1
|
Marazzi F, Masiello V, Orlandi A, Moschella F, Chiesa S, Di Leone A, Garufi G, Mazzarella C, Sanchez AM, Casa C, Bucaro A, De Lauretis F, Borghesan N, Tagliaferri L, Franceschini G, Bria E, Masetti R, Fabi A, Aristei C, Tortora G, Valentini V, Gambacorta MA. Outcomes of Radiotherapy in Oligoprogressive Breast Cancer. J Pers Med 2024; 14:805. [PMID: 39201997 PMCID: PMC11355129 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy (RT) shows potential for improving local control in cases of oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). This retrospective analysis aims to evaluate the advantages of RT in such a clinical scenario. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis including patients with mBC who received radiation therapy (RT) for up to three sites of oligoprogression while continuing systemic therapy. The study took place between January 2014 and December 2021. Our endpoints were progression-free survival after radiotherapy (PFS-AR), the rate of discontinuation of systemic therapy (RDT) at three months post-RT, and overall survival (OS). We used Cox regression analysis to perform multivariate analysis for PFS-AR. RESULTS Fifty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. The PFS-AR was 13 months (95% CI 8.5-18.8 months). At three months, the RDT was 3% (two patients). A significant difference in median PFS-AR was observed between patients in the first + second-line group and those in the subsequent line group (p = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis conducted for PFS-AR, the biologically effective dose (BED) with α/β = 4 > 100 Gy emerged as the sole significant variable (p = 0.0017). The median overall survival (OS) was 24.4 months (95% CI 17-24.4 months). CONCLUSIONS This study is the first report on the outcomes of radiotherapy in a cohort of over 50 patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Our findings emphasize the significant relationship between PFS-AR, the number of ongoing lines of systemic therapy, and the BED of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Marazzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (V.M.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (C.C.); (L.T.); (V.V.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (V.M.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (C.C.); (L.T.); (V.V.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Armando Orlandi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.O.); (G.G.); (E.B.); (G.T.)
| | - Francesca Moschella
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.L.); (A.B.); (F.D.L.); (N.B.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Silvia Chiesa
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (V.M.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (C.C.); (L.T.); (V.V.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Alba Di Leone
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.L.); (A.B.); (F.D.L.); (N.B.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Giovanna Garufi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.O.); (G.G.); (E.B.); (G.T.)
| | - Ciro Mazzarella
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (V.M.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (C.C.); (L.T.); (V.V.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Alejandro M. Sanchez
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.L.); (A.B.); (F.D.L.); (N.B.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Calogero Casa
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (V.M.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (C.C.); (L.T.); (V.V.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Angela Bucaro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.L.); (A.B.); (F.D.L.); (N.B.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Flavia De Lauretis
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.L.); (A.B.); (F.D.L.); (N.B.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Niccolo Borghesan
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.L.); (A.B.); (F.D.L.); (N.B.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (V.M.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (C.C.); (L.T.); (V.V.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.L.); (A.B.); (F.D.L.); (N.B.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.O.); (G.G.); (E.B.); (G.T.)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.L.); (A.B.); (F.D.L.); (N.B.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fabi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOSD di Medicina Personalizzata in Senologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Direzione Scientifica, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, 06156 Perugia, Italy;
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.O.); (G.G.); (E.B.); (G.T.)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (V.M.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (C.C.); (L.T.); (V.V.); (M.A.G.)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria A. Gambacorta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (V.M.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (C.C.); (L.T.); (V.V.); (M.A.G.)