Biochemical Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Molecular pathology and protein markers for pancreatic cancer: relevance in staging, in adjuvant therapy, in determination of minimal residual disease, and follow-up

The diagnosis and monitoring of disease through the detection of circulating protein biomarkers is a growing field in the practice of oncology. The search for more effective protein biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a valuable area of study, given the aggressive and often occult nature of this malignancy. Liquid biopsies are attractive, as they offer a minimally invasive and cost-effective approach when compared to traditional biopsy methods and imaging modalities used for diagnosis and surveillance. Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 is currently the most commonly used serum protein biomarker for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with PDAC, but due to its sensitivity and specificity, its utility remains limited. In this review, we examine how circulating protein biomarkers are used in the diagnosis, prognostication, and surveillance of PDAC. We also highlight protein biomarkers that are currently under investigation that have the potential to enhance our ability to detect early-stage malignancies, predict response to therapy, and monitor for recurrence, but these markers require larger prospective validation studies before they can be widely implemented. Continued efforts to identify and validate novel biomarkers will be crucial for improving the management and outcomes of patients with this challenging disease.

Mucins as contrast agent targets for fluorescence-guided surgery of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is difficult to resect due to its unique challenges, often leading to incomplete tumor resections. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS), also known as intraoperative molecular imaging and optical surgical navigation, is an intraoperative tool that can aid surgeons in complete tumor resection through an increased ability to detect the tumor. To target the tumor, FGS contrast agents rely on biomarkers aberrantly expressed in malignant tissue compared to normal tissue. These biomarkers allow clinicians to identify the tumor and its stage before surgical resection and provide a contrast agent target for intraoperative imaging. Mucins, a family of glycoproteins, are upregulated in malignant tissue compared to normal tissue. Therefore, these proteins may serve as biomarkers for surgical resection. Intraoperative imaging of mucin expression in pancreatic cancer can potentially increase the number of complete resections. While some mucins have been studied for FGS, the potential ability to function as a biomarker target extends to the entire mucin family. Therefore, mucins are attractive proteins to investigate more broadly as FGS biomarkers. This review summarizes the biomarker traits of mucins and their potential use in FGS for pancreatic cancer.

KRAS gene mutation quantification in the resection or venous margins of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is not predictive of disease recurrence

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients eligible for curative surgery undergo unpredictable disease relapse. Even patients with a good pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) remain susceptible to recurrent PDAC. Molecular analysis of R0 margins may identify patients with a worse prognosis. The molecular status of mutant KRAS (exon 2, codon 12/13) was analysed retrospectively by digital droplet PCR in tumour areas, venous and resection margins of resected tumours, either undergoing up-front surgery (UFS) or after NAT with a good pathological response. Expectedly, tumour tissues or remnants from patients who underwent NAT presented lower KRAS mutant allele frequencies (MAF) than patients eligible for UFS. Similarly, ypT1 tumour MAFs were greater than the ypT0 tumour remnant MAFs in the NAT group. Mutant KRAS status in margins did not distinguish NAT subgroups. It was not predictive of shorter recurrence-free or overall survival within or between groups. KRAS-double negativity in both venous and resection margins did not identify patients with a better prognosis, regardless of the groups. The cohorts ‘sizes were small due to limited numbers of patients meeting the inclusion criteria, but KRAS-positivity or MAFs in resection and venous margins did not carry prognostic value. Comparison of margins from good versus bad responders receiving NAT may provide better clinical value.

Reproducibility and prognostic significance of area of residual tumor (ART) in post-neoadjuvant resections of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The pathologic assessments of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) are critical to improving the prognostic stratification for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Here we clarified the utility of our new grading system based on the area of residual tumor (ART) as compared to existing systems, such as the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and MD Anderson (MDA) score.

METHODS

Eight reviewers individually evaluated the tumor regression grade of 30 patients with PDAC based on three types of grading systems. The interobserver concordance and clinicopathological characteristics were compared between the three systems.

RESULTS

The interobserver concordance (kappa value) of the ART, CAP, and MDA score were 0.61, 0.48, and 0.53, respectively. Discrepant cases, which were 27% of the cases, exhibited smaller tumor and tumor bed sizes than concordant cases. The reduction in tumor size evaluated by microscopy showed a correlation with the rate of change in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, CA19-9 level, and tumor size on computed tomography (CT). The ART score was correlated with the tumor size on CT before and after NACRT and disease-free survival. The CAP and MDA scores were not associated with prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The ART grading system may be the most practical system to assess the tumor response in post-NACRT resections of PDAC.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following induction therapy: a systematic review of the published literature

Patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (UR-PDAC) are traditionally treated with palliative chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of conversion surgery for initially UR-PDAC following induction therapy. The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published between January 2000 and October 2020. Thirty-two series involving 1270 patients with 1056 locally advanced (LA) disease and 214 distant metastases were reviewed. The median mortality and morbidity was 0% (range 0-10%) and 47.1% (range 8.6-93.3%), respectively. Lymph-node negativity, negative resection margin and pathological complete response were observed in a median of 62.9% (38.5-90.9%), 84.4% (32.8-100%) and 6.7% (0-45.8%) of the specimens. The median survival was 32 (16.4-63.9) months with a 3-year survival rate of 47% (22-80%). Meta-analysis demonstrated that conversion surgery of initially UR-PDAC was associated with a significantly improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.45-0.66, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival between the group with LA disease and that with distant metastases after conversion surgery (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.28, P = 0.790). Conversion surgery improved long-term survival of patients with initially UR-PDAC who had favorable response to induction therapy.

Pancreatitis initiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Pathophysiology explaining clinical evidence

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant lethal disease due to its asymptomatic at its early lesion of the disease and drug resistance. Target therapy associated with molecular pathways so far seems not to produce reasonable outcomes. Understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying inflammation-initiated tumorigenesis may be helpful for development of an effective therapy of the disease. A line of studies showed that pancreatic tumorigenesis was resulted from pancreatitis, which was caused synergistically by various pancreatic cells. This review focuses on those players and their possible clinic implications, such as exocrine acinar cells, ductal cells, and various stromal cells, including pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs), macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, mast cells, adipocytes and endothelial cells, working together with each other in an inflammation-mediated microenvironment governed by a myriad of cellular signaling networks towards PDAC.