1
|
Konishi K, Okamoto M, Tokumitsu R, Yano M, Nasu K, Kobayashi E. Usage of nivolumab and ipilimumab for recurrent or advanced malignant vaginal melanoma: a two-case series. Med Mol Morphol 2024; 57:83-90. [PMID: 38289480 PMCID: PMC11128387 DOI: 10.1007/s00795-023-00377-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2024]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors help treat malignant melanoma, but show limited use in treating malignant vaginal melanoma, an aggressive, rare gynecological malignancy. We identified two patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab for vaginal melanoma; both were immunonegative for programmed cell death-ligand 1 and wild-type BRAF. Case 1, a 56-year-old female who underwent radical surgery for stage 1 malignant vaginal melanoma, experienced recurrence 15 months postoperatively. She briefly responded to ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy before showing disease progression. Tumor shrinkage occurred with nivolumab and local radiotherapy and, 45 months postoperatively, she survives with the melanoma. Case 2, a 50-year-old female, presented with a 4-cm blackish polypoid vaginal tumor with metastatic pelvic lymph nodes. She received ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy for stage III unresectable malignant vaginal melanoma. The vaginal tumor shrank after the third course of treatment, and the lymphadenopathy disappeared. The patient underwent radical surgery and is currently disease-free, using nivolumab for maintenance therapy. Both patients had immune-related adverse events coinciding with periods of high therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy for immune checkpoint inhibitor resensitization may effectively treat advanced or recurrent vaginal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kota Konishi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamamachi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Mamiko Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamamachi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Tokumitsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamamachi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Mitsutake Yano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamamachi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
| | - Kaei Nasu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamamachi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Support System for Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan
| | - Eiji Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamamachi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smart AC, Giobbie-Hurder A, Desai V, Xing JL, Lukens JN, Taunk NK, Sullivan RJ, Mooradian MJ, Hsu CC, Buchbinder EI, Schoenfeld JD. Multicenter Evaluation of Radiation and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Mucosal Melanoma and Review of Recent Literature. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101310. [PMID: 38260223 PMCID: PMC10801653 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Optimal integration of local therapy and systemic immune therapy for patients with mucosal melanoma (MM) is uncertain. We evaluated treatment patterns and outcomes following radiation therapy (RT) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in MM. Methods and Materials Thirty-seven patients with localized (n = 32, 87%) or node-positive (n = 5, 14%) MM were treated across 4 institutions with RT to the primary tumor with or without oncologic resection (n = 28, 76%) and ICI from 2012 to 2020. Recurrence rates were estimated using cumulative incidence in the presence of the competing risk of death. Results Mucosal sites were head/neck (n = 29, 78%), vaginal (n = 7, 19%), and anorectal (n = 1, 3%). Patients received ICI prior to or concurrent with RT (n = 14, 38%), following RT (n = 5, 14%), or at recurrence (n = 18, 49%). The objective response rate for evaluable patients was 31% for ICI as initial treatment (95% CI, 11%-59%) and 19% for ICI at recurrence (95% CI, 4%-46%). Median follow-up was 26 months for living patients; median overall survival (OS) was 54 months (95% CI, 31 months-not reached). Two-year OS was 85%; distant metastasis-free survival 44%. The 2-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR) was 26% (95% CI, 13%-41%). For 9 patients with unresectable disease, 2-year OS was 88% (95% CI, 35%-98%); LR was 25% (95% CI, 3%-58%). For 5 patients with positive nodes at diagnosis, 2-year OS was 100%; LR was 0%. Conclusions High rates of local control were achieved with RT with or without oncologic resection and ICI for localized and locally advanced MM. In particular, favorable local control was possible even for patients with unresectable or node-positive disease. Although risk of distant failure remains high, patients with MM may benefit from aggressive local therapy including RT in the setting of immunotherapy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia C. Smart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anita Giobbie-Hurder
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Science, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jessica L. Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - John N. Lukens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Neil K. Taunk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ryan J. Sullivan
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meghan J. Mooradian
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles C. Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - Jonathan D. Schoenfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cuccia F, D'Alessandro S, Blasi L, Chiantera V, Ferrera G. The Role of Radiotherapy in the Management of Vaginal Melanoma: A Literature Review with a Focus on the Potential Synergistic Role of Immunotherapy. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1142. [PMID: 37511755 PMCID: PMC10381892 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Among the mucosal melanomas, vaginal melanomas are very rare tumors, accounting for less than 20% of melanomas arising from the female genital tract. They occur most frequently in women in post-menopausal age, but younger patients may also experience this neoplasm, mainly located in the lower third of the vagina or the anterior wall. The optimal management of this tumor remains controversial, with surgery reported as the most frequently adopted approach. However, a clear benefit of surgical treatment in terms of survival has not yet been demonstrated. Conversely, radiotherapy may represent an attractive non-invasive alternative, and there are several favorable reports of the role of radiation therapy, either delivered with photons, brachytherapy, or hadrontherapy. A wide range of techniques and fractionation regimens are reported with substantially good tolerance to the treatment, and acute G3 or higher toxicities are reported only in the case of concurrent immunotherapy. Of note, due to the rarity of the disease, there is a lack of high-level evidence for the optimal therapeutic option. In this scenario, recent studies theorize the possibility of developing combinatorial approaches of radiotherapy with immunotherapy based on cutaneous melanomas reports. In this review, we aim to summarize the evidence available in the literature supporting the role of definitive radiotherapy for vaginal melanomas, with a focus on the combination of RT with immunotherapy, in terms of optimal timing and biological rationale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiotherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore D'Alessandro
- Radiotherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | - Livio Blasi
