1
|
Manojlovic N, Savic G, Manojlovic S. Neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Whom, when and how. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1223-1230. [PMID: 38817288 PMCID: PMC11135299 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is notorious for its aggressiveness and poor prognosis, remains an area of great unmet medical need, with a 5-year survival rate of 10% - the lowest of all solid tumours. At diagnosis, only 20% of patients have resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) or borderline RPC (BRPC) disease, while 80% of patients have unresectable tumours that are locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or have distant metastases. Nearly 60% of patients who undergo upfront surgery for RPC are unable to receive adequate adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) because of postoperative complications and early cancer recurrence. An important paradigm shift to achieve better outcomes has been the sequence of therapy, with neoadjuvant CHT preceding surgery. Three surgical stages have emerged for the preoperative assessment of nonmetastatic pancreatic cancers: RPC, BRPC, and LAPC. The main goal of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is to improve postoperative outcomes through enhanced selection of candidates for curative-intent surgery by identifying patients with aggressive or metastatic disease during initial CHT, reducing tumour volume before surgery to improve the rate of margin-negative resection (R0 resection, a microscopic margin-negative resection), reducing the rate of positive lymph node occurrence at surgery, providing early treatment of occult micrometastatic disease, and assessing tumour chemosensitivity and tolerance to treatment as potential surgical criteria. In this editorial, we summarize evidence concerning NAT of PDAC, providing insights into future practice and study design. Future research is needed to establish predictive biomarkers, measures of therapeutic response, and multidisciplinary strategies to improve patient-centered outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nebojsa Manojlovic
- Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Military Medical Academy, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
| | - Goran Savic
- Military Medical Academy, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Robbins KJ, Newcomer KF, Barnell EK, Anzelmo MA, Liu J, Hawkins WG. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Associated with Increased Risk of Postoperative DVT After Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: a NSQIP Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2873-2881. [PMID: 38151621 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14763-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a persistent source of postoperative morbidity despite prevention and mitigation efforts. Cancer, surgery, and chemotherapy are known risk factors for VTE. Existing literature suggests that neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) may contribute to increased VTE risk in the postoperative period, but few authors specifically examine this relationship in distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this study, we analyze the association of NAT and postoperative VTE in patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) for PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we analyzed the Procedure Targeted files for pancreatectomy from 2014 to 2020. Adults with PDAC who underwent DP were grouped by receipt of NAT. The primary outcome was the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and the secondary outcome was the rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine risk factors associated with postoperative DVT. RESULTS There were 4327 patients with PDAC who underwent DP. Of these, 1414 (32.7%) had NAT. Receipt of NAT was significantly associated with postoperative DVT requiring therapy (3.5% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.02), but was not associated with PE (p = 0.42). On MVA, NAT was associated with a 73% greater chance of developing postoperative DVT [odds ratio (OR) 1.73, 95% CI 1.18-2.55]. CONCLUSIONS Patients who receive NAT prior to DP for PDAC are 73% more likely to develop postoperative DVT compared with upfront resection. As NAT becomes more commonplace, these high-risk patients should be prioritized for guideline-recommended extended duration prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keenan J Robbins
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kenneth F Newcomer
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Erica K Barnell
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Jingxia Liu
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William G Hawkins
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Murakami H, Takahama S, Akita H, Kobayashi S, Masuta Y, Nagatsuka Y, Higashiguchi M, Tomokuni A, Yoshida K, Takahashi H, Doki Y, Eguchi H, Matsuura N, Yamamoto T. Circulating tumor-associated antigen-specific IFNγ +4-1BB + CD8 + T cells as peripheral biomarkers of treatment outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1363568. [PMID: 38550601 PMCID: PMC10972947 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1363568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
CD8+ T cells affect the outcomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Using tissue samples at pre-treatment to monitor the immune response is challenging, while blood samples are beneficial in overcoming this limitation. In this study, we measured peripheral antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses against four different tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) in PDAC using flow cytometry and investigated their relationships with clinical features. We analyzed the optimal timing within the treatment course for effective immune checkpoint inhibition in vitro. We demonstrated that the frequency of TAA-specific IFNγ+4-1BB+ CD8+ T cells was correlated with a fold reduction in CA19-9 before and after neoadjuvant therapy. Moreover, patients with TAA-specific IFNγ+4-1BB+ CD8+ T cells after surgery exhibited a significantly improved disease-free survival. Anti-PD-1 treatment in vitro increased the frequency of TAA-specific IFNγ+4-1BB+ CD8+ T cells before neoadjuvant therapy in patients, suggesting the importance of the timing of anti-PD-1 inhibition during the treatment regimen. Our results indicate that peripheral immunophenotyping, combined with highly sensitive identification of TAA-specific responses in vitro as well as detailed CD8+ T cell subset profiling via ex vivo analysis, may serve as peripheral biomarkers to predict treatment outcomes and therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotomo Murakami
- Laboratory of Precision Immunology, Center for Intractable Diseases and ImmunoGenomics, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shokichi Takahama
- Laboratory of Precision Immunology, Center for Intractable Diseases and ImmunoGenomics, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Akita
- Laboratory of Precision Immunology, Center for Intractable Diseases and ImmunoGenomics, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
- Next-Generation Precision Medicine Research Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuji Masuta
- Laboratory of Precision Immunology, Center for Intractable Diseases and ImmunoGenomics, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuta Nagatsuka
- Laboratory of Precision Immunology, Center for Intractable Diseases and ImmunoGenomics, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaya Higashiguchi
- Laboratory of Precision Immunology, Center for Intractable Diseases and ImmunoGenomics, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Tomokuni
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keiichi Yoshida
- Next-Generation Precision Medicine Research Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidenori Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nariaki Matsuura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuya Yamamoto
- Laboratory of Precision Immunology, Center for Intractable Diseases and ImmunoGenomics, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan
- Next-Generation Precision Medicine Research Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
- Laboratory of Aging and Immune Regulation, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Virology and Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huan L, Yu F, Cao D, Zhou H, Qin M, Cao Y. Comparison of neoadjuvant treatment and surgery first for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0295983. [PMID: 38451955 PMCID: PMC10919605 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current treatment recommendations for resectable or borderline pancreatic carcinoma support upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. However, neoadjuvant therapy (NT) seems to increase prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma and come to everyone's attention gradually. Randomized controlled trials offering comparison with the NT are lacking and optimal neoadjuvant treatment regimen still remains uncertain. This study aims to compare both treatment strategies for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS The PRISMA checklist was used as a guide to systematically review relevant peer-reviewed literature reporting primary data analysis. We searched PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Datebase and related reviews for randomized controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant therapy with surgery first for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma. We estimated relative hazard ratios (HRs) for median overall survival and ratios risks (RRs) for microscopically complete (R0) resection among different neoadjuvant regimens and major complications. We assessed the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on R0 resection rate and median overall survival with Bayesian analysis. RESULTS Thirteen eligible articles were included. Eight studies performed comparison neoadjuvant therapy with surgery first, and R0 resection rate was recorded in seven studies. Compared with surgery first, neoadjuvant therapy did increase the R0 resection rate (RR = 1.53, I2 = 0%, P< 0.00001), there was a certain possibility that gemcitabine + cisplatin (Gem+Cis) + Radiotherapy was the most favorable in terms of the fact that there was no significant difference concerning the results from the individual studies. In direct comparison, four studies were included and estimated that Neoadjuvant therapy improved mOS compared with upfront surgery (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.92; P = 0.012; I2 = 15%), after Bayesian analysis it seemed that regimen with Cisplatin/ Epirubicin then Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine (PEXG) was most likely the best with a relatively small sample size. The rate of major surgical complications was available for six studies and ranged from 11% to 56% with neoadjuvant therapy and 11% to 45% with surgery first. There was no significant difference between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery first, also with a high heterogeneity (RR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.65-1.43; P = 0.85; I2 = 46%). CONCLUSION In conclusion neoadjuvant therapy might offer benefit over up-front surgery. Neoadjuvant therapy increased the R0 resection rate with gemcitabine + cisplatin + Radiotherapy that was the most favorable and improved mOS with Cisplatin/ Epirubicin then Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine (PEXG) that was most likely the best.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Huan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chongqing Fifth People’s Hospital, Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Fucai Yu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chongqing Fifth People’s Hospital, Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Ding Cao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chongqing Fifth People’s Hospital, Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Hantao Zhou
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chongqing Fifth People’s Hospital, Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Maoling Qin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Yang Cao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chongqing Fifth People’s Hospital, Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Eijck CWF, Sabroso-Lasa S, Strijk GJ, Mustafa DAM, Fellah A, Koerkamp BG, Malats N, van Eijck CHJ. A liquid biomarker signature of inflammatory proteins accurately predicts early pancreatic cancer progression during FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Neoplasia 2024; 49:100975. [PMID: 38335839 PMCID: PMC10873733 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2024.100975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is often treated with FOLFIRINOX, a chemotherapy associated with high toxicity rates and variable efficacy. Therefore, it is crucial to identify patients at risk of early progression during treatment. This study aims to explore the potential of a multi-omics biomarker for predicting early PDAC progression by employing an in-depth mathematical modeling approach. METHODS Blood samples were collected from 58 PDAC patients undergoing FOLFIRINOX before and after the first cycle. These samples underwent gene (GEP) and inflammatory protein expression profiling (IPEP). We explored the predictive potential of exclusively IPEP through Stepwise (Backward) Multivariate Logistic Regression modeling. Additionally, we integrated GEP and IPEP using Bayesian Kernel Regression modeling, aiming to enhance predictive performance. Ultimately, the FOLFIRINOX IPEP (FFX-IPEP) signature was developed. RESULTS Our findings revealed that proteins exhibited superior predictive accuracy than genes. Consequently, the FFX-IPEP signature consisted of six proteins: AMN, BANK1, IL1RL2, ITGB6, MYO9B, and PRSS8. The signature effectively identified patients transitioning from disease control to progression early during FOLFIRINOX, achieving remarkable predictive accuracy with an AUC of 0.89 in an independent test set. Importantly, the FFX-IPEP signature outperformed the conventional CA19-9 tumor marker. CONCLUSIONS Our six-protein FFX-IPEP signature holds solid potential as a liquid biomarker for the early prediction of PDAC progression during toxic FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Further validation in an external cohort is crucial to confirm the utility of the FFX-IPEP signature. Future studies should expand to predict progression under different chemotherapies to enhance the guidance of personalized treatment selection in PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper W F van Eijck
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Sergio Sabroso-Lasa
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaby J Strijk
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dana A M Mustafa
- Department of Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Amine Fellah
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Núria Malats
