1
|
Li J, Yang L, Yao X, Xu L, Zhao L, Bai F. A retrospective study on improving the accuracy of radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer with lymph node metastasis using Styrofoam. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58:124-132. [PMID: 38183274 PMCID: PMC10878773 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2024-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To retrospectively analyze the accuracy of radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), Styrofoam fixation, and breast bracket fixation in the chest wall target area and supraclavicular lymphatic drainage area (supraclavicular target area) of patients with breast cancer.and compare the setting efficiency and comfort satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 65 patients with postoperative lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer, including 36 cases of Styrofoam fixation and 29 cases of breast bracket fixation, were recruited from March 2021 to August 2022 and retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent CBCT scans weekly, and the setup errors of the chest wall and supraclavicular target volume were compared and recorded. The planning target volume (PTV) margins of the two groups were calculated using the correlation MPTV = 2.5Σ + 0.7σ. The setup time and comfort satisfaction scores of the two groups were recorded and analyzed. The correlations among errors in each direction were analyzed using the Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS There was a significant difference in the left-right direction (X) axis of the chest wall target area between the Styrofoam and breast bracket groups (1.59 ± 1.47 mm vs. 2.05 ± 1.64 mm, P = 0.012). There were statistical differences in the ventrodorsal direction (Z) and bed angle of the supraclavicular target area, the data were (1.36 ± 1.27 mm vs. 1.75 ± 1.55 mm, P = 0.046; 0.47 ± 0.47° vs. 0.66 ± 0.59°, P = 0.006, respectively). In the X, Y, and Z directions, the respective PTV margins of the two groups in the chest wall target area were 5.01 mm, 5.99 mm, and 5.47 mm in the Styrofoam group, while those in the breast bracket group were 6.10 mm, 6.34 mm, and 6.10 mm, respectively. Moreover, the PTV margins of the supraclavicular target in the three directions were 3.69 mm, 3.86 mm, and 4.28 mm in the Styrofoam group, while those in the breast bracket group were 3.99 mm, 3.72 mm, and 5.45 mm, respectively. The setup time of the two groups was 3.4 ± 1.1 min and 5.5 ± 3.1 min (P = 0.007). The subjective comfort satisfaction scores of the two groups were 27.50 ± 1.24 and 25.44 ± 1.23 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The application of Styrofoam fixation in radiotherapy of breast cancer in the supraclavicular lymph node area has several advantages as compared to breast bracket fixation, including higher positioning accuracy, smaller external expansion boundary, improved work efficiency, and patients' comfort, which might provide a reference for clinical work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi’an, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi’an, China
| | - Xiaowei Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi’an, China
| | - Linlin Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi’an, China
| | - Lina Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi’an, China
| | - Fei Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beddok A, Lim R, Thariat J, Shih HA, El Fakhri G. A Comprehensive Primer on Radiation Oncology for Non-Radiation Oncologists. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4906. [PMID: 37894273 PMCID: PMC10605284 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Multidisciplinary management is crucial in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Multidisciplinary teams include specialists in surgery, medical therapies, and radiation therapy (RT), each playing unique roles in oncology care. One significant aspect is RT, guided by radiation oncologists (ROs). This paper serves as a detailed primer for non-oncologists, medical students, or non-clinical investigators, educating them on contemporary RT practices. Methods: This report follows the process of RT planning and execution. Starting from the decision-making in multidisciplinary teams to the completion of RT and subsequent patient follow-up, it aims to offer non-oncologists an understanding of the RO's work in a comprehensive manner. Results: The first step in RT is a planning session that includes obtaining a CT scan of the area to be treated, known as the CT simulation. The patients are imaged in the exact position in which they will receive treatment. The second step, which is the primary source of uncertainty, involves the delineation of treatment targets and organs at risk (OAR). The objective is to ensure precise irradiation of the target volume while sparing the OARs as much as possible. Various radiation modalities, such as external beam therapy with electrons, photons, or particles (including protons and carbon ions), as well as brachytherapy, are utilized. Within these modalities, several techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal RT, intensity-modulated RT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, scattering beam proton therapy, and intensity-modulated proton therapy, are employed to achieve optimal treatment outcomes. The RT plan development is an iterative process involving medical physicists, dosimetrists, and ROs. The complexity and time required vary, ranging from an hour to a week. Once approved, RT begins, with image-guided RT being standard practice for patient alignment. The RO manages acute toxicities during treatment and prepares a summary upon completion. There is a considerable variance in practices, with some ROs offering lifelong follow-up and managing potential late effects of treatment. Conclusions: Comprehension of RT clinical effects by non-oncologists providers significantly elevates long-term patient care quality. Hence, educating non-oncologists enhances care for RT patients, underlining this report's importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Godinot, 51100 Reims, France
