An in Vivo Mouse Model to Investigate the Effect of Local Anesthetic Nanomedicines on Axonal Conduction and Excitability

In situ pain relief during photodynamic therapy by ROS-responsive nanomicelle through blocking VGSC

Pain in photodynamic therapy (PDT), resulting from the stimulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and local acute inflammation, is a primary side effect of PDT that often leads to treatment interruption or termination, significantly compromising the efficacy of PDT and posing an enduring challenge for clinical practice. Herein, a ROS-responsive nanomicelle, poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(propylene sulphide) (PEG-PPS) encapsulated Ce6 and Lidocaine (LC), (ESCL) was used to address these problems. The tumor preferentially accumulated micelles could realize enhanced PDT effect, as well as in situ quickly release LC due to its ROS generation ability after light irradiation, which owes to the ROS-responsive property of PSS. In addition, PSS can suppress inflammatory pain which is one of the mechanisms of PDT induced pain. High LC-loaded efficiency (94.56 %) owing to the presence of the thioether bond of the PPS made an additional pain relief by inhibiting excessive inflammation besides blocking voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC). Moreover, the anti-angiogenic effect of LC offers further therapeutic effects of PDT. The in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor results revealed significant PDT efficacy. The signals of the sciatic nerve in mice were measured by electrophysiological study to evaluate the pain relief, results showed that the relative integral area of neural signals in ESCL-treated mice decreased by 49.90 % compared to the micelles without loaded LC. Therefore, our study not only develops a very simple but effective tumor treatment PDT and in situ pain relief strategy during PDT, but also provides a quantitative pain evaluation method.

Emerging Anesthetic Nanomedicines: Current State and Challenges

Anesthetics, which include both local and general varieties, are a unique class of drugs widely utilized in clinical surgery to alleviate pain and promote relaxation in patients. Although numerous anesthetics and their traditional formulations are available in the market, only a select few exhibit excellent anesthetic properties that meet clinical requirements. The main challenges are the potential toxic and adverse effects of anesthetics, as well as the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which makes it difficult for most general anesthetics to effectively penetrate to the brain. Loading anesthetics onto nanocarriers as anesthetic nanomedicines might address these challenges and improve anesthesia effectiveness, reduce toxic and adverse effects, while significantly enhance the efficiency of general anesthetics passing through the BBB. Consequently, anesthetic nanomedicines play a crucial role in the field of anesthesia. Despite their significance, research on anesthetic nanomedicines is still in its infancy, especially when compared to other types of nanomedicines in terms of depth and breadth. Although local anesthetic nanomedicines have received considerable attention and essentially meet clinical needs, there are few reported instances of nanomedicines for general anesthetics. Given the extensive usage of anesthetics and the many of them need for improved performance, emerging anesthetic nanomedicines face both unparalleled opportunities and considerable challenges in terms of theory and technology. Thus, a comprehensive summary with systematic analyses of anesthetic nanomedicines is urgently required. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the classification, properties, and research status of anesthetic nanomedicines, along with an exploration of their opportunities and challenges. In addition, future research directions and development prospects are discussed. It is hoped that researchers from diverse disciplines will collaborate to study anesthetic nanomedicines and develop them as a valuable anesthetic dosage form for clinical surgery.

Effects of Mexiletine and Lacosamide on Nerve Excitability in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study

Selective voltage-gated sodium channel blockers are of growing interest as treatment for pain. For drug development of such compounds, it would be critical to have a biomarker that can be used for proof-of-mechanism. We aimed to evaluate whether drug-induced changes in sodium conductance can be detected in the peripheral nerve excitability profile in 18 healthy subjects. In a randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover study, effects of single oral doses of 333 mg mexiletine and 300 mg lacosamide were compared with placebo. On each study visit, motor and sensory nerve excitability measurements of the median nerve were performed (predose; and 3 and 6 hours postdose) using Qtrac. Treatment effects were calculated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline as covariate. Mexiletine and lacosamide had significant effects on multiple motor and sensory nerve excitability variables. Depolarizing threshold electrotonus (TEd₄₀ (40-60 ms)) decreased by mexiletine (estimated difference (ED) -1.37% (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.20, -0.547; P = 0.002) and lacosamide (ED -1.27%, 95% CI: -2.10, -0.443; P = 0.004) in motor nerves. Moreover, mexiletine and lacosamide decreased superexcitability (less negative) in motor nerves (ED 1.74%, 95% CI: 0.615, 2.87; P = 0.004, and ED 1.47%, 95% CI: 0.341, 2.60; P = 0.013, respectively). Strength-duration time constant decreased after lacosamide in motor- (ED -0.0342 ms, 95% CI: -0.0571, -0.0112; P = 0.005) and sensory nerves (ED -0.0778 ms, 95% CI: -0.116, -0.0399; P < 0.001). Mexiletine and lacosamide significantly decrease excitability of motor and sensory nerves, in line with their suggested mechanism of action. Results of this study indicate that nerve excitability threshold tracking can be an effective pharmacodynamic biomarker. The method could be a valuable tool in clinical drug development.