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim K, Park HC, Yu JI, Park JO, Hong JY, Lee KT, Lee KH, Lee JK, Park JK, Heo JS, Shin SH, Min JH, Kim K, Han IW. Impact and optimal timing of local therapy addition in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100732. [PMID: 38317678 PMCID: PMC10840322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the efficacy and optimal timing of local treatment in patients with borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX. Method Between 2015 and 2020, 258 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were analysed. Treatment outcomes were compared between systemic treatment group (ST) and multimodality treatment groups (MT) using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. The MT were stratified as follows: FOLFIRINOX + radiation therapy (RT) (MT1), FOLFIRINOX + surgical resection (MT2), and FOLFIRINOX + RT + surgical resection (MT3). Results With median follow-up period of 18 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) for the ST was 22.0%, and it was significantly worse than MT (MT1, 46.3%; MT2, 65.7% and MT3; 90.2%; P < .001). The 2-year locoregional progression free survival (LRPFS) and overall PFS in ST were 10.7% and 7.0%, which were also significantly lower than those of MT (2-year LRPFS: MT1, 31.8%; MT2, 45.3%; MT3, 81.0%; 2-year overall PFS: MT1, 23.3%; MT2, 35.0%; MT3, 66.3%; P < .001). In time-varying multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, local treatment contributed to better treatment outcomes, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.568 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.398-0.811), 0.490 (95% CI, 0.331-0.726), and 0.656 (95% CI, 0.458-0.940) for OS, LRPFS, and overall PFS, respectively. The time window of 11-17 months after FOLFIRINOX appeared to demonstrate the maximal efficacy of local treatments in OS. Conclusions Adding local treatment in BR/LAPC patients treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX seemed to contribute in improved treatment outcomes, and it showed maximal efficacy in OS when applied 11-17 months after the initiation of FOLFIRINOX. We suggest that administration of sufficient period of upfront FOLFIRINOX may intensify the efficacy of local treatments, and well controlled prospective trials are expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangpyo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joon Oh Park
- Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung Yong Hong
- Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyu Taek Lee
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang Hyuck Lee
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Kyun Lee
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joo Kyung Park
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Seok Heo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Shin
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Hye Min
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Data Convergence & Future Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - In Woong Han
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saadat LV, Schofield E, Bai X, Curry M, Saskin R, Lipitz-Snyderman A, Soares KC, Kingham TP, Jarnagin WR, D'Angelica MI, Wright FC, Irish JC, Coburn NG, Wei AC. Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Ontario and the USA. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:58-65. [PMID: 37833463 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14375-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparative studies evaluating quality of care in different healthcare systems can guide reform initiatives. This study seeks to characterize best practices by comparing utilization and outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) in the USA and Ontario, Canada. METHODS Patients (age ≥ 66 years) with PC were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry and SEER-Medicare databases from 2006 to 2015. Demographics and treatment (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or multimodality (surgery and chemotherapy)) were described. In resected patients, neoadjuvant therapy, readmission, and 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were calculated. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS This study includes 38,858 and 11,512 patients with PC from the USA and Ontario, respectively. More female patients were identified in the USA (54.0%) versus Ontario (46.9%). In the entire cohort, US patients received more radiation in addition to other therapies (18.8% vs. 13.5% Ontario) and chemotherapy alone (34.3% vs. 19.0% Ontario). While rates of resection were similar (13.4% USA vs.12.5% Ontario), multimodality therapy was more common in the UAS (9.0% vs. 6.4%). Among resected patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was uncommon in both groups, although more frequent in the USA (12.0% vs. 3.2% Ontario). The 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were lower in Ontario vs. the USA (30-day: 3.26% vs. 4.91%; 90-day: 7.08% vs. 10.96%), however, overall survival was similar between the USA and Ontario. CONCLUSIONS We observed substantive differences in treatment and outcomes between PC patients in the USA and Ontario, which may reflect known differences in healthcare systems. Close evaluation of healthcare policies can inform initiatives to improve care quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily V Saadat
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xing Bai
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Curry
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Refik Saskin
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allison Lipitz-Snyderman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin C Soares
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frances C Wright
- Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Irish
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Natalie G Coburn
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alice C Wei
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang HK, Park MS, Han K, Eom G, Chung YE, Choi JY, Bang S, Kang CM, Seong J, Kim MJ. Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Surgery after Neoadjuvant Therapy. Cancer Res Treat 2024; 56:247-258. [PMID: 37605535 PMCID: PMC10789942 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical prognostic criteria using preoperative factors were not developed for post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) surgery of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aimed to identify preoperative factors associated with overall survival (OS) in PDAC patients who underwent post-NAT curative-intent surgery and develop risk stratification criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive PDAC patients who underwent post-NAT curative-intent surgeries between 2007 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, laboratory, surgical, and histopathologic variables were collected. Baseline, preoperative, and interval changes of computed tomography (CT) findings proposed by the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association were analyzed. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to select preoperative variables associated with OS. We developed risk stratification criteria composed of the significant preoperative variables, i.e., post-NAT response criteria. We compared the discrimination performance of post-NAT response criteria with that of post-NAT pathological (yp) American Joint Cancer Committee TNM staging system. RESULTS One hundred forty-five PDAC patients were included. Stable or increased tumor size on CT (hazard ratio [HR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58 to 4.21; p < 0.001) and elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.55; p=0.021) were independent factors of OS. The OS of the patient groups stratified by post-NAT response criteria which combined changes in tumor size and CA19-9 showed significant difference (p < 0.001). Such stratification was comparable to ypTNM staging in discrimination performance (difference of C-index, 0.068; 95% CI, -0.012 to 0.142). CONCLUSION "Any degree of decrease in tumor size on CT" and CA19-9 normalization or staying normal were independent favorable factors of OS. The combination of the two factors discriminated OS comparably to ypTNM staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Kyung Yang
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Suk Park
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyunghwa Han
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Sciences and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Geonsik Eom
- Department of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Choi
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seungmin Bang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myeong-Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang SQ, Zou RQ, Dai YS, Li FY, Hu HJ. Comparison of the upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 2024; 76:1-15. [PMID: 37639177 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01626-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a malignant disease with a dismal prognosis. While neoadjuvant therapy has shown promise in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, its role remains a subject of controversy among physicians. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Eligible studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Studies comparing neoadjuvant therapy with upfront surgery (with or without adjuvant therapy) in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were included. The primary endpoint assessed was overall survival. A total of 10,022 studies were identified, and the meta-analysis finally enrolled 50 revealed studies. The meta-analysis suggested that neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved the overall survival (HR 0.74, p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.75, p = 0.006) compared to the upfront surgery approach. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy leads to favorable postoperative outcomes, with an enhanced R0 resection rate (OR 1.90, p < 0.001) and reduced lymph node metastasis (OR 0.36, p < 0.001) and perineural invasion (OR 0.42, p < 0.001), although it is associated with a reduced resection rate (OR 0.42, p < 0.001). In addition, patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy experience superior survival benefits compared to those undergoing adjuvant therapy (HR 0.87, p = 0.019). These results are further corroborated by the subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neoadjuvant therapy has the potential to provide survival benefits and improve postoperative long-term outcomes for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. However, to validate and reinforce these findings, further well-designed and large trials are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Qi Yang
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Rui-Qi Zou
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yu-Shi Dai
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| | - Hai-Jie Hu
- Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Donisi G, Nappo G, Pacilli M, Capretti GL, Spaggiari P, Sollai M, Bozzarelli S, Zerbi A. Pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer: does it affect prognosis? Updates Surg 2023; 75:1497-1508. [PMID: 37578734 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01628-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) + surgical resection for pancreatic cancer (PC) has gained consensus in recent years. Pathological response (PR) is generally assessed according to the College of American Pathologists grading system, ranging from 0 (complete response) to 3 (no response). The aim of our study is to evaluate the PR in a series of resections for PC after NAT and its prognostic implication. 112 patients undergone NAT and resection for PC between 2011 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. PR was 0/1, 2 and 3 in 18 (15%), 79 (61%) and 29 (24%) cases, respectively. Chemotherapy regimens different from FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (OR 11.61 (2.53-53.36), p = 0.002) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 11.28 (1.89-67.23), p = 0.008) were associated to PR-3. Median follow-up was 25.8 (3.6-130.5) months. For PR-0/1, PR-2 and PR-3, median DFS was 45.8, 11.5, 4.6 months (p < 0.0001), respectively, while median OS was not reached, 27.1 and 17.5 months (p = 0.0006), respectively. At univariate analysis, PR-0/1 was significantly associated to better DFS and OS (HR 0.33 (0.17-0.67), p = 0.002; HR 0.20 (0.07-0.54), p = 0.002, respectively). At multivariate analysis, pancreaticoduodenectomy (HR 0.50 (0.30-0.84), p = 0.009), LNR (HR 27.14 (1.21-608.9), p = 0.038) and lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.99 (1.06-3.76), p = 0.033) were independently associated to DFS; pre-treatment CA 19.9 value (HR 1.00 (1.00-1.00), p = 0.025), post-treatment resectability status (HR 0.51 (0.28-0.95), p = 0.035), pancreaticoduodenectomy (HR 0.56 (0.32-0.99), p = 0.050), severe morbidity (2.99 (1.22-7.55), p = 0.017), LNR (HR 56.8 (2.08-1548.3), p = 0.017), lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.18 (1.08-4.37), p = 0.029) were independently associated to OS. PR did not reach statistical significance at multivariate analysis. A favorable PR is observed only in a limited number of cases. The prognostic role of PR, despite being promising, remains unclear and further multicentric studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Donisi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - G Nappo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy.
| | - M Pacilli
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - G L Capretti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - P Spaggiari
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - M Sollai
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - S Bozzarelli
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - A Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kwaśniewska D, Fudalej M, Nurzyński P, Badowska-Kozakiewicz A, Czerw A, Cipora E, Sygit K, Bandurska E, Deptała A. How A Patient with Resectable or Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer should Be Treated-A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4275. [PMID: 37686551 PMCID: PMC10487031 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease with high morbidity and mortality in which long-term survival rates remain disastrous. Surgical resection is the only potentially curable treatment for early pancreatic cancer; however, the right patient qualification is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes. With the rapid development of radiographic and surgical techniques, resectability decisions are made by a multidisciplinary team. Upfront surgery (Up-S) can improve the survival of patients with potentially resectable disease with the support of adjuvant therapy (AT). However, early recurrences are quite common due to the often-undetectable micrometastases occurring before surgery. Adopted by international consensus in 2017, the standardization of the definitions of resectable PDAC (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable PDAC (BR-PDAC) disease was necessary to enable accurate interpretation of study results and define which patients could benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). NAT is expected to improve the resection rate with a negative margin to provide significant local control and eliminate micrometastases to prolong survival. Providing information about optimal sequential multimodal NAT seems to be key for future studies. This article presents a multidisciplinary concept for the therapeutic management of patients with R-PDAC and BR-PDAC based on current knowledge and our own experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Kwaśniewska
- Department of Oncology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland; (D.K.); (M.F.)
| | - Marta Fudalej
- Department of Oncology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland; (D.K.); (M.F.)
- Department of Oncology Propaedeutics, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Nurzyński
- Department of Oncology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland; (D.K.); (M.F.)
| | | | - Aleksandra Czerw
- Department of Health Economics and Medical Law, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Economic and System Analyses, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Cipora
- Medical Institute, Jan Grodek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Sygit
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Calisia University, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland
| | - Ewa Bandurska
- Centre for Competence Development, Integrated Care and e-Health, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-204 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Andrzej Deptała
- Department of Oncology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland; (D.K.); (M.F.)
