Impact of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity on survival in patients with primary liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in patients with gastric cancer and effects on adverse outcomes: A meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

To assess the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in patients with gastric cancer and its impact on adverse outcomes.

METHODS

A computerized search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases was performed to search for articles related to sarcopenic obesity in patients with gastric cancer. The search was conducted until June 16, 2024, from the date of the creation of the database.

RESULTS

A total of sixteen studies were included, including fifteen cohort studies and one cross-sectional study involving 4087 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in gastric cancer patients was 16.3 % (95 % CI: 12.2 %-20.4 %). Sarcopenic obesity significantly shortened the overall survival of gastric cancer patients (HR = 1.64, 95 % CI: 1.20 to 2.25, P = 0.002) and increased the risk of postoperative significant complications (OR = 2.84, 95 % CI: 1.95 to 4.16, P < 0.001), severe complications (OR = 2.60, 95 % CI: 1.45 to 4.64, P = 0.001), surgical site infection (OR = 3.82, 95 % CI: 1.47 to 9.89, P = 0.006), and mortality (OR = 4.84, 95 % CI: 1.38 to 17.02, P = 0.014), but no significant effect on 30-day readmission (OR = 1.90, 95 % CI: 0.31 to 11.84, P = 0.491).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity is high in patients with gastric cancer and is strongly associated with poor postoperative outcomes. Healthcare providers should evaluate patients with gastric cancer for sarcopenic obesity early to prevent or reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes.

Assessing cachexia in obesity: contradiction or perfectly possible?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Existing definitions of clinically important weight loss in patients with cancer do not specifically address weight loss in patients who are obese at presentation. This review explores the clinical impact of weight loss and depletion of the skeletal muscle mass (i.e., criteria defining cancer cachexia), in patients with obesity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Overweight and obese BMI values are shown by many recent studies to pose a survival advantage in patients with cancers of advanced stage, when compared with BMI in normal and underweight ranges. The classification of cancer-associated weight loss has evolved, and current grading schemes evaluate the impact of weight across the range of BMI values. Weight loss is associated with mortality in patients with BMI more than 30 kg/m 2 , however this is to a much lesser degree than in patients with lower BMI values. Diagnostic imaging permits the precise assessment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) in patients with cancer, and it has been clearly shown that while usually quite muscular, obese patients can have profound muscle depletion (i.e., sarcopenia), independent of the presence of weight loss. Muscle depletion associates strongly with mortality in obese patients, as well as with complications of cancer surgery and systemic therapy.

SUMMARY

It would seem contradictory to diagnose concurrent obesity and cachexia, as these terms represent opposite ends of the weight spectrum. Weight loss can occur in anyone with cancer, however its priority for clinical management may be lesser in obese versus low body weight individuals. Sarcopenic obesity is strongly associated with a poor clinical outcome and deserves further research, diagnosis in clinical practice, and new strategies for mitigation.

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of systemic inflammation response index in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

It is unclear whether the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) can predict the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Consequently, the present study focused on systematically identifying the relationship between SIRI and the prognosis of patients with HCC through a meta-analysis.

Methods

Systematic and comprehensive studies were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to August 10, 2023. The role of SIRI in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in HCC was determined using pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were pooled to analyze the correlations between SIRI and the clinicopathological features of HCC.

Results

Ten articles involving 2,439 patients were included. An elevated SIRI was significantly associated with dismal OS (HR=1.75, 95% CI=1.52-2.01, p<0.001) and inferior PFS (HR=1.66, 95% CI=1.34-2.05, p<0.001) in patients with HCC. Additionally, according to the combined results, the increased SIRI was significantly related to multiple tumor numbers (OR=1.42, 95% CI=1.09-1.85, p=0.009) and maximum tumor diameter >5 cm (OR=3.06, 95% CI=1.76-5.30, p<0.001). However, the SIRI did not show any significant relationship with sex, alpha-fetoprotein content, Child-Pugh class, or hepatitis B virus infection.

Conclusion

According to our results, elevated SIRI significantly predicted OS and PFS in patients with HCC. Moreover, the SIRI was significantly associated with tumor aggressiveness.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-9-0003/, identifier INPLASY202390003.