- Medical Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Gynecological Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Radiotherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mori T, Izumi T, Doi R, Kamimura A, Takai S, Teramoto Y, Nakamura Y. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy for advanced acral and mucosal melanoma. Exp Dermatol 2023; 32:276-289. [PMID: 36477933 DOI: 10.1111/exd.14725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Acral melanoma (AM) and mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare clinical subtypes of melanoma. AM and MM are etiologically, biologically, and molecularly distinct from cutaneous melanoma (CM). Despite the recent development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of advanced CMs, the true therapeutic efficacy of ICIs for these rare subtypes remains unclear. Since these subtypes are rare, especially in the Caucasian population, their biological features and corresponding novel therapies are underexplored than those of CM. Even in the larger phase III clinical trials for ICIs, the sample size of patients with AM and MM is limited. Consequently, establishment of standard of care for advanced AM and MM has been challenging. This review covers current update and overview on clinical efficacy of ICIs and ICI-based therapy for advanced AM and MM, based mainly on the reported clinical trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective studies, to provide a better understanding of the current landscape of this field. In addition, we discuss the future direction of treatment for those rare clinical subtypes, focusing on issues relevant to dermatology and medical oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuhiko Mori
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Teruaki Izumi
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Reiichi Doi
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Anna Kamimura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Sayaka Takai
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yukiko Teramoto
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
King ALO, Lee V, Yu B, Mirza FN, Zogg CK, Yang DX, Tran T, Leventhal J, An Y. Factors associated with the use of adjuvant radiation therapy in stage III melanoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1005930. [PMID: 36816935 PMCID: PMC9929351 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1005930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The role of radiation therapy (RT) in melanoma has historically been limited to palliative care, with surgery as the primary treatment modality. However, adjuvant RT can be a powerful tool in certain cases and its application in melanoma has been increasingly explored in recent years. The aim of this study is to explore national patterns of care and associations surrounding the use of adjuvant RT for stage III melanoma. Methods The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to identify patients who were diagnosed with stage III melanoma between 2004 and 2014. Exclusion criteria included those with distant metastatic disease, in-situ histology, no confirmed positive nodes, palliative intent therapy, and dosing regimens inconsistent with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for adjuvant RT in melanoma. Patients treated with and without adjuvant RT were compared and factors associated with use of adjuvant RT were identified using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results A total of 7,758 cases of stage III melanoma were analyzed, of which 11.7% received adjuvant RT. The mean age of the overall cohort was 58.5 years, and the majority of patients were male (64.7%), white (96.6%), on private insurance (51.3%), and presented to a non-high-volume facility (90.3%). Multivariable regression analyses revealed that patients who present to the hospital in 2009-2014 as compared to 2004-2008 (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-1.92), had 4 or more positive nodes (OR 4.30, 95% CI 3.67-5.04), and had microscopic residual tumor (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.46-3.04) were more likely to receive adjuvant RT. Factors that were negatively associated with receiving adjuvant RT included female gender (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.85) and median income of at least $63,000 (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.83). Conclusions This study demonstrates the rising use of RT for stage III melanoma in recent years and identifies demographic, social, clinical, and hospital-specific factors associated with patients receiving adjuvant RT. Further investigation is needed to explore disease benefits to improve guidance on the utilization of RT in melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber L. O. King
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Victor Lee
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Beverly Yu
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Fatima N. Mirza
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Cheryl K. Zogg
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Daniel X. Yang
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Thuy Tran
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Jonathan Leventhal
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Yi An
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Synergistic effects of radiotherapy and targeted immunotherapy in improving tumor treatment efficacy: a review. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2022; 24:2255-2271. [PMID: 35913663 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02888-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT), unlike chemotherapy, is one of the most routinely used and effective genotoxic and immune response inducing cancer therapies with an advantage of reduced side effects. However, cancer can relapse after RT owing to multiple factors, including acquired tumor resistance, immune suppressive microenvironment buildup, increased DNA repair, thus favoring tumor metastasis. Efforts to mitigate these undesirable effects have drawn interest in combining RT with immunotherapy, particularly the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, to tilt the pre-existing tumor stromal microenvironment into long-lasting therapy-induced antitumor immunity at multiple metastatic sites (abscopal effects). This multimodal therapeutic strategy can alleviate the increased T cell priming and decrease tumor growth and metastasis, thus emerging as a significant approach to sustain as long-term antitumor immunity. To understand more about this synergism, a detailed cellular mechanism underlying the dynamic interaction between tumor and immune cells within the irradiated tumor microenvironment needs to be explored. Hence, in the present review, we have attempted to evaluate various RT-inducible immune factors, which can be targeted by immunotherapy and provide detailed explanation to optimally maximize their synergy with immunotherapy for long-lasting antitumor immunity. Moreover, we have critically assessed various combinatorial approaches along with their challenges and described strategies to modify them in addition to providing approaches for optimal synergistic effects of the combination.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lechner M, Takahashi Y, Turri-Zanoni M, Ferrari M, Liu J, Counsell N, Mattavelli D, Rampinelli V, Vermi W, Lombardi D, Saade R, Park KW, Schartinger VH, Franchi A, Facco C, Sessa F, Battocchio S, Fenton TR, Vaz FM, O'Flynn P, Howard D, Stimpson P, Wang S, Hannan SA, Unadkat S, Hughes J, Dwivedi R, Forde CT, Randhawa P, Gane S, Joseph J, Andrews PJ, Dave M, Fleming JC, Thomson D, Zhu T, Teschendorff A, Royle G, Steele C, Jimenez JE, Laco J, Wang EW, Snyderman C, Lacy PD, Woods R, O'Neill JP, Saraswathula A, Kaur RP, Zhao T, Ramanathan M, Gallia GL, London NR, Le QT, West RB, Patel ZM, Nayak JV, Hwang PH, Hermsen M, Llorente J, Facchetti F, Nicolai P, Bossi P, Castelnuovo P, Jay A, Carnell D, Forster MD, Bell DM, Lund VJ, Hanna EY. International Multicenter Study of Clinical Outcomes of Sinonasal Melanoma Shows Survival Benefit for Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Potential Improvements to the Current TNM Staging System. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is an extremely rare and challenging sinonasal malignancy with a poor prognosis. Standard treatment involves complete surgical resection, but the role of adjuvant therapy remains unclear. Crucially, our understanding of its clinical presentation, course, and optimal treatment remains limited, and few advancements in improving its management have been made in the recent past.
