1
|
Aebischer P, Weder S, Vischer M, Mantokoudis G, Caversaccio M, Wimmer W. Uncovering Vulnerable Phases in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion: Insights from an In Vitro Model. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:e271-e280. [PMID: 38346807 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to improve our understanding of the mechanics involved in the insertion of lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays. DESIGN A series of 30 insertion experiments were conducted by three experienced surgeons. The experiments were carried out in a previously validated artificial temporal bone model according to established soft surgery guidelines. The use of an in vitro setup enabled us to comprehensively evaluate relevant parameters, such as insertion force, intracochlear pressure, and exact electrode array position in a controlled and repeatable environment. RESULTS Our findings reveal that strong intracochlear pressure transients are more frequently caused during the second half of the insertion, and that regrasping the electrode array is a significant factor in this phenomenon. For choosing an optimal insertion speed, we show that it is crucial to balance slow movement to limit intracochlear stress with short duration to limit tremor-induced pressure spikes, challenging the common assumption that a slower insertion is inherently better. Furthermore, we found that intracochlear stress is affected by the order of execution of postinsertion steps, namely sealing the round window and posterior tympanotomy with autologous tissue and routing of the excess cable into the mastoid cavity. Finally, surgeons' subjective estimates of physical parameters such as speed, smoothness, and resistance did not correlate with objectively assessed measures, highlighting that a thorough understanding of intracochlear mechanics is essential for an atraumatic implantation. CONCLUSION The results presented in this article allow us to formulate evidence-based surgical recommendations that may ultimately help to improve surgical outcome and hearing preservation in cochlear implant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefan Weder
- Department for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mattheus Vischer
- Department for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
| | - Georgios Mantokoudis
- Department for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oberhoffner T, Mlynski R, Schraven S, Brademann G, Dierker A, Spitzer P, Hey M. Effects of Intraoperative Cochlear Implant Electrode Conditioning on Impedances and Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2024; 71:650-659. [PMID: 37682654 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2023.3313198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current study investigates whether, during a Cochlear Implant (CI) surgery, conditioning (i.e. applying short bursts of electrical stimulation) within a saline solution can have positive effects on subsequent intra-operative measurements. We hypothesize that, based on previous research, the impedance values will be reduced, and that the reproducibility of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs) is improved as a result of conditioning. METHODS We conditioned half of the electrode contacts, within a saline solution, before CI insertion, using 23 MED-EL implants. Impedance was measured for both the conditioned and non-conditioned groups at five time points. Repeated ECAP recordings were measured and compared between the conditioned and non-conditioned groups. RESULTS Impedance of the electrode contacts were reduced by 31% after conditioning in saline solution; however, there were no clinically relevant differences after the implantation of the electrode array. The hypothesis that measurement reproducibility would be increased after conditioning could not be confirmed with our data. Within the saline solution, we observed that 44% of the electrode contacts were covered with air bubbles, which most disappeared after implantation. However, these air bubbles limited the effectiveness of the conditioning within the saline solution. Lastly, the effect of conditioning on the reference electrode stimulation was approximately 16% of the total reduction in impedance. CONCLUSION Our data does not suggest that intraoperative conditioning is clinically required for cochlear implantation with MED-EL implants. Additionally, an in-vivo ECAP recording can be considered as a method of conditioning the electrode contacts. SIGNIFICANCE We confirm that the common clinical practice does not need to be changed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Schraivogel S, Aebischer P, Wagner F, Weder S, Mantokoudis G, Caversaccio M, Wimmer W. Postoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth. Ear Hear 2023; 44:1379-1388. [PMID: 37157125 PMCID: PMC10583924 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Reliable determination of cochlear implant electrode positions shows promise for clinical applications, including anatomy-based fitting of audio processors or monitoring of electrode migration during follow-up. Currently, electrode positioning is measured using radiography. The primary objective of this study is to extend and validate an impedance-based method for estimating electrode insertion depths, which could serve as a radiation-free and cost-effective alternative to radiography. The secondary objective is to evaluate the reliability of the estimation method in the postoperative follow-up over several months. DESIGN The ground truth insertion depths were measured from postoperative computed tomography scans obtained from the records of 56 cases with an identical lateral wall electrode array. For each of these cases, impedance telemetry records were