Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging

Comparison of SS-EPI DWI and one-minute TGSE-BLADE DWI for diagnosis of acute infarction

The efficacy of 2D turbo gradient- and spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging with non-Cartesian BLADE trajectory (TGSE-BLADE DWI) has not been well studied for acute stroke due to its long acquisition time. This study was performed to compare distortion, artifacts and image quality between single-shot echo planar imaging (SS-EPI) DWI and TGSE-BLADE DWI with acquisition time reduced to 1 min by simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) imaging, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of TGSE-BLADE DWI for acute infarctions. Total 104 patients with a past history of stroke or symptoms suspicious for acute infarction or who had undergone surgery for brain tumor within two days were prospectively enrolled. Ten lesions in 9 patients were diagnosed as acute or subacute infarction and were detectable only in TGSE-BLADE DWI but not in SS-EPI DWI. Scores for geometric distortion, susceptibility artifacts, overall image quality, lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence were lower for SS-EPI DWI than TGSE-BLADE DWI (p ≤ .001). Distortion was significantly worse in SS-EPI DWI than TGSE-BLADE DWI (p < .001). SNR of centrum semiovale was significantly higher in SS-EPI DWI than TGSE-BLADE DWI (p < .001). One-minute TGSE-BLADE DWI showed better image quality than SS-EPI DWI in terms of distortion and artifacts, and higher diagnostic performance for acute infarctions.

Reduced-distortion diffusion weighted imaging for head and neck radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Quantitative Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) has potential value in guiding head and neck (HN) cancer radiotherapy. However, clinical translation has been hindered by severe distortions in standard single-shot Echo-Planar-Imaging (ssEPI) and prolonged scan time and low SNR in Turbo-Spin-Echo (ssTSE) sequences. In this study, we evaluate "multi-shot" (ms) msEPI and msTSE acquisitions in the context of HN radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

ssEPI, ssTSE, msEPI with 2 and 3 shots (2sEPI, 3sEPI), and msTSE DWI were acquired in a phantom, healthy volunteers (N=10), and patients with HN cancer (N=5) on a 3-Tesla wide-bore MRI in radiotherapy simulation RF coil setup, with matched spatial resolution (2x2x5mm) and b = 0, 200, 800 s/mm2.Geometric distortions measured with deformable vector field (DVF) and contour analysis, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and signal-to-noise-ratio efficiency (SNReff) were quantified for all scans.

Results

All techniques significantly (P<1x10-3) reduced distortions compared with ssEPI (DVFmean = 3.1 ± 1.3 mm). Distortions were marginally lower for msTSE (DVFmean = 1.5 ± 0.6 mm) than ssTSE (1.8 ± 0.9 mm), but were slightly higher with 2sEPI and 3sEPI (2.6 ± 1.0 mm, 2.2 ± 1.0 mm). SNReff reduced with decreasing distortion with ssEPI=21.9 ± 7.9, 2sEPI=15.1 ± 5.0, 3sEPI=12.1 ± 4.5, ssTSE=6.0 ± 1.6, and msTSE=5.7 ± 1.9 for b = 0 images. Phantom ADC values were consistent across all protocols (errors ≤ 0.03x10-3mm2/s), but in vivo ADC values were ∼ 4 % lower with msEPI and ∼ 12 % lower with ssTSE/msTSE compared with ssEPI.

Conclusions

msEPI and TSE acquisitions exhibited improved geometric distortion at the cost of SNReff and scan time. While msTSE exhibited the least distortion, 3sEPI may offer an appealing middle-ground with improved geometric fidelity but superior efficiency and in vivo ADC quantification.

Prospective Comparison of FOCUS MUSE and Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Evaluating Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare single-shot (SS) echo-planar imaging (EPI) and field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (FOCUS MUSE) for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SS EPI and FOCUS MUSE DWIs were obtained from 39 patients with TAO (18 male; mean ± standard deviation: 48.3 ± 13.3 years) and 26 healthy controls (9 male; mean ± standard deviation: 43.0 ± 18.5 years). Two radiologists scored the visual image quality using a 4-point Likert scale. The image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of extraocular muscles (EOMs) were compared between the two DWIs. Differences in the ADC of EOMs were also evaluated. The performance of discriminating active from inactive TAO was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. The correlation between ADC and clinical activity score (CAS) was analyzed using Spearman correlation.