Methods We conducted an international multicenter retrospective analysis of 505 SNMM cases from 11 institutions across the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, and continental Europe. Data on clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes were assessed.
Results One-, three-, and five-year recurrence-free and overall survival were 61.4, 30.6, and 22.0%, and 77.6, 49.2, and 38.3%, respectively. Compared with disease confined to the nasal cavity, sinus involvement confers significantly worse survival; based on this, further stratifying the T3 stage was highly prognostic (p < 0.001) with implications for a potential modification to the current TNM staging system. There was a statistically significant survival benefit for patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy, compared with those who underwent surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57–0.96, p = 0.021). Immune checkpoint blockade for the management of recurrent or persistent disease, with or without distant metastasis, conferred longer survival (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25–1.00, p = 0.036).
Conclusions We present findings from the largest cohort of SNMM reported to date. We demonstrate the potential utility of further stratifying the T3 stage by sinus involvement and present promising data on the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent, persistent, or metastatic disease with implications for future clinical trials in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matt Lechner
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of ENT, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yoko Takahashi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Jacklyn Liu
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Counsell
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Davide Mattavelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Rampinelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - William Vermi
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davide Lombardi
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rami Saade
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ki Wan Park
- Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Volker H. Schartinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Carla Facco
- Unit of Pathology, ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Fausto Sessa
- Unit of Pathology, ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Simonetta Battocchio
- Pathology Unit, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Tim R. Fenton
- Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Francis M. Vaz
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul O'Flynn
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Howard
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Stimpson
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Wang
- Department of Oncology, Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S. Alam Hannan
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Samit Unadkat
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Hughes
- Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Raghav Dwivedi
- Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cillian T. Forde
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Premjit Randhawa
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Gane
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Joseph
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter J. Andrews
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manas Dave
- Division of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jason C. Fleming
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - David Thomson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Tianyu Zhu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Andrew Teschendorff
- CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Gary Royle
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Joaquin E. Jimenez
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, United States
| | - Jan Laco
- The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Eric W. Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, United States
- Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Carl Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, United States
- Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Peter D. Lacy
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Robbie Woods
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - James P. O'Neill
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anirudh Saraswathula
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Raman Preet Kaur
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Tianna Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Gary L. Gallia
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Nyall R. London
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program—Head and Neck Surgery Branch, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Robert B. West
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Zara M. Patel
- Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Jayakar V. Nayak
- Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Peter H. Hwang
- Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Mario Hermsen
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Jose Llorente
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Fabio Facchetti
- Pathology Unit, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialities, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Amrita Jay
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dawn Carnell
- Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin D. Forster
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M. Bell
- Disease Team Alignment: Head and Neck, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, United States
| | - Valerie J. Lund
- Royal National ENT Hospital and Head and Neck Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ehab Y. Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tagliaferri L, Lancellotta V, Fionda B, Mangoni M, Casà C, Di Stefani A, Pagliara MM, D’Aviero A, Schinzari G, Chiesa S, Mazzarella C, Manfrida S, Colloca GF, Marazzi F, Morganti AG, Blasi MA, Peris K, Tortora G, Valentini V. Immunotherapy and radiotherapy in melanoma: a multidisciplinary comprehensive review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:1903827. [PMID: 33847208 PMCID: PMC9122308 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1903827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is an extremely aggressive tumor and is considered to be an extremely immunogenic tumor because compared to other cancers it usually presents a well-expressed lymphoid infiltration. The aim of this paper is to perform a multidisciplinary comprehensive review of the evidence available about the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy for melanoma. Radiation, in fact, can increase tumor antigens visibility and promote priming of T cells but can also exert immunosuppressive action on tumor microenvironment. Combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy provides an opportunity to increase immunostimulatory potential of radiation. We therefore provide the latest clinical evidence about radiobiological rationale, radiotherapy techniques, timing, and role both in advanced and systemic disease (with a special focus on ocular melanoma and brain, liver, and bone metastases) with a particular attention also in geriatric patients. The combination of immunotherapy and radiotherapy seems to be a safe therapeutic option, supported by a clear biological rationale, even though the available data confirm that radiotherapy is employed more for metastatic than for non-metastatic disease. Such a combination shows promising results in terms of survival outcomes; however, further studies, hopefully prospective, are needed to confirm such evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- CONTACT Bruno Fionda UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Roma00168, Italy
| | - Monica Mangoni
- Sezione di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Sperimentali e Cliniche, Università di Firenze, Florence, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Di Stefani
- UOC Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze mediche e chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Monica Maria Pagliara