- Department of Oncology Propaedeutics, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mukherjee D, Chakraborty S, Bercz L, D’Alesio L, Wedig J, Torok MA, Pfau T, Lathrop H, Jasani S, Guenther A, McGue J, Adu-Ampratwum D, Fuchs JR, Frankel TL, Pietrzak M, Culp S, Strohecker AM, Skardal A, Mace TA. Tomatidine targets ATF4-dependent signaling and induces ferroptosis to limit pancreatic cancer progression. iScience 2023; 26:107408. [PMID: 37554459 PMCID: PMC10405072 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer with high metastasis and therapeutic resistance. Activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), a master regulator of cellular stress, is exploited by cancer cells to survive. Prior research and data reported provide evidence that high ATF4 expression correlates with worse overall survival in PDAC. Tomatidine, a natural steroidal alkaloid, is associated with inhibition of ATF4 signaling in multiple diseases. Here, we discovered that in vitro and in vivo tomatidine treatment of PDAC cells inhibits tumor growth. Tomatidine inhibited nuclear translocation of ATF4 and reduced the transcriptional binding of ATF4 with downstream promoters. Tomatidine enhanced gemcitabine chemosensitivity in 3D ECM-hydrogels and in vivo. Tomatidine treatment was associated with induction of ferroptosis signaling validated by increased lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial biogenesis, and decreased GPX4 expression in PDAC cells. This study highlights a possible therapeutic approach utilizing a plant-derived metabolite, tomatidine, to target ATF4 activity in PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debasmita Mukherjee
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Srija Chakraborty
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Lena Bercz
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Liliana D’Alesio
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Jessica Wedig
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Molly A. Torok
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Timothy Pfau
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Hannah Lathrop
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Shrina Jasani
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Abigail Guenther
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Jake McGue
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Daniel Adu-Ampratwum
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry & Pharmacognosy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - James R. Fuchs
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry & Pharmacognosy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | | | - Maciej Pietrzak
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Stacey Culp
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Anne M. Strohecker
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology & Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Aleksander Skardal
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Thomas A. Mace
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
De Grandis MC, Ascenti V, Lanza C, Di Paolo G, Galassi B, Ierardi AM, Carrafiello G, Facciorusso A, Ghidini M. Locoregional Therapies and Remodeling of Tumor Microenvironment in Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12681. [PMID: 37628865 PMCID: PMC10454061 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the advances made in treatment, the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains dismal, even in the locoregional and locally advanced stages, with high relapse rates after surgery. PDAC exhibits a chemoresistant and immunosuppressive phenotype, and the tumor microenvironment (TME) surrounding cancer cells actively participates in creating a stromal barrier to chemotherapy and an immunosuppressive environment. Recently, there has been an increasing use of interventional radiology techniques for the treatment of PDAC, although they do not represent a standard of care and are not included in clinical guidelines. Local approaches such as radiation therapy, hyperthermia, microwave or radiofrequency ablation, irreversible electroporation and high-intensity focused ultrasound exert their action on the tumor tissue, altering the composition and structure of TME and potentially enhancing the action of chemotherapy. Moreover, their action can increase antigen release and presentation with T-cell activation and reduction tumor-induced immune suppression. This review summarizes the current evidence on locoregional therapies in PDAC and their effect on remodeling TME to make it more susceptible to the action of antitumor agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Velio Ascenti
- Postgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.A.); (C.L.)
| | - Carolina Lanza
- Postgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (V.A.); (C.L.)
| | - Giacomo Di Paolo
- Oncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.D.G.); (G.D.P.)
| | - Barbara Galassi
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (B.G.); (M.G.)
| | - Anna Maria Ierardi
- Radiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.M.I.); (G.C.)
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Radiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.M.I.); (G.C.)
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (B.G.); (M.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
White MJ, Sheka AC, LaRocca CJ, Irey RL, Ma S, Wirth KM, Benner A, Denbo JW, Jensen EH, Ankeny JS, Ikramuddin S, Tuttle TM, Hui JYC, Marmor S. The association of new-onset diabetes with subsequent diagnosis of pancreatic cancer-novel use of a large administrative database. J Public Health (Oxf) 2023; 45:e266-e274. [PMID: 36321614 PMCID: PMC10273390 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening options for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are limited. New-onset type 2 diabetes (NoD) is associated with subsequent diagnosis of PDAC in observational studies and may afford an opportunity for PDAC screening. We evaluated this association using a large administrative database. METHODS Patients were identified using claims data from the OptumLabs® Data Warehouse. Adult patients with NoD diagnosis were matched 1:3 with patients without NoD using age, sex and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) status. The event of PDAC diagnosis was compared between cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with PDAC diagnosis were evaluated with Cox's proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS We identified 640 421 patients with NoD and included 1 921 263 controls. At 3 years, significantly more PDAC events were identified in the NoD group vs control group (579 vs 505; P < 0.001). When controlling for patient factors, NoD was significantly associated with elevated risk of PDAC (HR 3.474, 95% CI 3.082-3.920, P < 0.001). Other factors significantly associated with PDAC diagnosis were increasing age, increasing age among Black patients, and COPD diagnosis (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS NoD was independently associated with subsequent diagnosis of PDAC within 3 years. Future studies should evaluate the feasibility and benefit of PDAC screening in patients with NoD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J White
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
| | - A C Sheka
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
- OptumLabs® Visiting Fellow, Eden Prairie, MN, USA Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
| | - C J LaRocca
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA
| | - R L Irey
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
| | - S Ma
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
| | - K M Wirth
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
- OptumLabs® Visiting Fellow, Eden Prairie, MN, USA Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
| | - A Benner
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
| | - J W Denbo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL 33612 USA
| | - E H Jensen
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA
| | - J S Ankeny
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA
| | - S Ikramuddin
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
- OptumLabs® Visiting Fellow, Eden Prairie, MN, USA Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
| | - T M Tuttle
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA
| | - J Y C Hui
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA
| | - S Marmor
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lu W, Wang L, Lou J, Tang K. Sequential therapy for pancreatic cancer patients with synchronous oligo-hepatic metastatic lesions. TUMORI JOURNAL 2023; 109:307-313. [PMID: 35815545 DOI: 10.1177/03008916221110265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatments for patients suffering from pancreatic cancer with oligo-hepatic metastasis have always been a cause of certain controversy. Herein, we reported 15 pancreatic cancer patients with oligo-hepatic metastasis who accepted sequential therapy of chemotherapy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and radical resection of the primary tumor. METHODS A total of 87 pancreatic cancer patients with synchronous oligo-metastatic hepatic lesions who received treatments in the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University between January 2017 and July 2020 were enrolled. The chemotherapy regimens included modified folfirinox (54/87) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (33/87). Test of blood tumor markers and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) scan was performed at diagnosis and after eight weeks of chemotherapy. RESULTS Thirty-five patients received just chemotherapy because of poor reaction to the first round of chemotherapy(Overall survival (OS), 6.47±1.80 months); 15 patients reassessed as stable disease (SD)/partial response (PR) continued chemotherapy (OS, 10.35±3.15); nine patients reassessed as progressive disease (PD) after RFA and continued chemotherapy (OS, 10.90±2.60). The primary tumors in 13 patients were unresectable after chemotherapy and RFA (OS, 12.92±2.47), while 15 patients completed the sequential therapy of chemotherapy, radio-frequency ablation, and radical resection (OS, 16.76±6.55). CONCLUSIONS Sequential chemotherapy and RFA is a good treatment strategy to select the best candidates for surgical treatment among patients with pancreatic cancer with oligo-hepatic metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Lu
- Department of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lantian Wang
- Department of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianyao Lou
- Department of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kezhong Tang
- Department of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ritter AR, Miller ED. Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:537-552. [PMID: 37182991 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite improvements in definitive therapy, many patients with gastrointestinal malignancies experience local recurrences or have unresectable disease making subsequent management often challenging and morbid. Although higher doses of radiation may offer improved local control, the ability for dose escalation of external beam radiation therapy is often limited by adjacent radiosensitive structures. Intraoperative radiation therapy allows for additional radiotherapy to be delivered directly to the tumor or areas at highest risk for local recurrence while minimizing toxicity to adjacent structures, offering potentially improved outcomes for patients with unresectable disease or those with a high risk of local recurrence.
Collapse
|
17
|
Multivisceral resection for primary pancreatic signet ring cell carcinoma. Clin J Gastroenterol 2023; 16:482-487. [PMID: 36939986 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-023-01783-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
Primary pancreatic signet ring cell carcinoma (PPSRCC) is a rare and aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. Here, we report a case of PPSRCC treated with curative surgery. A 49-year-old man presented with right mid-abdominal pain. Imaging tests showed a 3.6 cm tumor extending around the head of the pancreas, the second portion of the duodenum, and the retroperitoneum. Involvement of the right proximal ureter resulted in moderate right hydronephrosis. A subsequent tumor biopsy revealed suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. No apparent lymph node or remote metastases were observed. The tumor was considered resectable, and radical pancreaticoduodenectomy was planned. Pancreaticoduodenectomy, right nephroureterectomy, and right hemicolectomy were conducted to resect the tumor en bloc. Final pathology revealed a poorly differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with signet ring cells infiltrating the right ureter and transverse mesocolon (pT3N0M0, stage IIA, according to UICC for International Cancer Control TNM classification). The postoperative course was uneventful, and oral fluoropyrimidine (S-1) was administered as adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year. At the 16-month follow-up, the patient was alive without any evidence of recurrence. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with right hemicolectomy and right nephroureterectomy was performed for curative resection of PPSRCC infiltrating the transverse mesocolon and right ureter.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kung H, Yu J. Targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Mechanisms and clinical study. MedComm (Beijing) 2023; 4:e216. [PMID: 36814688 PMCID: PMC9939368 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with a high rate of recurrence and a dismal 5-year survival rate. Contributing to the poor prognosis of PDAC is the lack of early detection, a complex network of signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms, a dense and desmoplastic stroma, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. A recent shift toward a neoadjuvant approach to treating PDAC has been sparked by the numerous benefits neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has to offer compared with upfront surgery. However, certain aspects of NAT against PDAC, including the optimal regimen, the use of radiotherapy, and the selection of patients that would benefit from NAT, have yet to be fully elucidated. This review describes the major signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in PDAC initiation and progression in addition to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of PDAC. We then review current guidelines, ongoing research, and future research directions on the use of NAT based on randomized clinical trials and other studies. Finally, the current use of and research regarding targeted therapy for PDAC are examined. This review bridges the molecular understanding of PDAC with its clinical significance, development of novel therapies, and shifting directions in treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng‐Chung Kung
- Krieger School of Arts and SciencesJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jun Yu
- Departments of Medicine and OncologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Establishment and Molecular Characterization of Two Patient-Derived Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines as Preclinical Models for Treatment Response. Cells 2023; 12:cells12040587. [PMID: 36831254 PMCID: PMC9954561 DOI: 10.3390/cells12040587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is exceedingly poor. Although surgical resection is the only curative treatment option, multimodal treatment is of the utmost importance, as only about 20% of tumors are primarily resectable at the time of diagnosis. The choice of chemotherapeutic treatment regimens involving gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX is currently solely based on the patient's performance status, but, ideally, it should be based on the tumors' individual biology. We established two novel patient-derived primary cell lines from surgical PDAC specimens. LuPanc-1 and LuPanc-2 were derived from a pT3, pN1, G2 and a pT3, pN2, G3 tumor, respectively, and the clinical follow-up was fully annotated. STR-genotyping revealed a unique profile for both cell lines. The population doubling time of LuPanc-2 was substantially longer than that of LuPanc-1 (84 vs. 44 h). Both cell lines exhibited a typical epithelial morphology and expressed moderate levels of CK7 and E-cadherin. LuPanc-1, but not LuPanc-2, co-expressed E-cadherin and vimentin at the single-cell level, suggesting a mixed epithelial-mesenchymal differentiation. LuPanc-1 had a missense mutation (p.R282W) and LuPanc-2 had a frameshift deletion (p.P89X) in TP53. BRCA2 was nonsense-mutated (p.Q780*) and CREBBP was missense-mutated (p.P279R) in LuPanc-1. CDKN2A was missense-mutated (p.H83Y) in LuPanc-2. Notably, only LuPanc-2 harbored a partial or complete deletion of DPC4. LuPanc-1 cells exhibited high basal and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-induced migratory activity in real-time cell migration assays, while LuPanc-2 was refractory. Both LuPanc-1 and LuPanc-2 cells responded to treatment with TGF-β1 with the activation of SMAD2; however, only LuPanc-1 cells were able to induce TGF-β1 target genes, which is consistent with the absence of DPC4 in LuPanc-2 cells. Both cell lines were able to form spheres in a semi-solid medium and in cell viability assays, LuPanc-1 cells were more sensitive than LuPanc-2 cells to treatment with gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX. In summary, both patient-derived cell lines show distinct molecular phenotypes reflecting their individual tumor biology, with a unique clinical annotation of the respective patients. These preclinical ex vivo models can be further explored for potential new treatment strategies and might help in developing personalized (targeted) therapy regimens.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cui M, Shoucair S, Liao Q, Qiu X, Kinny-Köster B, Habib JR, Ghabi EM, Wang J, Shin EJ, Leng SX, Ali SZ, Thompson ED, Zimmerman JW, Shubert CR, Lafaro KJ, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, Zheng L, He J, Zhao Y, Wolfgang CL, Yu J. Cancer-cell-derived sialylated IgG as a novel biomarker for predicting poor pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Int J Surg 2023; 109:99-106. [PMID: 36799816 PMCID: PMC10389326 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly applied in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, accurate prediction of therapeutic response to NAT remains a pressing clinical challenge. Cancer-cell-derived sialylated immunoglobulin G (SIA-IgG) was previously identified as a prognostic biomarker in PDAC. This study aims to explore whether SIA-IgG expression in treatment-naïve fine needle aspirate (FNA) biopsy specimens could predict the pathological response (PR) to NAT for PDAC. METHODS Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA biopsy specimens prior to NAT were prospectively obtained from 72 patients with PDAC at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. SIA-IgG expression of PDAC specimens was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Associations between SIA-IgG expression and PR, as well as patient prognosis, were analyzed. A second cohort enrolling surgically resected primary tumor specimens from 79 patients with PDAC was used to validate the prognostic value of SIA-IgG expression. RESULTS SIA-IgG was expressed in 58.3% of treatment-naïve FNA biopsies. Positive SIA-IgG expression at diagnosis was associated with unfavorable PR and can serve as an independent predictor of PR. The sensitivity and specificity of SIA-IgG expression in FNA specimens in predicting an unfavorable PR were 63.9% and 80.6%, respectively. Both positive SIA-IgG expression in treatment-naïve FNA specimens and high SIA-IgG expression in surgically resected primary tumor specimens were significantly associated with shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS Assessment of SIA-IgG on FNA specimens prior to NAT may help predict PR for PDAC. Additionally, SIA-IgG expression in treatment-naïve FNA specimens and surgically resected primary tumor specimens were predictive of the prognosis for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Cui