RESULTS

Compared with SS EPI DWI, FOCUS MUSE DWI demonstrated significantly higher image quality scores (P < 0.001), a higher SNR and CNR on the lateral rectus muscle (LRM) and medial rectus muscle (MRM) (P < 0.05), and a non-significant difference in the ADC of the LRM and MRM. Active TAO showed higher ADC than inactive TAO and healthy controls with both SS EPI and FOCUS MUSE DWIs (P < 0.001). Inactive TAO and healthy controls did not show a significant ADC difference with both DWIs. Compared with SS EPI DWI, FOCUS MUSE DWI demonstrated better discrimination of active from inactive TAO (AUC: 0.925 vs. 0.779; P = 0.007). The ADC was significantly correlated with CAS in SS EPI DWI (r = 0.391, P < 0.001) and FOCUS MUSE DWI (r = 0.645, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

FOCUS MUSE DWI provides better images for evaluating EOMs and better performance in diagnosing active TAO than SS EPI DWI. The application of FOCUS MUSE will facilitate the DWI evaluation of TAO.

Acquisition and reconstruction with motion suppression DWI enhance image quality in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: Non-echo-planar DWI comparison with single-shot echo-planar DWI

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of application acquisition and reconstruction with motion suppression (ARMS) technology on improving the image quality of diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), compared to single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI).

METHODS

A total of 90 patients with NPC underwent MR examination, including ARMS DWI and SS-EPI DWI sequences. Both DWI sequences were acquired with b-values 0 and 800 s/mm2. Two radiologists evaluated the visibility of the lesion, geometric distortion, and overall image quality of the two DWI sequences. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), geometric distortion degree, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the nasopharyngeal lesions were assessed and compared for two sequences. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the quantitative and qualitative parameters of the two sequences.

RESULTS

The lesion visibility, geometric distortion, and overall image quality scores were significantly higher in ARMS DWI (all P<0.001). Four small-sized lesions were not visible and four lesions were partially visible in the SS-EPI DWI sequence. Lesion detection rate of ARMS DWI is 100 %, while that of SS-EPI is 95.56 %, P<0.043. The mismatch distance between the fusion images of ARMS DWI and T2WI was smaller than that of SS-EPI DWI and T2WI (all P<0.001). The SNR and CNR of ARMS DWI were lower than that of SS-EPI DWI (114.48 ± 37.89 vs. 202.61 ± 78.84, P<0.001 and 1.81 ± 1.84 vs. 3.29 ± 3.71, P<0.003) while the ADC value was higher (839.19 ± 138.44 × 10-6 mm2/s vs. 788.82 ± 110.96 × 10-6 mm2/s, P<0.002).

CONCLUSION

ARMS DWI improves the image quality by reducing geometric distortion and magnetic susceptibility artifacts. ARMS DWI is superior to SS-EPI DWI for diagnosing small-sized nasopharyngeal lesions, although it has lower SNR and CNR.

Turbo Gradient and Spin-Echo BLADE-DWI for Extraocular Muscles in Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy

Purpose: To investigate feasibility and diagnostic performance of turbo gradient and spin-echo BLADE (proprietary name for Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction [PROPELLER] in Siemens MR systems)-diffusion weighted imaging (TGSE-BLADE-DWI) for depicting extraocular muscle (EOM) involvement and activity in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO), and to compare TGSE-BLADE-DWI with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE). Materials and methods: Thirty-five patients with identified TAO underwent the two DWI scans. Two radiologists visually scored the image quality of the two DWIs with respect to the susceptibility artifacts and geometric distortions on a three-point scale. The maximum size (Size_max) of EOMs and corresponding ADCs (cADCs) of each patient were compared between the active and inactive phases. The clinical activity score (CAS) was used as a reference to assess the diagnostic performance of EOM ADCs for grading TAO activity. ROC analysis, Pearson correlation, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analyses. Results: For scores of EOMs, the image quality of TGSE-BLADE-DWI was significantly higher than that of RESOLVE. There were no statistically significant differences between the AUCs of the two DWIs, Size_max, or cADCs between the active and inactive phases. TGSE-BLADE-DWI ADCs were significantly higher than the RESOLVE ADCs in the right superior rectus, right lateral rectus, left superior rectus, and left inferior rectus. There were no statistically significant correlations between the cADC or Size_max, and CAS. The highest AUC was 0.697 for RESOLVE and 0.657 for TGSE-BLADE-DWI. The best performing ADC threshold was 1.85 × 10^-3 mm²/s with 85.7% sensitivity, 58.8% specificity and 66.67% accuracy for RESOLVE and 1.99 × 10^-3 mm²/s with 79.0% sensitivity, and 55.6% specificity and 65.27% accuracy for TGSE-BLADE-DWI. Conclusion: Compared to RESOLVE, TGSE-BLADE-DWI provided improved image quality with fewer susceptibility artifacts and geometric distortions for EOM visualization and showed an equivalent performance in detecting active TAO.

