (RR/SP/PP/unknown) were 68/19/10/3%. PwMS performed substantially worse than HC across all walking capacity outcomes. Weak to strong associations were found for construct validity (r=0.29-0.88, EDSS or PDDS and walking capacity or ability outcomes) and concurrent validity (r=0.16-0.88 between walking capacity and ability, r=0.73-0.95 between walking capacity outcomes). Ecological validity showed weak to moderate associations between daily steps and walking outcomes (r=0.42-0.68). Good to excellent test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability were reported across outcomes (ICC=0.71-1.00). Responsiveness was most frequently reported as the minimal-clinically-important-difference, minimal-detectable-change, or as the minimal-important-change (data not shown).

CONCLUSION

Overall the T25FW, 6MWT, SSST, and MSWS-12 demonstrate moderate to excellent psychometric properties (i.e., valid, reliable, and responsive to changes), which make them clinically useful and applicable to research.

Measurement Properties of Backward Walking and Its Sensitivity and Feasibility in Predicting Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience mobility impairments that elevate fall risk, increasing the need to identify clinical measures that accurately predict falls. Backward walking (BW) better differentiates fallers from nonfallers in MS. However, no studies have reported the measurement properties of the backward walking Timed 25-Foot Walk (B-T25-FW) and BW metrics, like BW velocity. Additionally, it is unknown whether BW can predict future falls in MS or its link to activity levels. This study assessed the reliability and responsiveness of B-T25-FW and BW metrics, including BW velocity. It also examined whether BW could predict falls at 3 and 6 months and its association with activity levels.

METHODS

During 2 separate visits, 23 people with MS completed the forward walking Timed 25-Foot Walk (F-T25-FW) and B-T25-FW, as well as forward walking and BW assessments in which spatiotemporal measures were recorded. Test-retest reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients, and minimum detectable changes were calculated. Correlation analyses explored the relationship between BW velocity, B-T25-FW, prospective falls, and activity levels.

RESULTS

B-T25-FW and BW velocity exhibited excellent test-retest reliability. Large effect sizes to interpret clinically meaningful change in the B-T25-FW and BW velocity were also found. Both metrics demonstrated modest negative correlations with falls at 3 and 6 months and correlated strongly with very active minutes at 3- and 6-months post study.

CONCLUSIONS

The B-T25-FW and BW velocity are effective and reliable in clinical use for evaluating functional mobility in people with MS, are sensitive enough to detect subtle changes, and may be a meaningful marker for tracking disease progression and treatment efficacy.

Smartwatch-derived sleep and heart rate measures complement step counts in explaining established metrics of MS severity

BACKGROUND

Passive remote monitoring of patients with MS (PwMS) with sensor-based wearable technologies promises near-continuous evaluation with high ecological validity. Step counts correlate strongly with traditional measures of MS severity. We hypothesized that remote monitoring of sleep and heart rate will yield complementary information.

METHODS

We recruited 31 PwMS and 31 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (HV) as part of the dreaMS feasibility study (NCT04413032). Fitbit Versa 2 smartwatches were worn for 6 weeks and provided a total of 25 features for activity, heart rate, and sleep. Features were selected based on their pairwise intercorrelation (Pearson |r| < 0.6), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.6 or median coefficient of variation < 0.2) and group comparisons between HV and PwMS with moderate disability (expanded disability status scale (EDSS) ≥ 3.5) (rank-biserial |r| ≥ 0.5). These selected features were correlated with clinical reference tests (EDSS, timed 25-foot walk (T25FW), MS-walking scale (MSWS-12)) in PwMS, and multivariate models adjusted for age, sex, and disease duration were compared.

RESULTS

We analyzed 28 PwMS (68% female, mean age 44 years, median EDSS 3.0) and 26 HV in our primary analysis. The objectively selected features discriminated well between HV and PwMS with moderate disability with rank-biserial r = 0.83 for Total number of steps, 0.51 for Deep sleep proportion, -0.51 for Median heart rate, 0.85 for Proportion very active, and 0.65 for Total number of floors. In PwMS they correlated strongly with the three clinical reference tests EDSS (strongest Spearman ρ = -0.75 for Proportion very active), T25FW (-0.75 for Total number of floors), and MSWS-12 (-0.72 for Total number of floors). Deep sleep proportion and Median heart rate complemented Total number of steps in explaining the variance of reference tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Activity, deep sleep and heart rate measures can be derived reliably from smartwatches and contain independent clinically meaningful information about MS severity, highlighting their potential for continuous passive monitoring in both clinical trials and clinical care of PwMS.

Re-WRAP (Remyelination for women at risk of axonal loss and progression): A phase II randomized placebo-controlled delayed-start trial of bazedoxifene for myelin repair in multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a major cause of disability in young and middle-aged people, and myelin repair therapies are needed to slow or potentially reverse this damage. Bazedoxifene (BZA) is a selective estrogen receptor modulator identified in a novel high-throughput unbiased screen for its remyelinating potential, and its remyelinating effects were demonstrated in pre-clinical models.

METHODS

This is a single-center, double blind, randomized, controlled, delayed-start Phase 2 clinical trial (NCT04002934) investigating the remyelinating effects of BZA relative to placebo. Female patients with relapsing-remitting MS, aged 45-60 years (or > 40 if post-menopausal), and ambulatory status (EDSS 0-6 inclusive), will be recruited into a clinical trial with 2 arms of identical design, except that the "Chronic Optic Neuropathy" arm requires additional inclusion criteria of electrophysiological evidence of prior visual pathway demyelination. Clinical, electrophysiological, and imaging evaluations will occur at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome is change in Myelin Water Fraction (MWF) on MRI within the corpus callosum. Secondary outcomes are: visual evoked potential (VEP) P100 latency, novel digital measures of cognition and activity, and patient reported outcomes. Tertiary outcomes are: safety and tolerability.

