1
|
Sit TPH, Feord RC, Dunn AWE, Chabros J, Oluigbo D, Smith HH, Burn L, Chang E, Boschi A, Yuan Y, Gibbons GM, Khayat-Khoei M, De Angelis F, Hemberg E, Hemberg M, Lancaster MA, Lakatos A, Eglen SJ, Paulsen O, Mierau SB. MEA-NAP compares microscale functional connectivity, topology, and network dynamics in organoid or monolayer neuronal cultures. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.02.05.578738. [PMID: 38370637 PMCID: PMC10871179 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.05.578738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Microelectrode array (MEA) recordings are commonly used to compare firing and burst rates in neuronal cultures. MEA recordings can also reveal microscale functional connectivity, topology, and network dynamics-patterns seen in brain networks across spatial scales. Network topology is frequently characterized in neuroimaging with graph theoretical metrics. However, few computational tools exist for analyzing microscale functional brain networks from MEA recordings. Here, we present a MATLAB MEA network analysis pipeline (MEA-NAP) for raw voltage time-series acquired from single- or multi-well MEAs. Applications to 3D human cerebral organoids or 2D human-derived or murine cultures reveal differences in network development, including topology, node cartography, and dimensionality. MEA-NAP incorporates multi-unit template-based spike detection, probabilistic thresholding for determining significant functional connections, and normalization techniques for comparing networks. MEA-NAP can identify network-level effects of pharmacologic perturbation and/or disease-causing mutations and, thus, can provide a translational platform for revealing mechanistic insights and screening new therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy PH Sit
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Sainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael C Feord
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexander WE Dunn
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jeremi Chabros
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Oluigbo
- Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Hugo H Smith
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lance Burn
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elise Chang
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alessio Boschi
- Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy
| | - Yin Yuan
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - George M Gibbons
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Erik Hemberg
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Martin Hemberg
- Gene Lay Institute for Immunology and Inflammation, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Andras Lakatos
- John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen J Eglen
- Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ole Paulsen
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susanna B Mierau
- Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Amato LG, Vergani AA, Lassi M, Fabbiani C, Mazzeo S, Burali R, Nacmias B, Sorbi S, Mannella R, Grippo A, Bessi V, Mazzoni A. Personalized modeling of Alzheimer's disease progression estimates neurodegeneration severity from EEG recordings. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2024; 16:e12526. [PMID: 38371358 PMCID: PMC10870085 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is necessary for a timely onset of therapeutic care. However, cortical structural alterations associated with AD are difficult to discern. METHODS We developed a cortical model of AD-related neurodegeneration accounting for slowing of local dynamics and global connectivity degradation. In a monocentric study we collected electroencephalography (EEG) recordings at rest from participants in healthy (HC, n = 17), subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n = 58), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 44) conditions. For each patient, we estimated neurodegeneration model parameters based on individual EEG recordings. RESULTS Our model outperformed standard EEG analysis not only in discriminating between HC and MCI conditions (F1 score 0.95 vs 0.75) but also in identifying SCD patients with biological hallmarks of AD in the cerebrospinal fluid (recall 0.87 vs 0.50). DISCUSSION Personalized models could (1) support classification of MCI, (2) assess the presence of AD pathology, and (3) estimate the risk of cognitive decline progression, based only on economical and non-invasive EEG recordings. Highlights Personalized cortical model estimating structural alterations from EEG recordings.Discrimination of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Healthy (HC) subjects (95%)Prediction of biological markers of Alzheimer's in Subjective Decline (SCD) Subjects (87%)Transition correctly predicted for 3/3 subjects that converted from SCD to MCI after 1y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Gaetano Amato
- The BioRobotics InstituteSant'Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AISant'Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
| | - Alberto Arturo Vergani
- The BioRobotics InstituteSant'Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AISant'Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
| | - Michael Lassi
- The BioRobotics InstituteSant'Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AISant'Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
| | - Carlo Fabbiani
- IRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo GnocchiFlorenceItaly
- Department of NeurosciencePsychology, Drug Research and Child HealthCareggi University HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Salvatore Mazzeo
- IRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo GnocchiFlorenceItaly
- Department of NeurosciencePsychology, Drug Research and Child HealthCareggi University HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | | | - Benedetta Nacmias
- IRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo GnocchiFlorenceItaly
- Department of NeurosciencePsychology, Drug Research and Child HealthCareggi University HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Sandro Sorbi
- IRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo GnocchiFlorenceItaly
- Department of NeurosciencePsychology, Drug Research and Child HealthCareggi University HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | | | | | - Valentina Bessi
- Department of NeurosciencePsychology, Drug Research and Child HealthCareggi University HospitalFlorenceItaly
| | - Alberto Mazzoni