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doyle E, Killean AJ, Harrow S, Phillips ID. Systematic review of the efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligoprogressive disease in metastatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110288. [PMID: 38648995 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of oligometastatic disease can improve survival and delay the requirement for systemic therapy. The benefits of SABR in oligoprogressive disease are less well-defined. Here, we evaluate the available evidence investigating the efficacy of SABR in the treatment of oligoprogressive disease. METHODS A systematic review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. Medline and Embase databases were searched using the terms "stereotactic radiotherapy" OR "SABR" OR "Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy" OR "SBRT" OR "SRT" AND "oligoprogression" in May 2022, June 2023, and February 2024. Studies were excluded where: SABR was used as a radical treatment, a specific oligoprogressive cohort could not be identified, publication was as a conference abstract or where fewer than 10 patients were recruited. Studies treating only brain metastases were also excluded. The site of primary tumour, oligoprogressive sites, rates of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and time to next systemic therapy were collected. RESULTS Thirty-three full text studies were included. These consisted of single centre and multi-institutional observational studies, case series and phase II trials. Twenty-two studies were related to a specific tumour type: 12 urological cancer (9 prostate, 3 renal cancer), 6 non-small cell lung cancer, 2 colorectal cancer, 2 breast cancer and 11 were studies covering multiple tumour sites (5 studies involving SABR to a single organ and 6 studies involving SABR to multi-organ). Median PFS was >6 months in patients with oligoprogressive prostate, non-small cell lung cancer and renal cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS SABR appears to have clinical benefit in oligoprogresssive prostate, lung, and renal patients. However, the optimal management of patients with oligoprogressive disease is still somewhat uncertain due to lack of prospective data. This will hopefully become clearer in the near future with the publication of further randomised trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Doyle
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
| | - Angus J Killean
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Harrow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Iain D Phillips
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Armstrong S, Makris A, Belessiotis-Richards K, Abdul-Latif M, Ostler P, Shah N, Miles D, Tsang YM. Treatment Outcomes of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy on Extra-cranial Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Breast Cancer: Mature Results from a Single Institution Experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:362-369. [PMID: 38575431 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Evidence shows stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is used as a non-invasive ablative therapy in the treatment of multisite oligometastatic (OM) and oligoprogressive (OP) diseases originating from metastatic breast cancer. This study aims to report the treatment outcomes and to investigate what factors that are prognostic in terms of local control, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving SABR for extracranial OM and OP diseases originating from metastatic breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review on treatment records of patients with OM and OP from metastatic breast cancer who underwent SABR at a single was carried out. SABR was performed with daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using a dedicated robotic SABR machine. Local control, PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier statistics and the post-treatment toxicity data was scored following the CTCAE v4.0 protocol. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression tests were used in the subgroup analysis of prognostic factors on PFS and OS including patients' age, types of follow-up imaging (staging CT only vs whole-body MR/PET), metastases status (OM vs OP), primary breast cancer tumour grade, hormone receptors (ER/PR/HER2) status, change of systemic treatments at SABR, number of metastases, SABR treatment sites and doses. RESULTS 56 metastatic breast cancer patients (38 patients with OM and 18 patients with OP) were involved in this retrospective review. The median follow-up was 35.6 months (range 4.0-132.9 months). The estimated local control at 1 , 2 and 5 years were 90.9%, 88.7% and 88.7%, respectively. The estimated median PFS was 19.2 months (95%CI 10.3-28.1 months); the PFS at 1, 2 and 5 years were 63.3%, 44.4% and 33.2%. The estimated OS at 1, 2 and 5 years were 98.0%, 91.9% and 74.3%, respectively with the estimated median OS of 105.1 months (95%CI 51.5-158.7 months). The vast majority of patients tolerated the treatment well with the commonest acute side effects as grade 1 fatigue. There were no statistically significant factors found in OS regression analysis. The types of follow-up imaging, metastases status, oestrogen receptor status, and number of metastases for SABR were statistically significant factors (p < 0.05) in the multivariate Cox regression analysis on PFS. CONCLUSION There are limited studies published on the efficacy and post-treatment toxicities of metastatic breast cancer OM and OP SABR with adequate length of follow-up. This study confirmed that SABR was a safe, non-invasive treatment option for patients with extracranial OM and OP diseases originated from primary breast cancer in terms of the acceptable post-treatment toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Armstrong
- Lismore Base Hospital, North Coast Cancer Institute, New South Wales, Australia
| | - A Makris
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - M Abdul-Latif
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - P Ostler
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - N Shah
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - D Miles
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - Y M Tsang