DISCUSSION

BZA has strong preclinical effects on myelin repair, and in the general population demonstrated benefits in treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. Together, these findings support the rationale for an RCT testing BZA in women with MS, evaluating established neuroimaging and neurovisual measures of myelin repair. Additionally, validating novel digital tools could increase sensitivity to change and inform the duration and design of future clinical trials.

Wearable Sensor Technologies to Assess Motor Functions in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Scoping Review and Perspective

BACKGROUND

Wearable sensor technologies have the potential to improve monitoring in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and inform timely disease management decisions. Evidence of the utility of wearable sensor technologies in people with MS is accumulating but is generally limited to specific subgroups of patients, clinical or laboratory settings, and functional domains.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of all studies that have used wearable sensors to assess, monitor, and quantify motor function in people with MS during daily activities or in a controlled laboratory setting and to shed light on the technological advances over the past decades.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed studies on wearable sensors to assess the motor performance of people with MS. We scanned PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases until December 31, 2022, considering search terms "multiple sclerosis" and those associated with wearable technologies and included all studies assessing motor functions. The types of results from relevant studies were systematically mapped into 9 predefined categories (association with clinical scores or other measures; test-retest reliability; group differences, 3 types; responsiveness to change or intervention; and acceptability to study participants), and the reporting quality was determined through 9 questions. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 1251 identified publications, 308 were included: 176 (57.1%) in a real-world context, 107 (34.7%) in a laboratory context, and 25 (8.1%) in a mixed context. Most publications studied physical activity (196/308, 63.6%), followed by gait (81/308, 26.3%), dexterity or tremor (38/308, 12.3%), and balance (34/308, 11%). In the laboratory setting, outcome measures included (in addition to clinical severity scores) 2- and 6-minute walking tests, timed 25-foot walking test, timed up and go, stair climbing, balance tests, and finger-to-nose test, among others. The most popular anatomical landmarks for wearable placement were the waist, wrist, and lower back. Triaxial accelerometers were most commonly used (229/308, 74.4%). A surge in the number of sensors embedded in smartphones and smartwatches has been observed. Overall, the reporting quality was good.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous monitoring with wearable sensors could optimize the management of people with MS, but some hurdles still exist to full clinical adoption of digital monitoring. Despite a possible publication bias and vast heterogeneity in the outcomes reported, our review provides an overview of the current literature on wearable sensor technologies used for people with MS and highlights shortcomings, such as the lack of harmonization, transparency in reporting methods and results, and limited data availability for the research community. These limitations need to be addressed for the growing implementation of wearable sensor technologies in clinical routine and clinical trials, which is of utmost importance for further progress in clinical research and daily management of people with MS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021243249; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=243249.

Objective and subjective measures of daily physical activity in persons with Multiple Sclerosis beginning a rehabilitation regime: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Fatigue, and balance and gait disorders can impact on physical activity (PA) levels in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). To date, several studies have examined PA in pwMS during daily life, but little is known about PA levels in pwMS during a rehabilitation period. The present study investigated PA levels (daily steps, light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)) in inpatient and outpatients with MS during their rehabilitation period and described the relationship between objectively measured PA and levels of disability, quality of life, fatigue, and self-efficacy.

METHODS

In this exploratory cross-sectional study, we examined 40 pwMS during their inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation regime. Participants included in the study (N = 34) wore a Fitbit Versa tracker for one week recording daily steps, minutes of LPA, and minutes of MVPA (primary outcomes). They underwent a clinical assessment of physical activity levels (Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire(GLTEQ)), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale(FSS)), walking ability (10 Meter Walk Test(10MWT), 2-Min Walk Test(2MWT), 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking scale(MSWS-12)), quality of life (12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12)), and self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis scale (SEMS)) (secondary outcomes). Multiple linear regressions (MLR) models were used to test whether the demographic difference between the two groups influenced the estimation of objective variables measured by Fitbit. Finally, correlations between objectively measured physical activity and subjective clinical scales were estimated with Spearman correlations.

RESULTS

Our sample consisted of 21 females and 13 males with a mean (interquartile range) age of 52 (20) years and an Expanded Disability Status scale(EDSS) score of 6.0 (1.50) points; baseline characteristics of inpatients (N = 18) and outpatients (N = 16) differed statistically only in EDSS levels (p-value = 0.008) and use of assistive devices (p=0.007). The whole sample performed (mean±standard deviation) 3969±2190 steps per day, with no significant difference between inpatients (3318±1515) and outpatients (4660±2606). No statistical difference was found between the groups in LPA (p-value=0.064). A significant difference in MVPA (p-value < 0.001) was found between inpatients and outpatients, 1.52±3.98 and 14.69±11.56 min per day, respectively. Significant correlations were found between FSS and MVPA both in the whole sample (r(32)= -0.62, p < 0.001) and in the outpatients group (r(14) = -0.66, p = 0.005), and between 10MWT and daily steps (whole sample:(r(32) = 0.48, p = 0.005), outpatients:(r(14)= -0.51, p = 0.05)).

CONCLUSIONS

PwMS in our study overall engaged in reduced and less intense levels of daily PA with respect to the guidelines with inpatients performing almost no vigorous activities. Considering the importance of PA in improving physical and mental well-being, clinicians and researchers should develope strategies to increase daily PA of PwMS during their rehabilitation programs and daily life.