Brain–Computer Interface-Robot Training Enhances Upper Extremity Performance and Changes the Cortical Activation in Stroke Patients: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study

Electroencephalogram-based adaptive closed-loop brain-computer interface in neurorehabilitation: a review

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) represent a groundbreaking approach to enabling direct communication for individuals with severe motor impairments, circumventing traditional neural and muscular pathways. Among the diverse array of BCI technologies, electroencephalogram (EEG)-based systems are particularly favored due to their non-invasive nature, user-friendly operation, and cost-effectiveness. Recent advancements have facilitated the development of adaptive bidirectional closed-loop BCIs, which dynamically adjust to users' brain activity, thereby enhancing responsiveness and efficacy in neurorehabilitation. These systems support real-time modulation and continuous feedback, fostering personalized therapeutic interventions that align with users' neural and behavioral responses. By incorporating machine learning algorithms, these BCIs optimize user interaction and promote recovery outcomes through mechanisms of activity-dependent neuroplasticity. This paper reviews the current landscape of EEG-based adaptive bidirectional closed-loop BCIs, examining their applications in the recovery of motor and sensory functions, as well as the challenges encountered in practical implementation. The findings underscore the potential of these technologies to significantly enhance patients' quality of life and social interaction, while also identifying critical areas for future research aimed at improving system adaptability and performance. As advancements in artificial intelligence continue, the evolution of sophisticated BCI systems holds promise for transforming neurorehabilitation and expanding applications across various domains.

Research hotspots and trends of brain-computer interface technology in stroke: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis

Background

The incidence and mortality rates of stroke are escalating due to the growing aging population, which presents a significant hazard to human health. In the realm of stroke, brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has gained considerable attention as a means to enhance treatment efficacy and improve quality of life. Consequently, a bibliometric visualization analysis was performed to investigate the research hotspots and trends of BCI technology in stroke, with the objective of furnishing reference and guidance for future research.

Methods

This study utilized the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) within the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database as the data source, selecting relevant literature published between 2013 and 2022 as research sample. Through the application of VOSviewer 1.6.19 and CiteSpace 6.2.R2 visualization analysis software, as well as the bibliometric online analysis platform, the scientific knowledge maps were constructed and subjected to visualization display, and statistical analysis.

Results

This study encompasses a total of 693 relevant literature, which were published by 2,556 scholars from 975 institutions across 53 countries/regions and have been collected by 185 journals. In the past decade, BCI technology in stroke research has exhibited an upward trend in both annual publications and citations. China and the United States are high productivity countries, while the University of Tubingen stands out as the most contributing institution. Birbaumer N and Pfurtscheller G are the authors with the highest publication and citation frequency in this field, respectively. Frontiers in Neuroscience has published the most literature, while Journal of Neural Engineering has the highest citation frequency. The research hotspots in this field cover keywords such as stroke, BCI, rehabilitation, motor imagery (MI), motor recovery, electroencephalogram (EEG), neurorehabilitation, neural plasticity, task analysis, functional electrical stimulation (FES), motor impairment, feature extraction, and induced movement therapy, which to a certain extent reflect the development trend and frontier research direction of this field.

Conclusion

This study comprehensively and visually presents the extensive and in-depth literature resources of BCI technology in stroke research in the form of knowledge maps, which facilitates scholars to gain a more convenient understanding of the development and prospects in this field, thereby promoting further research work.

Upper limb intelligent feedback robot training significantly activates the cerebral cortex and promotes the functional connectivity of the cerebral cortex in patients with stroke: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

Background

Upper limb intelligence robots are widely used to improve the upper limb function of patients with stroke, but the treatment mechanism is still not clear. In this study, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to evaluate the concentration changes of oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) and deoxyhemoglobin (deoxy-Hb) in different brain regions and functional connectivity (FC) of the cerebral cortex in patients with stroke.

Method

Twenty post-stroke patients with upper limb dysfunction were included in the study. They all received three different types of shoulder joint training, namely, active intelligent feedback robot training (ACT), upper limb suspension training (SUS), and passive intelligent feedback robot training (PAS). During the training, activation of the cerebral cortex was detected by fNIRS to obtain the concentration changes of hemoglobin and FC of the cerebral cortex. The fNIRS signals were recorded over eight ROIs: bilateral prefrontal cortices (PFC), bilateral primary motor cortices (M1), bilateral primary somatosensory cortices (S1), and bilateral premotor and supplementary motor cortices (PM). For easy comparison, we defined the right hemisphere as the ipsilesional hemisphere and flipped the lesional right hemisphere in the Nirspark.

Result

Compared with the other two groups, stronger cerebral cortex activation was observed during ACT. One-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences in mean oxy-Hb changes among conditions in the four ROIs: contralesional PFC [F_{(2, 48)} = 6,798, p < 0.01], ipsilesional M1 [F_{(2, 48)} = 6.733, p < 0.01], ipsilesional S1 [F_{(2, 48)} = 4,392, p < 0.05], and ipsilesional PM [F_{(2, 48)} = 3.658, p < 0.05]. Oxy-Hb responses in the contralesional PFC region were stronger during ACT than during SUS (p < 0.01) and PAS (p < 0.05). Cortical activation in the ipsilesional M1 was significantly greater during ACT than during SUS (p < 0.01) and PAS (p < 0.05). Oxy-Hb responses in the ipsilesional S1 (p < 0.05) and ipsilesional PM (p < 0.05) were significantly higher during ACT than during PAS, and there is no significant difference in mean deoxy-Hb changes among conditions. Compared with SUS, the FC increased during ACT, which was characterized by the enhanced function of the ipsilesional cortex (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in FC between the ACT and PAS.

