A possible role of the locus coeruleus in complex regional pain syndrome

The sensory and affective components of pain differentially shape pupillary dilatation during cold pressor tests

Nociceptive and affective stimuli increase reflex sympathetic outflow to the pupils. To investigate effects of stimulus intensity, unpleasantness and distress on these pupillary reflexes, and to assess their stability, healthy participants immersed their hand in ice-water three times (for 20, 40 and 60 s; or 60, 40 and 20 s; or three times for 60 s) (N = 21 in each condition). Each ice-water immersion was preceded by a 90 s warm water immersion. To evaluate phasic sympathetic influences on pupil diameter, pupillary re-dilatation after 1 s of bright light was assessed during the last 10 s of each immersion. By-and-large, pain ratings and pupil diameter were greater during longer than shorter ice-water immersions, and ice-water immersions facilitated pupillary re-dilatation after the flash stimulus. However, mean pupil diameter during ice- and warm water immersions, minor ipsilateral amplification of the pupillary response, and ratings of pain unpleasantness and distress decreased across the experiment. Together, these findings suggest that nociceptive input increased sympathetic pupillary tone and amplified phasic increases in sympathetic activity after exposure to light. However, tonic sympathetic influences on pupil diameter and lateralization decreased across repeated immersions, possibly as novel or threatening aspects of the experience declined. Pupillary nociceptive and affective reflexes involve the locus coeruleus, an integral component of neural circuits that heighten cortical arousal and regulate pain. As these reflexes appear to reflect different aspects of sensory and affective processing, their combined assessment might increase the sensitivity and specificity of tests of locus coeruleus function in patients with suspected deficits.

An Update: Pathophysiology of Migraine

Migraine is the most common disabling primary headache globally. Attacks typically present with unilateral throbbing headache and associated symptoms including, nausea, multisensory hypersensitivity, and marked fatigue. In this article, the authors address the underlying neuroanatomical basis for migraine-related headache, associated symptomatology, and discuss key clinical and preclinical findings that indicate that migraine likely results from dysfunctional homeostatic mechanisms. Whereby, abnormal central nervous system responses to extrinsic and intrinsic cues may lead to increased attack susceptibility.

CRPS: what’s in a name? Taxonomy, epidemiology, neurologic, immune and autoimmune considerations

This account of the condition now termed complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) spans approximately 462 years since a description embodying similar clinical features was described by Ambroise Paré in 1557. While reviewing its historical origins, the text describes why it became necessary to change the taxonomies of two clinical syndromes with similar pathophysiologies to one which acknowledges this aspect but does not introduce any mechanistic overtones. Discussed at length is the role of the sympathetic component of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and why its dysfunction has both directly and indirectly influenced our understanding of the inflammatory aspects of CRPS. As the following article will show, our knowledge has expanded in an exponential fashion to include musculoskeletal, immune, autoimmune, central and peripheral nervous system and ANS dysfunction, all of which increase the complexity of its clinical management. A burgeoning literature is beginning to shed light on the mechanistic aspects of these syndromes and the increasing evidence of a genetic influence on such factors as autoimmunity, and its importance is also discussed at length. An important aspect that has been missing from the diagnostic criteria is a measure of disease severity. The recent validation of a CRPS Severity Score is also included.

Divergent influences of the locus coeruleus on migraine pathophysiology

Migraine is a common disabling neurological condition that is associated with several premonitory symptoms that can occur days before the headache onset. The most commonly reported premonitory symptom is marked fatigue that has been shown to be highly predictive of an ensuing migraine attack. The locus coeruleus (LC) is a key nucleus involved in arousal that has also been shown to impact pain processing. It provides one of the major sources of noradrenaline to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and neocortex. Given the clinical association between migraine, sleep-wake regulation, and fatigue, we sought to determine whether LC modulation could impact migraine-related phenotypes in several validated preclinical models of migraine. To determine its role in migraine-related pain, we recorded dural nociceptive-evoked responses of neurons in the trigeminocervical complex, which receives trigeminal primary afferents from the durovascular complex. In addition, we explored the susceptibility to cortical spreading depression initiation, the presumed underlying phenomenon of migraine aura. Our experiments reveal a potent role for LC disruption in the differential modulation of migraine-related phenotypes, inhibiting dural-evoked activation of wide dynamic neurons in the trigeminocervical complex while increasing cortical spreading depression susceptibility. This highlights the potential divergent impact of LC disruption in migraine physiology, which may help explain the complex interactions between dysfunctional arousal mechanisms and migraine.