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Ruth Lim
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François-Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Helen A. Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Georges El Fakhri
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dal Pra A, Dirix P, Khoo V, Carrie C, Cozzarini C, Fonteyne V, Ghadjar P, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Panebianco V, Zapatero A, Bossi A, Wiegel T. ESTRO ACROP guideline on prostate bed delineation for postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100638. [PMID: 37251620 PMCID: PMC10209331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective Radiotherapy to the prostate bed is a potentially curative salvage option after radical prostatectomy. Although prostate bed contouring guidelines are available in the literature, important variabilities exist. The objective of this work is to provide a contemporary consensus guideline for prostate bed delineation for postoperative radiotherapy. Methods An ESTRO-ACROP contouring consensus panel consisting of 11 radiation oncologists and one radiologist, all with known subspecialty expertise in prostate cancer, was established. Participants were asked to delineate the prostate bed clinical target volumes (CTVs) in 3 separate clinically relevant scenarios: adjuvant radiation, salvage radiation with PSA progression, and salvage radiation with persistently elevated PSA. These cases focused on the presence of positive surgical margin, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicles involvement. None of the cases had radiographic evidence of local recurrence on imaging. A single computed tomography (CT) dataset was shared via FALCON platform and contours were performed using EduCaseTM software. Contours were analyzed qualitatively using heatmaps which provided a visual assessment of controversial regions and quantitatively analyzed using Sorensen-Dice similarity coefficients. Participants also answered case-specific questionnaires addressing detailed recommendations on target delineation. Discussions via electronic mails and videoconferences for final editing and consensus were performed. Results The mean CTV for the adjuvant case was 76 cc (SD = 26.6), salvage radiation with PSA progression was 51.80 cc (SD = 22.7), and salvage radiation with persistently elevated PSA 57.63 cc (SD = 25.2). Compared to the median, the mean Sorensen-Dice similarity coefficient for the adjuvant case was 0.60 (SD 0.10), salvage radiation with PSA progression was 0.58 (SD = 0.12), and salvage radiation with persistently elevated PSA 0.60 (SD = 0.11). A heatmap for each clinical scenario was generated. The group agreed to proceed with a uniform recommendation for all cases, independent of the radiotherapy timing. Several controversial areas of the prostate bed CTV were identified based on both heatmaps and questionnaires. This formed the basis for discussions via videoconferences where the panel achieved consensus on the prostate bed CTV to be used as a novel guideline for postoperative prostate cancer radiotherapy. Conclusion Variability was observed in a group formed by experienced genitourinary radiation oncologists and a radiologist. A single contemporary ESTRO-ACROP consensus guideline was developed to address areas of dissonance and improve consistency in prostate bed delineation, independent of the indication.There is important variability in existing contouring guidelines for postoperative prostate bed (PB) radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy. This work aimed at providing a contemporary consensus guideline for PB delineation. An ESTRO ACROP consensus panel including radiation oncologists and a radiologist, all with known subspecialty expertise in prostate cancer, delineated the PB CTV in 3 scenarios: adjuvant RT, salvage RT with PSA progression, and salvage RT with persistently elevated PSA. None of the cases had evidence of local recurrence. Contours were analysed qualitatively using heatmaps for visual assessment of controversial regions and quantitatively using Sorensen-Dice coefficient. Case-specific questionnaires were also discussed via e-mails and videoconferences for consensus. Several controversial areas of the PB CTV were identified based on both heatmaps and questionnaires. This formed the basis for discussions via videoconferences. Finally, a contemporary ESTRO-ACROP consensus guideline was developed to address areas of dissonance and improve consistency in PB delineation, independent of the indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
- University of Bern, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Cesare Cozzarini