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoon SM, Bazan JG. Navigating Breast Cancer Oligometastasis and Oligoprogression: Current Landscape and Future Directions. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:647-664. [PMID: 38652425 PMCID: PMC11168988 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01529-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We examine the potential for curative approaches among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients by exploring the recent literature on local ablative therapies like surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer. We also cover therapies for MBC patients with oligoprogressive (OP) disease. KEY FINDINGS Surgery and SBRT have been studied for OM and OP breast cancer, mainly in retrospective or non-randomized trials. While many studies demonstrated favorable results, a cooperative study and single-institution trial found no support for surgery/SBRT in OM and OP cases, respectively. CONCLUSION While there is interest in applying local therapies to OM and OP breast cancer, the current randomized data does not back the routine use of surgery or SBRT, particularly when considering the potential for treatment-related toxicities. Future research should refine patient selection through advanced imaging and possibly explore these therapies specifically in patients with hormone receptor-positive or HER2-positive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Jose G Bazan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li X, Zhong X, Xu H, Wang J, Liu X, Wang Y, He L, Ma J, Li G, Liu L. Survival analysis of palliative radiotherapy in patients with HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 14:1305429. [PMID: 38260126 PMCID: PMC10800428 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1305429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Whether radiotherapy can improve the long-term survival of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer remains unclear. We launched this study to explore the effect of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer patients through anti-HER-2 targeted therapy + radiotherapy. Methods 488 HER-2 + metastatic breast cancer patients who received anti-HER2 targeted ± local radiotherapy from March 2006 to September 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a radiotherapy group (n=207) and a non-radiotherapy group (n=281) based on whether they received radiotherapy or not. 1: 1 propensity matching analysis was used to determine two groups of patients with similar baselines. Results Before matching, the radiotherapy group (n=207) had a median overall survival (mOS) of 51.7 months (48.8-63.8), which was superior to the non-radiotherapy group's (n=281) mOS of 33.9 months (27.9-39.9) (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the radiotherapy group exhibited better 1-year (94.6% vs 83.9%), 3-year (70.8% vs 45.5%), and 5-year (43.3% vs 25.0%) survival rates compared to the control group. Propensity score matching analysis identified 135 pairs of baseline-matched patients. In the matched groups, the mOS was 57.2 (44.5-69.8) months in the radiotherapy group (n=135) and 34.1 (27.5-40.6) months in the non-radiotherapy group (n=135), showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). Additionally, the radiotherapy group demonstrated 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 93.2%, 71.5%, and 46.9%, respectively, while those in the non-radiotherapy group were 89.4%, 45.8%, and 22.2%, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the presence of brain metastasis, liver metastasis, and radiotherapy were identified as independent predictive factors significantly associated with OS. Conclusion In patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer, radiotherapy was associated with better survival benefits compared to those who did not receive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueting Li
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaorong Zhong
- Department of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hongyu Xu
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xianguo Liu
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Liang He
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiayu Ma
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Guanghua Li
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gram-Nielsen R, Christensen IY, Naghavi-Behzad M, Dahlsgaard-Wallenius SE, Jakobsen NM, Gerke O, Jensen JD, Ewertz M, Hildebrandt MG, Vogsen M. The Pattern of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of [ 18F]FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT. J Imaging 2023; 9:222. [PMID: 37888329 PMCID: PMC10607582 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging9100222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to compare the metastatic pattern of breast cancer and the intermodality proportion of agreement between [18F]FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT. Women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were enrolled prospectively and underwent a combined [18F]FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT scan to diagnose MBC. Experienced nuclear medicine and radiology physicians evaluated the scans blinded to the opposite scan results. Descriptive statistics were applied, and the intermodality proportion of agreement was used to compare [18F]FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT. In total, 76 women with verified MBC were enrolled in the study. The reported number of site-specific metastases for [18F]FDG-PET/CT vs. CE-CT was 53 (69.7%) vs. 44 (57.9%) for bone lesions, 31 (40.8%) vs. 43 (56.6%) for lung lesions, and 16 (21.1%) vs. 23 (30.3%) for liver lesions, respectively. The proportion of agreement between imaging modalities was 76.3% (95% CI 65.2-85.3) for bone lesions; 82.9% (95% CI 72.5-90.6) for liver lesions; 57.9% (95% CI 46.0-69.1) for lung lesions; and 59.2% (95% CI 47.3-70.4) for lymph nodes. In conclusion, bone and distant lymph node metastases were reported more often by [18F]FDG-PET/CT than CE-CT, while liver and lung metastases were reported more often by CE-CT than [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Agreement between scans was highest for bone and liver lesions and lowest for lymph node metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Gram-Nielsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (R.G.-N.); (M.N.-B.); (S.E.D.-W.); (N.M.J.); (M.G.H.)
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
| | | | - Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (R.G.-N.); (M.N.-B.); (S.E.D.-W.); (N.M.J.); (M.G.H.)