Painful stimulation of a sensitized site in the forearm inhibits ipsilateral trigeminal nociceptive blink reflexes

Exposure to moderate levels of ultraviolet B radiation (UVB) is painless but nevertheless induces an inflammatory response that sensitizes primary afferent nociceptors. Subsequently, heating the UVB-treated site can sensitize spinal nociceptors. We used a repeated-measures design to determine whether heating the UVB-treated site also triggers ipsilateral inhibitory controls. Specifically, a 2-cm diameter site on the forearm of 20 participants was exposed to UVB at twice the minimum erythema dose. 48 h later mechanical and thermal sensitivity had increased at the UVB-treated site, indicating primary hyperalgesia. In addition, sensitivity to blunt pressure had increased in the ipsilateral forehead, implying activation of an ipsilateral supra-spinal pro-nociceptive mechanism. Despite this, the area under the curve of the ipsilateral nociceptive blink reflex decreased when the UVB-treated site was heated to induce moderate pain. Together, these findings suggest that the UVB treatment sensitized primary nociceptive afferents and generated an ipsilateral supra-spinal pro-nociceptive mechanism. In addition, sensitization to heat induced by the UVB treatment strengthened an ipsilateral anti-nociceptive process elicited by heat-pain. Infrequent but enduring discharge of sensitized primary nociceptive afferents, driven by inflammation after UVB exposure, might initiate a lateralized supra-spinal pro-nociceptive influence that heightens awareness of impending harm on the sensitized side of the body. In addition, a lateralized anti-nociceptive response triggered by an intense barrage of nociceptive signals may help to differentiate stronger from weaker sources of pain.

Mental load during cognitive performance in complex regional pain syndrome I

BACKGROUND

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is associated with deficits in limb recognition. The purpose of our study was to determine whether mental load during this task affected performance, sympathetic nervous system activity or pain in CRPS patients.

METHODS

We investigated twenty CRPS-I patients with pain in the upper extremity and twenty age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Each participant completed a limb recognition task. To experimentally manipulate mental load, the presentation time for each picture varied from 2 s (greatest mental load), 4, 6 to 10 s (least mental load). Before and after each run, pain intensity was assessed. Skin conductance was recorded continuously.

RESULTS

Patients with CRPS did not differ from controls in terms of limb recognition and skin conductance reactivity. However, patients with CRPS reported an increase in pain during the task, particularly during high mental load and during the latter stages of the task. Interestingly, state anxiety and depressive symptoms were also associated with increases in pain intensity during high mental load.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that high mental load intensifies pain in CRPS. The increase of pain in association with anxiety and depression indicates a detrimental effect of negative affective states in situations of high stress and mental load in CRPS.

SIGNIFICANCE

The effects of mental load need to be considered when patients with CRPS-I are investigated for diagnostic or therapeutic reasons.

A disturbance in sensory processing on the affected side of the body increases limb pain in complex regional pain syndrome

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether a central disturbance in somatosensory processing contributes to limb pain in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

METHODS

In 37 patients with CRPS, the effect of cooling the ipsilateral forehead on pain in the affected limb was compared with the effect of cooling the contralateral forehead. In addition, symptoms associated with cold-evoked limb pain were explored.

RESULTS

Limb pain generally increased when the ipsilateral side of the forehead was cooled but did not change when the contralateral side of the forehead was cooled. Increases were greatest in patients with heightened sensitivity to cold, brushing, and pressure-pain in the ipsilateral forehead, in patients with heightened sensitivity to pressure-pain in the limbs, and in patients with chronic symptoms. In contrast, sensitivity to light touch was diminished in the CRPS-affected limb of patients whose limb pain remained unchanged or decreased during ipsilateral forehead cooling.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary findings suggest that a central disturbance in sensory processing and pain modulation, which extends beyond the affected limb to the ipsilateral forehead, contributes to symptoms in a subgroup of patients with CRPS.

Coexistence of ipsilateral pain-inhibitory and facilitatory processes after high-frequency electrical stimulation

BACKGROUND

High-frequency electrical stimulation (HFS) of the human forearm evokes analgesia to blunt pressure in the ipsilateral forehead, consistent with descending ipsilateral inhibitory pain modulation. The aim of the current study was to further delineate pain modulation processes evoked by HFS by examining sensory changes in the arm and forehead; investigating the effects of HFS on nociceptive blink reflexes elicited by supraorbital electrical stimulation; and assessing effects of counter-irritation (electrically evoked pain at the HFS-conditioned site in the forearm) on nociceptive blink reflexes before and after HFS.

METHODS

Before and after HFS conditioning, sensitivity to heat and to blunt and sharp stimuli was assessed at and adjacent to the conditioned site in the forearm and on each side of the forehead. Nociceptive blink reflexes were also assessed before and after HFS with and without counter-irritation of the forearm.

RESULTS

HFS triggered secondary hyperalgesia in the forearm (a sign of central sensitization) and analgesia to blunt pressure in the ipsilateral forehead. Under most conditions, both HFS conditioning and counter-irritation of the forearm suppressed electrically evoked pain in the forehead, and the amplitude of the blink reflex to supraorbital stimuli decreased. Importantly, however, in the absence of forearm counter-irritation, HFS conditioning facilitated ipsilateral blink reflex amplitude to supraorbital stimuli delivered ipsilateral to the HFS-conditioned site.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that HFS concurrently triggers hemilateral inhibitory and facilitatory influences on nociceptive processing over and above more general effects of counter-irritation. The inhibitory influence may help limit the spread of sensitization in central nociceptive pathways.