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Quan Liao
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Xiaoyan Qiu
- Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Joseph R. Habib
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Elie M. Ghabi
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Christopher R. Shubert
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Kelly J. Lafaro
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Richard A. Burkhart
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - William R. Burns
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Jin He
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Yupei Zhao
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Jun Yu
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cremen S, Kelly ME, Gallagher TK. The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:975136. [PMID: 36568243 PMCID: PMC9779982 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.975136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common malignancy affecting the biliary tree. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, aiming for negative margins (R0). For those who have locally advanced disease, which is borderline resectable, neoadjuvant chemoradiation presents an opportunity to reduce tumour size and allow for surgical resection. The aim of this review is to establish the role of neoadjuvant therapy in each subtype of CCA and establish its impact on survival. Methods Search terms such as 'neoadjuvant therapy' and 'cholangiocarcinoma' were searched on multiple databases, including Pubmed, Ovid and Embase. They were then reviewed separately by two reviewers for inclusion criteria. 978 studies were initially identified from the search strategy, with 21 being included in this review. Results 5,009 patients were included across 21 studies. 1,173 underwent neoadjuvant therapy, 3,818 had surgical resection alone. 359 patients received Gemcitabine based regimes, making it the most commonly utilised regimen for patients CCA and Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC). Data on tolerability of regimes was limited. All included papers were found to have low risk of bias when assessed using The Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a similar median overall survival compared to those who underwent upfront surgery (38.4 versus 35.1 months respectively). Pre-operative CA19-9, microvascular invasion, perineurial invasion and positive lymph nodes were of prognostic significance across BTC and CCA subtypes. Conclusion Neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is associated with improved patient outcomes and longer median overall survival compared to therapy and upfront surgery, however heterogeneity between research papers limited the ability to further analyse the significance of these results. Although initial studies are promising, further research is required in order to define suitable treatment protocols and tolerability of neoadjuvant regimes. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020164781.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinead Cremen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael E. Kelly
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tom K. Gallagher
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland,*Correspondence: Tom K. Gallagher,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Melucci AD, Chacon AC, Burchard PR, Tsagkalidis V, Casabianca AS, Goyal S, Switchenko JM, Kooby DA, Staley CA, Carpizo DR, Shah MM. The Impact of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 on Survival in Patients with Clinical Stage I and II Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:8536-8547. [PMID: 36121582 PMCID: PMC9879696 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12497-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 is a biomarker to monitor treatment effect. A threshold to predict prognostic significance remains undefined. We evaluated the impact of CA19-9 on overall survival (OS) in patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer (PC) utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS The NCDB was queried from 2010 to 2014 to identify patients with clinical stage I-II PC. Patients who had undocumented pretreatment CA19-9 were excluded. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: CA19-9 < 98 U/mL and CA19-9 ≥ 98 U/mL, and further categorized into surgery versus no surgery. Twelve- and 24-month OS rates are reported. RESULTS Overall, 32,382 patients (stage I: 12,173; stage II: 20,209) were included. The majority of stage I (52.1%) and II (60%) patients had CA19-9 ≥ 98 U/mL. Stage I-II patients with CA19-9 < 98 U/mL had improved OS rates (stage I: 67.5%, 42.6%; stage II: 59.8%, 32.8%) compared with stage I and II patients with CA19-9 ≥ 98 U/mL (stage I: 50.7%, 26.9%; stage II: 48.1%, 22%). Among resected stage I patients, CA19-9 <98 U/mL was associated with improved OS (< 98: 80.5%, 56%; ≥ 98: 70.2%, 42.8%), and a similar trend was seen in resected stage II patients (< 98: 77.6%, 49.9%; ≥ 98: 71%, 39.2%). Unresected stage I patients with lower CA19-9 had improved OS (< 98: 42.1%, 17.5; ≥ 98: 29.9%, 10%), with similar findings in unresected stage II patients (< 98: 41.1%, 15.3%; ≥ 98: 33.4%, 10.6%). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated the prognostic value of CA19-9 in patients with clinical stage I-II PC, with a value < 98 U/mL demonstrating improved survival. Surgery significantly improved survival at 12 and 24 months irrespective of CA19-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Subir Goyal
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jeffrey M. Switchenko
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - David A. Kooby
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| | - Charles A. Staley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| | - Darren R. Carpizo
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY,Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Mihir M. Shah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Frountzas M, Liatsou E, Schizas D, Pergialiotis V, Vailas M, Kritikos N, Toutouzas KG. The impact of surgery delay on survival of resectable pancreatic cancer: A systematic review of observational studies. Surg Oncol 2022; 45:101855. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
|
24
|
Burkoň P, Trna J, Slávik M, Němeček R, Kazda T, Pospíšil P, Dastych M, Eid M, Novotný I, Procházka T, Vrzal M. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) of Pancreatic Cancer-A Critical Review and Practical Consideration. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102480. [PMID: 36289742 PMCID: PMC9599229 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the developed world and is predicted to become the second by 2030. A cure may be achieved only with surgical resection of an early diagnosed disease. Surgery for more advanced disease is challenging and can be contraindicated for many reasons. Neoadjuvant therapy may improve the probability of achieving R0 resection. It consists of systemic treatment followed by radiation therapy applied concurrently or sequentially with cytostatics. A novel approach to irradiation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), has the potential to improve treatment results. SBRT can deliver higher doses of radiation to the tumor in only a few treatment fractions. It has attracted significant interest for pancreatic cancer patients, as it is completed quickly, requires less time away from full-dose chemotherapy, and is well-tolerated than conventional radiotherapy. In this review, we aim to provide the reader with a basic overview of current evidence for SBRT indications in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. In the second part of the review, we focus on practical information with respect to SBRT treatment plan preparation the performance of such therapy. Finally, we discuss future directions related to the use of magnetic resonance linear accelerators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petr Burkoň
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Trna
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (M.S.)
| | - Marek Slávik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (M.S.)
| | - Radim Němeček
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Pospíšil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Dastych
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 340/20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Eid
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 340/20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ivo Novotný
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Procházka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Miroslav Vrzal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kim SH, Kim SS, Hwang HK, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Should the Splenic Vein Be Preserved-Fate of Sinistral Portal Hypertension after Pancreatoduodenectomy with Vascular Re-Section for Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194853. [PMID: 36230776 PMCID: PMC9564260 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aims to evaluate sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) development and its clinical impact on the long-term outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgical resection with splenic vein (SV) ligation. Methods: Data from 94 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer from 2008 to 2019 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether the SV was preserved or ligated during the surgery. Their computed tomography images were serially reviewed (preoperative, 6-, 12-, and 24-months postoperative) with clinical parameters. The degree of variceal formation (variceal score) and splenomegaly were assessed, and the oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups. Variceal score in the SV ligation group was significantly higher than that in the SV saving group at the same postoperative periods (SV saving vs. ligation: 12 months, 0.9 ± 1.3 vs. 3.5 ± 2.2, p < 0.001; 24 months, 1.4 ± 1.8 vs. 4.0 ± 3.4, p = 0.009). Clinically relevant variceal bleeding was noted in one patient from the SV ligation group (SV saving vs. ligation: 0.0% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.953). In survival analysis, there was no significant difference between the two groups (DFS; SV saving vs. ligation: 13.0 (11.1−14.9) months vs. 13.0 (10.4−15.6) months, p = 0.969, OS; SV saving vs. ligation: 35.0 (19.9−50.1) months vs. 27.0 (11.6−42.4) months, p = 0.417). Although SV ligation induced SPH during PD for pancreatic cancer, it did not lead to clinically significant long-term complications. In addition, it did not impact the long-term survival of patients with resected pancreatic head cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Hyun Kim
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
- Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Seung-Seob Kim
- Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Ho Kyoung Hwang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
- Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Woo Jung Lee
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
- Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
- Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-2-2228-2100; Fax: +82-2-313-8289
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Thosani N, Cen P, Rowe J, Guha S, Bailey-Lundberg JM, Bhakta D, Patil P, Wray CJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) for advanced pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2022; 12:16516. [PMID: 36192558 PMCID: PMC9530230 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20316-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Long term prognosis and 5-year survival for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains suboptimal. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided RFA (EUS-RFA) is an emerging technology and limited data exist regarding safety and long-term outcomes. The aim of this study is to report safety-profile, feasibility and outcomes of EUS-RFA for advanced PDAC. Prospective review of patients with diagnosis of locally-advanced or metastatic PDAC undergoing EUS-RFA between October 2016 to March 2018 with long-term follow up (> 30 months). Study patients underwent a total of 1–4 RFA sessions. All patients were enrolled in longitudinal cohort study and received standard of care chemotherapy. 10 patients underwent EUS-RFA. Location of the lesions was in the head(4), neck(2), body(2), and tail(2). 22 RFA sessions were performed with a range of 1–4 sessions per patient. There were no major adverse events (bleeding, perforation, infection, pancreatitis) in immediate (up to 72 h) and short-term follow up (4 weeks). Mild worsening of existing abdominal pain was noted during post-procedure observation in 12/22 (55%) of RFA treatments. Follow-up imaging demonstrated tumor progression in 2 patients, whereas tumor regression was noted in 6 patients (> 50% reduction in size in 3 patients). Median survival for the cohort was 20.5 months (95% CI, 9.93–42.2 months). Currently, 2 patients remain alive at 61 and 81 months follow-up since initial diagnosis. One patient had 3 cm PDAC with encasement of the portal confluence, abutment of the celiac axis, common hepatic and superior mesenteric artery. This patient had significant reduction in tumor size and underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy. In our experience, EUS-RFA was safe, well-tolerated and could be concurrently performed with standard chemotherapy. In this select cohort, median survival was improved when compared to published survival based upon SEER database and clinical trials. Future prospective trials are needed to understand the role of EUS-RFA in overall management of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirav Thosani
- Department of Medicine, Center for Interventional Gastroenterology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Putao Cen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Julie Rowe
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sushovan Guha
- Department of Medicine, Center for Interventional Gastroenterology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Dimpal Bhakta
- Department of Medicine, Center for Interventional Gastroenterology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prithvi Patil
- Department of Medicine, Center for Interventional Gastroenterology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Curtis J Wray
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.164a, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gorbudhun R, Patel PH, Hopping E, Doyle J, Geropoulos G, Mavroeidis VK, Kumar S, Bhogal RH. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Chemoradiation for Borderline-Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A UK Tertiary Surgical Oncology Centre Series. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194678. [PMID: 36230600 PMCID: PMC9563387 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) have historically poor survival, even after curative pancreatic resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Emerging evidence suggests that neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCR) improves R0 resection rates in BR-PDAC patients. We evaluated the R0 resection rate, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in our patients who underwent NCR for BR-PDAC at our institution. Methods: All patients who underwent NCR for BR-PDAC from January 2010 to March 2020 were included in the study. The patients received a variety of NCR regimens during the study period, and in patients with radiological evidence of tumour stability or regression, pancreatic resection was performed. The primary endpoint was the OS, and the secondary endpoints included patient morbidity, the R0 resection rate, histological parameters and the DFS. Results: The study included 29 patients (16 men and 13 women), with a median age of 65 years (range 46–74 years). Of these 29 patients, 17 received FOLFIRINOX and 12 received gemcitabine (GEM)-based NCR regimens. All patients received chemoradiation at the end of chemotherapy (range 45–56 Gy). R0 resection was achieved in 75% of the patients, with a higher rate noted in the FOLFIRINOX group. The median DFS was 22 months for the whole cohort but higher in the FOLFIRINOX group (34 months). The median OS for the cohort was 29 months, with a higher median OS noted for the FOLFIRINOX cohort versus the GEM cohort (42 versus 28 months). Conclusion: NCR, particularly FOLFIRINOX-based treatment, for BR-PDAC results in higher rates of R0 resection and an increased median DFS and OS, supporting its continued use in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachna Gorbudhun
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Pranav H. Patel
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Eve Hopping
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Joseph Doyle
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Georgios Geropoulos
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | | | - Sacheen Kumar
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research Group, Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Ricky H. Bhogal
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research Group, Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-0208-7808-2781
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Clinical Significance of Germline Pathogenic Variants among 51 Cancer Predisposition Genes in an Unselected Cohort of Italian Pancreatic Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184447. [PMID: 36139606 PMCID: PMC9496779 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Multigene germline panel testing is recommended for Pancreatic Cancer (PC) patients; however, for non-BRCA1/2 genes, the clinical utility is unclear. A comprehensive multi-gene assessment in unselected Italian PC patients is missing. We evaluated the prevalence and impact of Pathogenic Variants (PV) in 51 PC susceptibility genes in a real-world series of 422 Italian PC patients unselected for Family History (FH), compared the clinical characteristics and conducted survival analyses. 17% of patients had PVs (70/422), mainly in BRCA1/2 (4.5%, all <70 y), CDKN2A (4.5%, all >50 y), ATM (2.1%). PV carriers were younger (64 vs. 67; p = 0.02) and had more frequent personal/FH of PC, melanoma and breast/ovarian cancer (all p < 0.05). The Overall Survival (OS) was longer in patients carrying PVs (HR 0.78; p = 0.090), comprising ATM carriers (HR 0.33; p = 0.054). In the oxaliplatin-treated subset, PV carriers showed better control of the disease, although this was not statistically significant (67% vs. 56%). CDKN2A, BRCA2 and ATM were the most frequently altered genes. ATM PVs were positively associated with OS in 41% of PV carriers, 60% of whom carried CDKN2A,BRCA2 or ATM PVs, had negative FH and would have been missed by traditional referral. Thus, CDKN2A and ATM should be added to BRCA1/2 testing regardless of FH.
