1
|
Hassan J, Hyde C, Joiner M, Miller SR. Complete radiographic response after proton radiation therapy in the re-irradiation of a diffuse high-grade glioma: A case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2024; 12:2050313X241274218. [PMID: 39185065 PMCID: PMC11342437 DOI: 10.1177/2050313x241274218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are the most aggressive of brain tumors and are one of the most common primary intracranial malignancies. The poor prognosis after aggressive treatment of HGGs makes these gliomas a challenge to treat with curative intent. Proton radiation therapy is a recent radiation modality that is being explored for the treatment of HGGs. Proton radiation therapy provides improved sparing of critical normal structures while giving an ablative dose of radiation to the tumor, which can be performed more accurately than photon beam radiation therapy. We report a case of a diffuse HGG treated with proton radiotherapy and chemotherapy after previously being treated with photon irradiation. A complete radiographic response was seen on MRI imaging after proton irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacfar Hassan
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Christian Hyde
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Michael Joiner
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Szklener K, Bilski M, Nieoczym K, Mańdziuk D, Mańdziuk S. Enhancing glioblastoma treatment through the integration of tumor-treating fields. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1274587. [PMID: 37916157 PMCID: PMC10616854 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1274587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) represents a significant therapeutic challenge due to its aggressive nature. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) present a promising approach to GBM therapy. The primary mechanism of TTFields, an antimitotic effect, alongside numerous indirect effects including increased cell membrane permeability, signifies their potential in combination with other treatment modalities. Current combinations often include chemotherapy, particularly with temozolomide (TMZ), however, emerging data suggests potential synergy with targeted therapies, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy as well. TTFields display minimal side effects, predominantly skin-related, posing no significant barrier to combined therapies. The effectiveness of TTFields in GBM treatment has been demonstrated through several post-registration studies, advocating for continued research to optimize overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients, as opposed to focusing solely on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Szklener
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Mateusz Bilski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Karolina Nieoczym
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Dominika Mańdziuk
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Sławomir Mańdziuk
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grogan PT, Helgager JJ, Deming DA, Howard SP, Jenkins RB, Robins HI. Case report: Radiographic complete response of radiation-induced glioblastoma to front-line radiotherapy: A report and molecular characterization of two unique cases. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1099424. [PMID: 37025206 PMCID: PMC10070702 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1099424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation-induced gliomas (RIGs) are an uncommon disease type and a known long-term complication of prior central nervous system radiation exposure, often during childhood. Given the rarity of this malignancy subtype, no clinical trials have explored optimal therapy for these patients, and the literature is primarily limited to reports of patient cases and series. Indeed, the genomic profiles of RIGs have only recently been explored in limited numbers, categorizing these gliomas into a unique subset. Here, we describe two cases of RIG diagnosed as glioblastoma (GB), IDH-wildtype, in adults who had previously received central nervous system radiation for childhood cancers. Both patients demonstrated a surprising complete radiographic response of the postoperative residual disease to front-line therapy, a phenomenon rarely observed in the management of any GB and never previously reported for the radiation-induced subgroup. Both tumors were characterized by next-generation sequencing and chromosomal microarray to identify potential etiologies for this response as well as to further add to the limited literature about the unique molecular profile of RIGs, showing signatures more consistent with diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 4. Ultimately, we demonstrate that treatment utilizing a radiation-based regimen for GB in a previously radiated tissue can be highly successful despite historical limitations in the management of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick T. Grogan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Jeffrey J. Helgager
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Dustin A. Deming
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Steven P. Howard
- Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Robert B. Jenkins
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - H. Ian Robins
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abed T, Ganser K, Eckert F, Stransky N, Huber SM. Ion channels as molecular targets of glioblastoma electrotherapy. Front Cell Neurosci 2023; 17:1133984. [PMID: 37006466 PMCID: PMC10064067 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1133984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Therapies with weak, non-ionizing electromagnetic fields comprise FDA-approved treatments such as Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) that are used for adjuvant therapy of glioblastoma. In vitro data and animal models suggest a variety of biological TTFields effects. In particular, effects ranging from direct tumoricidal, radio- or chemotherapy-sensitizing, metastatic spread-inhibiting, up to immunostimulation have been described. Diverse underlying molecular mechanisms, such as dielectrophoresis of cellular compounds during cytokinesis, disturbing the formation of the spindle apparatus during mitosis, and perforating the plasma membrane have been proposed. Little attention, however, has been paid to molecular structures that are predestinated to percept electromagnetic fields-the voltage sensors of voltage-gated ion channels. The present review article briefly summarizes the mode of action of voltage sensing by ion channels. Moreover, it introduces into the perception of ultra-weak electric fields by specific organs of fishes with voltage-gated ion channels as key functional units therein. Finally, this article provides an overview of the published data on modulation of ion channel function by diverse external electromagnetic field protocols. Combined, these data strongly point to a function of voltage-gated ion channels as transducers between electricity and biology and, hence, to voltage-gated ion channels as primary targets of electrotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tayeb Abed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Ganser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Franziska Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nicolai Stransky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan M. Huber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tumor-Treating Fields in Glioblastomas: Past, Present, and Future. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153669. [PMID: 35954334 PMCID: PMC9367615 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor. Although the standard of care, including maximal resection, concurrent radiotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ), and adjuvant TMZ, has largely improved the prognosis of these patients, the 5-year survival rate is still < 10%. Tumor-treating fields (TTFields), a noninvasive anticancer therapeutic modality, has been rising as a fourth treatment option for GBMs, as confirmed by recent milestone large-scale phase 3 randomized trials and subsequent real-world data, elongating patient overall survival from 16 months to 21 months. However, the mechanisms of antitumor efficacy, its clinical safety, and potential benefits when combined with other treatment modalities are far from completely elucidated. As an increasing number of studies have recently been published on this topic, we conducted this updated, comprehensive review to establish an objective understanding of the mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, clinical concerns, and future perspectives of TTFields. Abstract Tumor-treating fields (TTFields), a noninvasive and innovative therapeutic approach, has emerged as the fourth most effective treatment option for the management of glioblastomas (GBMs), the most deadly primary brain cancer. According to on recent milestone randomized trials and subsequent observational data, TTFields therapy leads to substantially prolonged patient survival and acceptable adverse events. Clinical trials are ongoing to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of TTFields in treating GBMs and its biological and radiological correlations. TTFields is administered by delivering low-intensity, intermediate-frequency, alternating electric fields to human GBM function through different mechanisms of action, including by disturbing cell mitosis, delaying DNA repair, enhancing autophagy, inhibiting cell metabolism and angiogenesis, and limiting cancer cell migration. The abilities of TTFields to strengthen intratumoral antitumor immunity, increase the permeability of the cell membrane and the blood–brain barrier, and disrupt DNA-damage-repair processes make it a promising therapy when combined with conventional treatment modalities. However, the overall acceptance of TTFields in real-world clinical practice is still low. Given that increasing studies on this promising topic have been published recently, we conducted this updated review on the past, present, and future of TTFields in GBMs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Liang C, Gong J, Zhang B, Meng Z, Li M, Guo Y. Multiple subtentorial metastasis in diffuse midline glioma receiving tumor treating fields: a case report and literature review. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1604. [PMID: 34790810 PMCID: PMC8576728 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-4395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is one of fatal glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with no proven medical therapies. Tumor treating fields (TTFields) is a new revolutionary therapy for GBM which prolongs the overall survival time obviously. However, we can observe more tumor growth phenomena (such as distant multiple metastases) than before. This report describes an adult patient who presented headache and dizziness, accompanied by left limb weakness, nausea, and vomiting following car accident trauma, following imaging examinations suggested thalamus GBM. He was treated with subtotal excision. Final pathology was diagnosed as DMG with H3F3A mutation, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type. Following concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy + TTFields therapy were carried out. Supratentorial tumor has been exhibited a partial radiological response for nine months until TTFields was used irregularly or even discontinued in the later stage. Especially, subtentorial and spinal multiple metastasis occurred during this time. Both supratentorial and subtentorial tumors were treated with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, even targeted drugs, with the only difference being TTFields, but we could see different consequences for tumor growth. One conclusion might be drawn that TTFields can provide a longer survival time (14 vs. 8 months reported before) for DMG patients and improve survival benefits. However, we can observe that patients maybe die from subtentorial metastasis because TTFields could not cover the subtentorial tumors, which is the focal challenge at present. So further research on subtentorial tumors with TTFields is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaofeng Liang
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin Gong
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Baoyu Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhan'ao Meng
- Department of Radiology, 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Manting Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Guo
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu S, Shi W, Zhao Q, Zheng Z, Liu Z, Meng L, Dong L, Jiang X. Progress and prospect in tumor treating fields treatment of glioblastoma. Biomed Pharmacother 2021; 141:111810. [PMID: 34214730 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a challenging cancer with poor prognosis. The classical standard for treatment is safe resection, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with subsequent adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Despite several attempts at different treatments, the 5-year survival rate remains poor. In recent years, with the continuous progress of treatment technology, tumor treating fields (TTFields) were preferable. The device could generate an intermediate frequency alternating electric field and induce apoptosis of some specific types of cancer cells with few toxic and side effects. TTFields induced apoptosis through multiple activations of the pathway. TTFields have been Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for diagnosis and recurrent GBM as additional clinical trial results are revealed. This study reviewed the current status, mechanisms, correlations with immune pathways, the prospects of applying TTFields for GBM, and the adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiyu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Weiyan Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Qin Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Zhuangzhuang Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Zijing Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Lingbin Meng
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Lihua Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Xin Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang M, Zhang C, Wang X, Yu H, Zhang H, Xu J, Zhao J, Jiang X. Tumor-treating fields (TTFields)-based cocktail therapy: a novel blueprint for glioblastoma treatment. Am J Cancer Res 2021; 11:1069-1086. [PMID: 33948346 PMCID: PMC8085847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in the central nervous system. Due to the high plasticity, heterogeneity and complexity of the tumor microenvironment, these tumors are resistant to almost all therapeutic strategies when they reach an advanced stage. Along with being a unique and effective way to kill cancer cells, tumor-treating fields (TTFields) has emerged as a breakthrough among glioblastoma therapies since the advent of temozolomide (TMZ), and the combination of these treatments has gradually been promoted and applied in the clinic. The combination of TTFields with other therapies is particularly suitable for this type of "cold" tumors and has attracted a large amount of attention from clinicians and researchers in the era of cancer cocktail therapy. Here, we introduced the current treatment regimen for glioblastoma, highlighting the unique advantages of TTFields in the treatment of glioblastoma. Then, we summarized current glioblastoma clinical trials that combine TTFields and other therapies. In addition, the main and potential mechanisms of TTFields were introduced to further understand the rationale for each combination therapy. Finally, we focused on the most advanced technologies applied in glioblastoma research and treatment and the prospect of their combination with TTFields. This review provides a unique overview of glioblastoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minjie Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan 430022, China
| | - Chaocai Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hainan General Hospital/Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical UniversityHaikou 570311, China
| | - Xuan Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan 430022, China
| | - Hao Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan 430022, China
| | - Hemei Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hainan General Hospital/Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical UniversityHaikou 570311, China
| | - Junnv Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical UniversityHaikou 570311, China
| | - Jiannong Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hainan General Hospital/Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical UniversityHaikou 570311, China
| | - Xiaobing Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan 430022, China
| |
Collapse
|