Microenvironment changes in arteriovenous malformations after stereotactic radiation

Stereotactic radiosurgery for facial nerve hemangioma: Case report and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Facial nerve hemangiomas (FNHs) are rare tumors that primarily occur near the geniculate ganglion in the temporal bone. Despite their rarity, they can cause significant facial nerve dysfunction. The optimal management approach for FNHs remains uncertain, with surgery being the mainstay but subject to debate regarding the extent of resection and preservation of the facial nerve.

METHODS

Systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We queried the PubMed/Medline (accessed on 5 March 2024) electronic database using combinations of the following search terms and words text: "geniculate ganglion hemangioma", "ganglional hemangioma", "hemangioma of the facial nerve", "facial hemangioma", and "intratemporal hemangioma".

RESULTS

We identified a total of 30 literatures (321 patients). The most common site involved for the facial nerve hemangioma was the geniculate ganglion area followed by internal auditory canal, tympanic segment, labyrinthine segment and mastoid involvement. All patients were treated with conservative management or surgery. We report a 48-year-old female patient with HB grade 2 facial palsy and hemifacial spasm underwent SRS using Cyberknife technology. The treatment targeted the FNH in the left internal acoustic canal near the geniculate ganglion. Six months post-treatment, clinical improvement was evident, and lesion control was confirmed in a follow-up brain MRI.

CONCLUSION

The rarity of FNHs contributes to the lack of consensus on optimal management. This illustrative case demonstrates the feasibility of SRS as a standalone treatment for FNHs.

Hemangioblastoma and arteriovenous malformation in the same patient: a not random association or two isolated entities? Systematic review starting from a unique case

BACKGROUND

The association between intracranial hemangioblastomas and arteriovenous malformations has been documented in very few cases in literature since 1965 and might present in three modalities: "intermixed, adjacent and separated (spatially and temporally)". Often, the pattern of presentation is "intermixed". According to our systematic review, we propose an adjustment of the previous classification, specifically for these entities. We describe the first case of a truly "spatially separated" association between these two lesions.

METHODS

Our study encompassed all adult patients diagnosed with both intracranial hemangioblastoma and AVM who were evaluated in the last 20-year period, from 2003 to 2023 at Helsinki University Hospital. Cases of this coexistence were retrospectively identified and collected from clinical records. For the systematic review, studies reporting the coexistence of hemangioblastoma and AVM in adult patients (>18 years old) were selected. Given the rarity of this pattern, case reports were also included.

RESULTS

The combined analysis of our systematic review and institutional retrospective study revealed a total of only seven identified cases. We applied the classification of neoplasms and AVM by Yano, modifying and adapting it into our screened patient series. We systematically reclassified "adjacent" and genuinely "spatially separated" patterns based on the vascular axis supplying both lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemangioblastomas and AVMs rarely coexist in the same patient. Our study reports the first instance of a truly "spatially separated" sporadic association between these vascular lesions. The rarity of such coexistence underscores the need for a nuanced and systematic classification to guide the management of these infrequent cases.