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Radiation Oncology, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria IP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Charlebourg, La Garenne Colombe, France
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laughlin BS, Lo S, Vargas CE, DeWees TA, Van der Walt C, Tinnon K, Beckett M, Hobbis D, Schild SE, Wong WW, Keole SR, Rwigema JCM, Yu NY, Clouser E, Rong Y. Clinical Practice Evolvement for Post-Operative Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy-Part 1: Consistent Organs at Risk Management with Advanced Image Guidance. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010016. [PMID: 36612013 PMCID: PMC9817677 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Post-operative prostate cancer patients are treated with full bladder instruction and the use of an endorectal balloon (ERB). We reassessed the efficacy of this practice based on daily image guidance and dose delivery using high-quality iterative reconstructed cone-beam CT (iCBCT). Methods: Fractional dose delivery was calculated on daily iCBCT for 314 fractions from 14 post-operative prostate patients (8 with and 6 without ERB) treated with volumetric modulated radiotherapy (VMAT). All patients were positioned using novel iCBCT during image guidance. The bladder, rectal wall, femoral heads, and prostate bed clinical tumor volume (CTV) were contoured and verified on daily iCBCT. The dose-volume parameters of the contoured organs at risk (OAR) and CTV coverage were assessed for the clinical impact of daily bladder volume variations and the use of ERB. Minimum bladder volume was studied, and a straightforward bladder instruction was explored for easy clinical adoption. Results: A “minimum bladder” contour, the overlap between the original bladder contour and a 15 mm anterior and superior expansion from prostate bed PTV, was confirmed to be effective in identifying cases that might fail a bladder constraint of V65% <60%. The average difference between the maximum and minimum bladder volumes for each patient was 277.1 mL. The daily bladder volumes varied from 62.4 to 590.7 mL and ranged from 29 to 286% of the corresponding planning bladder volume. The bladder constraint of V65% <60% was met in almost all fractions (98%). CTVs (D90%, D95%, and D98%) remained well-covered regardless of the absolute bladder volume daily variation or the presence of the endorectal balloon. Patients with an endorectal balloon showed smaller variation but a higher average maximum rectal wall dose (D0.03mL: 104.3% of the prescription) compared to patients without (103.3%). Conclusions: A “minimum bladder” contour was determined that can be easily generated and followed to ensure sufficient bladder sparing. Further analysis and validation are needed to confirm the utility of the minimal bladder contour. Accurate dose delivery can be achieved for prostate bed target coverage and OAR sparing with or without the use of ERB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady S. Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Stephanie Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Charles Van der Walt
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Katie Tinnon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Mason Beckett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Dean Hobbis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Jean-Claude M. Rwigema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Edward Clouser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morgan HE, Wang K, Yan Y, Desai N, Hannan R, Chambers E, Cai B, Lin MH, Sher DJ, Wang J, Wang AZ, Jiang S, Timmerman R, Park CJ, Garant A. Preliminary Evaluation of PTV Margins for Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of the Prostatic Fossa. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022:S1879-8500(22)00366-6. [PMID: 36509197 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In modern trials, traditional planning target volume (PTV) margins for postoperative prostate radiation therapy have been large (7-10 mm) to account for both daily changes in patient positioning and target deformation. With daily adaptive radiation therapy, these interfractional changes could be minimized, potentially reducing the margins required for treatment and improving adjacent normal-tissue dosimetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS A single-center retrospective study was conducted from March 2021 to November 2021. Patients receiving conventionally fractionated postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for prostate cancer with pretreatment and posttreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging (pre-CBCT and post-CBCT, respectively) were included (248 paired images). Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical target volumes (pre-CTVs and post-CTVs) were contoured by a single observer on all CBCTs and verified by a second observer. Motion was calculated from pre-CTV to that of the post-CTV, and predicted margins were calculated with van Herk's formula. Adequate coverage of the proposed planning target volume (PTV) margin expansions (pre-PTV) were verified by determining overlap with post-CTV. In a smaller cohort (25 paired images), dosimetric changes with the proposed online adaptive margins were compared with conventional plans in the Ethos emulator environment. RESULTS The estimated margins predicted to achieve ≥95% CTV coverage for 90% of the population were 1.6 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.2 mm (x-, y-, and z -xes, respectively), with 95% of the absolute region of interest displacement being within 1.9 mm, 2.8 mm, and 2.1 mm. After symmetrically expanding all pre-CTVs by 3 mm, the percentage of paired images achieving ≥95% CTV coverage was 97.1%. When comparing adaptive plans (3-mm margins) with scheduled plans (7-mm margins), rectum dosimetry significantly improved, with an average relative reduction in V40Gy[cc] of 59.2% and V65Gy[cc] of 79.5% (where V40Gy and V65Gy are defined as the volumes receiving 40 Gy and 65 Gy or higher dose, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Online daily adaptive radiation therapy could significantly decrease PTV margins for prostatic PORT and improve rectal dosimetry, with a symmetrical expansion of 3 mm achieving excellent coverage in this cohort. