Epidural Spinal Electrogram Provides Direct Spinal Recordings in Awake Human Participants

An active electronic bidirectional interface for high resolution interrogation of the spinal cord

Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has shown promise as both a clinical therapeutic tool and research aid in the study of nervous system function. However, available clinical paddles are limited to using a small number of contacts due to the burden of wires necessary to connect each contact to the therapeutic device. Here, we introduce for the first time the integration of a hermetic active electronic multiplexer onto the electrode paddle array itself, removing this interconnect limitation. We evaluated the chronic implantation of an active electronic 60-contact paddle (the HD64) on the lumbosacral spinal cord of two sheep. The HD64 was implanted for 13 months and 15 months, with no device-related malfunctions or adverse events. We identified increased selectivity in EES-evoked motor responses using dense stimulating bipoles. Further, we found that dense recording bipoles decreased the spatial correlation between channels during recordings. Finally, spatial electrode encoding enabled a neural network to accurately perform EES parameter inference for unseen stimulation electrodes, reducing training data requirements. A high-density EES paddle, containing active electronics safely integrated into neural interfaces, opens new avenues for the study of nervous system function and new therapies to treat neural injury and dysfunction.

Spatiotemporal Distribution of Electrically Evoked Spinal Compound Action Potentials During Spinal Cord Stimulation

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies using epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have demonstrated restoration of motor function in individuals previously diagnosed with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). In parallel, the spinal evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) induced by SCS have been used to gain insight into the mechanisms of SCS-based chronic pain therapy and to titrate closed-loop delivery of stimulation. However, the previous characterization of ECAPs recorded during SCS was performed with one-dimensional, cylindrical electrode leads. Herein, we describe the unique spatiotemporal distribution of ECAPs induced by SCS across the medial-lateral and rostral-caudal axes of the spinal cord, and their relationship to polysynaptic lower-extremity motor activation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In each of four sheep, two 24-contact epidural SCS arrays were placed on the lumbosacral spinal cord, spanning the L3 to L6 vertebrae. Spinal ECAPs were recorded during SCS from nonstimulating contacts of the epidural arrays, which were synchronized to bilateral electromyography (EMG) recordings from six back and lower-extremity muscles.

RESULTS

We observed a triphasic P1, N1, P2 peak morphology and propagation in the ECAPs during midline and lateral stimulation. Distinct regions of lateral stimulation resulted in simultaneously increased ECAP and EMG responses compared with stimulation at adjacent lateral contacts. Although EMG responses decreased during repetitive stimulation bursts, spinal ECAP amplitude did not significantly change. Both spinal ECAP responses and EMG responses demonstrated preferential ipsilateral recruitment during lateral stimulation compared with midline stimulation. Furthermore, EMG responses were correlated with stimulation that resulted in increased ECAP amplitude on the ipsilateral side of the electrode array.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ECAPs can be used to investigate the effects of SCS on spinal sensorimotor networks and to inform stimulation strategies that optimize the clinical benefit of SCS in the context of managing chronic pain and the restoration of sensorimotor function after SCI.