Evaluating the Effects of 5-Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With and Without Wrist-Ankle Acupuncture on Improving Spasticity and Motor Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Catgut embedding in acupoints combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Background

To date, the clinical modulation for bone metabolism based on the neuro-bone mass regulation theory is still not popular. The stimulation of nerve systems to explore novel treatments for Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) is urgent and significant. Preliminary research results suggested that changes brain function and structure may play a crucial role in bone metabolism with PMOP. Thus, we set up a clinical trial to investigate the effect of the combination of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and catgut embedding in acupoints (CEA) for PMOP and to elucidate the central mechanism of this neural stimulation in regulating bone metabolism.

Method

This trial is a prospective and randomized controlled trial. 96 PMOP participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into a CEA group, an rTMS group, or a combined one. Participants will receive CEA, rTMS, or combined therapy for 3 months with 8 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcomes will be the changes in Bone Mineral Density scores, total efficiency of Chinese Medicine Symptoms before and after treatment. Secondary outcomes include the McGill Pain Questionnaire Short-Form, Osteoporosis Symptom Score, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Beck Depression Inventory-II. The leptin, leptin receptor, and norepinephrine levels of peripheral blood must be measured before and after treatment. Adverse events that occur during the trial will be recorded.

Discussion

CEA achieves brain-bone mass regulation through the bottom-up way of peripheral-central while rTMS achieves it through the top-down stimulation of central-peripheral. CEA combined with rTMS can stimulate the peripheral-central at the same time and promote peripheral bone mass formation. The combination of CEA and rTMS may play a coordinating, synergistic, and side-effect-reducing role, which is of great clinical significance in exploring better treatment options for PMOP.Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2300073863.

Effects of traditional Chinese medicine combined with modern rehabilitation therapies on motor function in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has considerable experience in the treatment of cerebral palsy (CP), but little evidence shows the effect of a combination of TCM and modern rehabilitation therapies on CP. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effect of integrated TCM and modern rehabilitation therapies on motor development in children with CP.

Methods

We systematically searched five databases up to June 2022, including PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. Gross motor function measure (GMFM) and Peabody Development Motor Scales-II were the primary outcomes to evaluate motor development. Secondary outcomes included the joint range of motion, the Modified Ashworth scale (MAS), the Berg balance scale, and Activities of Daily living (ADL). Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to determine intergroup differences.

Results

A total of 2,211 participants from 22 trials were enrolled in this study. Among these, one study was at a low risk of bias and seven studies showed a high risk of bias. Significant improvements were found in GMFM-66 (WMD 9.33; 95% CI 0.14-18.52, P < 0.05, I ² = 92.1%), GMFM-88 (WMD 8.24; 95% CI 3.25-13.24, P < 0.01, I ² = 0.0%), Berg balance scale (WMD 4.42; 95% CI 1.21-7.63, P < 0.01, I ² = 96.7%), and ADL (WMD 3.78; 95% CI 2.12-5.43, P < 0.01, I ² = 58.8%). No adverse events were reported during the TCM intervention in the included studies. The quality of evidence was high to low.

Conclusion

Integrated TCM and modern rehabilitation therapies may be an effective and safe intervention protocol to improve gross motor function, muscle tone, and the functional independence of children with CP. However, our results should be interpreted carefully because of the heterogeneity between the included studies.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022345470.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of magnetic acupuncture for supplementary analgesia after laparoscopic appendectomy in children

PURPOSE

Magnetic acupuncture (MA) is a noninvasive technique potentially useful for postoperative pain reduction. While anecdotal case series have reported analgesic effects, this has not been systematically studied. We evaluated the analgesic properties of supplemental MA versus placebo and standard treatment in children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).

METHODS

Children age 2-18 years who underwent LA for acute appendicitis were recruited from 2018 through 2020. Standardized postoperative pain medication including Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen, and narcotics were given as needed. Patients were randomized to 3 groups: Group 1 had adhesive acupuncture magnets placed on 5 predetermined meridian points for 48 h. Group 2 had corresponding non-magnetic adhesive metal disks placed in the same locations. Group 3 received no supplemental treatment. Pain was measured every 4 h using a 1-10 Visual-Analog-Scale (VAS). Cumulative demand of as-needed pain medication was calculated. Patients and families were handed open questionnaires upon discharge assessing satisfaction with treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were randomized. Groups were similar in age and gender distribution. Differences of means of cumulative VAS scores were significantly lower for group 1 (8.0,SD5.2) compared to group 2 (12.8,SD4.4; -4.8[95%CI -7.1 to -2.5], p < 0.01), and group 3 (19.8,SD7.7; -11.8[95%CI -15.0 to -8.6], p < 0.01). Cumulative acetaminophen and ibuprofen use per patient during the entire hospital stay was lower for group 1 (1510 mg, 20 mg) than for group 2 (2950 mg, 1800 mg), and group 3 (6100 mg; 2300 mg), respectively. In contrast to groups 2 and 3, none of the patients in group 1 asked for narcotics. Patients were highly satisfied with MA.

CONCLUSIONS

Supplemental MA after LA in children had a beneficial effect on the postoperative pain perception and on-demand use of analgesics that could not be explained by placebo mechanism. MA is a safe, simple, and effective adjunct to standard postoperative care. Further studies are warranted.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective randomized, placebo-controlled trial LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Effects of auricular acupuncture stimulation on healthy adults’ upper limb motor-evoked potentials: A randomized, crossover, double-blind study

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine whether auricular acupuncture has neuromodulatory effects on the motor cortex of healthy adults.

Methods

Fourteen healthy subjects received a real auricular acupuncture stimulation (SF1) session and a sham acupuncture stimulation session. The interval between the two types of stimulation was more than 24 h. A finger dexterity test (taping score and taping speed by using ipad) was assessed, and motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were assessed before and after each stimulation.

Results

Before the treatment, there were no significant differences in MEP amplitude, tapping score, or tapping speed (P > 0.05) between the real and sham stimulation conditions. After the treatment, the MEP amplitude, tapping score, and tapping speed in the real stimulation condition increased significantly compared to the pre-stimulation measurements and were significantly higher than those in the sham stimulation condition (P < 0.01). In the sham stimulation condition, the MEP amplitude, tapping score, and tapping speed decreased significantly compared to the pre-stimulation measurements (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Acupuncture of auricular points can modulate the excitability of the motor cortex area of controlling the upper limbs.

Clinical trial registration

[http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx], identifier [ChiCTR2100051608].