1
|
Liu L, Ren J, Li Z, Yang C. A review of MEG dynamic brain network research. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2022; 236:763-774. [PMID: 35465768 DOI: 10.1177/09544119221092503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The dynamic description of neural networks has attracted the attention of researchers for dynamic networks may carry more information compared with resting-state networks. As a non-invasive electrophysiological data with high temporal and spatial resolution, magnetoencephalogram (MEG) can provide rich information for the analysis of dynamic functional brain networks. In this review, the development of MEG brain network was summarized. Several analysis methods such as sliding window, Hidden Markov model, and time-frequency based methods used in MEG dynamic brain network studies were discussed. Finally, the current research about multi-modal brain network analysis and their applications with MEG neurophysiology, which are prospected to be one of the research directions in the future, were concluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Liu
- Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Jiechuan Ren
- Department of Internal Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhimei Li
- Department of Internal Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chunlan Yang
- Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duque-Muñoz L, Tierney TM, Meyer SS, Boto E, Holmes N, Roberts G, Leggett J, Vargas-Bonilla JF, Bowtell R, Brookes MJ, López JD, Barnes GR. Data-driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays. Hum Brain Mapp 2019; 40:4357-4369. [PMID: 31294909 PMCID: PMC6772064 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have reached sensitivity levels that make them viable portable alternatives to traditional superconducting technology for magnetoencephalography (MEG). OPMs do not require cryogenic cooling and can therefore be placed directly on the scalp surface. Unlike cryogenic systems, based on a well-characterised fixed arrays essentially linear in applied flux, OPM devices, based on different physical principles, present new modelling challenges. Here, we outline an empirical Bayesian framework that can be used to compare between and optimise sensor arrays. We perturb the sensor geometry (via simulation) and with analytic model comparison methods estimate the true sensor geometry. The width of these perturbation curves allows us to compare different MEG systems. We test this technique using simulated and real data from SQUID and OPM recordings using head-casts and scanner-casts. Finally, we show that given knowledge of underlying brain anatomy, it is possible to estimate the true sensor geometry from the OPM data themselves using a model comparison framework. This implies that the requirement for accurate knowledge of the sensor positions and orientations a priori may be relaxed. As this procedure uses the cortical manifold as spatial support there is no co-registration procedure or reliance on scalp landmarks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Duque-Muñoz
- SISTEMIC, Engineering Faculty, Universidad de Antioquia UDEA, Calle 70 No 52-51, Medellín, Colombia.,MIRP Research Group, Engineering Faculty, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano ITM, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Tim M Tierney
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sofie S Meyer
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elena Boto
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Niall Holmes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Gillian Roberts
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - James Leggett
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J F Vargas-Bonilla
- SISTEMIC, Engineering Faculty, Universidad de Antioquia UDEA, Calle 70 No 52-51, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Richard Bowtell
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew J Brookes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jose D López
- SISTEMIC, Engineering Faculty, Universidad de Antioquia UDEA, Calle 70 No 52-51, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Gareth R Barnes
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
López JD, Valencia F, Flandin G, Penny W, Barnes GR. Reconstructing anatomy from electro-physiological data. Neuroimage 2017; 163:480-486. [PMID: 28687516 PMCID: PMC5725312 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Here we show how it is possible to make estimates of brain structure based on MEG data. We do this by reconstructing functional estimates onto distorted cortical manifolds parameterised in terms of their spherical harmonics. We demonstrate that both empirical and simulated MEG data give rise to consistent and plausible anatomical estimates. Importantly, the estimation of structure from MEG data can be quantified in terms of millimetres from the true brain structure. We show, for simulated data, that the functional assumptions which are closer to the functional ground-truth give rise to anatomical estimates that are closer to the true anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D López
- SISTEMIC, Engineering Faculty, Universidad de Antioquia UDEA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
| | - F Valencia
- Solar Energy Research Center SERC-Chile, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - G Flandin
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL, 12 Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK
| | - W Penny
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL, 12 Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK
| | - G R Barnes
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL, 12 Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boto E, Meyer SS, Shah V, Alem O, Knappe S, Kruger P, Fromhold TM, Lim M, Glover PM, Morris PG, Bowtell R, Barnes GR, Brookes MJ. A new generation of magnetoencephalography: Room temperature measurements using optically-pumped magnetometers. Neuroimage 2017; 149:404-414. [PMID: 28131890 PMCID: PMC5562927 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in the field of quantum sensing mean that magnetic field sensors, operating at room temperature, are now able to achieve sensitivity similar to that of cryogenically cooled devices (SQUIDs). This means that room temperature magnetoencephalography (MEG), with a greatly increased flexibility of sensor placement can now be considered. Further, these new sensors can be placed directly on the scalp surface giving, theoretically, a large increase in the magnitude of the measured signal. Here, we present recordings made using a single optically-pumped magnetometer (OPM) in combination with a 3D-printed head-cast designed to accurately locate and orient the sensor relative to brain anatomy. Since our OPM is configured as a magnetometer it is highly sensitive to environmental interference. However, we show that this problem can be ameliorated via the use of simultaneous reference sensor recordings. Using median nerve stimulation, we show that the OPM can detect both evoked (phase-locked) and induced (non-phase-locked oscillatory) changes when placed over sensory cortex, with signals ~4 times larger than equivalent SQUID measurements. Using source modelling, we show that our system allows localisation of the evoked response to somatosensory cortex. Further, source-space modelling shows that, with 13 sequential OPM measurements, source-space signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is comparable to that from a 271-channel SQUID system. Our results highlight the opportunity presented by OPMs to generate uncooled, potentially low-cost, high SNR MEG systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Boto
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
| | - Sofie S Meyer
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
| | - Vishal Shah
- QuSpin Inc., 2011 Cherry Street, Unit 112, Louisville, CO 80027, USA
| | - Orang Alem
- QuSpin Inc., 2011 Cherry Street, Unit 112, Louisville, CO 80027, USA
| | - Svenja Knappe
- QuSpin Inc., 2011 Cherry Street, Unit 112, Louisville, CO 80027, USA
| | - Peter Kruger
- Midlands Ultracold Atom Research Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
| | - T Mark Fromhold
- Midlands Ultracold Atom Research Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Lim
- Chalk Studios Ltd., 14 Windsor Street, London N1 8QG, United Kingdom
| | - Paul M Glover
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
| | - Peter G Morris
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Bowtell
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth R Barnes
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J Brookes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|