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
- Centre for Personalized Response Monitoring in Oncology (PREMIO), Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Sara Elisabeth Dahlsgaard-Wallenius
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (R.G.-N.); (M.N.-B.); (S.E.D.-W.); (N.M.J.); (M.G.H.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
| | - Nick Møldrup Jakobsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (R.G.-N.); (M.N.-B.); (S.E.D.-W.); (N.M.J.); (M.G.H.)
| | - Oke Gerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (R.G.-N.); (M.N.-B.); (S.E.D.-W.); (N.M.J.); (M.G.H.)
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
| | | | - Marianne Ewertz
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
| | - Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (R.G.-N.); (M.N.-B.); (S.E.D.-W.); (N.M.J.); (M.G.H.)
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Marianne Vogsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (R.G.-N.); (M.N.-B.); (S.E.D.-W.); (N.M.J.); (M.G.H.)
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
- Centre for Personalized Response Monitoring in Oncology (PREMIO), Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
- Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burgaleta AM, Burguete AB, Gutiérrez LR, Nuín EB, Felipe GA, de la Vega FA. Local treatment in oligometastasis from breast cancer: an overview. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2861-2867. [PMID: 37106239 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03170-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
Oligometastasic breast cancer (OMBC) consists of breast cancer patient with a limited number of systemic metastases (≤ 5), all of them candidates for local ablative treatment with the intention of achieving long-term control of the metastasis and, eventually, an increase in survival The first consensus for the management of patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) was published in 2007, establishing that a more aggressive multidisciplinary strategy is recommended in order to increase the survival while maintaining a good quality of life. The current scientific evidence is based on observational studies, mainly retrospective, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and only a randomized nonexclusive study of oligometastatic (OM) published. All trials with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in OM cancer have shown excellent tolerance and good local control, although first trials on Lung SBRT did not prove so excellent tolerance and had some deaths due to bronchus irradiation and secondary hemoptysis. There are multiple ongoing studies researching the benefit of SBRT in oligometastatic breast cancer. Despite the lack of impact on survival seen in the NRG BR-002 Trial, SBRT probably allows the delay of the systemic treatment until progression, and so, improves the quality of life of patients. We have to wait for the results of the ongoing and future studies for clarification of the role of local treatment in OMBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Manterola Burgaleta
- Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Radiation Oncology Service, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
- Service of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | - Erkuden Burillo Nuín
- Service of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gemma Asín Felipe
- Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Radiation Oncology Service, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
- Service of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Arias de la Vega
- Service of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain.
- "Clinical Research Group in Radiation Oncology", Health Research Institute of Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yan B, Ramadan S, Jerzak KJ, Louie AV, Donovan E. The Effectiveness and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in the Treatment of Oligoprogressive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6976-6985. [PMID: 37504365 PMCID: PMC10378468 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a technique to treat oligoprogressive sites among patients with breast cancer who are otherwise doing well on systemic therapy. This study systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of SBRT in the setting of oligoprogressive breast cancer. A literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE database. Studies regarding SBRT and oligoprogressive breast cancer were included. Key outcomes of interest were toxicity, local control, progression, and overall survival. From 863 references, five retrospective single-center cohort studies were identified. All studies included patients with both oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease; 112 patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer were identified across these studies. Patient age ranged from 22 to 84, with a median of 55 years of age. Most patients had hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative disease. SBRT doses varied from 24 to 60 Gy in 1-10 fractions based on the location/size of the lesion. Forty toxicity events were reported, of which the majority (n = 25, 62.5%) were grade 1-2 events. Among 15 patients who received SBRT concurrently with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, 37.5% of patients experienced grade 3-5 toxicities. Progression-free and overall survival ranged from 17 to 57% and 62 to 91%, respectively. There are limited data on the role of SBRT in oligoprogressive breast cancer, and prospective evaluation of this strategy is awaited to inform its safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernie Yan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Sherif Ramadan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Katarzyna J Jerzak
