The Effect of Brain–Computer Interface Training on Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Dysfunction After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Bridging Minds and Machines: The Recent Advances of Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurological and Neurosurgical Applications

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), a remarkable technological advancement in neurology and neurosurgery, mark a significant leap since the inception of electroencephalography in 1924. These interfaces effectively convert central nervous system signals into commands for external devices, offering revolutionary benefits to patients with severe communication and motor impairments due to a myriad of neurological conditions like stroke, spinal cord injuries, and neurodegenerative disorders. BCIs enable these individuals to communicate and interact with their environment, using their brain signals to operate interfaces for communication and environmental control. This technology is especially crucial for those completely locked in, providing a communication lifeline where other methods fall short. The advantages of BCIs are profound, offering autonomy and an improved quality of life for patients with severe disabilities. They allow for direct interaction with various devices and prostheses, bypassing damaged or nonfunctional neural pathways. However, challenges persist, including the complexity of accurately interpreting brain signals, the need for individual calibration, and ensuring reliable, long-term use. Additionally, ethical considerations arise regarding autonomy, consent, and the potential for dependence on technology. Despite these challenges, BCIs represent a transformative development in neurotechnology, promising enhanced patient outcomes and a deeper understanding of brain-machine interfaces.

Evolving Therapeutic Landscape of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Emerging Cutting-Edge Advancements in Surgical Robots, Regenerative Medicine, and Neurorehabilitation Techniques

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most serious form of stroke and has limited available therapeutic options. As knowledge on ICH rapidly develops, cutting-edge techniques in the fields of surgical robots, regenerative medicine, and neurorehabilitation may revolutionize ICH treatment. However, these new advances still must be translated into clinical practice. In this review, we examined several emerging therapeutic strategies and their major challenges in managing ICH, with a particular focus on innovative therapies involving robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, stem cell transplantation, in situ neuronal reprogramming, and brain-computer interfaces. Despite the limited expansion of the drug armamentarium for ICH over the past few decades, the judicious selection of more efficacious therapeutic modalities and the exploration of multimodal combination therapies represent opportunities to improve patient prognoses after ICH.

Bioactive polymer-enabled conformal neural interface and its application strategies

Neural interface is a powerful tool to control the varying neuron activities in the brain, where the performance can directly affect the quality of recording neural signals and the reliability of in vivo connection between the brain and external equipment. Recent advances in bioelectronic innovation have provided promising pathways to fabricate flexible electrodes by integrating electrodes on bioactive polymer substrates. These bioactive polymer-based electrodes can enable the conformal contact with irregular tissue and result in low inflammation when compared to conventional rigid inorganic electrodes. In this review, we focus on the use of silk fibroin and cellulose biopolymers as well as certain synthetic polymers to offer the desired flexibility for constructing electrode substrates for a conformal neural interface. First, the development of a neural interface is reviewed, and the signal recording methods and tissue response features of the implanted electrodes are discussed in terms of biocompatibility and flexibility of corresponding neural interfaces. Following this, the material selection, structure design and integration of conformal neural interfaces accompanied by their effective applications are described. Finally, we offer our perspectives on the evolution of desired bioactive polymer-enabled neural interfaces, regarding the biocompatibility, electrical properties and mechanical softness.

Exploration on neurobiological mechanisms of the central–peripheral–central closed-loop rehabilitation

Central and peripheral interventions for brain injury rehabilitation have been widely employed. However, as patients’ requirements and expectations for stroke rehabilitation have gradually increased, the limitations of simple central intervention or peripheral intervention in the rehabilitation application of stroke patients’ function have gradually emerged. Studies have suggested that central intervention promotes the activation of functional brain regions and improves neural plasticity, whereas peripheral intervention enhances the positive feedback and input of sensory and motor control modes to the central nervous system, thereby promoting the remodeling of brain function. Based on the model of a central–peripheral–central (CPC) closed loop, the integration of center and peripheral interventions was effectively completed to form “closed-loop” information feedback, which could be applied to specific brain areas or function-related brain regions of patients. Notably, the closed loop can also be extended to central and peripheral immune systems as well as central and peripheral organs such as the brain–gut axis and lung–brain axis. In this review article, the model of CPC closed-loop rehabilitation and the potential neuroimmunological mechanisms of a closed-loop approach will be discussed. Further, we highlight critical questions about the neuroimmunological aspects of the closed-loop technique that merit future research attention.

Brain-machine interface-based training for improving upper extremity function after stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Upper extremity dysfunction after stroke is an urgent clinical problem that greatly affects patients' daily life and reduces their quality of life. As an emerging rehabilitation method, brain-machine interface (BMI)-based training can extract brain signals and provide feedback to form a closed-loop rehabilitation, which is currently being studied for functional restoration after stroke. However, there is no reliable medical evidence to support the effect of BMI-based training on upper extremity function after stroke. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BMI-based training for improving upper extremity function after stroke, as well as potential differences in efficacy of different external devices.

Methods

English-language literature published before April 1, 2022, was searched in five electronic databases using search terms including “brain-computer/machine interface”, “stroke” and “upper extremity.” The identified articles were screened, data were extracted, and the methodological quality of the included trials was assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. The GRADE method was used to assess the quality of the evidence.

Results

A total of 17 studies with 410 post-stroke patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that BMI-based training significantly improved upper extremity motor function [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.34, 0.90); I² = 38%; p < 0.0001; n = 385; random-effects model; moderate-quality evidence]. Subgroup meta-analysis indicated that BMI-based training significantly improves upper extremity motor function in both chronic [SMD = 0.68; 95% CI (0.32, 1.03), I² = 46%; p = 0.0002, random-effects model] and subacute [SMD = 1.11; 95%CI (0.22, 1.99); I² = 76%; p = 0.01; random-effects model] stroke patients compared with control interventions, and using functional electrical stimulation (FES) [SMD = 1.11; 95% CI (0.67, 1.54); I² = 11%; p < 0.00001; random-effects model]or visual feedback [SMD = 0.66; 95% CI (0.2, 1.12); I² = 4%; p = 0.005; random-effects model;] as the feedback devices in BMI training was more effective than using robot. In addition, BMI-based training was more effective in improving patients' activities of daily living (ADL) than control interventions [SMD = 1.12; 95% CI (0.65, 1.60); I² = 0%; p < 0.00001; n = 80; random-effects model]. There was no statistical difference in the dropout rate and adverse effects between the BMI-based training group and the control group.

Conclusion

BMI-based training improved upper limb motor function and ADL in post-stroke patients. BMI combined with FES or visual feedback may be a better combination for functional recovery than robot. BMI-based trainings are well-tolerated and associated with mild adverse effects.