OEDL: an optimized ensemble deep learning method for the prediction of acute ischemic stroke prognoses using union features

A comprehensive review for artificial intelligence on neuroimaging in rehabilitation of ischemic stroke

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide, with ischemic stroke accounting for a significant proportion of morbidity and mortality among stroke patients. Ischemic stroke often causes disability and cognitive impairment in patients, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients. Therefore, how to predict the recovery of patients can provide support for clinical intervention in advance and improve the enthusiasm of patients for rehabilitation treatment. With the popularization of imaging technology, the diagnosis and treatment of ischemic stroke patients are often accompanied by a large number of imaging data. Through machine learning and Deep Learning, information from imaging data can be used more effectively. In this review, we discuss recent advances in neuroimaging, machine learning, and Deep Learning in the rehabilitation of ischemic stroke.

Current status and quality of radiomics studies for predicting outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pre-treatment prediction of reperfusion and long-term prognosis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients is crucial for effective treatment and decision-making. Recent studies have demonstrated that the inclusion of radiomics data can improve the performance of predictive models. This paper reviews published studies focused on radiomics-based prediction of reperfusion and long-term prognosis in AIS patients.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to September 9, 2023, for studies on radiomics-based prediction of AIS patient outcomes. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the phase classification criteria, the radiomics quality scoring (RQS) tool, and the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Two separate meta-analyses were performed of these studies that predict long-term prognosis and reperfusion in AIS patients.

Results

Sixteen studies with sample sizes ranging from 67 to 3,001 were identified. Ten studies were classified as phase II, and the remaining were categorized as phase 0 (n = 2), phase I (n = 1), and phase III (n = 3). The mean RQS score of all studies was 39.41%, ranging from 5.56 to 75%. Most studies (87.5%, 14/16) were at high risk of bias due to their retrospective design. The remaining two studies were categorized as low risk and unclear risk, respectively. The pooled area under the curve (AUC) was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.92] for predicting the long-term prognosis and 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.86) for predicting reperfusion in AIS.

Conclusion

Radiomics has the potential to predict immediate reperfusion and long-term outcomes in AIS patients. Further external validation and evaluation within the clinical workflow can facilitate personalized treatment for AIS patients. This systematic review provides valuable insights for optimizing radiomics prediction systems for both reperfusion and long-term outcomes in AIS patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023461671, identifier CRD42023461671.