nab-Paclitaxel-Based Therapy in Underserved Patient Populations: The ABOUND.PS2 Study in Patients With NSCLC and a Performance Status of 2

First-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Final results of the NEPTUN study

Real-world data on the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still limited. The NEPTUN study evaluated effectiveness and safety of first-line nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) plus carboplatin (nab-P/C) in patients with advanced NSCLC in routine clinical practice in Germany. Patients included in our study were aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and with decision for first-line nab-P/C in routine clinical practice. Primary objective was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6), secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. From 2016 to 2019, 408 patients from 75 sites were enrolled. PFS6 was 39.5% (95% CI: 34.2-44.8), median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI: 4.6-5.6), ORR was 42.9% (95% CI: 37.7-48.2). Median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 9.2-11.6). In subgroup analyses, median OS for squamous vs non-squamous histology was 11.5 months (95% CI: 9.2-13.8) vs 9.8 months (95% CI: 8.1-11.3) and for patients aged ≥70 vs <70 years median OS was 12.4 months (95% CI: 9.8-15.1) vs 9.6 months (95% CI: 7.7-11.1). Adverse events (AEs) related to nab-paclitaxel were reported in 247 (66.4%) patients, while carboplatin-related AEs were documented in 224 (60.2%) patients. Most frequently related AEs were leukopenia (22.3%) for nab-paclitaxel and anemia (20.2%) for carboplatin. Nab-P/C-related deaths were reported in 2 (0.5%) patients (sepsis and neutropenic sepsis). No new or unexpected safety signals emerged. These results support the effectiveness and safety of first-line nab-P/C in patients with advanced NSCLC reported in the pivotal trial and highlight the clinical value of this regimen in the real-world setting.

Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel: Worthy of Further Study in Sarcomas

Taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) play an important role in the treatment of advanced sarcomas. Albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is a new kind of taxane and has many advantages compared with paclitaxel and docetaxel. Nab-paclitaxel is currently approved for the treatment of advanced breast, non-small cell lung, and pancreatic cancers. However, the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in sarcomas has not been reviewed. In this review, we first compare the similarities and differences among nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, and docetaxel and then summarize the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel against various non-sarcoma malignancies based on clinical trials with reported results. The efficacy and clinical research progress on nab-paclitaxel in sarcomas are also summarized. This review will serve as a good reference for the application of nab-paclitaxel in clinical sarcoma treatment studies and the design of clinical trials.

First-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of the NEPTUN study

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy remains a first-line standard of care for approximately 30% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not harboring a druggable alteration. Favorable efficacy and safety of the nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin (nab-P/C) combination was shown in the pivotal phase 3 trial. However, information on effectiveness of nab-P/C in a real-world setting in Germany is missing. The NEPTUN study prospectively investigated the effectiveness and safety of nab-P/C in patients with advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC received first-line nab-P/C according to clinical routine. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6). Other endpoints included further effectiveness parameters, safety and quality of life. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

408 patients were enrolled. PFS6 was 40.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.3-46.2); median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.5-5.7). overall response rate was 41.5% (95% CI, 36.3-46.8). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.5 months (95% CI, 9.2-11.6). Subgroup analyses revealed median OS for squamous versus non-squamous histology (11.8 months [95% CI, 9.2-13.8] vs. 9.6 months [95% CI, 7.7-11.2]) and age ≥70 versus <70 years (11.7 months [95% CI, 9.4-14.3] vs. 9.6 months [95% CI, 7.5-11.2]). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (26.5%), leukopenia (25.7%), and thrombocytopenia (16.6%). Mostly reported grade 3/4 TEAEs were leukopenia (10.2%), anemia (8.6%), and pneumonia (5.1%). nab-paclitaxel-related deaths as reported by the investigator occurred in 0.8% of patients.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data support the effectiveness and safety of nab-P/C as first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC independent of tumor histology. The results are comparable with the pivotal phase 3 trial. No new safety signals emerged.