retrieved starting from the day of implantation up to a maximum observation period of 60 mo. Based on these recordings, the linear and angular electrode insertion depths were estimated using a phenomenological model. The estimates obtained were compared with the ground truth values to calculate the accuracy of the model. RESULTS Analysis of the long-term recordings using a linear mixed-effects model showed that postoperative tissue resistances remained stable throughout the follow-up period, except for the two most basal electrodes, which increased significantly over time (electrode 11: ~10 Ω/year, electrode 12: ~30 Ω/year). Inferred phenomenological models from early and late impedance telemetry recordings were not different. The insertion depth of all electrodes was estimated with an absolute error of 0.9 mm ± 0.6 mm or 22° ± 18° angle (mean ± SD). CONCLUSIONS Insertion depth estimations of the model were reliable over time when comparing two postoperative computed tomography scans of the same ear. Our results confirm that the impedance-based position estimation method can be applied to postoperative impedance telemetry recordings. Future work needs to address extracochlear electrode detection to increase the performance of the method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Schraivogel
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Aebischer
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Franca Wagner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Weder
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Georgios Mantokoudis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Technical University of Munich, Germany; TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Otorhinolaryngology
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Andonie RR, Wimmer W, Wildhaber RA, Caversaccio M, Weder S. Real-Time Feature Extraction From Electrocochleography With Impedance Measurements During Cochlear Implantation Using Linear State-Space Models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2023; 70:3137-3146. [PMID: 37195836 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2023.3276993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Electrocochleography (ECochG) is increasingly used to monitor the inner ear function of cochlear implant (CI) patients during surgery. Current ECochG-based trauma detection shows low sensitivity and specificity and depends on visual analysis by experts. Trauma detection could be improved by including electric impedance data recorded simultaneously with the ECochG. However, combined recordings are rarely used because the impedance measurements produce artifacts in the ECochG. In this study, we propose a framework for automated real-time analysis of intraoperative ECochG signals using Autonomous Linear State-Space Models (ALSSMs). We developed ALSSM based algorithms for noise reduction, artifact removal, and feature extraction in ECochG. Feature extraction includes local amplitude and phase estimations and a confidence metric over the presence of a physiological response in a recording. We tested the algorithms in a controlled sensitivity analysis using simulations and validated them with real patient data recorded during surgeries. The results from simulation data show that the ALSSM method provides improved accuracy in the amplitude estimation together with a more robust confidence metric of ECochG signals compared to the state-of-the-art methods based on the fast Fourier transform (FFT). Tests with patient data showed promising clinical applicability and consistency with the findings from the simulations. We showed that ALSSMs are a valid tool for real-time analysis of ECochG recordings. Removal of artifacts using ALSSMs enables simultaneous recording of ECochG and impedance data. The proposed feature extraction method provides the means to automate the assessment of ECochG. Further validation of the algorithms in clinical data is needed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Schuerch K, Wimmer W, Rummel C, Caversaccio MD, Weder S. Objective evaluation of intracochlear electrocochleography: repeatability, thresholds, and tonotopic patterns. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1181539. [PMID: 37621854 PMCID: PMC10446839 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1181539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) is increasingly being used to measure residual inner ear function in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. ECochG signals reflect the state of the inner ear and can be measured during implantation and post-operatively. The aim of our study was to apply an objective deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to assess the reproducibility of longitudinally recorded ECochG signals, compare them with audiometric hearing thresholds, and identify signal patterns and tonotopic behavior. Methods We used a previously published objective DL-based algorithm to evaluate post-operative intracochlear ECochG signals collected from 21 ears. The same measurement protocol was repeated three times over 3 months. Additionally, we measured the pure-tone thresholds and subjective loudness estimates for correlation with the objectively detected ECochG signals. Recordings were made on at least four electrodes at three intensity levels. We extracted the electrode positions from computed tomography (CT) scans and used this information to evaluate the tonotopic characteristics of the ECochG responses. Results The objectively detected ECochG signals exhibited substantial repeatability over a 3-month period (bias-adjusted kappa, 0.68; accuracy 83.8%). Additionally, we observed a moderate-to-strong dependence of the ECochG thresholds on audiometric and subjective hearing levels. Using radiographically