1
|
Chang JS, Lee J, Vicini FA, Kim JS, Kim J, Choi SH, Lee IJ, Kim YB. Large institutional experience of early outcomes and dosimetric findings with postoperative stereotactic partial breast irradiation in breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110066. [PMID: 38142936 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the dosimetric and toxicity outcomes of patients treated with postoperative stereotactic partial breast irradiation (S-PBI). METHODS We identified 799 women who underwent S-PBI at our institution between January 2016 and December 2022. The most commonly used dose-fraction and technique were 30 Gy in 5 fractions (91.7 %) and a robotic stereotactic radiation system with real-time tracking (83.7 %). The primary endpoints were dosimetric parameters and radiation-related toxicities. For comparison, a control group undergoing ultra-hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (UF-WBI, n = 468) at the same institution was selected. RESULTS A total of 815 breasts from 799 patients, with a median planning target volume (PTV) volume of 89.6 cm3, were treated with S-PBI. Treatment plans showed that the mean and maximum doses received by the PTV were 96.2 % and 104.8 % of the prescription dose, respectively. The volume of the ipsilateral breast that received 50 % of the prescription dose was 32.3 ± 8.9 %. The mean doses for the ipsilateral lung and heart were 2.5 ± 0.9 Gy and 0.65 ± 0.39 Gy, respectively. Acute toxicity occurred in 175 patients (21.5 %), predominantly of grade 1. Overall rate of late toxicity was 4 % with a median follow-up of 31.6 months. Compared to the UF-WBI group, the S-PBI group had comparably low acute toxicity (21.5 % vs. 25.2 %, p = 0.12) but significantly lower dosimetric parameters for all organs-at-risks (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION In this large cohort, S-PBI demonstrated favorable dosimetric and toxicity profiles. Considering the reduced radiation exposure to surrounding tissues, external beam PBI with advanced techniques should at least be considered over traditional WBI-based approaches for PBI candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Suk Chang
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jeongshim Lee
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Frank A Vicini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Farmington Hills, MI, USA
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jihun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seo Hee Choi
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Byun HK, Chang JS, Kim H, Kim J, Han MC, Kim SY, Park RH, Kim CJ, Kim YB. Cosmetic Outcome and Toxicity After Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:690-700. [PMID: 37201757 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this work was to prospectively evaluate the toxicity and cosmetic outcomes of 5-fraction, stereotactic, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS This prospective observational cohort study enrolled women who underwent APBI for invasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the breast. APBI was delivered using a CyberKnife M6 robotic radiosurgery system at 30 Gy in 5 nonconsecutive, once-daily fractions. Women undergoing whole breast irradiation (WBI) were also enrolled for comparison. Patient-reported and physician-assessed adverse events were recorded. Breast fibrosis was measured using a tissue compliance meter, and breast cosmesis was assessed using BCCT.core (an automatic, computer-based software). Outcomes were collected until 24 months posttreatment according to the study protocol. RESULTS In total, 204 patients (APBI, n = 103; WBI, n = 101) were enrolled. Regarding patient-reported outcomes, the APBI group reported significantly less skin dryness (6.9% vs 18.3%; P = .015), radiation skin reaction (9.9% vs 23.5%; P = .010), and breast hardness (8.0% vs 20.4%; P = .011) at 6 months than the WBI group. On physician assessment, the APBI group had significantly less dermatitis at 12 months (1.0% vs 7.2%; P = .027) than the WBI group. Any severe toxicities after APBI were rare in patient-reported outcomes (score ≥3, 3.0%) and physician assessments (grade ≥3, 2.0%). In the uninvolved quadrants, measured fibrosis in the APBI group was significantly lower than that in the WBI group at 6 (P = .001) and 12 (P = .029) months but not at 24 months. In the involved quadrant, measured fibrosis in the APBI group was not significantly different from that in the WBI group at any time. Cosmetic outcomes in the APBI group were mostly excellent or good (77.6%) at 24 months, and there was no significant cosmetic detriment from the baseline. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic APBI was associated with less fibrosis in the uninvolved breast quadrants than WBI. Patients showed minimal toxicity and no detrimental effects on cosmesis after APBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwa Kyung Byun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Hojin Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jihun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min Cheol Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Se Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ryeong Hwang Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Claire Jieun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Montalvo SK, Collins B, Vicini F, Rahimi A. Stereotactic Partial Breast Irradiation: What Does the Future Hold? Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:20-24. [PMID: 36477344 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Breast irradiation has evolved significantly over the last several decades. Accelerated partial breast and stereotactic breast irradiation have evolved as strategies to reduce irradiated volumes, preserve appropriate oncologic control, and improve cosmetic outcome. The sequencing and/or combination of stereotactic partial breast irradiation with novel systemic agents is of great interest to the oncologic community. Here we explore the landscape of modern trials and opine on the future of partial breast irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven K Montalvo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Brian Collins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL
| | - Frank Vicini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Genesis Care, Farmington Hills, MI
| | - Asal Rahimi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Five Fraction External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation: A User's Guide. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:16-19. [PMID: 36562691 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mature follow up from multiple randomized trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of external beam partial breast irradiation (PBI) for appropriately selected patients with early stage breast cancer. Despite this evidence, external beam PBI remains underutilized. In this user guide we outline patient selection, workflow, and address possible challenges to aid in implementation of evidence-based external beam PBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS Review of the current guidelines for PBI suitability, surgical considerations, treatment technique, simulation, contouring, and treatment planning, citing the latest published literature to support PBI utilization. RESULTS Prospective data supports the use of 30 Gy in 5 fractions delivered with intensity modulated radiation therapy on a daily or every other day basis for a significant proportion of early stage breast cancer patients. The surgical cavity must be clearly visualized on treatment planning scan, recommend 3-5 weeks post-operatively, and the recommended clinical target volume expansion on the surgical cavity is 0.5-1.0 cm. A planning target volume expansion, based on motion management and image guidance, of 0.5-1.0 cm should be used. Organ at risk dose constraints of heart V3Gy ≤10% and contralateral breast Dmax ≤1 Gy are often achievable. CONCLUSIONS Five fraction external beam PBI is a highly effective treatment with very limited toxicity for patients with early stage breast cancer following breast conserving surgery. Commonly utilized intensity modulated treatment planning techniques with plan delivery on standard linear accelerators results significant normal tissue sparing and makes implementation feasible at most radiation oncology centers.
Collapse
|
5
|
Takanen S, Pinnarò P, Farina I, Sperati F, Botti C, Vici P, Soriani A, Marucci L, Sanguineti G. Stereotactic partial breast irradiation in primary breast cancer: A comprehensive review of the current status and future directions. Front Oncol 2022; 12:953810. [PMID: 36313648 PMCID: PMC9606691 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.953810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In selected low-risk breast cancer patients, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may represent an alternative option to the whole breast irradiation to reduce the volume of irradiated breast and total treatment duration. In the last few years, preliminary data from clinical trials showed that stereotactic partial breast radiotherapy may have the advantage to be less invasive compared to other APBI techniques, with preliminary good results in terms of local toxicity and cosmesis: the use of magnetic resonance, fiducial markers in the tumor bed, and new breast devices support both a precise definition of the target and radiation planning.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021257856, identifier CRD42021257856.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Takanen
- Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Silvia Takanen, ; Ilaria Farina,
| | - Paola Pinnarò
- Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Farina
- Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Silvia Takanen, ; Ilaria Farina,
| | - Francesca Sperati
- Biostatistics, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Botti
- Surgery, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Phase IV Studies, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Soriani
- Physics, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Marucci
- Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chang JS, Chang JH, Kim N, Kim YB, Shin KH, Kim K. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: An Updated Review. J Breast Cancer 2022; 25:349-365. [DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ciérvide R, Montero Á, Potdevin G, García J, Aranda MG, Álvarez B, Rossi K, López M, Hernando O, Valero J, Sánchez E, Chen X, Alonso R, Letón PF, Rubio C. 5-year results of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) and exactrac adaptive gating (Novalis ®) for very early breast cancer patients: was it all worth it? Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:2358-2367. [PMID: 34043153 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02636-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the feasibility of image-guided and respiratory-gated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) in patients with very early breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Selected patients with early breast carcinoma after breast-conserving surgery were enrolled in this phase II trial. A fiducial marker was percutaneously placed close to surgical bed and five external fiducials were set on the skin. A CT scan for planning was acquired at free breathing. The treatment was planned and DVH were assessed according to international recommendations. Prescription dose was 30 Gy in five consecutive fractions of 6 Gy. A 6MV monoenergetic LINAC (linear accelerator) that combines stereoscopic X-ray imaging system and ExacTrac Adaptive Gating technique was used. PTV (planning target volume) intrafraction motion was controlled and PTV was irradiated in a selected gated area of the respiratory cycle. Shifts for a correct, gated set-up were calculated and automatically applied. RESULTS Between April 2013 and October 2015, a total of 23 patients were included. The median tumor size was 12 mm. The mean PTV volume was 114 cc. The mean ipsilateral lung V9 Gy was 2.2% and for left-sided breast cancers, the volume of the heart receiving 1.5 Gy was 11.5%. Maximum skin dose was 30.8 Gy. Acute toxicity was grade1 in all the patients and 100% experienced excellent/good breast cosmesis outcomes. With a median follow-up of 66 months (range 8-99 months) local-relapse-free-survival reaches 100%. One patient developed a second breast cancer outside the treated quadrant after 25.1 months. CONCLUSION APBI with SBRT and ExacTrac Adaptive Gating System was feasible. The acute and late toxicities were almost null and cosmesis was excellent. We also found that the margins of 5 mm applied from CTV to PTV were sufficient to compensate for geometric uncertainties.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Disease-Free Survival
- Dose Fractionation, Radiation
- Feasibility Studies
- Female
- Fiducial Markers
- Heart/radiation effects
- Humans
- Lung/radiation effects
- Mastectomy, Segmental
- Middle Aged
- Organ Motion
- Organs at Risk/radiation effects
- Postoperative Care/methods
- Prospective Studies
- Radiosurgery/instrumentation
- Radiosurgery/methods
- Respiration
- Skin/radiation effects
- Time Factors
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Tumor Burden
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Á Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Potdevin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia
| | - J García
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Puerta del Sur. HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - M G Aranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - K Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - O Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Puerta del Sur. HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Valero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - X Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Puerta del Sur. HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Puerta del Sur. HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - P F Letón
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Puerta del Sur. HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Sanchinarro. HM Hospitales, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, U.H. Puerta del Sur. HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy versus stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife for accelerated partial breast irradiation: a comparative treatment planning study with respect to dosimetry of organs at risk. Radiol Oncol 2021; 55:229-239. [PMID: 33768766 PMCID: PMC8042824 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to dosimetrically compare multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) and stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife (CK) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) especially concerning the dose of organs at risk (OAR-s). Patients and methods Treatment plans of thirty-two MIBT and CK patients were compared. The OAR-s included ipsilateral non-target and contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung, skin, ribs, and heart for left-sided cases. The fractionation was identical (4 x 6.25 Gy) in both treatment groups. The relative volumes (e.g. V100, V90) receiving a given relative dose (100%, 90%), and the relative doses (e.g. D0.1cm3, D1cm3) delivered to the most exposed small volumes (0.1 cm3, 1 cm3) were calculated from dose-volume histograms. All dose values were related to the prescribed dose (25 Gy). Results Regarding non-target breast CK performed slightly better than MIBT (V100: 0.7% vs. 1.6%, V50: 10.5% vs. 12.9%). The mean dose of the ipsilateral lung was the same for both techniques (4.9%), but doses irradiated