Decreasing the indications for radical nephrectomy: a study of multifocal renal cell carcinoma

Prediction of clinically significant recurrence after partial nephrectomy. Data from the Cancer Registry of Norway with more than five years of follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To determine recurrence incidence after partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma and identify predictors for local recurrence (LR) and metastasis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 524 patients from the Cancer Registry of Norway, who underwent PN between January 2014 and December 2015 and were followed-up for >6 years. Patient demographics and pathological characteristics were correlated with recurrence and progression-free survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 64 years, and the median tumour size was 2.6 cm. A positive surgical margin (PSM) was observed in 11% of the cases, while the LR and metastasis rates were 3.4% and 3.2%, respectively. PSM (hazard ratio [HR], 55.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.55-244.6), tumour number (HR, 45.4; 95% CI, 6.5-316.1) and stage (HR, 33.5; 95% CI, 5.4-205.3) were independent predictors for LR. Undetermined margin status was also a risk factor for LR. Tumour stage (HR, 41.05; 95% CI, 8.52-197.76), tumour necrosis (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.4-4.31) and age (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14) were predictors for metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both local and distant recurrences after PN were rare, and the pT stage was a common predictor. PSM or indeterminate surgical margin and tumour number were LR predictors, while age at surgery and the presence of tumour necrosis predicted metastasis.

A case of ipsilateral three simultaneous renal cell carcinomas with different histologic types

Introduction

Few reports have presented sporadic multifocal renal cell carcinomas of different histologic types occurring simultaneously in a single kidney. Here, we present a case of three ipsilateral renal cell carcinomas with three histologic types.

Case presentation

A 44-year-old man with end-stage renal disease due to nephrosclerosis was referred to our hospital for an incidental renal tumor. Following the introduction of hemodialysis, enhanced computed tomography revealed a renal tumor suggestive of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma with a cystic component. With a preoperative diagnosis of one renal tumor, he underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. However, pathological examination revealed three renal cell carcinomas with three histological diagnoses: clear-cell, papillary, and clear-cell papillary renal cell carcinomas.

Conclusion

Preoperative imaging may not detect all synchronous ipsilateral multifocal renal cell carcinomas. Patients with severe renal function impairment may have synchronous multifocal renal cell carcinomas.

Ipsilateral synchronous papillary and clear renal cell carcinoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

There is limited information on ipsilateral synchronous papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Therefore, these rare tumors are often misdiagnosed preoperatively as a single tumor with intrarenal metastasis or some other diseases. Effective management and long-term overall survival might be affected because the prognosis of the two tumors differs.

CASE SUMMARY

We describe a case of ipsilateral synchronous PRCC and CCRCC with two histological variants in a 72-year-old man, whose mass was found incidentally, with no other chief complaints and vital signs were normal. Initial ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic lobular mass with a volume of 7.8 cm × 4.8 cm × 2.8 cm in the middle to lower pole of the left kidney. A subsequent contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan showed a single endophytic mass of 7.5 cm in diameter. The patient underwent laparoscopic left radical nephrectomy. A final diagnosis of ipsilateral synchronous PRCC and CCRCC was confirmed by pathological examination. There was no recurrence or metastasis after 25 mo follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We report a case of ipsilateral synchronous PRCC and CCRCC, and review related literature to estimate the prevalence of similar cases. The above descriptions may be expected to help understand the disease, and improve diagnosis in the future.

Histopathological validation of safe margin for nephron-sparing surgery based on individual tumor growth pattern

Background

To evaluate the clinicopathologic value of morphological growth patterns of small renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) and determine the actual demand for taking a rim of healthy parenchyma to avoid positive SM.

Methods

Data was collected from 560 sRCC patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries from May 2010 to October 2017. One hundred forty-nine cases received nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and others received radical nephrectomy (RN). All specimens were analyzed separately by two uropathologists, and three morphological growth patterns were identified. The presence of pseudocapsule (PC), surgical margins (SM), and other routine variables were recorded. The relationship between growth patterns and included variables was measured by the χ² test and Fisher’s exact probability test. Survival outcomes were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

Results

The median age of patients was 63.2 years old and the mean tumor diameter was 3.0 cm. Four hundred eighty (85.7%) cases were clear cell RCC and 541 (96.6%) cases were at the pT1a stage. Peritumoral PC was detected in 512 (92.5%) specimens, and the ratio of tumor invasion in PC in infiltration pattern increased obviously than that of the other growth patterns. Similarly, the pT stage was significantly correlated with the infiltration pattern as well. One hundred forty-nine patients underwent NSS and 3 (2.0%) of them showed positive SM after operation. Statistical differences of the 5-year overall survival (OS) and the cancer-specific survival (CSS) existed between different morphological growth patterns, PC status, and pT stages.

