Murine Depression Model and its Potential Applications for Discovering Foods and Farm Products with Antidepressant-Like Effects

Social defeat models in animal science: What we have learned from rodent models

Studies on stress and its impacts on animals are very important in many fields of science, including animal science, because various stresses influence animal production and animal welfare. In particular, the social stresses within animal groups have profound impact on animals, with the potential to induce abnormal behaviors and health problems. In humans, social stress induces several health problems, including psychiatric disorders. In animal stress models, social defeat models are well characterized and used in various research fields, particularly in studies concerning mental disorders. Recently, we have focused on behavior, nutrition and metabolism in rodent models of social defeat to elucidate how social stresses affect animals. In this review, recent significant progress in studies related to animal social defeat models are described. In the field of animal science, these stress models may contribute to advances in the development of functional foods and in the management of animal welfare.

Effects of Diet Quality and Psychosocial Stress on the Metabolic Profiles of Mice

There has been an increasing interest in relationship between stress and diet. To address this relationship, we evaluated an animal model of depression: male C57BL/6J mice subjected to subchronic mild social defeat stress (sCSDS) for 10 consecutive days using male ICR mice under two different calorie-adjusted diets conditions-nonpurified (MF) and semipurified (AIN) diets made from natural and chemical ingredients mainly, respectively. Our previous study indicates that diet quality and purity affect stress susceptibility in sCSDS mice. We therefore hypothesized that there are some key peripheral metabolites to change stress-susceptible behavior. GC-MS metabolomics of plasma, liver, and cecal content were performed on four test groups: sCSDS + AIN diet (n = 7), sCSDS + MF diet (n = 6), control (no sCSDS) + AIN diet (n = 8), and control + MF diet (n = 8). Metabolome analyses revealed that the number of metabolites changed by food was larger than the number changed by stress in all tissues. Enrichment analysis of the liver metabolite set altered by food implies that stress-susceptible mice show increased glycolysis-related substrates in the liver. We found metabolites that were affected by stress (e.g., plasma and liver 4-hydroxyproline and plasma beta-alanine are higher in sCSDS than in control) and a stress × food interaction (e.g., plasma GABA is lower in sCSDS + AIN than in sCSDS + MF). Because functional compounds were altered by both stress and food, diet may be able to attenuate various stress-induced symptoms by changing metabolites in peripheral tissues.

The acute social defeat stress and nest-building test paradigm: A potential new method to screen drugs for depressive-like symptoms

Psychosocial stress can cause mental conditions such as depression in humans. To develop drug therapies for the treatment of depression, it is necessary to use animal models of depression to screen drug candidates that exhibit anti-depressive effects. Unfortunately, the present methods of drug screening for antidepressants, the forced-swim test and tail-suspension test, are limiting factors in drug discovery because they are not based on the constructive validity of objective phenotypes in depression. Previously, we discovered that the onset of nest building is severely delayed in mice exposed to subchronic mild social defeat stress (sCSDS). Therefore, a novel paradigm combining acute social defeat stress (ASDS) and the nest-building test (SNB) were established for the efficient screening of drugs for depressive-like symptoms. Since ASDS severely delayed the nest-building process as shown in chronically social defeated mice, we sought to rescue the delayed nest-building behavior in ASDS mice. Injecting a specific serotonin 2a receptor antagonist (SR-46349B), the nest-building deficit exhibited by ASDS mice was partially rescued. On the other hand, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (fluoxetine) did not rescue the nest-building deficit in ASDS mice. Therefore, we conclude that the SNB paradigm is an another potential behavioral method for screening drugs for depressive-like symptoms including attention deficit, anxiety, low locomotion, and decreased motivation.