Randomized phase III study comparing the first-line chemotherapy regimens in patients with driver mutation-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status complicated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) complicated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with poor performance status (PS) are common in clinical practice with few related studies. Present studies have found that weekly low-dose docetaxel or gemcitabine combined with platinum is suitable for elderly or poor PS patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Untreated advanced driver mutation-negative NSCLC patients with COPD and PS ≥2 were enrolled in this double-blind randomized trial. Both groups controlled their COPD symptoms according to the GOLD guidelines. The anti-tumor regimens included docetaxel (37.5 mg/m², D1, D8)/carboplatin (AUC 5.0) (DC group) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m², D1, D8)/carboplatin (AUC 5.0) (GC group) were used every 3 weeks with continuous chemotherapy for 4–6 cycles or until disease progression. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Among the 52 patients (DC, n=25; GC, n=27), the median follow-up time was 12.3 months. There was no significant difference in tumor overall response rate (ORR; DC, 20.0% vs. GC, 22.2%, P=0.845) and disease control rate (DCR; DC, 72.0% vs. GC, 74.1%, P=0.064) between the 2 groups. The median PFS (GC, 6.5 vs. DC, 5.5 months; P=0.296) and the median OS (GC, 14.9 vs. DC, 12.3 months; P=0.548) of the GC group was slightly longer than the DC group. The main adverse reactions were myelosuppression and there were few adverse reactions of grade 3–4. Compared with the anti-tumor therapy only group in previous literature, the median PFS in this study was longer (6.2 months, 95% CI: 3.533–6.733 vs. 3.5 months, 95% CI: 2.432–4.568; P=0.589). There was also no significant difference in median OS and median PFS between the 2 groups (14.0 vs. 15.0 months, P=0.718). Chemotherapy cycle (P<0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for PFS, while chemotherapy cycle (P=0.011) and PS (P=0.041) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusions

Weekly low-dose docetaxel or gemcitabine combined with carboplatin chemotherapy regimens can yield survival benefits and a tolerable safety profile in patients with driver mutation-negative advanced NSCLC and poor PS complicated with COPD, with no significant difference between the two regimens.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-IPR-15006164.

nab-Paclitaxel/Carboplatin in Vulnerable Populations With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analysis

Introduction

Despite improvements in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), certain patient populations remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Many patients have benefited from platinum doublets, including nab-paclitaxel-based regimens, but there are patients with comorbidities who particularly require careful balancing of efficacy and safety. Clinical trial data are limited for patients who are elderly or have renal impairment, diabetes, or impaired performance status.

Methods

To better understand outcomes in these patient populations, we performed a pooled analysis using data from the ABOUND clinical trial program (ABOUND.SQM, ABOUND.PS2, ABOUND.70+) and the key phase III trial of nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin in advanced NSCLC. The populations included in this pooled analysis consisted of elderly patients (≥ 70 years) and patients with renal impairment (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²), diabetes, or poor performance status (ECOG PS 2).

Results

Median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 4.1 months in patients with ECOG PS 2 (95% CI, 2.04-5.09 months) to 7.7 months in patients with diabetes (95% CI, 5.88-10.12 months). PFS for elderly patients and patients with renal impairment was 6.9 months each (95% CI, 6.01-7.98 months and 4.47-9.79 months, respectively). Median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months (95% CI, 10.94-28.22 months), 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.59-20.14 months), and 16.1 months (95% CI, 14.09-18.50 months) in patients with renal impairment, patients with diabetes, and elderly patients, respectively. Patients with ECOG PS 2 exhibited the shortest median OS: 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.98-11.37 months). Overall response rates were 56.9%, 54.6%, 45.9%, and 29.4% in patients with diabetes, elderly patients, patients with renal impairment, and patients with ECOG PS 2, respectively. Most treatment-related adverse events were hematologic. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events in patients with renal impairment, elderly patients, patients with diabetes, and patients with poor performance status included neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia.