Collapse
|
29
|
Liu L, An X, Schaefer M, Yan B, de la Torre C, Hillmer S, Gladkich J, Herr I. Nanosilver inhibits the progression of pancreatic cancer by inducing a paraptosis-like mixed type of cell death. Biomed Pharmacother 2022; 153:113511. [PMID: 36076598 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Silver has been in clinical use since ancient times and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have attracted attention in cancer therapy. We investigated the mechanisms by which AgNPs inhibit pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). AgNPs were synthesized and 3 human PDAC and 2 nonmalignant primary cell lines were treated with AgNPs. MTT, MAPK, colony, spheroid and scratch assays, Western blotting, TEM, annexin V, 7-AAD, and H2DCFDA staining, FACS analysis, mRNA array and bioinformatics analyses, tumor xenograft transplantation, and immunohistochemistry of the treated cells were performed. We found that minimal AgNPs amounts selectively eradicated PDAC cells within a few hours. AgNPs inhibited cell migration and spheroid and colony formation, damaged mitochondria, and induced paraptosis-like cell death with the presence of cytoplasmic vacuoles, dilation of the ER and mitochondria, ROS formation, MAPK activity, and p62 and LC3b expression, whereas effects on the nucleus, DNA fragmentation, or caspases were not detectable. AgNPs strongly decreased tumor xenograft growth without side effects and reduced the expression of markers for proliferation and DNA repair, but upregulated paraptosis markers. The results highlight nanosilver as complementary agent to improve the therapeutic efficacy in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Liu
- Section Surgical Research, Molecular OncoSurgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - XueFeng An
- Section Surgical Research, Molecular OncoSurgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Michael Schaefer
- Section Surgical Research, Molecular OncoSurgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Bin Yan
- Section Surgical Research, Molecular OncoSurgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Carolina de la Torre
- Microarray Analytics - NPGS Core Facility, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Hillmer
- Electron Microscopy Core Facility, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jury Gladkich
- Section Surgical Research, Molecular OncoSurgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Ingrid Herr
- Section Surgical Research, Molecular OncoSurgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lu C, Zhu Y, Kong W, Yang J, Zhu L, Wang L, Tang M, Chen J, Li Q, He J, Li A, Qiu X, Gu Q, Chen D, Meng F, Liu B, Qiu Y, Du J. Study protocol for a prospective, open-label, single-arm, phase II study on the combination of tislelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and concurrent radiotherapy as the induction therapy for patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:879661. [PMID: 36059628 PMCID: PMC9434272 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.879661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a fatal malignancy with a low resection rate. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) are the main treatment approaches for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is considered a promising strategy to increase the resection rate. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has shown remarkable efficacy in several cancers. Therefore, the combination of ICI, chemotherapy, and concurrent radiotherapy is promising for patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer, mainly referring to locally advanced (LAPC) and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), to increase the chances of conversion to surgical resectability and prolong survival. This study aims to introduce the design of a clinical trial. Methods This is an open-label, single-arm, and single-center phase II trial. Patients with pathologically and radiographically confirmed LAPC or BRPC without prior anti-cancer treatment or severe morbidities will be enrolled. All patients will receive induction therapy and will be further evaluated by the Multiple Disciplinary Team (MDT) for the possibility of surgery. The induction therapy consists of up to four cycles of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2via intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1 and 8, along with tislelizumab (a PD-1 monoclonal antibody) 200 mg administered through IV infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks, concurrently with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) during the third cycle of treatment. After surgery, patients without progression will receive another two to four cycles of adjuvant therapy with gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and tislelizumab. The primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR) and the R0 resection rate. The secondary objectives are median overall survival (mOS), median progression free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR), pathological grade of tumor tissue after therapy, and adverse reactions. Besides, we expect to explore the value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in predicting tumor response to induction therapy and survival outcome of patients. Discussion This is a protocol for a clinical trial that attempts to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of anti-PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy and radiotherapy as the induction therapy for LAPC and BRPC. The results of this phase II study will provide evidence for the clinical practice of this modality. Clinical Trial Registration http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=53720&htm=4, identifier ChiCTR2000032955.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changchang Lu
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Yahui Zhu
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Weiwei Kong
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ju Yang
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Linxi Zhu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Digestive Department of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Min Tang
- Imaging Department of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Pathology Department of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Qi Li
- Pathology Department of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jian He
- Nuclear Medicine Department of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Aimei Li
- Nuclear Medicine Department of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xin Qiu
- Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Qing Gu
- National Institute of Healthcare Data Science at Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Dongsheng Chen
- The State Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Fanyan Meng
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Baorui Liu
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- *Correspondence: Juan Du, ; Yudong Qiu, ; Baorui Liu,
| | - Yudong Qiu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- *Correspondence: Juan Du, ; Yudong Qiu, ; Baorui Liu,
| | - Juan Du
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- *Correspondence: Juan Du, ; Yudong Qiu, ; Baorui Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hennig A, Baenke F, Klimova A, Drukewitz S, Jahnke B, Brückmann S, Secci R, Winter C, Schmäche T, Seidlitz T, Bereuter JP, Polster H, Eckhardt L, Schneider SA, Brückner S, Schmelz R, Babatz J, Kahlert C, Distler M, Hampe J, Reichert M, Zeißig S, Folprecht G, Weitz J, Aust D, Welsch T, Stange DE. Detecting drug resistance in pancreatic cancer organoids guides optimized chemotherapy treatment. J Pathol 2022; 257:607-619. [PMID: 35373359 DOI: 10.1002/path.5906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Drug combination therapies for cancer treatment show high efficacy but often induce severe side effects, resulting in dose or cycle number reduction. We investigated the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTx) adaptions on treatment outcome in 59 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Resections with tumor-free margins were significantly more frequent when full-dose neoCTx was applied. We determined if patient-derived organoids (PDOs) can be used to personalize poly-chemotherapy regimens by pharmacotyping of treatment-naïve and post-neoCTx PDAC PDOs. Five out of ten CTx-naïve PDO lines exhibited a differential response to either the FOLFIRINOX or the Gem/Pac regimen. NeoCTx PDOs showed a poor response to the neoadjuvant regimen that had been administered to the respective patient in 30% of cases. No significant difference in PDO response was noted when comparing modified treatments in which the least effective single drug was removed from the complete regimen. Drug testing of CTx-naïve PDAC PDOs and neoCTx PDOs may be useful to guide neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimen selection, respectively. Personalizing poly-chemotherapy regimens by omitting substances with low efficacy could potentially result in less severe side effects, thereby increasing the fraction of patients receiving a full course of neoadjuvant treatment. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hennig
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Franziska Baenke
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anna Klimova
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephan Drukewitz
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- Core Unit for Molecular Tumor Diagnostics (CMTD), Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Beatrix Jahnke
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sascha Brückmann
- Institute of Pathology and Tumor- and Normal Tissue Bank of the University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ramona Secci
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM, Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christof Winter
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM, Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tim Schmäche
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Therese Seidlitz
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jean-Paul Bereuter
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Heike Polster
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lisa Eckhardt
- Core Unit for Molecular Tumor Diagnostics (CMTD), Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sidney A Schneider
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Brückner
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Renate Schmelz
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jana Babatz
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christoph Kahlert
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Jochen Hampe
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Regenerative Therapies (CRTD), Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maximilian Reichert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Medical Clinic and Polyclinic II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Center for Protein Assemblies (CPA), Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zeißig
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Regenerative Therapies (CRTD), Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gunnar Folprecht
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniela Aust
- Institute of Pathology and Tumor- and Normal Tissue Bank of the University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thilo Welsch
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniel E Stange
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Janssen QP, van Dam JL, Prakash LR, Doppenberg D, Crane CH, van Eijck CHJ, Ellsworth SG, Jarnagin WR, O'Reilly EM, Paniccia A, Reyngold M, Besselink MG, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD, Zureikat AH, Groot Koerkamp B, Wei AC. Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy After (m)FOLFIRINOX for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A TAPS Consortium Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:783-791.e1. [PMID: 35830887 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without dose modifications [(m)FOLFIRINOX], for patients with borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is uncertain. METHODS We conducted an international retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients with BR PDAC who received (m)FOLFIRINOX as initial treatment (2012-2019) from the Trans-Atlantic Pancreatic Surgery Consortium. Because the decision to administer RT is made after chemotherapy, patients with metastases or deterioration after (m)FOLFIRINOX or a performance score ≥2 were excluded. Patients who received RT after (m)FOLFIRINOX were matched 1:1 by nearest neighbor propensity scores with patients who did not receive RT. Propensity scores were calculated using sex, age (≤70 vs >70 years), WHO performance score (0 vs 1), tumor size (0-20 vs 21-40 vs >40 mm), tumor location (head/uncinate vs body/tail), number of cycles (1-4 vs 5-8 vs >8), and baseline CA 19-9 level (≤500 vs >500 U/mL). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from diagnosis. RESULTS Of 531 patients who received neoadjuvant (m)FOLFIRINOX for BR PDAC, 424 met inclusion criteria and 300 (70.8%) were propensity score-matched. After matching, median OS was 26.2 months (95% CI, 24.0-38.4) with RT versus 32.8 months (95% CI, 25.3-42.0) without RT (P=.71). RT was associated with a lower resection rate (55.3% vs 72.7%; P=.002). In patients who underwent a resection, RT was associated with a comparable margin-negative resection rate (>1 mm) (70.6% vs 64.8%; P=.51), more node-negative disease (57.3% vs 37.6%; P=.01), and more major pathologic response with <5% tumor viability (24.7% vs 8.3%; P=.006). The OS associated with conventional and stereotactic body RT approaches was similar (median OS, 25.7 vs 26.0 months; P=.92). CONCLUSIONS In patients with BR PDAC, neoadjuvant RT following (m)FOLFIRINOX was associated with more node-negative disease and better pathologic response in patients who underwent resection, yet no difference in OS was found. Routine use of RT cannot be recommended based on these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quisette P Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;,Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacob L van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Deesje Doppenberg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susannah G Ellsworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Marsha Reyngold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Management of Pancreatic Cancer and Its Microenvironment: Potential Impact of Nano-Targeting. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122879. [PMID: 35740545 PMCID: PMC9221065 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The poor prognosis and survival rates associated with pancreatic cancer show that there is a clear unmet need for better disease management. The heterogeneity of the tumor and its microenvironment, including stroma and fibrosis, creates a challenge for current therapy. The pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer is mediated by several factors, such as severed communication between pancreatic stellate cells and stroma and the consequences of hypoxia-inducible factors that aid in the survival of the pancreatic tumor. Given the multiple limitations of molecular targeting, multiple functional nano-targeting offers a breakthrough in pancreatic cancer treatment through its ability to overcome the physical challenges posed by the tumor microenvironment, amongst many others. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is rare and difficult to treat, making it a complicated diagnosis for every patient. These patients have a low survival rate along with a poor quality of life under current pancreatic cancer therapies that adversely affect healthy cells due to the lack of precise drug targeting. Additionally, chemoresistance and radioresistance are other key challenges in PDAC, which might be due in part to the lack of tumor-targeted delivery of sufficient levels of different chemotherapies because of their low therapeutic index. Thus, instead of leaving a trail of off-target damage when killing these cancer cells, it is best to find a way that targets them directly. More seriously, metastatic relapse often occurs after surgery, and therefore, achieving improved outcomes in the management of PDAC in the absence of strategies preventing metastasis is likely to be impossible. Nano-targeting of the tumor and its microenvironment has shown promise for treating various cancers, which might be a promising approach for PDAC. This review updates the advancements in treatment modalities for pancreatic cancer and highlights future directions that warrant further investigation to increase pancreatic patients’ overall survival.