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard E Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, CARTI Cancer Center, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yulong Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Neil Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Eric Chambers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Bin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - David J Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Andrew Z Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Steve Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Chunjoo Justin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Management of patients with a persistently elevated PSA after radical prostatectomy: a narrative review. World J Urol 2022; 40:965-972. [PMID: 35024944 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03923-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The management of the postoperative biological relapse of prostate cancer is most often based on salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with or without the addition of a variable duration of hormone therapy (HT). The indications for SRT +/- HT are established in the setting of a rising PSA level after a period where an undetectable PSA was achieved. However, in case of detectable PSA immediately after radical prostatectomy, the treatment options and prognosis are still unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a narrative review based on an analysis of the literature focusing on articles targeting the population of patients with postoperative persistently detectable PSA level. Case reports, original articles, clinical trials, and published reviews were studied for this purpose. CONCLUSION This article will describe current management of patients with detectable PSA immediately after radical prostatectomy, notably the contribution of modern imaging and new treatment options involving the combination of RT and HT.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on external radiotherapy of prostate cancer. External radiotherapy is intended for all localized prostate cancers, and more recently for oligometastatic prostate cancers. The irradiation techniques are detailed. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with prostate image-guided radiotherapy is the recommended technique. A total dose of 74 to 80Gy is recommended in case of standard fractionation (2Gy per fraction). Moderate hypofractionation (total dose of 60Gy at a rate of 3Gy per fraction over 4 weeks) in the prostate has become a standard of therapy. Simultaneous integrated boost techniques can be used to treat lymph node areas. Extreme hypofractionation (35 to 40Gy in five fractions) using stereotactic body radiotherapy can be considered a therapeutic option to treat exclusively the prostate. The postoperative irradiation technique, indicated mainly in case of biological recurrence and lymph node involvement, is detailed.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cao M, Gao Y, Yoon SM, Yang Y, Sheng K, Ballas LK, Basehart V, Sachdeva A, Felix C, Low DA, Steinberg ML, Kishan AU. Interfractional Geometric Variations and Dosimetric Benefits of Stereotactic MRI Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy (SMART) of Prostate Bed after Radical Prostatectomy: Post-Hoc Analysis of a Phase II Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112802. [PMID: 34199881 PMCID: PMC8200117 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate geometric variations of patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after radical prostatectomy and the dosimetric benefits of stereotactic MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) to compensate for these variations. MATERIALS/METHODS The CTV and OAR were contoured on 55 MRI setup scans of 11 patients treated with an MR-LINAC and enrolled in a phase II trial of post-prostatectomy SBRT. All patients followed institutional bladder and rectum preparation protocols and received five fractions of 6-6.8 Gy to the prostate bed. Interfractional changes in volume were calculated and shape deformation was quantified by the Dice similar coefficient (DSC). Changes in CTV-V95%, bladder and rectum maximum dose, V32.5Gy and V27.5Gy were predicted by recalculating the initial plan on daily MRI. SMART was retrospectively simulated if the predicted dose exceeded pre-set criteria. RESULTS The CTV volume and shape remained stable with a median volumetric change of 3.0% (IQR -3.0% to 11.5%) and DSC of 0.83 (IQR 0.79 to 0.88). Relatively large volumetric changes in bladder (median -24.5%, IQR -34.6% to 14.5%) and rectum (median 5.4%, IQR - 9.7% to 20.7%) were