Conclusions

Although survival data in patients with ECOG PS 2 were notably inferior to the other cohorts, our findings are consistent with those previously reported in the population-specific studies of the ABOUND trials and lend additional support for the use of nab-paclitaxel-based regimens in historically understudied and vulnerable populations.

The efficacy of carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel after cisplatin plus pemetrexed in non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is one of the available first-line treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the efficacy of carboplatin plus nab-PTX as second-line, remains unknown. We examined the efficacy of carboplatin plus nab-PTX after cisplatin plus pemetrexed in non-squamous NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients who received carboplatin plus nab-PTX as a second-line chemotherapy regimen after cisplatin plus pemetrexed in our hospital between March 2013 and December 2017. We assessed clinical characteristics, efficacy, and toxicities.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were recruited. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29% and the disease control rate (DCR), 69%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.4-5.5 months) and the median overall survival, 16.6 months (95% CI:8.8-19.5 months). We assessed the ORR and mPFS using the best overall response in the prior regimen. The ORR and mPFS were better in the PD group (ORR; 44% and mPFS: 5.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin plus nab-PTX after cisplatin plus pemetrexed in non-squamous NSCLC patients is a treatment option. There were several cases where cisplatin plus pemetrexed was not effective, but Carboplatin plus nab-PTX was.

CheckMate 171: A phase 2 trial of nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer, including ECOG PS 2 and elderly populations

BACKGROUND

CheckMate 171 (NCT02409368) is an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial of nivolumab in previously treated advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), conducted as part of a post-approval commitment to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). We report outcomes from this trial.

METHODS

Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2 and disease progression during/after ≥1 systemic treatment (≥1 being platinum-based chemotherapy) for advanced or metastatic disease were treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was incidence of grade 3-4 treatment-related select adverse events (AEs). Other end-points included overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Of 811 patients treated, 103 had ECOG PS 2; 278 were aged ≥70 years and 125 were ≥75 years of age. Minimum follow-up was ~18 months. Safety was similar across populations; the most frequent grade 3-4 treatment-related select AEs in all treated patients were diarrhoea (1%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT, 1%), pneumonitis (0.7%), colitis (0.6%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST, 0.5%). Median OS was similar in all treated patients and those aged ≥70 and ≥75: 10.0 months, 10.0 months and 11.2 months, respectively. Median OS was 5.2 months in patients with ECOG PS 2.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that nivolumab is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced, relapsed squamous NSCLC, including the elderly, with OS outcomes consistent with phase 3 data. In patients with ECOG PS 2, nivolumab had similar tolerability, but outcomes were worse, as expected in this difficult-to-treat, poor prognosis population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02409368.

Performance Status and Age as Predictors of Immunotherapy Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy has become a key treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While a survival advantage has been proven for patients who are medically fit, it is unknown whether a benefit exists for patients with poor performance status (PS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients who received immunotherapy in our health system. Age and PS at the time of initial immunotherapy administration were assigned based on physician documentation. Radiographic response and date of progression were assigned according to the treating physician's assessment and confirmed by the study team. Immune-related adverse events were extracted from records.

RESULTS

We identified 285 NSCLC patients who received immunotherapy between January 2014 and April 2018. In this group, 153 patients (53.7%) had PS 0-1, 114 (40.0%) had PS 2, and 18 (6.3%) had PS 3. Response rates were similar across PS groups with 26.6% for PS 1, 25.2% for PS 2, and 23.1% for PS 3 (P = .95). Survival outcomes varied with pretreatment PS. For PS 0-1, PS 2, and PS 3, median overall survival was 14.7, 8.3, and 1.5 months (P < .001), and progression-free survival was 7.4, 5.1, and 1.3 months (P < .001). Patients aged < 70 had a lower rate (7.6%) of immune-related adverse events requiring steroids compared to patients ≥ 70 (15%) (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Patients with poor baseline PS demonstrate similar response rate but inferior progression-free survival and overall survival compared to medically fit patients. Prospective trials are needed to optimize treatment for this large population.