- UOC Oncologia Oculare, Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Invecchiamento, neurologiche ortopediche e della testa collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Andrea D’Aviero
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Schinzari
- UOC Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Silvia Chiesa
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Ciro Mazzarella
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefania Manfrida
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Fabio Marazzi
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale Settore Scientifico Disciplinare, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Blasi
- UOC Oncologia Oculare, Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Invecchiamento, neurologiche ortopediche e della testa collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Ketty Peris
- UOC Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze mediche e chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- UOC Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yin G, Guo W, Huang Z, Chen X. Efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with melanoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Melanoma Res 2022; 32:71-78. [PMID: 35254329 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to review the efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of melanoma and systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combined treatment compared with ICIs alone. We searched a number of online databases up to 1 July 2021. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 2.0 and RevMan 5.0 were used for summary analysis. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and treatment adverse effects (AEs) were calculated. In total, 624 patients were included from 12 studies, including nine published studies and the results of three clinical trials. Radiotherapy combined with ICIs had a higher ORR compared with ICIs alone (35.00 vs. 20.39%). In terms of survival effect, radiotherapy combined with ICIs had no obvious advantage in OS. There was no statistically significant difference between 6-month and 12-month OS (P = 0.13; P = 0.69). There was no significant difference in PFS at 6 months (P = 0.08), but there was a significant difference in PFS at 12 months (P = 0.005). For patients with melanoma, radiotherapy combined with ICIs can improve the effective rate of treatment. Although there is no obvious OS advantage, it can improve PFS without serious adverse effects. Most of the studies included in this article are retrospective analyses, and there are few randomized controlled studies at present. Therefore, more prospective studies are still needed to explore the efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaofei Yin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nenclares P, Harrington KJ. Management of Head and Neck Mucosal Melanoma. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2022; 34:299-314. [DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
11
|
QUAD SHOT radiotherapy and doublet immunotherapy in the management of anal mucosal melanoma: A case series of efficacy and toxicity of a novel treatment approach and a review of the literature. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:e179-e186. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
12
|
Anorectal and Genital Mucosal Melanoma: Diagnostic Challenges, Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Opportunities of Rare Melanomas. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10010150. [PMID: 35052829 PMCID: PMC8773579 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare tumors, being less than 2% of all diagnosed melanomas, comprising a variegated group of malignancies arising from melanocytes in virtually all mucosal epithelia, even if more frequently found in oral and sino-nasal cavities, ano-rectum and female genitalia (vulva and vagina). To date, there is no consensus about the optimal management strategy of MM. Furthermore, the clinical rationale of molecular tumor characterization regarding BRAF, KIT or NRAS, as well as the therapeutic value of immunotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, has not yet been deeply explored and clearly established in MM. In this overview, focused on anorectal and genital MM as models of rare melanomas deserving of a multidisciplinary approach, we highlight the need of referring these patients to centers with experts in melanoma, anorectal and uro-genital cancers treatments. Taking into account the rarity, the poor outcomes and the lack of effective treatment options for MM, tailored research needs to be promptly promoted.
Collapse
|
13
|
Schonewolf CA, Jaworski EM, Allen SG, McLean K, Lao CD, Schuchter LM, Tanyi J, Taunk NK. Complete Response After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Immunotherapy for Vaginal Melanoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 7:100839. [PMID: 34934869 PMCID: PMC8654617 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Steven G Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Karen McLean
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Christopher D Lao
- Department of Medicine, Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lynn M Schuchter
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Janos Tanyi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Neil K Taunk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Molecular Profiling and Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Mucosal Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 23:ijms23010147. [PMID: 35008570 PMCID: PMC8745551 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Mucosal melanoma is a rare and aggressive subtype of melanoma. Unlike its cutaneous counterpart, mucosal melanoma has only gained limited benefit from novel treatment approaches due to the lack of actionable driver mutations and poor response to immunotherapy. Over the last years, whole-genome and exome sequencing techniques have led to increased knowledge on the molecular landscape of mucosal melanoma. Molecular studies have underlined noteworthy findings with potential therapeutic implications, including the presence of KIT mutations, which are potential targets of tyrosine kinase inhibitors currently in use in the clinic (imatinib), but also SF3B1 mutation, CDK4 amplifications, and CDKN2A gene deletions, which are presently under investigation in clinical trials. Recent results from a pooled analysis of patients with mucosal melanoma treated with immunotherapy have suggested that the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors might improve survival outcomes in this subset of patients, as compared with single-agent immunotherapy. However, these results are not confirmed across different studies, and combo-immunotherapy correlates with a higher rate of adverse events. In this review, we describe the clinical, biological, and genetic features of mucosal melanoma. We also provide an update on the results of approved systemic treatment in this setting and overview the therapeutic strategies currently under investigation in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
15
|
Nakamura Y, Namikawa K, Yoshikawa S, Kiniwa Y, Maekawa T, Yamasaki O, Isei T, Matsushita S, Nomura M, Nakai Y, Fukushima S, Saito S, Takenouchi T, Tanaka R, Kato H, Otsuka A, Matsuya T, Baba N, Nagase K, Inozume T, Fujimoto N, Kuwatsuka Y, Onishi M, Kaneko T, Onuma T, Umeda Y, Ogata D, Takahashi A, Otsuka M, Teramoto Y, Yamazaki N. Anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy versus anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy as first-line immunotherapy in unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma: a retrospective, multicenter study of 329 Japanese cases (JMAC study). ESMO Open 2021; 6:100325. [PMID: 34839104 PMCID: PMC8633880 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody monotherapy (PD1) has led to favorable responses in advanced non-acral cutaneous melanoma among Caucasian populations; however, recent studies suggest that this therapy has limited efficacy in mucosal melanoma (MCM). Thus, advanced MCM patients are candidates for PD1 plus anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) combination therapy (PD1 + CTLA4). Data on the efficacy of immunotherapy in MCM, however, are limited. We aimed to compare the efficacies of PD1 and PD1 + CTLA4 in Japanese advanced MCM patients. Patients and methods We retrospectively assessed advanced MCM patients treated with PD1 or PD1 + CTLA4 at 24 Japanese institutions. Patient baseline characteristics, clinical