- The BioRobotics InstituteSant'Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AISant'Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chiarion G, Sparacino L, Antonacci Y, Faes L, Mesin L. Connectivity Analysis in EEG Data: A Tutorial Review of the State of the Art and Emerging Trends. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:bioengineering10030372. [PMID: 36978763 PMCID: PMC10044923 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10030372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding how different areas of the human brain communicate with each other is a crucial issue in neuroscience. The concepts of structural, functional and effective connectivity have been widely exploited to describe the human connectome, consisting of brain networks, their structural connections and functional interactions. Despite high-spatial-resolution imaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) being widely used to map this complex network of multiple interactions, electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings claim high temporal resolution and are thus perfectly suitable to describe either spatially distributed and temporally dynamic patterns of neural activation and connectivity. In this work, we provide a technical account and a categorization of the most-used data-driven approaches to assess brain-functional connectivity, intended as the study of the statistical dependencies between the recorded EEG signals. Different pairwise and multivariate, as well as directed and non-directed connectivity metrics are discussed with a pros-cons approach, in the time, frequency, and information-theoretic domains. The establishment of conceptual and mathematical relationships between metrics from these three frameworks, and the discussion of novel methodological approaches, will allow the reader to go deep into the problem of inferring functional connectivity in complex networks. Furthermore, emerging trends for the description of extended forms of connectivity (e.g., high-order interactions) are also discussed, along with graph-theory tools exploring the topological properties of the network of connections provided by the proposed metrics. Applications to EEG data are reviewed. In addition, the importance of source localization, and the impacts of signal acquisition and pre-processing techniques (e.g., filtering, source localization, and artifact rejection) on the connectivity estimates are recognized and discussed. By going through this review, the reader could delve deeply into the entire process of EEG pre-processing and analysis for the study of brain functional connectivity and learning, thereby exploiting novel methodologies and approaches to the problem of inferring connectivity within complex networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Chiarion
- Mathematical Biology and Physiology, Department Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
| | - Laura Sparacino
- Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
| | - Yuri Antonacci
- Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca Faes
- Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca Mesin
- Mathematical Biology and Physiology, Department Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bouillet T, Ciba M, Alves CL, Rodrigues FA, Thielemann C, Colin M, Buée L, Halliez S. Revisiting the involvement of tau in complex neural network remodeling: analysis of the extracellular neuronal activity in organotypic brain slice co-cultures. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 36374001 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aca261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Tau ablation has a protective effect in epilepsy due to inhibition of the hyperexcitability/hypersynchrony. Protection may also occur in transgenic models of Alzheimer's disease by reducing the epileptic activity and normalizing the excitation/inhibition imbalance. However, it is difficult to determine the exact functions of tau, because tau knockout (tauKO) brain networks exhibit elusive phenotypes. In this study, we aimed to further explore the physiological role of tau using brain network remodeling.Approach.The effect of tau ablation was investigated in hippocampal-entorhinal slice co-cultures during network remodeling. We recorded the spontaneous extracellular neuronal activity over 2 weeks in single-slice cultures and co-cultures from control andtauKOmice. We compared the burst activity and applied concepts and analytical tools intended for the analysis of the network synchrony and connectivity.Main results.Comparison of the control andtauKOco-cultures revealed that tau ablation had an anti-synchrony effect on the hippocampal-entorhinal two-slice networks at late stages of culture, in line with the literature. Differences were also found between the single-slice and co-culture conditions, which indicated that tau ablation had differential effects at the sub-network scale. For instance, tau ablation was found to have an anti-synchrony effect on the co-cultured hippocampal slices throughout the culture, possibly due to a reduction in the excitation/inhibition ratio. Conversely, tau ablation led to increased synchrony in the entorhinal slices at early stages of the co-culture, possibly due to homogenization of the connectivity distribution.Significance.The new methodology presented here proved useful for investigating the role of tau in the remodeling of complex brain-derived neural networks. The results confirm previous findings and hypotheses concerning the effects of tau ablation on neural networks. Moreover, the results suggest, for the first time, that tau has multifaceted roles that vary in different brain sub-networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bouillet
- University Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Manuel Ciba
- BioMEMS Lab, University of Applied Sciences Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg 63743, Germany
| | - Caroline Lourenço Alves
- BioMEMS Lab, University of Applied Sciences Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg 63743, Germany.,Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo, São Carlos SP 13566-590, Brazil
| | | | - Christiane Thielemann
- BioMEMS Lab, University of Applied Sciences Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg 63743, Germany
| | - Morvane Colin
- University Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Luc Buée
- University Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Sophie Halliez
- University Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille F-59000, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang M, Yin X, Zhu Y, Hu J. Representation Learning and Pattern Recognition in Cognitive Biometrics: A Survey. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:5111. [PMID: 35890799 PMCID: PMC9320620 DOI: 10.3390/s22145111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Cognitive biometrics is an emerging branch of biometric technology. Recent research has demonstrated great potential for using cognitive biometrics in versatile applications, including biometric recognition and cognitive and emotional state recognition. There is a major need to summarize the latest developments in this field. Existing surveys have mainly focused on a small subset of cognitive biometric modalities, such as EEG and ECG. This article provides a comprehensive review of cognitive biometrics, covering all the major biosignal modalities and applications. A taxonomy is designed to structure the corresponding knowledge and guide the survey from signal acquisition and pre-processing to representation learning and pattern recognition. We provide a unified view of the methodological advances in these four aspects across various biosignals and applications, facilitating interdisciplinary research and knowledge transfer across fields. Furthermore, this article discusses open research directions in cognitive biometrics and proposes future prospects for developing reliable and secure cognitive biometric systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Wang
- School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2612, Australia; (M.W.); (X.Y.)
| | - Xuefei Yin
- School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2612, Australia; (M.W.); (X.Y.)
| | - Yanming Zhu
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
| | - Jiankun Hu
- School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2612, Australia; (M.W.); (X.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|