Collapse
|
34
|
Gartrell RD, Enzler T, Kim PS, Fullerton BT, Fazlollahi L, Chen AX, Minns HE, Perni S, Weisberg SP, Rizk EM, Wang S, Oh EJ, Guo XV, Chiuzan C, Manji GA, Bates SE, Chabot J, Schrope B, Kluger M, Emond J, Rabadán R, Farber D, Remotti HE, Horowitz DP, Saenger YM. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation alters the immune microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2022; 11:2066767. [PMID: 35558160 PMCID: PMC9090285 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2022.2066767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have a grim prognosis despite complete surgical resection and intense systemic therapies. While immunotherapies have been beneficial with many different types of solid tumors, they have almost uniformly failed in the treatment of PDAC. Understanding how therapies affect the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) can provide insights for the development of strategies to treat PDAC. We used quantitative multiplexed immunofluorescence (qmIF) quantitative spatial analysis (qSA), and immunogenomic (IG) analysis to analyze formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) primary tumor specimens from 44 patients with PDAC including 18 treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and 26 patients receiving no treatment (NT) and compared them with tissues from 40 treatment-naïve melanoma patients. We find that relative to NT tumors, CD3+ T cell infiltration was increased in CRT treated tumors (p = .0006), including increases in CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CTLs, p = .0079), CD3+CD4+FOXP3- T helper cells (Th, p = .0010), and CD3+CD4+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs, p = .0089) with no difference in CD68+ macrophages. IG analysis from micro-dissected tissues indicated overexpression of genes involved in antigen presentation, T cell activation, and inflammation in CRT treated tumors. Among treated patients, a higher ratio of Tregs to total T cells was associated with shorter survival time (p = .0121). Despite comparable levels of infiltrating T cells in CRT PDACs to melanoma, PDACs displayed distinct spatial profiles with less T cell clustering as defined by nearest neighbor analysis (p < .001). These findings demonstrate that, while CRT can achieve high T cell densities in PDAC compared to melanoma, phenotype and spatial organization of T cells may limit benefit of T cell infiltration in this immunotherapy-resistant tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn D. Gartrell
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Enzler
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Pan S. Kim
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin T. Fullerton
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ladan Fazlollahi
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew X. Chen
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hanna E. Minns
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Subha Perni
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stuart P. Weisberg
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emanuelle M. Rizk
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel Wang
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eun Jeong Oh
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xinzheng V. Guo
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Codruta Chiuzan
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gulam A. Manji
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan E. Bates
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Chabot
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Beth Schrope
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Kluger
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jean Emond
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Raul Rabadán
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna Farber
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen E. Remotti
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David P. Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Felsenstein M, Lindhammer F, Feist M, Hillebrandt KH, Timmermann L, Benzing C, Globke B, Zocholl D, Hu M, Fehrenbach U, Sinn BV, Pelzer U, Sauer IM, Pratschke J, Malinka T. Perineural Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC): A Saboteur of Curative Intended Therapies? J Clin Med 2022; 11:2367. [PMID: 35566494 PMCID: PMC9103867 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Perineural invasion (PNI) is a common characteristic of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and is present in most resection margins. We hypothesized that curative pancreatic tumor resection with long-term survival could only be achieved in PNI-negative patients. (2) Material and Methods: A retrospective investigation of PDAC patients who underwent curative-intended surgery during the period 2008 to 2019 was performed at our institution. (3) Results: We identified 571 of 660 (86.5%) resected patients with well-annotated reports and complete datasets. Of those, 531 patients (93%) exhibited tumors with perineural invasion (Pn1), while 40 (7%) were negative for PNI (Pn0). The majority of patients in the Pn1 group presented advanced tumor stage and positive lymph node infiltration. Patients in the Pn0 group showed an improved disease-free and long-term survival compared to the Pn1 group (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of all R0-resected patients indicated improved long-term survival and disease-free survival of R0 Pn0 patients when compared to R0 Pn1 patients (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: Our study confirmed that Pn0 improves the long-term survival of PDAC-resected cancer patients. Furthermore, PNI significantly challenges the long-term survival of formally curative (R0) resected patients. We provide new insights into the dynamics of PNI in pancreatic cancer patients which are needed to define subgroups of patients for risk stratification and multimodal treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthäus Felsenstein
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Flora Lindhammer
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
| | - Mathilde Feist
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
| | - Karl Herbert Hillebrandt
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Lea Timmermann
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
| | - Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
| | - Brigitta Globke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dario Zocholl
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Mengwen Hu
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Department of Radiology, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Bruno Valentin Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Uwe Pelzer
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Igor Maximillian Sauer
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
| | - Thomas Malinka
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.L.); (M.F.); (K.H.H.); (L.T.); (C.B.); (B.G.); (M.H.); (I.M.S.); (J.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Versteijne E, de Hingh IHJT, Homs MYV, Intven MPW, Klaase JM, van Santvoort HC, de Vos-Geelen J, Wilmink JW, van Tienhoven G. Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy? Front Oncol 2022; 11:744161. [PMID: 35237500 PMCID: PMC8882845 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.744161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Worldwide, there is a shifting paradigm from immediate surgery with adjuvant treatment to a neoadjuvant approach for patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC or BRPC). Comparison of neoadjuvant and adjuvant studies is extremely difficult because of a great difference in patient selection. The evidence from randomized studies shows that overall survival by intention-to-treat improves after neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy (various regimens), as compared to immediate surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiotherapy appears to play an important role in mediating locoregional effects. Yet, since more effective chemotherapy regimens are currently available, in particular FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel, these chemotherapy regimens should be investigated in future randomized trials combined with (stereotactic) radiotherapy to further improve outcomes of RPC and BRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Versteijne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Eva Versteijne,
| | - Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven and GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y. V. Homs
- Department Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martijn P. W. Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Joost M. Klaase
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regionaal Academisch Kankercentrum Utrecht (RAKU), St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna W. Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Irfan A, Rose JB, Wang TN, Vickers SM, Dudeja V, Gbolahan O, Reddy S. The Fate of Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Pancreas 2022; 51:100-105. [PMID: 35195602 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pancreatic cancer continues to be a major cause of cancer-related mortality. There has been a greater implementation of up-front chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Although there are many theoretical benefits to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, its clinical impact is uncertain. We sought to understand the outcomes of patients with resectable and borderline-resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS Patients were collected in a secure database from September 2018 to May 2020. Patients were excluded if they presented with locally advanced or metastatic disease, inability to complete chemotherapy, or if they were not a surgical candidate. RESULTS Sixty-six patients with resectable disease underwent chemotherapy. Folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan/oxaliplatin was used in 41 patients (62.1%) and gemcitabine-based regimens in 28 patients (42.4%, greater than 100% as some patients underwent both regimens). After restaging, 47 patients (71.2%) were thought to have resectable disease. Of these patients, 36 have been successfully resected to date. Metastatic disease was found in 12 patients (18.2%) and 6 patients (9.1%) had locally advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with resectable pancreatic cancer are resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but a subset will develop local or distant progression. Further studies will be needed to determine which patients will progress locally and may benefit from an up-front surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Olumide Gbolahan
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gorris M, Janssen QP, Besselink MG, van den Broek BLJ, van Eijck CHJ, van Gils MJ, Koerkamp BG, Struik F, van Driel LMJW, van Hooft JE. Sensitivity of CT, MRI, and EUS-FNA/B in the preoperative workup of histologically proven left-sided pancreatic lesions. Pancreatology 2022; 22:136-141. [PMID: 34857486 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Left-sided pancreatic lesions are often treated surgically. Accurate diagnostic work-up is therefore essential to prevent futile major abdominal surgery. Large series focusing specifically on the preoperative work-up of left-sided pancreatic lesions are lacking. This surgical cohort analysis describes the sensitivity of CT, MRI, and EUS-FNA/B in the diagnostic work-up of left-sided pancreatic lesions. METHODS We performed a post-hoc analysis of patients who underwent surgery for a left-sided pancreatic lesion between April 2010 and August 2017 and participated in the randomized CPR trial. Primary outcome was the sensitivity of CT, MRI, and EUS-FNA/B. Sensitivity was determined as the most likely diagnosis of each modality compared with the postoperative histopathological diagnosis. Additionally, the change in sensitivity of EUS versus EUS-FNA/B (i.e., cyst fluid analysis, and/or tissue acquisition) was measured. RESULTS Overall, 181 patients were included (benign: 23%, premalignant: 27%, malignant: 50%). Most patients had solid lesions (65%). Preoperative imaging included CT (86%), MRI (41%), EUS (68%). Overall, CT and EUS-FNA/B reached a sensitivity of both 71%, compared with 66% for MRI. When EUS was combined with FNA/B, sensitivity rose from 64% to 71%. For solid lesions, CT reached the highest sensitivity (75%) when compared with MRI (70%) and EUS-FNA/B (69%). For cystic lesions, EUS-FNA/B reached the highest sensitivity (75%) when compared with CT and MRI (both 62%). CONCLUSIONS CT is the most sensitive diagnostic modality for solid and EUS-FNA/B for cystic left-sided pancreatic lesions. EUS-FNA/B was associated with an increased sensitivity when compared to EUS alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrte Gorris
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Quisette P Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bram L J van den Broek
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjon J van Gils
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Struik
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lydi M J W van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cleary JM, Wolpin BM, Dougan SK, Raghavan S, Singh H, Huffman B, Sethi NS, Nowak JA, Shapiro GI, Aguirre AJ, D'Andrea AD. Opportunities for Utilization of DNA Repair Inhibitors in Homologous Recombination Repair-Deficient and Proficient Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:6622-6637. [PMID: 34285063 PMCID: PMC8678153 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is rapidly progressive and notoriously difficult to treat with cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted agents. Recent demonstration of the efficacy of maintenance PARP inhibition in germline BRCA mutated pancreatic cancer has raised hopes that increased understanding of the DNA damage response pathway will lead to new therapies in both homologous recombination (HR) repair-deficient and proficient pancreatic cancer. Here, we review the potential mechanisms of exploiting HR deficiency, replicative stress, and DNA damage-mediated immune activation through targeted inhibition of DNA repair regulatory proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Cleary
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie K Dougan
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Srivatsan Raghavan
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harshabad Singh
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brandon Huffman
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nilay S Sethi
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan A Nowak
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Geoffrey I Shapiro
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for DNA Damage and Repair, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew J Aguirre
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan D D'Andrea
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Center for DNA Damage and Repair, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