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Elysia Donovan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pérez-Montero H, Lozano A, de Blas R, Sánchez JJ, Martínez E, Laplana M, Gil-Gil M, Garcia-Tejedor A, Pernas S, Falo C, Godino Ó, Pla MJ, Guedea F, Navarro-Martin A. Ten-year experience of bone SBRT in breast cancer: analysis of predictive factors of effectiveness. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2023; 25:1756-1766. [PMID: 36645616 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03073-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Data on the benefit of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with breast cancer (BC) and bone metastases remain limited. The purpose of this study is to report our 10-year experience of bone SBRT, analyzing toxicity and prognostic factors for local control (LC); progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). METHODS/PATIENTS We analyzed all spine and non-spine bone SBRT performed in patients with BC during the 2012-2022 period at our institution. Treatments carried out with ablative intent in stereotactic conditions with dose/fraction ≥ 5 Gy in 5 or fewer sessions were considered. Demographic, treatment, and toxicity data were recorded according to CTCAEv4. Risk factors were assessed through univariate and multivariate analysis by Cox regression. RESULTS 60 bone SBRT treatments were performed during the study period. 75% were spine SBRT and 25% were non-spine SBRT (median BED4Gy was 80 Gy4). The median age was 52.5 years (34-79). The median tumor volume was 2.9 cm3 (0.5-39.4). The median follow-up was 32.4 months (1.2-101.7). 1 and 2 years LC were 92.9 and 86.6%, respectively. 1 and 2 years OS were 100 and 90.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis (MVA) associated volume of the treated lesion ≥ 13 cm3 with worse LC (p = 0.046; HR 12.1, 95%CI = 1.1-140.3). In addition, deferring SBRT > 3 months after lesion diagnosis to prioritize systemic treatment showed a significant benefit, improving the 2 years LC up to 96.8% vs. 67.5% for SBRT performed before this period (p = 0.031; HR 0.1, 95%CI = 0.01-0.8). Hormonal receptors, the total number of metastases, and CA15-3 value were significantly associated with OS in MVA. During follow-up, three non-spine fractures (5%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS According to our data, bone SBRT is a safe and effective technique for BC. Upfront systemic treatment before SBRT offers a benefit in LC. Therefore, SBRT should be considered after prior systemic treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héctor Pérez-Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Lozano
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rodolfo de Blas
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan José Sánchez
- Radiodiagnostic Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Evelyn Martínez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Laplana
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Gil-Gil
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amparo Garcia-Tejedor
- Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sonia Pernas
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Catalina Falo
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Óscar Godino
- Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J Pla
- Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferrán Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro-Martin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ladbury C, Hao C, Ruel C, Liu J, Glaser S, Amini A, Wong J, Paz I, Leong L, Morgan R, Margolin K, Shibata S, Frankel P, Somlo G, Dandapani S. Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with High-Dose Chemotherapy and Targeted Radiation: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Phase II Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5000. [PMID: 36291784 PMCID: PMC9599732 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (oMBC) may benefit from aggressive local therapy. We sought to assess the effects of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) on outcomes in oMBC patients treated on a prospective phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). METHODS Between 2005 and 2009, 12 patients with oMBC (≤3 metastatic sites) cancer were treated on protocol. Patients were to receive tandem HDCT supported by hematopoietic cell rescue (HCR). All radiographically identifiable oligometastatic sites received targeted radiation. RESULTS HDCT was initiated at a median of 6.7 (3.5-12.7) months after diagnosis of oMBC. Hormone receptors (HR) were positive in 91.6% of patients, and HER2 was overexpressed in 25% of patients. Median radiation dose (EQD2) was 41.2 (37.9-48.7) Gy. Median follow-up was 13.1 (6.8-15.1) years for living patients. Ten-year PFS and OS were 33% (95%CI, 10-59%) and 55% (95%CI, 22-79%), respectively. Durable local control of treated lesions was 87.5%. At the last follow up, two patients remained progression free and two more were without evidence of disease following additional salvage treatment. CONCLUSIONS Although modern systemic therapies have obviated the use of HDC, aggressive local therapy warrants further evaluation and fractionated radiotherapy is a viable alternative if SBRT is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Claire Hao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Christopher Ruel
- Division of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Jason Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Scott Glaser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Jeffrey Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Isaac Paz
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Lucille Leong
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Robert Morgan
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Kim Margolin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint John’s Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Stephen Shibata
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Paul Frankel
- Division of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - George Somlo
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Savita Dandapani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Systemic Therapy Combined with Locoregional Therapy Improved Survival in Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:7839041. [PMID: 36245976 PMCID: PMC9553526 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7839041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The optimal therapeutic options, adding locoregional therapy (LRT) to systemic therapy (ST) or not, for patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) have not been fully elucidated. Hence, we designed a retrospective observational study which enrolled patients with measurable extracranial OMBC having less than 5 metastatic lesions not necessarily in the same organ. We retrospectively reviewed a total of 199 patients diagnosed with extracranial OMBC, including 28 receiving ST followed by LRT (ST to LRT group), 44 receiving LRT followed by ST (LRT to ST group), and 127 receiving ST alone (ST alone group). After a median follow-up of 28.7 months, patients receiving both ST and LRT had a significantly better prognosis than those receiving ST alone: the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.3, 14.0, and 9.3 months (P < 0.001) and the median overall survival (OS) was 39.8, 70.5, and 26.7 months (P < 0.001) in the ST to LRT, LRT to ST, and ST alone groups, respectively. Sequence of ST and LRT had no significant impact on survival among patients receiving both. Further exploratory analysis identified ST plus LRT as an independent predictor for longer PFS. In conclusion, we demonstrated that adding LRT to ST was associated with survival benefits for patients with OMBC, and further prospective studies were warranted.
