SULT1A1 genetic polymorphisms and the association between smoking and oral cancer in a case-control study in Brazil

Pon1 and Sult1a1 Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Among Young Women in Brazil

Purpose: To investigate the association of genetic polymorphisms Gln192Arg and Leu55Met of Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) gene, and Arg213His of Sulfotransferase 1A1 (SUT1A1) gene with occurrence of breast cancer among young women living in Rio de Janeiro city. Methods: This is a hospital-based case-control study including 265 women aged 18-35 years, diagnosed with breast cancer at National Cancer Institute; and 277 controls in the same age group selected among women patients and companions of three general hospitals from Rio de Janeiro public health network. Polymorphisms genotyping was performed using the PCR-RFLP technique. Results: For PON1 gene, breast cancer women had a greater chance of being homozygote for Leu55Met polymorphism (ORadjusted = 1.42, 95% CI= 0.67-3.00, recessive model) and a lower chance of having at least one allele of Gln192Arg polymorphism (ORadjusted = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.50-1.13, dominant model), but without statistical significance. Accordingly, frequency of the haplotype Met55/Arg192 was lower among breast cancer women, but no statistically significant association was observed (ORadjusted = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.48-1.51). SULT1A1 His/His genotype was significantly associated with a protective effect for breast cancer (OR adjusted = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.28-0.91, recessive model). Conclusion: Arg213His polymorphism of SUT1A1 gene showed a protective effect against breast cancer among Brazilian young women. More studies with different designs are needed to understand the role of PON1 and SULT1A1 polymorphisms in breast cancer development in young Brazilian women.

Polymorphic variants of drug-metabolizing enzymes alter the risk and survival of oral cancer patients

The present study investigated the prevalence of CYP2D6*4, CYP3A5*3 and SULT1A1*2, using PCR-RFLP, in normal and oral cancer (OC) patients that were stratified by OC subtype and gender. The risk of cancer, 5-year cumulative survival and hazard's ratio (HR) with respect to risk factors and clinical factors were estimated using Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models. CYP2D6*4 'GA' lowered the risk of buccal mucosa cancer (BMC) in males (OR = 0.37), whereas, 'G' allele of CYP3A5*3 increased risk of tongue cancer (TC) (OR = 1.67). SULT1A1*2 'GA' increased the risk of TC (OR = 2.36) and BMC (OR = 3.25) in females. The 5-year survival of the patients depended on factors like age, lymphovascular spread (LVS), perinodal spread (PNS), recurrence, tobacco, and alcohol. CYP3A5*3 'AG' and 'GG' had decreased the hazard ratio (HR) for BMC females when inflammatory infiltrate alone or along with other covariates, LVS, PNI, PNS, metastasis, recurrence, and relapse was adjusted. Similarly, CYP3A5*3 'AG' decreased the risk of death (HR = 0.05) when the grade was adjusted. SULT1A1*2 'GA' had decreased HR for TC males (HR = 0.08) after adjusting for inflammatory infiltrate, LVS, perineural invasion (PNI), PNS, metastasis, recurrence, and relapse. Further, our bioinformatics study revealed the presence of a CpG island within the CYP2D6 and a CTCF binding site upstream of CYP2D6. Interestingly, three CpG islands and two CTCF binding sites were also identified near the SULT1A1. In conclusion, the SNPs altered risk and survival of BMC and TC differentially in a gender specified manner, that varied with clinical and risk factors.

Genotypes of CYP1A1, SULT1A1 and SULT1A2 and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus: outcome of a case-control study from Kashmir, India

Studies on associations of various polymorphism in xenobiotic metabolizing genes with different cancers including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are mixed and inconclusive. To evaluate the association of CYP1A1*4, SULT1A1*2 and SULT1A2*2 genotypes with ESCC risk and their modifying effects on different risk factors of ESCC, we conducted a case-control study in Kashmir, India, an area with relative high incidence of ESCC. We recruited 404 histopathologically confirmed ESCC cases, and equal number of controls, individually matched for sex, age and district of residence to respective case. Information was obtained on various dietary, lifestyle and environmental factors in face-to-face interviews, using a structured questionnaire, from each subject. Genotypes were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction, restriction fragment length polymorphism and direct sequencing. Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). A higher risk was observed in the subjects who harbored variant genotype of CYP1A1*4 (OR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.28-3.32); and the risk was further enhanced in ever smokers (OR = 3.47; 95% CI: 1.62-7.42), adobe dwellers (OR = 6.71; 95% CI: 3.02-14.89), and biomass fuel users (OR = 5.11; 95% CI: 1.34-19.50). We did not find any significant differences in the polymorphic variants of SULT1A1*2 and SULT1A2*2 between cases and controls. The study indicates that, unlike SULT1A1*2 and SULT1A2*2, the polymorphism of CYP1A1*4 is associated with ESCC risk. However, replicative studies with larger sample size are needed to substantiate our findings.

Pharmacogenetics of SULT1A1

Cytosolic SULT1A1 participates in the bioconversion of a plethora of endogenous and xenobiotic substances. Genetic variation in this important enzyme such as SNPs can vary by ethnicity and have functional consequences on its activity. Most SULT1A1 genetic variability studies have been centered on the SULT1A1*1/2 SNP. Highlighted here are not only this SNP, but other genetic variants associated with SULT1A1 that could modify drug efficacy and xenobiotic metabolism. Some studies have investigated how differential metabolism of xenobiotic substances influences susceptibility to or protection from cancer in multiple sites. This review will focus primarily on the impact of SULT1A1 genetic variation on the response to anticancer therapeutic agents and subsequently how it relates to environmental and dietary exposure to both cancer-causing and cancer-preventative compounds.

Sulfotransferase SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism with cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 53 case-control studies

Background

The SULT1A1 Arg213His (rs9282861) polymorphism is reported to be associated with many kinds of cancer risk. However, the findings are conflicting. For better understanding this SNP site and cancer risk, we summarized available data and performed this meta-analysis.

Methods

Data were collected from the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Knowledge and CNKI. The association was assessed by odd ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results

A total of 53 studies including 16733 cancer patients and 23334 controls based on the search criteria were analyzed. Overall, we found SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism can increase cancer risk under heterozygous (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.18, P = 0.040), dominant (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01–1.19, P = 0.021) and allelic (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.02–1.16, P = 0.015) models. In subgroup analyses, significant associations were observed in upper aero digestive tract (UADT) cancer (heterozygous model: OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.11–2.35, P = 0.012; dominant model: OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.13–2.35, P = 0.009; allelic model: OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.10–2.11, P = 0.012) and Indians (recessive model: OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.22–3.07, P = 0.005) subgroups. Hospital based study also showed marginally significant association. In the breast cancer subgroup, ethnicity and publication year revealed by meta-regression analysis and one study found by sensitivity analysis were the main sources of heterogeneity. The association between SULT1A1 Arg213His and breast cancer risk was not significant. No publication bias was detected.

Conclusions

The present meta-analysis suggests that SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism plays an important role in carcinogenesis, which may be a genetic factor affecting individual susceptibility to UADT cancer. SULT1A1 Arg213His didn't show any association with breast cancer, but the possible risk in Asian population needs further investigation.