responses (RECIST), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis, and toxicity was assessed to estimate the efficacy and safety of PD1 and PD1 + CTLA4. Results Altogether, 329 patients with advanced MCM were included in this study. PD1 and PD1 + CTLA4 were used in 263 and 66 patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between both treatment groups, except for age (median age 71 versus 65 years; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the PD1 and PD1 + CTLA4 groups with respect to objective response rate (26% versus 29%; P = 0.26) or PFS and OS (median PFS 5.9 months versus 6.8 months; P = 0.55, median OS 20.4 months versus 20.1 months; P = 0.55). Cox multivariate survival analysis revealed that PD1 + CTLA4 did not prolong PFS and OS (PFS: hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.19, P = 0.30; OS: HR 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.57-1.38, P = 0.59). The rate of ≥grade 3 immune-related adverse events was higher in the PD1 + CTLA4 group than in the PD1 group (53% versus 17%; P < 0.001). Conclusions First-line PD1 + CTLA4 demonstrated comparable clinical efficacy to PD1 in Japanese MCM patients, but with a higher rate of immune-related adverse events. Anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy (PD1 + CTLA4) is an option for patients with advanced mucosal melanoma (MCM). Data on the efficacy of PD1 + CTLA4 compared with PD-1 monotherapy (PD1) for MCM, however, are limited. We retrospectively analyzed data from 329 Japanese patients with advanced MCM treated with PD1 or PD1 + CTLA4. No significant differences in objective response rate, progression-free survival, or overall survival were observed. Immune-related adverse events resulting in treatment cessation were higher in the PD1 + CTLA4 group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
| | - K Namikawa
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Yoshikawa
- Department of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Y Kiniwa
- Department of Dermatology, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - T Maekawa
- Department of Dermatology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - O Yamasaki
- Department of Dermatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - T Isei
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - S Matsushita
- Department of Dermato-Oncology/Dermatology, National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - M Nomura
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Y Nakai
- Department of Dermatology, Mie University, Tsu, Japan
| | - S Fukushima
- Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - S Saito
- Department of Dermatology, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan
| | - T Takenouchi
- Department of Dermatology, Niigata Cancer Center, Niigata, Japan
| | - R Tanaka
- Department of Dermatology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - H Kato
- Department of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - A Otsuka
- Department of Dermatology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - T Matsuya
- Department of Dermatology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - N Baba
- Department of Dermatology, Fukui University, Fukui, Japan
| | - K Nagase
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - T Inozume
- Department of Dermatology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - N Fujimoto
- Department of Dermatology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Y Kuwatsuka
- Department of Dermatology, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - M Onishi
- Department of Dermatology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - T Kaneko
- Department of Dermatology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - T Onuma
- Department of Dermatology, Yamanashi University, Kofu, Japan
| | - Y Umeda
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Department of Dermatology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - D Ogata
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - A Takahashi
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Otsuka
- Department of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Y Teramoto
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - N Yamazaki
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ben Shimol J, Guzman-Prado Y, Karlinskaya M, Davidson T. Effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with palliative radiotherapy in advanced melanoma: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 167:103499. [PMID: 34687896 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is frequently added to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) when treating melanoma. We sought to describe the efficacy of combination ICI and palliative radiotherapy (pRT) and assess safety, focusing on immune related adverse events (irAE). METHODS A systematic search for studies investigating the combination of pRT and ICI was conducted. RESULTS Five hundred-two articles were identified; nine met inclusion criteria. Improvements in objective response rate (p = 0.02), complete response (p = 0.04), and one-year local control (p < 0.005) were demonstrated when pRT was added to ICI. While some studies revealed improved overall and progression free survival, findings were mixed. No significant increases in adverse events or irAE were seen with the combined treatment compared with ICI alone. CONCLUSION The included studies revealed that the addition of pRT to ICI is effective and safe in patients with advanced melanoma. Measures of survival varied. More studies are warranted to identify optimal conditions for combination treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Ben Shimol
- Department of Medicine, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Yuli Guzman-Prado
- Department of Clinical Research, International Centre for Medical Research, Dorset, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tima Davidson
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Umeda Y, Yoshikawa S, Kiniwa Y, Maekawa T, Yamasaki O, Isei T, Matsushita S, Nomura M, Nakai Y, Fukushima S, Saito S, Takenouchi T, Tanaka R, Kato H, Otsuka A, Matsuya T, Baba N, Nagase K, Inozume T, Onuma T, Kuwatsuka Y, Fujimoto N, Kaneko T, Onishi M, Namikawa K, Yamazaki N, Nakamura Y. Real-world efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody or combined anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, with or without radiotherapy, in advanced mucosal melanoma patients: A retrospective, multicenter study. Eur J Cancer 2021; 157:361-372. [PMID: 34563991 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a lower efficacy in mucosal melanoma (MUM) than in cutaneous melanoma. The use of combination treatments with radiotherapy (RT) to improve the efficacy in MUM, however, requires further investigation. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 225 advanced MUM patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (PD1; 115) or anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy (PD1+CTLA4; 42) with or without RT (56 and 12, respectively). Treatment efficacy was estimated by determining the objective response rate (ORR) and survival rate with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS The baseline characteristics between the two groups in each ICI cohort were similar, except for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in the PD1 cohort. No significant differences in ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were observed between the PD1 alone and PD1+RT groups in the PD1 cohort (ORR 26% versus 27%, P > 0.99; median PFS 6.2 versus 6.8 months, P = 0.63; median OS 19.2 versus 23.1 months, P = 0.70) or between the PD1+CTLA alone and PD1+CTLA4+RT groups in the PD1+CTLA4 cohort (ORR 28% vs 25%, P = 0.62; median PFS 5.8 versus 3.5 months, P = 0.21; median OS 31.7 versus 19.8 months, P = 0.79). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that RT in addition to PD1 or PD1+CTLA4 did not have a positive impact on the PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS A prolonged survival benefit with RT in combination with ICIs was not identified for advanced MUM patients, although RT may improve local control of the tumour and relieve local symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiyasu Umeda
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Department of Dermatology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | | | - Yukiko Kiniwa
- Department of Dermatology, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Takeo Maekawa
