Surgical Management of Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Upfront surgery for stage IIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer: retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Several international guidelines recommend neoadjuvant treatment before surgery; however, upfront surgery is the preferred approach for technically resectable non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of curative-intent upfront surgery in stage IIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent upfront surgery with stage cIIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer were identified. The clinical and pathological variables and survival outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 664 patients were identified, of whom 320 (48.8%) had N2 disease, 66.7% were males, 49.4% had a smoking history, and 61.2% had lung adenocarcinoma. Lobectomy was the most performed surgical procedure (84.9%). A total of 40 patients (6.02%) had positive margins (R1/R2). The grade III adverse event rate was 2.0% (13 of 664). The median follow-up was 30.6 (range 1.9-97.7) months. At follow-up, the mortality rate was 13.3% (88 of 664) and 37.2% of patients (247 of 664) had recurrence. Lung (101 of 247 (40.9%)) and brain (53 of 247 (21.5%)) were the most common sites of recurrence. The median overall survival was 60.0 (95% c.i. 51.5 to 67.6) months, with overall survival probability at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years being 89.6%, 77.8%, 67.2%, and 49.0% respectively. The R0 cohort showed an improved median overall survival compared with the R1/R2 cohort (67.4 versus 26.5 months respectively; P = greater than 0.001). The multivariable analysis revealed that age greater than or equal to 65 years (HR 1.51, 95% c.i. 1.08 to 2.12; reference = age less than 65 years), tumour size (greater than or equal to 5 cm (HR 2.13, 95% c.i. 1.41 to 3.21) and greater than or equal to 3 cm but less than 5 cm (HR 1.15, 95% c.i. 0.78 to 1.71); reference = less than 3 cm), and adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy (HR 0.69, 95% c.i. 0.49 to 0.96) and targeted therapy (HR 0.30, 95% c.i. 0.12 to 0.76); reference = none) significantly predicted overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Upfront surgery is an option for the management of stage IIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer.

Clinical management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer in India: An expert consensus statement

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered the most common type of lung cancer (>80% of all lung cancers); patients are often diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease. The management of NSCLC is considered challenging owing to variations in size, an extension of the tumors, involvement patterns, and classification. Although adequate literature and guidelines are available on the management of NSCLC in several countries, an Indian perspective on stage III NSCLC management is lacking. We used the modified Delphi approach to form consensus statements. A thorough literature search was done. The authors then convened and deliberated over published literature, available guidelines, and clinical judgment. Recommendation statements were formed for different clinical scenarios. These statements were sent as a form of survey to other oncologists, and their responses were recorded and mentioned. Evidence-based statements were formed for diagnosing and managing stage III NSCLC. These recommendation statements cover various aspects-surgical, radiation, and medical treatment in various clinical scenarios including adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and consolidation therapies.

True Prevalence of Unforeseen N2 Disease in NSCLC: A Systematic Review + Meta-Analysis

Patients with unforeseen N2 (uN2) disease are traditionally considered to have an unfavorable prognosis. As preoperative and intraoperative mediastinal staging improved over time, the prevalence of uN2 changed. In this review, the current evidence on uN2 disease and its prevalence will be evaluated. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies or completed, published trials that included uN2 disease until 6 April 2023, without language restrictions. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to score the included papers. A total of 512 articles were initially identified, of which a total of 22 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Despite adequate mediastinal staging, the pooled prevalence of true unforeseen pN2 (9387 patients) was 7.97% (95% CI 6.67-9.27%), with a pooled OS after five years (892 patients) of 44% (95% CI 31-58%). Substantial heterogeneity regarding the characteristics of uN2 disease limited our meta-analysis considerably. However, it seems patients with uN2 disease represent a subcategory with a similar prognosis to stage IIb if complete surgical resection can be achieved, and the contribution of adjuvant therapy is to be further explored.

A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Comparative Study with Historical Control to Determine the Real-World Effectiveness of Durvalumab after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study aimed to add real-world evidence to the literature regarding the effectiveness and safety of durvalumab consolidation (DC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the treatment of unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Using a hospital-based NSCLC patient registry and propensity score matching in a 2:1 ratio, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who completed CCRT with and without DC. The co-primary endpoints were 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival. For the safety evaluation, we evaluated the risk of any adverse events requiring systemic antibiotics or steroids. Of 386 eligible patients, 222 patients-including 74 in the DC group-were included in the analysis after propensity score matching. Compared with CCRT alone, CCRT with DC was associated with increased progression-free survival (median: 13.3 vs. 7.6 months, hazard ratio[HR]: 0.63, 95% confidence interval[CI]: 0.42-0.96) and overall survival (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.27-0.82) without an increased risk of adverse events requiring systemic antibiotics or steroids. While there were differences in patient characteristics between the present real-world study and the pivotal randomized controlled trial, we demonstrated significant survival benefits and tolerable safety with DC after the completion of CCRT.