Collapse
|
12
|
Oligometastasis in breast cancer—current status and treatment options from a radiation oncology perspective. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:601-611. [PMID: 35527272 PMCID: PMC9217902 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01938-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AbstractEvidence from a few small randomized trials and retrospective cohorts mostly including various tumor entities indicates a prolongation of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) from local ablative therapies in oligometastatic disease (OMD). However, it is still unclear which patients benefit most from this approach. We give an overview of the several aspects of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in extracranial OMD in breast cancer from a radiation oncology perspective. A PubMed search referring to this was conducted. An attempt was made to relate the therapeutic efficacy of SBRT to various prognostic factors. Data from approximately 500 breast cancer patients treated with SBRT for OMD in mostly in small cohort studies have been published, consistently indicating high local tumor control rates and favorable progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Predictors for a good prognosis after SBRT are favorable biological subtype (hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative), solitary metastasis, bone-only metastasis, and long metastasis-free interval. However, definitive proof that SBRT in OMD breast cancer prolongs DFS or OS is lacking, since, with the exception of one small randomized trial (n = 22 in the SBRT arm), none of the cohort studies had an adequate control group. Further studies are needed to prove the benefit of SBRT in OMD breast cancer and to define adequate selection criteria. Currently, the use of local ablative SBRT should always be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board.
Collapse
|
13
|
Nicosia L, Figlia V, Ricottone N, Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Giaj-Levra N, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Jafari F, Maria Magrini S, Girlando A, Alongi F. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and concomitant systemic therapy in oligoprogressive breast cancer patients. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:581-588. [PMID: 35511313 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10167-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease with a deep tailoring level. Evidence is accumulating on the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the management of oligometastatic disease, however this is limited in breast cancer. The aim of the present study is to show the effectiveness of SBRT in delaying the switch to a subsequent systemic treatment in oligoprogressive breast cancer patients. Retrospective analysis from two Institutions. Primary endpoint: time to next systemic treatment (NEST). Secondary endpoints: freedom from local progression (FLP), time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC) and overall survival (OS). One-hundred fifty-three (153) metastases in 79 oligoprogressive breast cancer patients were treated with SBRT. Median follow-up 24 months. Median NEST 8 months. Predictive factor of NEST at the multivariate analysis (MVA) was the number of treated oligometastases (HR 1.765, 95%CI 1.322-2.355; p = < 0.01). Systemic treatment after SBRT was changed in 29 patients for polymetastatic progression and in 10 patients for oligometastatic progression < 6 months after SBRT. The 2-year FLP in the overall population was 86.7%. A biological effective dose (BED) > 70Gy10 was associated with improved FLP (90% versus 74.2%). The median tPMC was 10 months. At the MVA the only factors significantly associated with tPMC were the number of oligometastases (HR 1.172, 95%CI 1.000-1.368; p = 0.03), and the local control of the treated metastases (HR 2.726, CI95% 1.108-6.706; p = 0.02). SBRT can delay the switch to a subsequent systemic treatment, however patient selection is necessary. Several predictive factors for treatment tailoring have been identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy.