van Dam MA, Vuijk FA, Stibbe JA, Houvast RD, Luelmo SAC, Crobach S, Shahbazi Feshtali S, de Geus-Oei LF, Bonsing BA, Sier CFM, Kuppen PJK, Swijnenburg RJ, Windhorst AD, Burggraaf J, Vahrmeijer AL, Mieog JSD. Overview and Future Perspectives on Tumor-Targeted Positron Emission Tomography and Fluorescence Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:6088. [PMID: 34885196 PMCID: PMC8656821 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recent advances in the multimodal treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), overall survival remains poor with a 5-year cumulative survival of approximately 10%. Neoadjuvant (chemo- and/or radio-) therapy is increasingly incorporated in treatment strategies for patients with (borderline) resectable and locally advanced disease. Neoadjuvant therapy aims to improve radical resection rates by reducing tumor mass and (partial) encasement of important vascular structures, as well as eradicating occult micrometastases. Results from recent multicenter clinical trials evaluating this approach demonstrate prolonged survival and increased complete surgical resection rates (R0). Currently, tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy is monitored using computed tomography (CT) following the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Accurate assessment of neoadjuvant treatment response and tumor resectability is considered a major challenge, as current conventional imaging modalities provide limited accuracy and specificity for discrimination between necrosis, fibrosis, and remaining vital tumor tissue. As a consequence, resections with tumor-positive margins and subsequent early locoregional tumor recurrences are observed in a substantial number of patients following surgical resection with curative intent. Of these patients, up to 80% are diagnosed with recurrent disease after a median disease-free interval of merely 8 months. These numbers underline the urgent need to improve imaging modalities for more accurate assessment of therapy response and subsequent re-staging of disease, thereby aiming to optimize individual patient's treatment strategy. In cases of curative intent resection, additional intra-operative real-time guidance could aid surgeons during complex procedures and potentially reduce the rate of incomplete resections and early (locoregional) tumor recurrences. In recent years intraoperative imaging in cancer has made a shift towards tumor-specific molecular targeting. Several important molecular targets have been identified that show overexpression in PDAC, for example: CA19.9, CEA, EGFR, VEGFR/VEGF-A, uPA/uPAR, and various integrins. Tumor-targeted PET/CT combined with intraoperative fluorescence imaging, could provide valuable information for tumor detection and staging, therapy response evaluation with re-staging of disease and intraoperative guidance during surgical resection of PDAC. METHODS A literature search in the PubMed database and (inter)national trial registers was conducted, focusing on studies published over the last 15 years. Data and information of eligible articles regarding PET/CT as well as fluorescence imaging in PDAC were reviewed. Areas covered: This review covers the current strategies, obstacles, challenges, and developments in targeted tumor imaging, focusing on the feasibility and value of PET/CT and fluorescence imaging for integration in the work-up and treatment of PDAC. An overview is given of identified targets and their characteristics, as well as the available literature of conducted and ongoing clinical and preclinical trials evaluating PDAC-targeted nuclear and fluorescent tracers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn A. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
| | - Floris A. Vuijk
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
| | - Judith A. Stibbe
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
| | - Ruben D. Houvast
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
| | - Saskia A. C. Luelmo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - Stijn Crobach
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Leiden, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands;
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A. Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
| | - Cornelis F. M. Sier
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
- Percuros B.V., 2333 CL Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter J. K. Kuppen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
| | | | - Albert D. Windhorst
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Jacobus Burggraaf
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
- Centre for Human Drug Research, 2333 CL Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander L. Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
| | - J. Sven D. Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (F.A.V.); (J.A.S.); (R.D.H.); (B.A.B.); (C.F.M.S.); (P.J.K.K.); (J.B.); (A.L.V.); (J.S.D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer 2021; 160:140-149. [PMID: 34838371 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant therapy may improve survival compared with upfront surgery in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, but high-quality evidence is lacking. METHODS We systematically searched for randomised trials comparing neoadjuvant therapy with upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer published since database inception until December 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) by intention-to-treat with subgroup analyses for resectability status. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model were performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS Seven trials with 938 patients were included. All trials included a neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemo(radio)therapy arm. None of the studies used adjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Neoadjuvant therapy improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.85; P = 0.001; I2 = 46%) compared with upfront surgery. This represents an increase in median OS from 19 to 29 months. In the subgroup of resectable pancreatic cancer (i.e., venous contact ≤180°, no arterial contact), no statistically significant difference in OS was observed (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.53-1.12; P = 0.18; I2 = 20%). In the subgroup of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (i.e. venous contact >180°, any arterial contact), neoadjuvant therapy improved OS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.85; P = 0.004; I2 = 59%). The GRADE certainty of evidence was high for the outcome of OS. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant therapy improves OS compared with upfront surgery in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. More evidence is required on whether neoadjuvant therapy improves survival for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
42
|
Abi Jaoude J, Thunshelle CP, Kouzy R, Nguyen ND, Lin D, Prakash L, Bumanlag IM, Noticewala SS, Niedzielski JS, Beddar S, Ludmir EB, Holliday EB, Das P, Minsky BD, Herman JM, Katz M, Koong AC, Koay EJ, Taniguchi CM. Stereotactic Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer in the Modern Era. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100763. [PMID: 34934858 PMCID: PMC8655391 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with pancreatic cancer often receive radiation therapy before undergoing surgical resection. We compared the clinical outcomes differences between stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and 3-dimensional (3D)/intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively collected data from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients with borderline resectable/potentially resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer receiving neoadjuvant SBRT (median, 36.0 Gy/5fx), 3D conformal radiation (median, 50.4 Gy/28 fx) or IMRT (median, 50.4 Gy/28 fx) were included. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS In total, 104 patients were included in our study. Fifty-seven patients (54.8%) were treated with SBRT, and 47 patients (45.2%) were treated with 3D/IMRT. Patients in the SBRT group were slightly older (median age: 70.3 vs 62.7 in the 3D/IMRT group). Both groups had similar proportions of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SBRT: 30, 52.6%; 3D/IMRT: 24, 51.1%). All patients were treated with chemotherapy. Patients in the SBRT group underwent more surgical resection compared with the 3D/IMRT group (38.6% vs 23.4%, respectively). At a median follow-up of 22 months, a total of 60 patients (57.7%) died: 25 (25/57, 43.9%) in the SBRT group, and 35 (35/47, 74.5%) in the 3D/IMRT group. Median OS was slightly higher in the SBRT group (29.6 months vs 24.1 months in the 3D/IMRT group). On multivariable Cox regression, the choice of radiation therapy technique was not associated with differences in OS (adjusted hazard ratios [aHR] = 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2%-1.3%, P = .18). Moreover, patients that underwent surgical resection had better OS (aHR = 0.3, 95% CI, 0.1%-0.8%, P = .01). Furthermore, progression-free survival was also similar between patients treated with SBRT and those treated with 3D/IMRT (aHR = 0.9, 95% CI, 0.5%-1.8%, P = .81). CONCLUSIONS SBRT was associated with similar clinical outcomes compared with conventional radiation techniques, despite being delivered over a shorter period of time which would spare patients prolonged treatment burden. Future prospective data are still needed to better assess the role of SBRT in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Abi Jaoude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Connor P. Thunshelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ramez Kouzy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nicholas D. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniel Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laura Prakash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Isabela M. Bumanlag
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sonal S. Noticewala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joshua S. Niedzielski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ethan B. Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Emma B. Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph M. Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, Hempstead, New York
| | - Matthew Katz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cullen M. Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT imaging for assessing resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy: importance of CT criteria. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:5201-5217. [PMID: 34331549 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03198-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the CT diagnostic performance for evaluating resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy and identify the factor(s) that affect(s) diagnostic performance. METHODS Databases were searched to identify studies published from January 1, 2000, to November 5, 2019 that evaluated the CT diagnostic performance for assessing resectability of post-neoadjuvant PDAC. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain summary sensitivity and specificity values using a bivariate random-effects model, and heterogeneity across studies was assessed. Univariable meta-regression analysis was performed with eight variables, including the different CT criteria for resectability, conventional National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for upfront surgery, and modified criteria for post-neoadjuvant surgery. RESULTS Ten studies were included and analyzed. The summary sensitivity and specificity for resectability were 78% (95% CI 68-86%) and 60% (95% CI 44-74%), respectively. No significant heterogeneity was identified (bivariate correlation coefficient ρ = - 1, p-value for hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model β = 0.667). The two different CT criteria showed different diagnostic performance (p < 0.01), with higher sensitivity (81% [95% CI 73-90%] vs. 28% [95% CI 15-42%], p < 0.01) and lower specificity (57% [95% CI 41-73%] vs. 90% [95% CI 80-100%], p < 0.01) for the modified criteria. No other variables affected the diagnostic performance. CONCLUSION CT criteria were the factors that affected the diagnostic performance. Modification of the conventional criteria improved sensitivity but lowered specificity. Further modifications are required to improve specificity and uniformity.
Collapse
|
44
|
Tonini V, Zanni M. Pancreatic cancer in 2021: What you need to know to win. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:5851-5889. [PMID: 34629806 PMCID: PMC8475010 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i35.5851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the solid tumors with the worst prognosis. Five-year survival rate is less than 10%. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment, but the tumor is often diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease and surgery could be performed in a very limited number of patients. Moreover, surgery is still associated with high post-operative morbidity, while other therapies still offer very disappointing results. This article reviews every aspect of pancreatic cancer, focusing on the elements that can improve prognosis. It was written with the aim of describing everything you need to know in 2021 in order to face this difficult challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Tonini
- Department of Medical Sciences and Surgery, University of Bologna- Emergency Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sant’Orsola Hospital, Bologna 40121, Italy
| | - Manuel Zanni
- University of Bologna, Emergency Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sant'Orsola Hospital, Bologna 40121, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Khakoo S, Petrillo A, Salati M, Muhith A, Evangelista J, Seghezzi S, Petrelli F, Tomasello G, Ghidini M. Neoadjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A False Promise or an Opportunity to Improve Outcome? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174396. [PMID: 34503206 PMCID: PMC8431597 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic cancer usually presents late when it has spread to distant sites. In a small proportion of patients, the cancer can be removed by surgery. Surgery is usually followed by chemotherapy, as studies have shown that this improves survival. However, due to complications after surgery and a decline in fitness, some patients do not start their chemotherapy and many do not complete the planned course. The cancer returns in the majority of patients. Chemotherapy or a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy before surgery are being investigated to improve survival. The best treatment regime and patient selection for different treatment strategies remains to be defined and is discussed here. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has an aggressive tumor biology and is associated with poor survival outcomes. Most patients present with metastatic or locally advanced disease. In the 10–20% of patients with upfront resectable disease, surgery offers the only chance of cure, with the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy representing an established standard of care for improving outcomes. Despite resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, at best, 3-year survival reaches 63.4%. Post-operative complications and poor performance mean that around 50% of the patients do not commence adjuvant chemotherapy, and a significant proportion do not complete the intended treatment course. These factors, along with the advantages of early treatment of micrometastatic disease, the ability to downstage tumors, and the increase in R0 resection rates, have increased interest in neo-adjuvant treatment strategies. Here we review biomarkers for early diagnosis of PDAC and patient selection for a neo-adjuvant approach. We also review the current evidence for different chemotherapy regimens in this setting, as well as the role of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy, and we discuss ongoing trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelize Khakoo
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK;
- Correspondence: (S.K.); (M.G.); Tel.: +39-02-5503-2660 (M.G.); Fax: +39-02-5503-2659 (M.G.)