The association between clinical parameters and resectability in stage III non-small cell lung cancer, and a combination of N2 lymph node burden and lung immune prognostic index score as a potential biomarker

Background

Surgery is important treatment option for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) because of its curative potential. We investigated the characteristics of resectable patients, and compared the outcomes according to treatment modalities.

Methods

Among 1,092 patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 2008 to 2020 from 7 university hospitals of Catholic Medical Center, we retrospectively analyzed 252 patients with clinical or pathological stage III. We compared survival outcomes among the groups according to resectability, first-line treatments, and the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) score. Clinical N2 subgroup was analyzed using multi-parameter scoring system.

Results

The resectable group consisted of less smokers, showed better pulmonary function and lower inflammatory markers, and tended to be diagnosed as earlier cancer stage than the unresectable group. The resectable group showed better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the unresectable group (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Regarding the first-line treatment, surgery showed the longest median PFS (33.70 months) and the highest 12-month OS rate (91.6%) than the other treatment modalities. OS was significantly different depending on the LIPI score in whole population, as well as in the unresectable group (P=0.004 and P=0.003, respectively). LIPI 0 group exhibited better OS than LIPI 1 and 2 in both populations. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2-4, LIPI 1-2, and first-line treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS. Smoking, forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and more advanced cancer stage were associated with unresectability. In subgroup analysis of N2 disease, we attempted to create new scoring system combining lymph node (LN) status and LIPI score. This scoring system showed significant association with OS.

Conclusions

The patients with resectable stage III NSCLC showed better PFS and OS than the patients with unresectable tumor. LIPI score exhibited possibility to be used as potential biomarker in stage III NSCLC. The multi-parameter scoring system using LN status and LIPI score was predictive of OS in the N2 subgroup.

Predicting N2 lymph node metastasis in presurgical stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer using multiview radiomics and deep learning method

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of N2 lymph node status of the resectable stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before surgery is crucial, while there is lack of corresponding method clinically.

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a model to quantitively predict the N2 lymph node metastasis in presurgical clinical stage I-II NSCLC using multiview radiomics and deep learning method.

METHODS

In this study, 140 NSCLC patients were enrolled and randomly divided into training and test sets. Univariate and multiple analysis method were used step by step to establish the clinical model; Then a multiview radiomics modeling scheme was designed, in which the optimal input feature set was determined by subcategorizing radiomics features (C1: original; C2: LoG and C3: wavelet) and comparison of corresponding radiomics model. The minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance (mRMR) selection and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm were used for the feature selection and construction of each radiomics model (Rad). Next, an end-to-end ResNet18 architecture and transfer learning techniques were designed to construct a deep learning model (DL). Subsequently, the screened clinical risk factors and constructed Rad and DL models were combined and compared and a nomogram was constructed. Finally, the diagnostic performance of all constructed models were evaluated and compared using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, Delong test, Calibration analysis, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curves, respectively.

RESULTS

Carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) level and spiculation were screened to make up the Clinical model, while seven radiomics features in the optimal input feature set C2 + C3 were selected to construct the Rad. DL was constructed by training on 1.8 million natural images and small sample data of our N2 lymph node volume of interest (VOI) images. Except for the Clinical model, all other models showed good predictive accuracy and consistency in both training set and test set. DL (area under curve (AUC): 0.83) was better than Rad (AUC: 0.76) in predictive accuracy, but their difference was not significant (p = 0.45). The combined models showed better diagnostic performance than the model only clinical or image risk factors were used (AUC for Clinical, Rad + DL, Rad + Clinical, DL + Clinical, and Rad + DL + Clinical were respectively 0.66, 0.86, 0.82, 0.86, and 0.88). Finally, the Rad + DL + Clinical model with the best diagnostic performance was selected to draw the final nomogram for clinical use.

CONCLUSION

This study proposes a nomogram based on multiview radiomics, deep learning, and clinical features that can be efficiently used to quantitively predict presurgical N2 diseases in patients with clinical stage I-II NSCLC.

Survival Analysis of Surgically Resected ypN2 Lung Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy

INTRODUCTION

 Surgery is widely accepted today when downstaging of mediastinal lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy is achieved. However, the role of surgery in patients with persistent N2 disease is still controversial. This study aims to detail the diagnostic problems, prognostic features, and long-term survival of the persistent N2 non-small cell lung cancer patient group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 One-hundred fifty patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and subsequently underwent resection, in-between 2003 and 2015, were retrospectively analyzed. In this study, "persistent N2" group refers to patients who received neoadjuvant therapy for clinically or histologically proven N2, who underwent a surgery after having been classified as "downstaged" at restaging, but in whom ypN2 lesions were subsequently confirmed on the operative specimens. Patients with multistation N2 were included in the study. There were 119 patients who met the criteria, whereas persistent ypN2 was detected in 28.5% (n = 34) of all patients.