- Department of Dermatology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Osamu Yamasaki
- Department of Dermatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Taiki Isei
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shigeto Matsushita
- Department of Dermato-Oncology/Dermatology, National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Motoo Nomura
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yasuo Nakai
- Department of Dermatology, Mie University, Tsu, Japan
| | - Satoshi Fukushima
- Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Shintaro Saito
- Department of Dermatology, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan
| | | | - Ryo Tanaka
- Department of Dermatology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kato
- Department of Dermatology, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Atsushi Otsuka
- Department of Dermatology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Taisuke Matsuya
- Department of Dermatology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - Natsuki Baba
- Department of Dermatology, Fukui University, Fukui, Japan
| | - Kotaro Nagase
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | | | - Takehiro Onuma
- Department of Dermatology, Yamanashi University, Yamanashi, Japan
| | | | - Noriki Fujimoto
- Department of Dermatology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Takahide Kaneko
- Department of Dermatology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Masazumi Onishi
- Department of Dermatology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Namikawa
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Yamazaki
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wu S, Yuan C, Chen L, Guo L, Chen Y, Peng Z, Lu L. Survival Benefits of Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Combination With Radiotherapy in Chinese Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastasis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:646328. [PMID: 33816300 PMCID: PMC8013706 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Limited data reported the synergistic anti-tumor effect of anti-PD-1 (programmed death 1) therapy and radiotherapy on melanoma BM (brain metastasis). And the efficacy in the Chinese population is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy and radiotherapy in Chinese melanoma patients with BM. We retrospectively reviewed 96 consecutive melanoma patients with BM treated at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. Patient demographics, BM characteristics and treatment details were carefully collected. The intracranial PFS (progression free survival) and OS (overall survival) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Twenty-five patients were treated with anti-PD-1 therapy and radiotherapy. Eighteen (72.0%) patients had SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) or SRS (stereotactic radiosurgery) for BM, 1 (4.0%) patient had WBRT (whole brain radiation therapy), 6 (24.0%) patients had SBRT/SRS and WBRT. The median treatment period of anti-PD-1 therapy was 10.77 months. Objective intracranial response was observed in 15 (60%) patients, and 5 (20%) patients achieved CR (complete response). After a median follow-up of 16 months, 11 (44%) patients experienced intracranial PD (progressive disease), and 15 (60%) patients died. The median intracranial PFS and OS were 10.73 months (range, 1.67–38.83 months) and 15.87 months (range, 2.47–41.50 months), respectively. The 1-year intracranial PFS and OS were 61.9% (95% CI, 44.1–86.9%) and 62.5% (95%CI, 45.8–85.2%), respectively. Patients with BM can benefit from a combination of anti-PD-1 therapy and radiotherapy. It merits further investigation in melanoma patients with BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chuanping Yuan
- Department of Oncology, Xinyu People's Hospital, Xinyu, China
| | - Lei Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lanlan Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenwei Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Clinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Institute of Precision Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lixia Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Emerging Trends for Radio-Immunotherapy in Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061374. [PMID: 33803620 PMCID: PMC8003099 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease at the genetic and molecular levels, both aspects having major repercussions on the tumor immune contexture. Whilst microsatellite status and tumor mutational load have been associated with response to immunotherapy, presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is one of the most powerful prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Yet, the majority of rectal cancers are characterized by microsatellite stability, low tumor mutational burden and poor T cell infiltration. Consequently, these tumors do not respond to immunotherapy and treatment largely relies on radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. Importantly, pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest that radiotherapy can induce a complete reprograming of the tumor microenvironment, potentially sensitizing it for immune checkpoint inhibition. Nonetheless, growing evidence suggest that this synergistic effect strongly depends on radiotherapy dosing, fractionation and timing. Despite ongoing work, information about the radiotherapy regimen required to yield optimal clinical outcome when combined to checkpoint blockade remains largely unavailable. In this review, we describe the molecular and immune heterogeneity of rectal cancer and outline its prognostic value. In addition, we discuss the effect of radiotherapy on the tumor microenvironment, focusing on the mechanisms and benefits of its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
|
20
|
Boer FL, Ten Eikelder MLG, van Geloven N, Kapiteijn EH, Gaarenstroom KN, Hughes G, Nooij LS, Jozwiak M, Tjiong MY, de Hullu JMA, Galaal K, van Poelgeest MIE. Evaluation of treatment, prognostic factors, and survival in 198 vulvar melanoma patients: Implications for clinical practice. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:202-210. [PMID: 33514483 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify clinicopathological characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with vulvar melanoma (VM). MATERIALS & METHODS This retrospective multicentre cohort study included 198 women with VM treated in eight cancer centres in the Netherlands and UK between 1990 and 2017. Clinicopathological features, treatment, recurrence, and survival data were collected. Overall and recurrence-free survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic parameters were identified with multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS The majority of patients (75.8%) had localized disease at diagnosis. VM was significantly associated with high-risk clinicopathological features, including age, tumour thickness, ulceration, positive resection margins and involved lymph nodes. Overall survival was 48% (95% CI 40-56%) and 31% (95% CI 23-39%) after 2 and 5 years respectively and did not improve in patients diagnosed after 2010 compared to patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2009. Recurrence occurred in 66.7% of patients, of which two-third was non-local. In multivariable analysis, age and tumour size were independent prognostic factors for worse survival. Prognostic factors for recurrence were tumour size and tumour type. Only the minority of patients were treated with immuno- or targeted therapy. CONCLUSION Our results show that even clinically early-stage VM is an aggressive disease associated with poor clinical outcome due to distant metastases. Further investigation into the genomic landscape and the immune microenvironment in VM may pave the way to novel therapies to improve clinical outcomes in these aggressive tumours. Clinical trials with immunotherapy or targeted therapy in patients with high-risk, advanced or metastatic disease are highly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florine L Boer
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Nan van Geloven
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen H Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Geoff Hughes
- Department of Gynaecology, Derriford hospital NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Linda S Nooij