Conclusion

The study found that cortical activation during ACT was higher in the contralesional PFC, and ipsilesional M1 than during SUS, and showed tighter cortical FC between the cortices. The activation of the cerebral cortex of ACT was significantly higher than that of PAS, but there was no significant difference in FC. Our research helps to understand the difference in cerebral cortex activation between upper limb intelligent feedback robot rehabilitation and other rehabilitation training and provides an objective basis for the further application of upper limb intelligent feedback robots in the field of stroke rehabilitation.

Brain-computer interface combined with mental practice and occupational therapy enhances upper limb motor recovery, activities of daily living, and participation in subacute stroke

Background

We investigated the effects of brain-computer interface (BCI) combined with mental practice (MP) and occupational therapy (OT) on performance in activities of daily living (ADL) in stroke survivors.

Methods

Participants were randomized into two groups: experimental (n = 23, BCI controlling a hand exoskeleton combined with MP and OT) and control (n = 21, OT). Subjects were assessed with the functional independence measure (FIM), motor activity log (MAL), amount of use (MAL-AOM), and quality of movement (MAL-QOM). The box and blocks test (BBT) and the Jebsen hand functional test (JHFT) were used for the primary outcome of performance in ADL, while the Fugl-Meyer Assessment was used for the secondary outcome. Exoskeleton activation and the degree of motor imagery (measured as event-related desynchronization) were assessed in the experimental group. For the BCI, the EEG electrodes were placed on the regions of FC3, C3, CP3, FC4, C4, and CP4, according to the international 10-20 EEG system. The exoskeleton was placed on the affected hand. MP was based on functional tasks. OT consisted of ADL training, muscle mobilization, reaching tasks, manipulation and prehension, mirror therapy, and high-frequency therapeutic vibration. The protocol lasted 1 h, five times a week, for 2 weeks.

Results

There was a difference between baseline and post-intervention analysis for the experimental group in all evaluations: FIM (p = 0.001, d = 0.56), MAL-AOM (p = 0.001, d = 0.83), MAL-QOM (p = 0.006, d = 0.84), BBT (p = 0.004, d = 0.40), and JHFT (p = 0.001, d = 0.45). Within the experimental group, post-intervention improvements were detected in the degree of motor imagery (p < 0.001) and the amount of exoskeleton activations (p < 0.001). For the control group, differences were detected for MAL-AOM (p = 0.001, d = 0.72), MAL-QOM (p = 0.013, d = 0.50), and BBT (p = 0.005, d = 0.23). Notably, the effect sizes were larger for the experimental group. No differences were detected between groups at post-intervention.

Conclusion

BCI combined with MP and OT is a promising tool for promoting sensorimotor recovery of the upper limb and functional independence in subacute post-stroke survivors.

Comparative Efficacy of Different Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocols for Stroke: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background

Although repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been proven to be effective in the upper limb motor function and activities of daily living (ADL), the therapeutic effects of different stimulation protocols have not been effectively compared. To fill this gap, this study carried out the comparison of the upper limb motor function and ADL performance of patients with stroke through a network meta-analysis.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the rTMS therapy for stroke were searched from various databases, including PubMed, web of science, Embase, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Wanfang database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and VIP information (www.cqvip.com). The retrieval period was from the establishment of the database to January 2021. Meanwhile, five independent researchers were responsible for the study selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation. The outcome measures included Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), the National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), and adverse reactions. The Gemtc 0.14.3 software based on the Bayesian model framework was used for network meta-analysis, and funnel plots and network diagram plots were conducted using Stata14.0 software.

Results

Ninety-five studies and 5,016 patients were included ultimately. The intervention measures included were as follows: placebo, intermittent theta-burst stimulation (ITBS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (CTBS),1 Hz rTMS,3–5 Hz rTMS, and ≥10 Hz rTMS. The results of the network meta-analysis show that different rTMS protocols were superior to placebo in terms of UE-FMA, NIHSS, and MBI outcomes. In the probability ranking results, ≥10 Hz rTMS ranked first in UE-FMA, WMFT, and MBI. For the NIHSS outcome, the ITBS ranked first and 1 Hz rTMS ranked the second. The subgroup analyses of UE-FMA showed that ≥10 Hz rTMS was the best stimulation protocol for mild stroke, severe stroke, and the convalescent phase, as well as ITBS was for acute and subacute phases. In addition, it was reported in 13 included studies that only a few patients suffered from adverse reactions, such as headache, nausea, and emesis.

Conclusion

Overall, ≥10 Hz rTMS may be the best stimulation protocol for improving the upper limb motor function and ADL performance in patients with stroke. Considering the impact of stroke severity and phase on the upper limb motor function, ≥10 Hz rTMS may be the preferred stimulation protocol for mild stroke, severe stroke, and for the convalescent phase, and ITBS for acute and subacute phases.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42020212253].