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Salati
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy;
| | - Abdul Muhith
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK;
| | - Jessica Evangelista
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Silvia Seghezzi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio, Italy;
| | - Fausto Petrelli
- Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Tomasello
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Correspondence: (S.K.); (M.G.); Tel.: +39-02-5503-2660 (M.G.); Fax: +39-02-5503-2659 (M.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Machairas N, Raptis DA, Velázquez PS, Sauvanet A, de Leon AR, Oba A, Koerkamp BG, Lovasik B, Chan C, Yeo C, Bassi C, Ferrone CR, Kooby D, Moskal D, Tamburrino D, Yoon DS, Barroso E, de Santibañes E, Kauffmann EF, Vigia E, Robin F, Casciani F, Burdío F, Belfiori G, Malleo G, Lavu H, Hartog H, Hwang HK, Han HS, Marques HP, Poves I, Rosado ID, Park JS, Lillemoe KD, Roberts K, Sulpice L, Besselink MG, Abuawwad M, Del Chiaro M, de Santibañes M, Falconi M, D'Silva M, Silva M, Hilal MA, Qadan M, Sell NM, Beghdadi N, Napoli N, Busch OR, Mazza O, Muiesan P, Müller PC, Ravikumar R, Schulick R, Powell-Brett S, Abbas SH, Mackay TM, Stoop TF, Gallagher TK, Boggi U, van Eijck C, Clavien PA, Conlon KCP, Fusai GK. The Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment on Survival in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy with Concomitant Portomesenteric Venous Resection: An International Multicenter Analysis. Ann Surg 2021; 274:721-728. [PMID: 34353988 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate whether neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) critically influenced microscopically complete resection (R0) rates and long-term outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with portomesenteric vein resection (PVR) from a diverse, world-wide group of high-volume centers. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Limited size studies suggest that NAT improves R0 rates and overall survival compared to upfront surgery in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (R/BR-PDAC) patients. METHODS This multicenter study analyzed consecutive patients with R/BR-PDAC who underwent PD with PVR in 23 high-volume centers from 2009 to 2018. RESULTS Data from 1192 patients with PD and PVR were collected and analyzed. The median age was 68 [interquartile range (IQR) 60-73] years and 52% were males. Some 186 (15.6%) and 131 (10.9%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), respectively. The R0/R1/R2 rates were 57%, 39.3%, and 3.2% in patients who received NAT compared to 46.6%, 49.9%, and 3.5% in patients who did not, respectively (p=0.004). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in patients receiving NAT was 79%, 41%, and 29%, while for those that did not it was 73%, 29%, and 18%, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed no administration of NAT, high tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, R1/R2 resection, no adjuvant chemotherapy, occurrence of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative complications within 90 days, preoperative diabetes mellitus, male sex and portal vein involvement were negative independent predictive factors for OS. CONCLUSION Patients with PDAC of the pancreatic head expected to undergo venous reconstruction should routinely be considered for NAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Machairas
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Department of Surgery, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain Department of Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, University of Paris, AP-HP, Clichy, France Department of Pancreatic Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Mexico City, Mexico Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Colorado, CO, USA Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, "Pancreas Institute," Verona, Italy Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milano, Italy Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, CHLC, Lisbon, Portugal Department of Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France Department of Surgery, Seoul Naional University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea Department of HPB Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK Department of HPB Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea Department of Surgery, Emory Saint Joseph's Hospital, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Janssen QP, van Dam JL, Bonsing BA, Bos H, Bosscha KP, Coene PPLO, van Eijck CHJ, de Hingh IHJT, Karsten TM, van der Kolk MB, Patijn GA, Liem MSL, van Santvoort HC, Loosveld OJL, de Vos-Geelen J, Zonderhuis BM, Homs MYV, van Tienhoven G, Besselink MG, Wilmink JW, Groot Koerkamp B. Total neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant gemcitabine for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-2 trial): study protocol for a nationwide multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:300. [PMID: 33757440 PMCID: PMC7989075 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08031-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy has several potential advantages over upfront surgery in patients with localized pancreatic cancer; more patients receive systemic treatment, fewer patients undergo futile surgery, and R0 resection rates are higher, thereby possibly improving overall survival (OS). Two recent randomized trials have suggested benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy over upfront surgery, both including single-agent chemotherapy regimens. Potentially, the multi-agent FOLFIRINOX regimen (5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) may further improve outcomes in the neoadjuvant setting for localized pancreatic cancer, but randomized studies are needed. The PREOPANC-2 trial investigates whether neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX improves OS compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS This nationwide multicenter phase III randomized controlled trial includes patients with pathologically confirmed resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with a WHO performance score of 0 or 1. Resectable pancreatic cancer is defined as no arterial and ≤ 90 degrees venous involvement; borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is defined as ≤90 degrees arterial and ≤ 270 degrees venous involvement without occlusion. Patients receive 8 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by surgery without adjuvant treatment (arm A), or 3 cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine with hypofractionated radiotherapy (36 Gy in 15 fractions) during the second cycle, followed by surgery and 4 cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine (arm B). The primary endpoint is OS by intention-to-treat. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, quality of life, resection rate, and R0 resection rate. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.70 with 80% power, 252 events are needed. The number of events is expected to be reached after inclusion of 368 eligible patients assuming an accrual period of 3 years and 1.5 years follow-up. DISCUSSION The PREOPANC-2 trial directly compares two neoadjuvant regimens for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Our study will provide evidence on the neoadjuvant treatment of choice for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION Primary registry and trial identifying number: EudraCT: 2017-002036-17 . Date of registration: March 6, 2018. Secondary identifying numbers: The Netherlands National Trial Register - NL7094 , NL61961.078.17, MEC-2018-004.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q P Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J L van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Bos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, The Netherlands
| | - K P Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - P P L O Coene
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - T M Karsten
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M B van der Kolk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - M S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - O J L Loosveld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - B M Zonderhuis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with prognosis and immunomodulatory in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Biosci Rep 2021; 40:225197. [PMID: 32510138 PMCID: PMC7300287 DOI: 10.1042/bsr20201190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Although the oncological outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have markedly improved over the past decade, the survival prediction is still challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and analyze the relationship of between the NLR and immune cells phenotypes in patients with PDAC. Sixty-seven consecutive patients with PDAC were recruited in this study. Life-table estimates of survival time were calculated according to the Kaplan and Meier methodology. The phenotypic T cells subclasses were evaluated by flow cytometry. All the 67 patients in this study were treated with surgical resection and among them, 46 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was performed to compare prognostic value of NLR with CA199. We found that the Harrell's area under ROC (AUROC) for the NLR to predict overall survival (OS) (0.840; 95% CI, 0.766–0.898) was significantly higher than that of the CA199 levels. After that we stratified all patients into NLR > 2.5 (n = 42) and NLR ≤ 2.5 (n = 25) groups according to the OS of patients with PDAC. Survival analysis showed that patients with NLR ≤ 2.5 had significantly favorable OS and progressive free survival (PFS) compared with patients with NLR > 2.5. The CD3+ and CD8+/CD28+ T cell subsets were significantly increased in patients with NLR ≤ 2.5 (P<0.05), while the CD8+/CD28- and CD4+/CD25+ cell subsets were significantly decreased in patients with NLR ≤ 2.5 (P<0.05). In conclusion, a high NLR value independently predicts poor survival in patients with PDAC after surgical resection. The NLR was closely related with immune cells phenotypes The NLR may help oncologists evaluate outcomes of patients received surgical resection and chemotherapy to choose alternative therapies for patients with high NLR value.
Collapse
|
49
|
van der Horst A, Kok HP, Crezee J. Effect of gastrointestinal gas on the temperature distribution in pancreatic cancer hyperthermia treatment planning. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 38:229-240. [PMID: 33602033 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1882709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In pancreatic cancer treatment, hyperthermia can be added to increase efficacy of chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Gas in stomach, intestines and colon is often in close proximity to the target volume. We investigated the impact of variations in gastrointestinal gas (GG) on temperature distributions during simulated hyperthermia treatment (HT). METHODS We used sets of one CT and eight cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans obtained prior to/during fractionated image-guided radiotherapy in four pancreatic cancer patients. In Plan2Heat, we simulated locoregional heating by an ALBA-4D phased array radiofrequency system and calculated temperature distributions for (i) the segmented CT (sCT), (ii) sCT with GG replaced by muscle (sCT0), (iii) sCT0 with eight different GG distributions as visible on CBCT inserted (sCTCBCT). We calculated cumulative temperature-volume histograms for the clinical target volume (CTV) for all ten temperature distributions for each patient and investigated the relationship between GG volume and change in ΔT50 (temperature increase at 50% of CTV volume). We determined location and volume of normal tissue receiving a high thermal dose. RESULTS GG volume on CBCT varied greatly (9-991 cm3). ΔT50 increased for increasing GG volume; maximum ΔT50 difference per patient was 0.4-0.6 °C. The risk for GG-associated treatment-limiting hot spots appeared low. Normal tissue high-temperature regions mostly occurred anteriorly; their volume and maximum temperature showed moderate positive correlations with GG volume, while fat-muscle interfaces were associated with higher risks for hot spots. CONCLUSIONS Considerable changes in volume and position of gastrointestinal gas can occur and are associated with clinically relevant tumor temperature differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid van der Horst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Petra Kok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Crezee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Significance of Lymph Node Resection After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic, Gastric, and Rectal Cancers. Ann Surg 2021; 272:438-446. [PMID: 32740236 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gastrointestinal cancers are increasingly being treated with NAT before surgical resection. Currently, quality metrics are linked to the number of LNs resected to determine subsequent treatment and prognosis. We hypothesize that NAT decreases LN metastasis, downstages patients, and decreases overall lymph node yields (LNY) compared to initial surgical resection. With increasing use of NAT, this brings into question the validity of quality metrics. METHODS Gastric (stage II/III), pancreatic (stage I/II/III), and rectal cancers (stage II/III) (2010-2015) treated with surgery with/without NAT were identified in National Cancer Database. We evaluated total LNY and LN metastasis with/without NAT and clinical and pathological stage to evaluate rates of downstaging. RESULTS A total of 7934 gastric, 15,908 pancreatic, and 21,354 rectal cancer patients were included of which 61.1%, 21.2%, and 85.7% received NAT, respectively. NAT patients were more likely to be downstaged (39.9% vs 11.1% gastric P< 0.001, 30.6% vs 3.2% pancreatic P< 0.001, 52.0% vs 16.3% rectal P< 0.001), have lower LNYs (18.8 vs 19.1 gastric P = 0.239, 18.4 vs 17.5 pancreatic P< 0.001, 15.7 vs 20.0 rectal P< 0.001) and have N0 pathologic disease (43.6% vs 26.7% gastric P< 0.001, 51.1% vs 30.9% pancreatic P< 0.001, 65.9% vs 49.4% rectal P< 0.001) when compared to initial surgical resection. CONCLUSION NAT for gastrointestinal cancers results in overall lower LN yields, lower LN metastases, and significant downstaging of tumors. As all patients undergoing NAT receive multimodality therapy, LN yield recommendations may not be true quality metric changing.
Collapse
|