determined tonotopic measurement positions, we observed a tendency for tonotopic allocation with a large variance. Furthermore, maximum ECochG amplitudes exhibited a substantial basal shift. Regarding maximal amplitude patterns, most subjects exhibited a flat pattern with amplitudes evenly distributed over the electrode carrier. At higher stimulation frequencies, we observed a shift in the maximum amplitudes toward the basal turn of the cochlea. Conclusions We successfully implemented an objective DL-based algorithm for evaluating post-operative intracochlear ECochG recordings. We can only evaluate and compare ECochG recordings systematically and independently from experts with an objective analysis. Our results help to identify signal patterns and create a better understanding of the inner ear function with the electrode in place. In the next step, the algorithm can be applied to intra-operative measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Schuerch
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Rummel
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (SCAN), University Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Domenico Caversaccio
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Weder
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schraivogel S, Aebischer P, Weder S, Caversaccio M, Wimmer W. Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1183116. [PMID: 37288065 PMCID: PMC10242064 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1183116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction and objectives Maintaining the structural integrity of the cochlea and preserving residual hearing is crucial for patients, especially for those for whom electric acoustic stimulation is intended. Impedances could reflect trauma due to electrode array insertion and therefore could serve as a biomarker for residual hearing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between residual hearing and estimated impedance subcomponents in a known collective from an exploratory study. Methods A total of 42 patients with lateral wall electrode arrays from the same manufacturer were included in the study. For each patient, we used data from audiological measurements to compute residual hearing, impedance telemetry recordings to estimate near and far-field impedances using an approximation model, and computed tomography scans to extract anatomical information about the cochlea. We assessed the association between residual hearing and impedance subcomponent data using linear mixed-effects models. Results The progression of impedance subcomponents showed that far-field impedance was stable over time compared to near-field impedance. Low-frequency residual hearing demonstrated the progressive nature of hearing loss, with 48% of patients showing full or partial hearing preservation after 6 months of follow-up. Analysis revealed a statistically significant negative effect of near-field impedance on residual hearing (-3.81 dB HL per kΩ; p < 0.001). No significant effect of far-field impedance was found. Conclusion Our findings suggest that near-field impedance offers higher specificity for residual hearing monitoring, while far-field impedance was not significantly associated with residual hearing. These results highlight the potential of impedance subcomponents as objective biomarkers for outcome monitoring in cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Schraivogel
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Aebischer
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Weder
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schuerch K, Wimmer W, Dalbert A, Rummel C, Caversaccio M, Mantokoudis G, Gawliczek T, Weder S. An intracochlear electrocochleography dataset - from raw data to objective analysis using deep learning. Sci Data 2023; 10:157. [PMID: 36949075 PMCID: PMC10033652 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02055-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Electrocochleography (ECochG) measures electrophysiological inner ear potentials in response to acoustic stimulation. These potentials reflect the state of the inner ear and provide important information about its residual function. For cochlear implant (CI) recipients, we can measure ECochG signals directly within the cochlea using the implant electrode. We are able to perform these recordings during and at any point after implantation. However, the analysis and interpretation of ECochG signals are not trivial. To assist the scientific community, we provide our intracochlear ECochG data set, which consists of 4,924 signals recorded from 46 ears with a cochlear implant. We collected data either immediately after electrode insertion or postoperatively in subjects with residual acoustic hearing. This data descriptor aims to provide the research community access to our comprehensive electrophysiological data set and algorithms. It includes all steps from raw data acquisition to signal processing and objective analysis using Deep Learning. In addition, we collected subject demographic data, hearing thresholds, subjective loudness levels, impedance telemetry, radiographic findings, and classification of ECochG signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Schuerch
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Dalbert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head&Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Rummel
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (SCAN), University Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Georgios Mantokoudis
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tom Gawliczek
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Weder