RESULTS

 Overall 5-year survival rate was 47.2%, while it was 23.4% for patients with persistent N2. Factors that adversely affected survival were to have nonsquamous cell histological type (p = 0.006), high ypT stage (p = 0.001), persistent N2 (p = 0.02), and recurrence during follow-up (p < 0.001). A trend toward a shorter survival was observed when the ypN2 zone was subcarinal versus other zones, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). In addition, a trend toward a shorter survival of patients with multiple N2 involvement (p = 0.412) was observed.

CONCLUSION

 In the persistent N2 group, when multiple involvement or subcarinal involvement was excluded, relatively good survival was detected.

The diagnostic value of metabolic, morphological and heterogeneous parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in mediastinal lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of PET/CT metabolic, morphological and heterogeneous parameters in the diagnosis of 18F-FDG positive mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 156 patients with pathologically diagnosed NSCLC and underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were enrolled in this study. Mediastinal lymph nodes with 18F-FDG uptake greater than the mediastinum were analyzed. The metabolic parameters of maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean), SUVratio (node SUVmax/mediastinum SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), morphological parameters of maximum short diameter (Dmin), CT values and metabolic heterogeneity parameter of coefficient of variation (COV) were measured. The performance of each parameter and their combinations for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were 206 lymph nodes with pathological evidence included in the study, including 103 metastatic and 103 nonmetastatic nodes. The SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVratio, TLG, COV and Dmin of metastatic lymph nodes were significantly higher/greater than those in nonmetastatic ones (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed that the combination of SUVratio, Dmin and COV showed the highest diagnostic efficacy among all single and combined parameters, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.907 (P = 0.000), these three parameters all increased the risk of lymph node metastasis, with odds ratios of 1.848, 1.293 and 1.258, respectively (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Heterogeneity parameter was helpful for the accurate distinction of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. The combination of the SUVratio, Dmin and COV could improve the diagnostic accuracy. Multiple-parameters analysis plays an important complementary role in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis.

Advances in the Treatment of Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) traditionally has involved combinations of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical resection. Although the multimodality approach remains standard, only a fraction of patients with stage III lung cancer can undergo complete resection, and long-term prognosis remains poor. The PACIFIC trial generated significant enthusiasm when it demonstrated that the programmed death ligand-1 inhibitor, durvalumab, improved survival in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC after completion of definitive concurrent chemoradiation. This article reviews the indications for traditional therapies in stage III NSCLC and highlights ongoing advances that have led to the incorporation of novel therapeutic agents.

Association Between Treatment Facility Volume, Therapy Types, and Overall Survival in Patients With Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

There is significant heterogeneity in the treatment of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated the therapeutic and survival disparities in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC based on the facility volume using the National Cancer Database.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIIA NSCLC diagnosed from 2004 through 2015 were included. Facilities were classified by tertiles based on mean patients treated per year, with low-volume facilities treating ≤8 patients, intermediate-volume treating 9 to 14 patients, and high-volume treating ≥15 patients. Cox multivariate analysis was used to determine the volume-outcome relationship.

RESULTS

Analysis included 83,673 patients treated at 1,319 facilities. Compared with patients treated at low-volume facilities, those treated at high-volume centers were more likely to be treated with surgical (25% vs 18%) and trimodality (12% vs 9%) therapies. In multivariate analysis, facility volume was independently associated with all-cause mortality (P<.0001). Median overall survival by facility volume was 15, 16, and 19 months for low-, intermediate-, and high-volume facilities, respectively (P<.001). Compared with patients treated at high-volume facilities, those treated at intermediate- and low-volume facilities had a significantly higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.11] and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.13], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated for stage IIIA NSCLC at high-volume facilities were more likely to receive surgical and trimodality therapies and had a significant improvement in survival.

Interdisciplinary multimodality management of stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer

Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises about one-third of NSCLC patients and is very heterogeneous with varying and mostly poor prognosis. It is also called "locoregionally or locally advanced disease". Due to its heterogeneity a general schematic management approach is not appropriate. Usually a combination of local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy, depending on functional, technical and oncological operability) with systemic platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and, recently, followed by immune therapy is used. A more aggressive approach of triple agent chemotherapy or two local therapies (surgery and radiotherapy, except for specific indications) has no benefit for overall survival. Until now tumour stage and the general condition of the patient are the most relevant prognostic factors. Characterising the tumour molecularly and immunologically may lead to a more personalised and effective approach. At the moment, after an exact staging and functional evaluation, an interdisciplinary discussion amongst the tumour board is warranted and offers the best management strategy.