to volume of 1 cm3 were lower with MIBT (36.1% vs. 45.4%). Protection of skin and rib was better with MIBT. There were no significant differences between the dose-volume parameters of the heart, but with MIBT, slightly larger volumes were irradiated by 5% dose (V5: 29.9% vs. 21.2%). Contralateral breast and lung received a somewhat higher dose with MIBT (D1cm3: 2.6% vs. 1.8% and 3.6% vs. 2.5%). Conclusions The target volume can be properly irradiated by both techniques with similar dose distributions and high dose conformity. Regarding the dose to the non-target breast, heart, and contralateral organs the CK was superior, but the nearby organs (skin, ribs, ipsilateral lung) received less dose with MIBT. The observed dosimetric differences were small but significant in a few parameters at the examined patient number. More studies are needed to explore whether these dosimetric findings have clinical significance.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fröhlich G, Mészáros N, Smanykó V, Stelczer G, Herein A, Polgár C, Major T. Is stereotactic CyberKnife radiotherapy or multicatheter HDR brachytherapy the better option dosimetrically for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Brachytherapy 2020; 20:326-331. [PMID: 33221260 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare dosimetrically the stereotactic CyberKnife (CK) therapy and multicatheter high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS Treatment plans of 25 patients treated with CK were selected, and additional plans using multicatheter HDR BT were created on the same CT images. The prescribed dose was 6.25/25 Gy in both plans to the target volume (PTV). The dose-volume parameters were calculated for both techniques and compared. RESULTS The D90 total dose of the PTV was significantly lower with CK than with HDR BT, D90 was 25.7 Gy, and 27.0 Gy (p < 0.001). However, CK plans were more conformal than BT, COIN was 0.87, and 0.81 (p = 0.0030). The V50 of the non-target breast was higher with CK than with BT: 10.5% and 3.3% (p = 0.0010), while there was no difference in the dose of the contralateral breast and contralateral lung. Dose to skin, ipsilateral lung, and ribs were higher with CK than with BT: D1 was 20.6 Gy vs. 11.5 Gy (p = 0.0018) to skin, 11.4 Gy vs. 9.6 Gy (p = 0.0272) to ipsilateral lung and 18.5 Gy vs. 12.3 Gy (p = 0.0013) to ribs, while D0.1 to heart was lower, 3.0 Gy vs. 3.2 Gy (p = 0.0476), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Multicatheter HDR BT yields more advantageous plans than stereotactic CyberKnife treatment in accelerated partial breast irradiation, except in terms of dose conformality and the dose to the heart. There was no difference in the dose of the contralateral breast and lung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina Fröhlich
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Biophysics, Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Science, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Norbert Mészáros
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Viktor Smanykó
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gábor Stelczer
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
| | - András Herein
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Polgár
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tibor Major
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Predicting adherence of dose-volume constraints for personalized partial-breast irradiation technique. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:163-170. [PMID: 32741559 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) and external-beam (EB) radiotherapy are established partial-breast irradiation (PBI) techniques. Although EB-PBI is widely available, it requires extra irradiated margins for target uncertainties. We examined the impact of EB-PBI on dose-volume constraints as compared to MIB-PBI. METHODS AND MATERIALS Among 653 patients receiving MIB-PBI between October 2008 and April 2020, consequent 159 patients after September 2018 were examined. Clinical target volume (CTV) included the lumpectomy cavity plus 1.0 cm. Planning target volume (PTV) for EB-PBI was defined as CTV with 1.0-cm expansion. Because the ratio of PTV to breast volume (RPB) was related to cosmesis, <25% of RPB was defined as suitable for the ipsilateral breast constraints. Preoperative breast size was classified as very small (<350 cm3), small (350-699 cm3), and medium or large (≥700 cm3). According to each category, the dose-volume constraints of the organs at risk were compared between the two PBI techniques. RESULTS Patients including 84 very small, 59 small, and 16 moderate to large breasts were examined. Although RPB was suitable in all patients receiving MIB-PBI, it was achieved in 74 patients (46.5%) receiving EB-PBI (p < 0.0001). The suitable RPB in patients with very small, small, and moderate to large breast was 32.1%, 55.9%, and 100%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Normal-tissue constraints for the other organs could be satisfied in patients with moderate to large breasts. CONCLUSION Although EB-PBI may be an appropriate option for patients with moderate to large breasts, MIB-PBI could still be a crucial technique, especially for patients with small breasts.
Collapse
|