Unequal Efficacy of Different Infarct Location in Predicting Futile Recanalization of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Differences in outcome between left-sided and right-sided mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a safe and effective treatment option for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. To investigate differences in outcomes between patients receiving left-sided and right-sided MT, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Additional literature was searched for manually. Studies reporting safety and efficacy metrics for MT were included. Data regarding the modified Rankin scale (mRS), thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality were included. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 13 reports consisting of 19 studies ranging from 98 to 5590 patients. Patients presenting with left-sided stroke had a National Institutes of health stroke scale score 2.89 greater than patients presenting with right-sided stroke (MD = 2.89; 95% CI = 2.09-3.68; P-value < 0.001). There were no differences between left-sided and right-sided MT patients for mRS 0-2 (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.85-1.04; P-value = 0.224), TICI 2b-3 (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.88-1.25; P-value = 0.598), sICH (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.61-1.14; P-value = 0.255), or 90-day mortality (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.84-1.33; P-value = 0.610).

CONCLUSIONS

There does not appear to be a difference in outcomes for patients undergoing left-sided or right-sided thrombectomy.