Addressing the Need of a Translational Approach in Peripheral Neuropathy Research: Morphology Meets Function

Peripheral neuropathies (PNs) are a type of common disease that hampers the quality of life of affected people. Treatment, in most cases, is just symptomatic and often ineffective. To improve drug discovery in this field, preclinical evidence is warranted. In vivo rodent models allow a multiparametric approach to test new therapeutic strategies, since they can allow pathogenetic and morphological studies different from the clinical setting. However, human readouts are warranted to promptly translate data from the bench to the bedside. A feasible solution would be neurophysiology, performed similarly at both sides. We describe a simple protocol that reproduces the standard clinical protocol of a neurophysiology hospital department. We devised the optimal montage for sensory and motor recordings (neurography) in mice, and we also implemented F wave testing and a short electromyography (EMG) protocol at rest. We challenged this algorithm by comparing control animals (BALB/c mice) with a model of mild neuropathy to grasp even subtle changes. The neurophysiological results were confirmed with neuropathology. The treatment group showed all expected alterations. Moreover, the neurophysiology matched the neuropathological analyses. Therefore, our protocol can be suggested to promptly translate data from the bench to the bedside and vice versa.

Topical anesthetic analgesic therapy using the combination of ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine: hyaluronic acid modified long-acting nanostructured lipid carriers containing a skin penetration enhancer

Purpose

Hyaluronic acid-poly(ethylene glycol)-distearoyl phosphoethanolamine (HA-PEG-DSPE) modified and tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) contained nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) were prepared loading ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine to improve the topical anesthetic analgesic anesthesia efficiency.

Methods

NLCs were prepared by the solvent diffusion method. The average particle size, zeta potential, release behavior, and cytotoxicity of the NLCs were tested. Ex vivo skin permeation was studied using a Franz diffusion cell mounted with depilated rat skin. Local anesthesia antinociceptive efficiency was evaluated by rat tail flick latency study in vivo.

Results

NLCs have sizes of about 100 nm, with negative zeta potentials. All the NLCs formulations were found to be significantly less cytotoxic than free drugs at equivalent concentrations. The cumulative amount of drugs penetrated through rat skin from NLCs was 2.0–4.7 folds higher than that of the drugs solution. The in vivo anesthesia antinociception study displayed that NLCs showed stronger and longer anesthesia antinociceptive effect when compared with single drugs loaded NLCs and drugs solution even at a lower dosage of drugs.

Conclusion

The results demonstrated that the HA modified, TPGS contained, dual drugs loaded NLCs could perform a synergistic effect and may reduce the amount of drugs, which can lower the toxicity of the system and at the meanwhile, increase the anesthesia antinociceptive efficiency.

[Mice, rats and men: how rodent models are still required to produce knowledge]

La recherche biomédicale est considérée par nos sociétés comme une nécessité et les réflexions sur les moyens à mettre en œuvre pour la développer s’accordent sur le constat que : « à défaut de pouvoir expérimenter sur l’homme, l’expérimentation animale est indispensable » [1]. Celle-ci, pour être légitime, doit respecter la fameuse règle des 3R (Raffiner, Remplacer, Réduire) énoncée dès 1959 par Russell et Burch [2]. En effet, bien que permettant certaines approches moléculaires, expérimentales ou modélisées, les méthodes alternatives conservent un caractère réducteur et ne permettent pas d’appréhender l’ensemble d’un organisme au sein de son environnement. À ce jour, il reste donc encore indispensable d’utiliser des modèles animaux pour générer des connaissances valides en recherche fondamentale et appliquée. La recherche fait ainsi appel à une grande variété d’organismes-modèles, parmi lesquels les rongeurs (rats et souris) sont les plus utilisés : en France, en 2016, 59,6 % des animaux utilisés pour la recherche étaient des souris et 8,9 % étaient des rats [3]. Le propos de cet article est de montrer en quoi les rongeurs sont des modèles expérimentaux importants et de donner quelques exemples des connaissances nouvelles qu’ils ont apportés.