Microscopic Transsphenoidal Resection of Giant Pituitary Adenomas: Analysis of the Factors Limiting the Degree of Resection in 73 Cases

Endoscopic and exoscopic surgery for brain tumors

Nerves and blood vessels must be protected during brain tumor surgery, which has traditionally relied on microscopes. In the 2000s, endoscopes and related equipment were developed for neurosurgery. In this review, we aim to outline the role of endoscopes in brain tumor surgery and discuss the emerging use of exoscopes. The primary use of endoscopes in brain tumor surgery is in endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary tumors. By using the space within the sphenoid sinus, surgeons can insert an endoscope and instruments such as forceps or scissors through the nose to access and remove the tumor. Compared to microscopes, endoscopes can get closer to tumors, nerves, and blood vessels. They enable wide-angle observation of the skull base, making them valuable for skull base tumors as well as pituitary tumors. Endoscopes are also used in cases where a brain tumor is associated with hydrocephalus, allowing surgeons to correct obstructive hydrocephalus and perform tumor biopsies simultaneously. Exoscopy, a newer technique introduced in recent years, involves surgeons wearing special glasses and removing the tumor while viewing a three-dimensional monitor. This approach reduces surgeon fatigue and allows for more natural positioning during lengthy brain tumor surgeries. Future brain tumor surgeries will likely involve robotic surgery, which is already used for other organs. This is expected to make brain tumor removal safer and more accurate.

Evaluation of Retrospective Patient Preference on Extent of Resection of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgeons treat nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas by surgical resection. Based on the adherence of the tumor to the normal pituitary gland, operative risks may include hormone replacement therapy for postoperative hypopituitarism with gross total resection that injures the gland or recurrent tumor with subtotal resection and purposeful avoidance of gland manipulation. None of the patients presented in this article had a preoperative preference regarding extent of resection. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative patient preferences regarding extent of resection.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent resection of adenomas between 2015 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed and surveyed. After surgery, participating patients were asked for their preference regarding 100% tumor resection with lifelong daily hormone replacement therapy versus 90% tumor resection with a chance of recurrence in the hypothetical situation where the neurosurgeon encounters tumor adherent to the normal gland.

RESULTS

Of the 73 patients included, 54 (74.0%) responded to the survey, with the majority (36 [66.7%]) preferring 90% resection with the chance of tumor recurrence. Tumor recurrence (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 2.1-2.5, P = 0.03) and steroid avoidance (odds ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 2.0-2.4, P = 0.04) were the 2 variables that were significant predictors of patient preference in multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients may not have the preoperative insight or experience to have a strong conviction regarding the extent of adenoma resection, the consequences following surgery clearly influence their preference. Most patients in our study, including patients with gross total resection and especially patients who experienced side effects of steroid therapy, preferred subtotal resection with the chance of tumor recurrence over hormone replacement therapy.