The Relevance of Mass Spectrometry Analysis for Personalized Medicine through Its Successful Application in Cancer "Omics"

Mass spectrometry (MS) is an essential analytical technology on which the emerging omics domains; such as genomics; transcriptomics; proteomics and metabolomics; are based. This quantifiable technique allows for the identification of thousands of proteins from cell culture; bodily fluids or tissue using either global or targeted strategies; or detection of biologically active metabolites in ultra amounts. The routine performance of MS technology in the oncological field provides a better understanding of human diseases in terms of pathophysiology; prevention; diagnosis and treatment; as well as development of new biomarkers; drugs targets and therapies. In this review; we argue that the recent; successful advances in MS technologies towards cancer omics studies provides a strong rationale for its implementation in biomedicine as a whole.

Salvage surgery after definitive chemo-radiotherapy for patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite all treatment advances, lung cancer is still the main cause of death worldwide. Treatment for resectable stage IIIA remains controversial including definitive chemoradiotherapy and induction treatment followed by surgery. After definitive chemoradiation up to 35% of patients will relapse locally. Experience with salvage resection after definitive chemoradiotherapy in lung cancer is limited. We present our experience in 27 patients who underwent surgical resection after definitive treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2016, 27 patients were evaluated in our department for surgical resection after receiving definitive chemoradiation treatment in different institutions. We conducted a retrospective study gathering the following data: age, gender, clinical and pathologic stage, histology, chemotherapy treatment regimen, radiotherapy dosage, surgical procedure and complications. Time between surgical resection and last follow-up was used to calculate Overall Survival (OS). Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was calculated from surgical resection to diagnosis of relapse.

RESULTS

Most of the patients were men with a median age of 56.09 years. Median follow-up time was 46.94 months. All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and high-dose radiotherapy, except for one patient who received 45 Gy. Lobectomy and bilobectomy was performed in 7 patients each, and pneumonectomy in 13. Complications appeared in 5 patients. Bronchopleural fistula appeared in two patients, and only one death in the early postoperative period. The analysis showed an OS of 75.56 months, with 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival of 74.1%, 57.8% and 53.3% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Salvage surgery in selected patients is technically feasible, with low morbidity and mortality rates and good long-term outcomes.

Role of EBUS TBNA in Staging of Lung Cancer: A Clinician's Perspective

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes surgical resection with curative intent in early-stage disease and chemoradiation in the advanced stage disease. Therefore, an accurate preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging is required not only to offer the appropriate treatment but also to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures including thoracotomy. The mediastinal lymph nodes can be sampled using several techniques including mediastinoscopy, surgery (open or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA). Currently, EBUS-TBNA/EUS-FNA is the preferred modality for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes because of its minimally invasive nature and high diagnostic yield. In this review, we discuss the utility of endosonographic procedures in mediastinal lymph node staging of NSCLC.

MEDIASTinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer by endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasonography with or without additional surgical mediastinoscopy (MEDIASTrial): study protocol of a multicenter randomised controlled trial

Background

In case of suspicious lymph nodes on computed tomography (CT) or fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), advanced tumour size or central tumour location in patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Dutch and European guidelines recommend mediastinal staging by endosonography (endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)) with sampling of mediastinal lymph nodes. If biopsy results from endosonography turn out negative, additional surgical staging of the mediastinum by mediastinoscopy is advised to prevent unnecessary lung resection due to false negative endosonography findings. We hypothesize that omitting mediastinoscopy after negative endosonography in mediastinal staging of NSCLC does not result in an unacceptable percentage of unforeseen N2 disease at surgical resection. In addition, omitting mediastinoscopy comprises no extra waiting time until definite surgery, omits one extra general anaesthesia and hospital admission, and may be associated with lower morbidity and comparable survival. Therefore, this strategy may reduce health care costs and increase quality of life. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of mediastinal staging strategies including and excluding mediastinoscopy.

Methods/design

This study is a multicenter parallel randomized non-inferiority trial comparing two diagnostic strategies (with or without mediastinoscopy) for mediastinal staging in 360 patients with suspected resectable NSCLC. Patients are eligible for inclusion when they underwent systematic endosonography to evaluate mediastinal lymph nodes including tissue sampling with negative endosonography results. Patients will not be eligible for inclusion when PET/CT demonstrates ‘bulky N2-N3’ disease or the combination of a highly suspicious as well as irresectable mediastinal lymph node. Primary outcome measure for non-inferiority is the proportion of patients with unforeseen N2 disease at surgery. Secondary outcome measures are hospitalization, morbidity, overall 2-year survival, quality of life, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. Patients will be followed up 2 years after start of treatment.

Discussion

Results of the MEDIASTrial will have immediate impact on national and international guidelines, which are accessible to public, possibly reducing mediastinoscopy as a commonly performed invasive procedure for NSCLC staging and diminishing variation in clinical practice.

Trial registration

The trial is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register on July 6th, 2017 (NTR 6528).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-018-0359-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.