Conclusions

Morphological growth patterns of sRCC might be used as a potential biomarker to help operate NSS to avoid the risk of positive SM. How to distinguish different morphological growth patterns before operation and the effectiveness of the growth pattern as a novel proposed parameter to direct NSS in sRCC patients deserves further exploration.

Ipsilateral synchronous clear and papillary renal cell carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma are the most common types of renal tumors. However, coexistence of both tumors in the same kidney is a rare condition.

We report a 56-year old male who was found to have ipsilateral synchronous clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma in the left kidney. Review of related literature is provided to estimate the prevalence of similar cases.

Collaborative Review of Risk Benefit Trade-offs Between Partial and Radical Nephrectomy in the Management of Anatomically Complex Renal Masses

BACKGROUND

While partial nephrectomy (PN) is the recommended treatment for many small renal masses, anatomically complex tumors necessitate a clear understanding of the potential risks and benefits of PN and radical nephrectomy (RN).

OBJECTIVE

To critically review the comparative effectiveness evidence of PN versus RN; to describe key trade-offs involved in this treatment decision; and to highlight gaps in the current literature.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A collaborative critical review of the medical literature was conducted.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Patients who undergo PN for an anatomically complex or large mass may be exposed to perioperative and potential oncologic risks that could be avoided if RN were performed, while patients who undergo RN may forgo long-term benefits of renal preservation. Decision-making regarding the optimal treatment with PN or RN among patients with anatomically complex or large renal mass is highly nuanced and must balance the risks and benefits of each approach. Currently, high-quality evidence on comparative effectiveness is sparse. Retrospective comparisons are plagued by selection biases, while the one existing prospective randomized trial, albeit imperfect, suggests that nephron-sparing surgery may not benefit all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

For anatomically complex tumors, PN preserves renal parenchyma but may expose patients to higher perioperative risks than RN. The risks and benefits of each surgical approach must be better objectified for identification of patients most suitable for complex PN. A prospective randomized trial is warranted and would help in directing patient counseling.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Treatment decisions for complex renal masses require shared decision-making regarding the risk trade-offs between partial and radical nephrectomy.

Multifocal Primary Neoplasms in Kidney Allografts: Evaluation of Two Cases

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the fifth most common malignancy in kidney transplant recipients, with increased risk arising due to immunosuppression. De novo RCC occurrence in kidney allografts is much less common when compared with the native kidneys. Multifocal RCC in allograft kidneys is rarely described. In this report, we discuss two cases of de novo multifocal renal neoplasms in allograft kidneys. Case 1 had three distinct neoplastic lesions of >5 mm, and case 2 had four. Using the World Health Organization 2016 classification of adult renal tumours, case 1 had one clear-cell (cc) RCC (grade 3) and two papillary adenomas; all confined to the kidney. Case 2 had a nodular lesion classified as ccRCC (grade 4) with focal rhabdoid differentiation and some infiltration of renal sinus fat; a cc tubulopapillary RCC; a multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential; and a mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma; the last three all confined to the kidney. This is the first report of mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma in a kidney allograft. When considering multifocal RCC with discordant histology, it is likely that these represent independent tumourigenic events.

Hereditary renal cell carcinoma: genetics, clinical features, and surgical considerations

OBJECTIVES

Hereditary renal cancer syndromes have been described and have illuminated novel methods to treat sporadic renal cell carcinoma. In this work, we aimed to review the genetic basis, molecular pathology and clinical manifestations of hereditary syndromes, as well as outline principles of surgical management and use of targeted therapy.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive review of selected peer-reviewed publications regarding hereditary renal cancer syndromes, their genetic basis, and recommendations for surgical management.

RESULTS

The major syndromes contributing to hereditary renal cell carcinoma are discussed along with relevant literature guiding their management. The evolving surgical and molecular treatments are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of genetic basis of hereditary carcinomas provides opportunity for targeted therapy of metastatic sporadic renal cell carcinoma. Appropriate and timely surgical management of hereditary renal cancers decreases the possibility of development of metastatic disease, and allows for preservation of renal function despite the need for repeat surgical interventions.