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Jozwiak
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - Ming Y Tjiong
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne M A de Hullu
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - Khadra Galaal
- Department of Gynaecology, Royal Cornwall hospital NHS trust, Truro, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sajjadi E, Venetis K, Scatena C, Fusco N. Biomarkers for precision immunotherapy in the metastatic setting: hope or reality? Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 14:1150. [PMID: 33574895 PMCID: PMC7864694 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision immunotherapy is a crucial approach to improve the efficacy of anti-cancer treatments, particularly in the metastatic setting. In this respect, accurate patient selection takes advantage of the multidimensional integration of patients' clinical information and tumour-specific biomarkers status. Among these biomarkers, programmed death-ligand 1, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, microsatellite instability, mismatch repair and tumour mutational burden have been widely investigated. However, novel tumour-specific biomarkers and testing methods will further improve patients' outcomes. Here, we discuss the currently available strategies for the implementation of a precision immunotherapy approach in the clinical management of metastatic solid tumours and highlight future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Sajjadi
- Divison of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, University of Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Venetis
- Divison of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, University of Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristian Scatena
- Division of Pathology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 57, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Divison of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, University of Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhuang H. Abscopal effect of stereotactic radiotherapy combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: Mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and issues. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2020; 40:649-654. [PMID: 33169937 PMCID: PMC7743005 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hongqing Zhuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Teterycz P, Czarnecka AM, Indini A, Spałek MJ, Labianca A, Rogala P, Cybulska-Stopa B, Quaglino P, Ricardi U, Badellino S, Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Falkowski S, Mandala M, Rutkowski P. Multimodal Treatment of Advanced Mucosal Melanoma in the Era of Modern Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113131. [PMID: 33114734 PMCID: PMC7692305 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment of cutaneous melanoma and greatly improved treatment outcomes in this group of patients. Mucosal melanoma is a rare disease, biologically distinct from the cutaneous subtype. There is little real-world data on immunotherapy efficacy in mucosal melanoma. Therefore, we aimed to analyze and describe experiences in mucosal melanoma treatment in five high volume oncology centers in Europe. Furthermore, we evaluated if concomitant radiotherapy may improve the outcomes of these patients. We conclude that immunotherapy with anti-PD1 antibodies is a safe and effective treatment of mucosal melanoma. Concomitant radiotherapy may be beneficial in a selected subgroup of patients with advanced mucosal melanoma. Abstract Mucosal melanoma is a rare disease epidemiologically and molecularly distinct from cutaneous melanoma developing from melanocytes located in mucosal membranes. Little is known about its therapy. In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the results of immunotherapy and radiotherapy in a group of patients with advanced mucosal melanoma, based on the experience of five high-volume centers in Poland and Italy. There were 82 patients (53 female, 29 male) included in this retrospective study. The median age in this group was 67.5 (IQR: 57.25–75.75). All patients received anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 antibodies in the first or second line of treatment. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy during anti-PD1 treatment. In the first-line treatment, the median progression-free survival (PFS) reached six months in the anti-PD1 group, which was statistically better than 3.1 months in the other modalities group (p = 0.004). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.3 months (CI: 12.1–22.3) in the whole cohort. Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) during the anti-PD1 treatment had a median PFS of 8.9 months (CI: 7.4–NA), whereas patients treated with single-modality anti-PD1 therapy had a median PFS of 4.2 months (CI: 3.0–7.8); this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.047). Anti-PD1 antibodies are an effective treatment option in advanced mucosal melanoma (MM). The addition of RT may have been beneficial in the selected subgroup of mucosal melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Teterycz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.T.); (M.J.S.); (P.R.); (S.F.); (P.R.)
| | - Anna M. Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.T.); (M.J.S.); (P.R.); (S.F.); (P.R.)
- Correspondence: or
| | - Alice Indini
- Melanoma Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (A.I.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Mateusz J. Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.T.); (M.J.S.); (P.R.); (S.F.); (P.R.)
| | - Alice Labianca
- Melanoma Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (A.I.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Pawel Rogala
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.T.); (M.J.S.); (P.R.); (S.F.); (P.R.)
| | - Bożena Cybulska-Stopa
- Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute—Oncology Center, Krakow Branch, 31-115 Krakow, Poland;
| | - Pietro Quaglino
- Department of Medical Sciences, Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Serena Badellino
- Department of Oncology, Radiotherapy Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland;
- Department of Diagnostic Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Slawomir Falkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.T.); (M.J.S.); (P.R.); (S.F.); (P.R.)
| | - Mario Mandala
- Melanoma Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (A.I.); (A.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.T.); (M.J.S.); (P.R.); (S.F.); (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mishra RK, Ahmad A, Vyawahare A, Kumar A, Khan R. Understanding the Monoclonal Antibody Involvement in Targeting the Activation of Tumor Suppressor Genes. Curr Top Med Chem 2020; 20:1810-1823. [DOI: 10.2174/1568026620666200616133814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have always provided outstanding therapeutic arsenal in the
treatment of cancer, be it hematological malignancies or solid tumors. Monoclonal antibodies mediated
targeting of cancer genes in general and tumor-suppressor genes, in particular, have appreciably allowed
the possibilities of trafficking these antibodies to specific tumor mechanisms and aim for the pin-point
maneuvered tumor treatment strategies. The conventional cancer treatment options are associated with
enormous limitations like drug resistance, acute and pan-toxic side effects and collateral damage to other
unrelated cells and organs. Therefore, monoclonal antibody-mediated treatments have some special advantages
of specific targeting of cancer-related genes and minimizing the off-target side effects. A large
number of monoclonal antibody-mediated treatment regimen viz. use of immunoconjugates, clinically
targeting TGFβ with pan-TGFβ monoclonal antibodies, p53 by its monoclonal antibodies and EGFRtargeted
monoclonal antibodies, etc. have been observed in the recent past. In this review, the authors
have discussed some of the significant advances in the context of targeting tumor suppressor genes with
monoclonal antibodies. Approximately 250 articles were scanned from research databases like PubMed
central, Europe PubMed Central and google scholar up to the date of inception, and relevant reports on
monoclonal antibody-mediated targeting of cancer genes were selected. mAb mediated targeting of tumor
suppressor genes is a recent grey paradigm, which has not been explored up to its maximum potential.