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lambriks L, van Hoof M, Debruyne J, Janssen M, Hof J, Hellingman K, Devocht E, George E. Toward neural health measurements for cochlear implantation: The relationship among electrode positioning, the electrically evoked action potential, impedances and behavioral stimulation levels. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1093265. [PMID: 36846130 PMCID: PMC9948626 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1093265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Estimating differences in neural health across different sites within the individual cochlea potentially enables clinical applications for subjects with a cochlear implant. The electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) is a measure of neural excitability that possibly provides an indication of a neural condition. There are many factors, however, that affect this measure and increase the uncertainty of its interpretation. To better characterize the ECAP response, its relationship with electrode positioning, impedances, and behavioral stimulation levels was explored. Methods A total of 14 adult subjects implanted with an Advanced Bionics cochlear electrode array were prospectively followed up from surgery to 6 months postoperative. Insertion depth, distance to the modiolus, and distance to the medial wall were assessed for each electrode by postoperative CT analysis. ECAPs were measured intraoperatively and at three visits postoperatively on all 16 electrodes using the NRI feature of clinical programming software and characterized using multiple parameters. Impedances and behavioral stimulation levels were measured at every fitting session. Results Patterns in ECAPs and impedances were consistent over time, but high variability existed among subjects and between different positions in the cochlea. Electrodes located closer to the apex of the cochlea and closer to the modiolus generally showed higher neural excitation and higher impedances. Maximum loudness comfort levels were correlated strongly with the level of current needed to elicit a response of 100 μV ECAP. Conclusion Multiple factors contribute to the ECAP response in subjects with a cochlear implant. Further research might address whether the ECAP parameters used in this study will benefit clinical electrode fitting or the assessment of auditory neuron integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Lambriks
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands,*Correspondence: Lars Lambriks ✉
| | - Marc van Hoof
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Joke Debruyne
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Miranda Janssen
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands,Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Janny Hof
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Katja Hellingman
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Elke Devocht
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Erwin George
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dallari V, Apa E, Monzani D, Genovese E, Marchioni D, Soloperto D, Sacchetto L. Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series. Audiol Res 2022; 13:1-11. [PMID: 36648922 PMCID: PMC9844357 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) following endoscopic transcanal infrapromontorial vestibular schwannoma (VS) dissection is a feasible intervention in intracanalicular VS, with minimal extension into the cerebellopontine angle, but no audiologic results have ever been reported in the literature. Methods: From 2015 to 2021 in the Otorhynolaryngology Departments of Modena and Verona, three patients underwent this intervention. All were suffering from sporadic left-sided intracanalicular Koos I VS. Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and electrophysiological measurements were performed before and after the placement of the electrode array, respectively. Since device activation one month after the surgery, each patient was followed up with audiometric tests, data logging, electrode impedance measurements and neural response telemetry performed at each scheduled fitting session at 15 days and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: Only in patient No. 3, an auditory benefit was observed and still evident even 36 months after activation. Impedances increased progressively in patient No. 1 and a benefit was never reported. Patient No. 2 left the follow-up for worsening comorbidities. Conclusions: CI following transcanal infrapromontorial VS resection is a beneficial intervention. The residual cochlear nerve after the tumour dissection and the course of electrophysiological measurements in the postoperative period were the main predictive factors for audiological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Dallari
- Section of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT), Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Borgo Roma Hospital, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Enrico Apa
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Daniele Monzani
- Section of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT), Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Borgo Roma Hospital, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Genovese
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Daniele Marchioni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Davide Soloperto
- Section of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT), Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Borgo Roma Hospital, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Sacchetto
- Section of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT), Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, Borgo Roma Hospital, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|