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola Ricottone
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Fatemeh Jafari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Girlando
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy.,University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Spałek MJ, Teterycz P, Borkowska A, Poleszczuk J, Rutkowski P. Stereotactic radiotherapy for soft tissue and bone sarcomas: real-world evidence. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359211070646. [PMID: 35186124 PMCID: PMC8848098 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211070646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Selected patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcomas (STBS) may benefit from intensive local treatment, such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). This study aimed to summarize the utilization and outcomes of SRT in STBS and to identify predictive factors for progression and survival. Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with advanced STBS who underwent STBS in a sarcoma tertiary center were identified. We collected tumor- and treatment-related factors. Endpoints comprised time to local progression (TTLP), local progression-free survival (LPFS), time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors. Results: We identified 141 patients who underwent 233 SRTs. Median follow-up was 21 months. Local and distant progression occurred after 19 and 163 SRTs, respectively. SRT for lung metastases was predictive for better TTLP and LPFS (hazard ratio, HR = 0.12, p = 0.007 and HR = 0.42, p = 0.002, respectively). Bone sarcoma (HR for TTLP = 3.18, p = 0.043; HR for LPFS = 1.99, p = 0.028) and lower administered dose (HR for TTLP = 0.98, p = 0.007; HR for LPFS = 0.99, p = 0.012) were predictive for worse TTLP and LPFS. SRT for oligometastases (HR = 0.46, p = 0.021) and lung metastases (HR = 0.55, p = 0.046) was predictive for better OS, whereas diagnosis of bone sarcoma (HR = 2.05, p = 0.029) was predictive for worse OS. Conclusion: SRT provides excellent local control in STBS patients without significant toxicity. Patients with oligometastatic disease, lung metastases, and soft tissue sarcomas benefit the most from SRT. The dose escalation moderately enhances local control; however, it does not translate into better survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Jacek Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Teterycz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Computational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aneta Borkowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jan Poleszczuk
- Department of Computational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Polish Academy of Sciences, Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Beduk Esen CS, Gultekin M, Yildiz F. Role of radiotherapy in oligometastatic breast cancer: Review of the literature. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:39-48. [PMID: 35116231 PMCID: PMC8790304 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i1.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer has been historically considered as an incurable disease. Radiotherapy (RT) has been traditionally used for only palliation of the symptoms caused by metastatic lesions. However, in recent years the concept of oligometastatic disease has been introduced in Cancer Medicine as a clinical scenario with a limited number of metastases (≤ 5) and involved organs (≤ 2) with controlled primary tumor. The main hypothesis in oligometastatic disease is that locoregional treatment of primary tumor site and metastasis-directed therapies with surgery and/or RT may improve outcomes. Recent studies have shown that not all metastatic breast cancer patients have the same prognosis, and selected patients with good prognostic features as those younger than 55 years, hormone receptor-positive, limited bone or liver metastases, a low-grade tumor, good performance status, long disease-free interval (> 12 mo), and good response to systemic therapy may provide maximum benefit from definitive treatment procedures to all disease sites. While retrospective and prospective studies on locoregional treatment in oligometastatic breast cancer demonstrated conflicting results, there is an increasing trend in favor of locoregional treatment. Currently, available data also demonstrated the improvements in survival with metastasis-directed therapy in oligometastatic breast cancer. The current review will discuss the concept of oligometastases and provide up-to-date information about the role of RT in oligometastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melis Gultekin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara 06100, Turkey
| | - Ferah Yildiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara 06100, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy and its integration with systemic therapies in metastatic kidney cancer: a multicenter study on behalf of the AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) genitourinary study group. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 38:527-537. [PMID: 34748125 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-021-10131-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Although systemic therapy represents the standard of care for polymetastatic kidney cancer, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may play a relevant role in the oligometastatic setting. We conducted a multicenter study including oligometastatic kidney cancer treated with SBRT. We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients who underwent 245 SBRT treatments on 385 lesions, including 165 (42.9%) oligorecurrent (OR) and 220 (57.1%) oligoprogressive (OP) lesions. Most common sites were lung (30.9%) for OR group, and bone (32.7%) for OP group. Among 78 (31.8%) patients receiving concomitant systemic therapy, sunitinib (61.5%) and pazopanib (15.4%) were the most common for OR patients, while sunitinib (49.2%) and nivolumab (20.0%) for OP patients. End points were local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to next systemic therapy (TTNS) and toxicity. Median follow-up was 18.6 months. 1, 2 and 3-year LC rates were 89.4%, 80.1% and 76.6% in OR patients, and 82.7%, 76.9% and 64.3% in those with OP, respectively. LC for OP group was influenced by clear cell histology (p = 0.000), total number of lesions (p = 0.004), systemic therapy during SBRT (p = 0.012), and SBRT dose (p = 0.012). Median PFS was 37.9 months. 1, 2- and 3-year OS was 92.7%, 86.4% and 81.8%, respectively. Median TTNS was 15.8 months for OR patients, and 13.9 months for OP patients. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported for both groups. SBRT may be considered an effective safe option in the multidisciplinary management of both OR and OP metastases from kidney cancer.