Therefore, this review will be of appreciable significance that it will boost further in-depth understanding
of various aspects of mAb arbitrated cancer targeting and will warrant and promote further rigorous
research initiatives in this regard. The authors expect that this review will acquaint the readers
with the current status regarding the recent progress in the domain of mAbs and their employability and
targetability towards tumor suppressor genes in anti-cancer therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakesh Kumar Mishra
- Department of Nano-Therapeutics, Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Habitat Centre, Phase 10, Sector 64, Mohali, Punjab 160062, India
| | - Anas Ahmad
- Department of Nano-Therapeutics, Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Habitat Centre, Phase 10, Sector 64, Mohali, Punjab 160062, India
| | - Akshay Vyawahare
- Department of Nano-Therapeutics, Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Habitat Centre, Phase 10, Sector 64, Mohali, Punjab 160062, India
| | - Ajay Kumar
- Department of Nano-Therapeutics, Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Habitat Centre, Phase 10, Sector 64, Mohali, Punjab 160062, India
| | - Rehan Khan
- Department of Nano-Therapeutics, Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Habitat Centre, Phase 10, Sector 64, Mohali, Punjab 160062, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li J, Kan H, Zhao L, Sun Z, Bai C. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or metastatic mucosal melanoma: a systematic review. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920922028. [PMID: 32489431 PMCID: PMC7238311 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920922028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy offers minor benefit to patients with mucosal melanoma (MM). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the preferred approach in patients with advanced or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, the evidence of their clinical use for MM is still limited. This systematic review aims to summarize the efficacy and safety of ICIs in advanced or metastatic MM. Methods We searched electronic databases, conference abstracts, clinical trial registers and reference lists for relevant studies. The primary outcomes included the overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), one-year PFS rate, and one-year OS rate. Results This review identified 13 studies assessing anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, 22 studies assessing anti-PD-1 monotherapy, two studies assessing anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 combination therapy, one study assessing anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with axitinib, and three studies assessing anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with radiotherapy. For most patients who received ipilimumab monotherapy, the ORR ranged from 0% to 17%, the median PFS was less than 5 months, and the median OS was less than 10 months. For patients who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy, most studies showed an ORR of more than 15% and a median OS of more than 11 months. The combined administration of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 agents showed benefits over single-agent therapy with an ORR of more than 33.3%. In a phase Ib trial of toripalimab in combination with axitinib, approximately half of patients had complete or partial responses. Three retrospective studies that investigated anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with radiotherapy showed an ORR of more than 50%, which was higher than each single modality treatment. Conclusions Immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies alone and in combination with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies or other modalities, are promising treatment options for advanced or metastatic MM. However, high-level evidence is still needed to support the clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiarui Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Haoxuan Kan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhao Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chunmei Bai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100032, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kang C, Jeong SY, Song SY, Choi EK. The emerging role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol J 2020; 38:1-10. [PMID: 32229803 PMCID: PMC7113146 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2019.00640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) has been used for decades as one of the main treatment modalities for cancer patients. The therapeutic effect of RT has been primarily ascribed to DNA damage leading to tumor cell death. Besides direct tumoricidal effect, RT affects antitumor responses through immune-mediated mechanism, which provides a rationale for combining RT and immunotherapy for cancer treatment. Thus far, for the combined treatment with RT, numerous studies have focused on the immune checkpoint inhibitors and have shown promising results. However, treatment resistance is still common, and one of the main resistance mechanisms is thought to be due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment where myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) play a crucial role. MDSCs are immature myeloid cells with a strong immunosuppressive activity. MDSC frequency is correlated with tumor progression, recurrence, negative clinical outcome, and reduced efficacy of immunotherapy. Therefore, increasing efforts to target MDSCs have been made to overcome the resistance in cancer treatments. In this review, we focus on the role of MDSCs in RT and highlight growing evidence for targeting MDSCs in combination with RT to improve cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changhee Kang
- Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Yun Jeong
- Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Si Yeol Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wallington DG, Rashid AS, Buchwald ZS, Sudmeier LJ, Khan MK. Complete and Durable Response After Radiation Therapy to Primary Tumor Site of a Patient With Metastatic Anorectal Mucosal Melanoma With Oligoprogression on Nivolumab. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:503-510. [PMID: 32529147 PMCID: PMC7276687 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David G. Wallington
- Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan
| | - Arif S. Rashid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Zachary S. Buchwald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lisa J. Sudmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mohammad K. Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Corresponding author: Mohammad K. Khan, MD, PhD
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Radiotherapy as a Backbone for Novel Concepts in Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 12:cancers12010079. [PMID: 31905723 PMCID: PMC7017108 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation-induced immunogenic cell death has been described to contribute to the efficacy of external beam radiotherapy in local treatment of solid tumors. It is well established that radiation therapy can induce immunogenic cell death in cancer cells under certain conditions. Initial clinical studies combining radiotherapy with immunotherapies suggest a synergistic potential of this approach. Improving our understanding of how radiation reconditions the tumor immune microenvironment should pave the way for designing rational and robust combinations with immunotherapeutic drugs that enhance both local and systemic anti-cancer immune effects. In this review, we summarize irradiation-induced types of immunogenic cell death and their effects on the tumor microenvironment. We discuss preclinical insights on mechanisms and benefits of combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy, focusing on immune checkpoint inhibitors. In addition, we elaborate how these observations were translated into clinical studies and which parameters may be optimized to achieve best results in future clinical trials.
Collapse
|