observed while shape changes were moderate (median DSC of 0.79 and 0.73, respectively). The median CTV-V95% was 98.4% (IQR 94.9% to 99.6%) for the predicted doses. However, SMART would have been deemed beneficial for 78.2% of the 55 fractions based on target undercoverage (16.4%), exceeding OAR constraints (50.9%), or both (10.9%). Simulated SMART improved the dosimetry and met dosimetric criteria in all fractions. Moderate correlations were observed between the CTV-V95% and target DSC (R2 = 0.73) and bladder mean dose versus volumetric changes (R2 = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS Interfractional dosimetric variations resulting from anatomic deformation are commonly encountered with post-prostatectomy RT and can be mitigated with SMART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| | - Stephanie M. Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| | - Leslie K. Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA;
| | - Vincent Basehart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| | - Ankush Sachdeva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| | - Carol Felix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| | - Daniel A. Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| | - Michael L. Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (Y.G.); (S.M.Y.); (Y.Y.); (K.S.); (V.B.); (A.S.); (C.F.); (D.A.L.); (M.L.S.); (A.U.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Webster A, Appelt A, Eminowicz G. Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Pelvic Cancers: A Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Utilisation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:805-816. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
10
|
Ren XC, Liu YE, Li J, Lin Q. Progress in image-guided radiotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. World J Radiol 2019; 11:46-54. [PMID: 30949299 PMCID: PMC6441935 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v11.i3.46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2018] [Revised: 01/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors. It has the highest incidence and mortality rate of all cancers worldwide. Late diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is very common in clinical practice, and most patients miss the chance for radical surgery. Thus, radiotherapy plays an indispensable role in the treatment of NSCLC. Radiotherapy technology has evolved from the classic two-dimensional approach to three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. However, how to ensure delivery of an accurate dose to the tumor while minimizing the irradiation of normal tissues remains a huge challenge for radiation oncologists, especially due to the positioning error between fractions and the autonomous movement of organs. In recent years, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has greatly increased the accuracy of tumor irradiation while reducing the irradiation dose delivered to healthy tissues and organs. This paper presents a brief review of the definition of IGRT and the various technologies and applications of IGRT. IGRT can help ensure accurate dosing of the target area and reduce radiation damage to the surrounding normal tissue. IGRT may increase the local control rate of tumors and reduce the incidence of radio-therapeutic complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Cang Ren
- Department of Oncology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Renqiu 062552, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yue-E Liu
- Department of Oncology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Renqiu 062552, Hebei Province, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Oncology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Renqiu 062552, Hebei Province, China
| | - Qiang Lin
- Department of Oncology, North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Renqiu 062552, Hebei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
La radiothérapie externe guidée par l’imagerie dans le cancer de la prostate ; comment, quand et pourquoi ? Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:586-592. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
12
|
Latorzeff I, Sargos P, Loos G, Supiot S, Guerif S, Carrie C. Delineation of the Prostate Bed: The "Invisible Target" Is Still an Issue? Front Oncol 2017; 7:108. [PMID: 28620579 PMCID: PMC5449739 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
For pathological high-risk prostate cancer, adjuvant irradiation has shown a survival benefit. Phase III studies have highlighted that half men would face biochemical relapse and would be candidate for radiotherapy at adjuvant or salvage times. Despite at least four published international contouring guidelines from different collaborative groups, discrepancies remain for volumes, delineation, and margins to be considered in order to optimize radiotherapy planning. This article from “Groupe d’Etude des Tumeurs UroGénitales (GETUG)” members will focus on controversies to help clinicians to create best volume delineation for adjuvant or salvage post prostatectomy radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Oncology Radiotherapy, Bât Atrium, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Geneviève Loos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest René Gauducheau, Nantes, France
| | - Stéphane Guerif
- Department of Radiotherapy, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | |
Collapse
|