1
|
Jambhekar A, Wong A, Taback B, Rao R, Horowitz D, Connolly E, Wiechmann L. Complication Rates After IntraOperative Radiation Therapy: Do Applicator Size and Distance to Skin Matter? J Surg Res 2021; 268:440-444. [PMID: 34416416 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has gained popularity for early stage breast cancer treatment. Few studies have examined the relationship between complications and both demographic and technical factors. The objective of the current study was to determine if applicator size or distances to the skin were significant risk factors for complications. METHODS Data was prospectively collected on patients who underwent lumpectomy followed by IORT from November 1, 2013 to August 31, 2018. Exclusion criteria included any prior radiation exposure or personal history of breast cancer. Comorbid conditions such as body mass index, diabetes, and smoking as well as technical specifications such as applicator size and distances to the skin were included for investigation. Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test, and odds ratios were utilized for statistical analysis. RESULTS The study was comprised of 219 patients. None developed Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or above complications. Of 21.0% (n = 46) had minor complications. The most common complication was a palpable breast seroma (n = 37). Diabetes was the only comorbid condition with increased risk for complications (OR 3.2; 95% CI1.3-7.5; P = 0.008). The applicator sizes and average skin distances were similar between groups. Surprisingly, the closest skin distance was not a significant risk factor for post-operative complications (1.4 +/- 1.6 versus 1.4 +/- 1.9 cm; P = 1.0). CONCLUSION Neither applicator size nor the closest skin distance were associated with increased complications. Traditionally described risk factors such as BMI and smoking were not predictive. This data provides support for potentially expanding the utilization for IORT without increasing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amani Jambhekar
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Abby Wong
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Bret Taback
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Roshni Rao
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - David Horowitz
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Eileen Connolly
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lisa Wiechmann
- Breast Surgery Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baghani HR, Nasrollahi S. Efficacy of various nanoparticle types in dose enhancement during low energy X-ray IORT: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
3
|
Tejera Hernández AA, Vega Benítez VM, Rocca Cardenas JC, Ortega Pérez N, Rodriguez Ibarria N, Díaz Chico JC, García-Granados Alayón JJ, Pérez Correa P, Hernández Hernández JR. Complications and local relapse after intraoperative low-voltage X-ray radiotherapy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 2020; 98:299-306. [PMID: 32528909 PMCID: PMC7263891 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.6.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To study those factors that influence the occurrence of surgical complications and local relapse in patients intervened for breast cancer and receiving intraoperative radiotherapy. Methods Observational study on patients intervened for breast cancer with conservative surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy with low-voltage X-ray energy source (INTRABEAM), from 2015 to 2017 with 24 months minimum follow-up. Variables possibly associated to the occurrence of postoperative complications were analyzed with the Student t-test and the Fisher exact test; P < 0.05 considered significant. Subsequently, the construction of multiple multivariate analysis models began, thus building a logistic regression analysis using the IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 23 software. Local relapse was described. Results The study included 102 patients, mean age of 61.2 years; mean global size of tumor, 12.2 mm. Complications occurred in 29.4%. Fibrosis was the most frequently observed complication, followed by postoperative seroma. Using a 45 mm or larger applicator were significantly associated with the occurrence of complications. Tumor size 2 cm or larger and reintervention showed borderline significant association. Only one case of local relapse was observed. Conclusion Certain factors may increase the risk of complication after the use of intraoperative radiotherapy. Using external complementary radiotherapy does not seem to increase the rate of complications. Select patients and the involvement of a multidisciplinary team are essential for achieving good results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Alicia Tejera Hernández
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Víctor Manuel Vega Benítez
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - Neith Ortega Pérez
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Nieves Rodriguez Ibarria
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - Juan José García-Granados Alayón
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,Service of Radiophysics and Radiological Protection, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Pedro Pérez Correa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Juan Ramón Hernández Hernández
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.,General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| |
Collapse
|