Comparison of TGSE-BLADE DWI, RESOLVE DWI, and SS-EPI DWI in healthy volunteers and patients after cerebral aneurysm clipping

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is prone to have susceptibility artifacts in an inhomogeneous magnetic field. We compared distortion and artifacts among three diffusion acquisition techniques (single-shot echo-planar imaging [SS-EPI DWI], readout-segmented EPI [RESOLVE DWI], and 2D turbo gradient- and spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging with non-Cartesian BLADE trajectory [TGSE-BLADE DWI]) in healthy volunteers and in patients with a cerebral aneurysm clip. Seventeen healthy volunteers and 20 patients who had undergone surgical cerebral aneurysm clipping were prospectively enrolled. SS-EPI DWI, RESOLVE DWI, and TGSE-BLADE DWI of the brain were performed using 3 T scanners. Distortion was the least in TGSE-BLADE DWI, and lower in RESOLVE DWI than SS-EPI DWI near air-bone interfaces in healthy volunteers (P < 0.001). Length of clip-induced artifact and distortion near the metal clip were the least in TGSE-BLADE DWI, and lower in RESOLVE DWI than SS-EPI DWI (P < 0.01). Image quality scores for geometric distortion, susceptibility artifacts, and overall image quality in both healthy volunteers and patients were the best in TGSE-BLADE DWI, and better in RESOLVE DWI than SS-EPI DWI (P < 0.001). Among the three DWI sequences, image quality was the best in TGSE-BLADE DWI in terms of distortion and artifacts, in both healthy volunteers and patients with an aneurysm clip.

Accuracy of 2D BLADE Turbo Gradient- and Spin-Echo Diffusion Weighted Imaging for the Diagnosis of Primary Middle Ear Cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo diffusion weighted imaging (TGSE BLADE DWI) for primary middle ear cholesteatoma diagnosis, using qualitative and quantitative methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Participants included those with suspected primary middle ear cholesteatoma after assessment by clinical otorhinolaryngologists combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Finally, of the 85 ears from 65 patients enrolled in the study, 73 had cholesteatoma, and 12 had otitis media.

INTERVENTION

Two radiologists independently assessed images and measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were evaluated. Kappa (k) statistics, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, the independent t test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used for statistical analysis. Pair-wise comparison of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was also performed using the Delong test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Imaging and histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

The mean ADC value of cholesteatoma group (mean, 0.923 ± 0.246 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s) was significantly lower than that of noncholesteatoma group (mean, 1.744 ± 0.205 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s; p < 0.001). In ≤3 mm cholesteatoma group, the AUC of qualitative DWI was 0.846; the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing cholesteatoma were 69.23%, 100%, and 84%, respectively; while the AUC of quantitative diagnosis was significantly increased to 1.0 ( p = 0.0209); and based on the optimal threshold of ADC, ≤1.352 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy improved to 100%. For >3 mm cholesteatoma group, there were no significant differences in diagnostic performance. Excellent interobserver agreement and ICC for the qualitative and quantitative evaluations (k = 0.90 and ICC = 0.80, respectively) was noted between reviewers.

CONCLUSION

TGSE BLADE DWI is useful for the detection of primary middle ear cholesteatomas, especially ≤3 mm lesions.

Detection of cholesteatoma: 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo imaging versus readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging

PURPOSE

This study is to compare the accuracy of 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo imaging (TGSE BLADE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with that of readout-segmented echo-planar (RESOLVE) DWI in the detection of primary and residual/recurrent temporal bone cholesteatoma.

METHODS

The prospective study population consisted of 58 patients who were underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the evaluation of suspected temporal bone cholesteatoma. Two radiologists independently evaluated the two sequences. Kappa (k) statistics, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and a paired t test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients included, all had histo-pathologically confirmed cholesteatomas. In ≤ 3 mm group (n = 13), TGSE BLADE sequence correctly identified all cases except one that was recorded as equivocal on both sequences because of high signal intensity on T1WI; while on RESOLVE sequences, 6 were positive, 4 were equivocal, and 3 were false negative. For > 3 mm group (n = 45), detection performance was similar between the two sequences. The mean ADC of cholesteatoma on TGSE BLADE DWI was 0.923 × 10^-3 mm²/s, and the mean ADC of cholesteatoma on RESOLVE DWI was 0.949 × 10^-3 mm²/s, with no significant difference in the mean ADC values of cholesteatoma measured on the two sequences (p = 0.9216).

CONCLUSION

TGSE BLADE outperforms RESOLVE in the detection of small temporal bone cholesteatoma ≤ 3 mm.