Collapse
|
17
|
Lemoine P, Bruand M, Kammerer E, Bogart E, Comte P, Royer P, Thariat J, Pasquier D. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:736690. [PMID: 34778049 PMCID: PMC8581293 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.736690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic radiotherapy may improve the prognosis of oligometastatic patients. In the literature, there is very little data available that is specific to breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective study. The primary objective was to estimate progression-free survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using Cyberknife of breast cancer oligometastases. The secondary objectives were to estimate overall survival, local control, and toxicity. The inclusion criteria were oligometastatic breast cancer with a maximum of five lesions distributed in one to three different organs, diagnosed on PET/CT and/or MRI, excluding brain metastases and oligoprogressions. This was combined with systemic medical treatment. FINDINGS Forty-four patients were enrolled from 2007 to 2017, at three high-volume cancer centers. The patients mostly had one to two lesion(s) whose most widely represented site was bone (24 lesions or 44.4%), particularly in the spine, followed by liver (22 lesions or 40.7%), then pulmonary lesions (six lesions or 11.1%). The primary tumor expressed estrogen receptors in 33 patients (84.6%); the status was HER2+++ in 7 patients (17.9%). The median dose was 40 Gy (min-max: 15-54) prescribed at 80% isodose, the median number of sessions was three (min-max: 3-10). The median D50% was 42 Gy (min max 17-59). After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, progression-free survival (PFS) at one year, two years, and three years was 81% (95% CI: 66-90%), 58% (95% CI: 41-72%), and 45% (95% CI: 28-60%), respectively. The median PFS was 2.6 years (95% CI: 1.3 - 4.9). Overall survival at three years was 81% (95% CI: 63-90%). The local control rate at two and three years was 100%. Three patients (7.3%) experienced G2 acute toxicity, no grade ≥3 toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION The PFS of oligometastatic breast cancer patients treated with SBRT appears long, with low toxicity. Local control is high. SBRT for oligometastases is rarely applied in breast cancer in light of the population in our study. Phase III studies are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Lemoine
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, O. Lambret Center, Lille, France
- University of Lille, H. Warembourg School of Medicine, Lille, France
| | - Marie Bruand
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Nancy, France
| | - Emmanuel Kammerer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Emilie Bogart
- Biostatistics department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France
| | - Pauline Comte
- Department of Medical Physics, O. Lambret Center, Lille, France
| | - Philippe Royer
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Nancy, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
- Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy (ARCHADE Research Community), Caen, France
- Laboratory of High-Energy Particle Physics, Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules, The National Engineering School of Caen (IN2P3/ENSICAEN), CNRS UMR 6534—Normandy University, Caen, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, O. Lambret Center, Lille, France
- University of Lille, H. Warembourg School of Medicine, Lille, France
- CRIStAL (Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille [Research center in Computer Science, Signal and Automatic Control of Lille] UMR 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Viani GA, Gouveia AG, Louie AV, Korzeniowski M, Pavoni JF, Hamamura AC, Moraes FY. Stereotactic body radiotherapy to treat breast cancer oligometastases: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:245-250. [PMID: 34624408 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been reported to be an effective treatment for oligometastatic disease from different primary cancer sites. Here we assess the effectiveness and safety of SABR for oligometastatic breast cancer patients by performing a meta-analysis. METHODS Following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Eligible studies were identified on Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and annual meetings proceedings from 1990 to June 2021. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess if there was a correlation between moderator variables and outcomes, and a p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Ten studies met criteria for inclusion, comprising 467 patients and 653 treated metastases. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 97% (95% CI 95-99%), and 90% (95% CI 84-94%), respectively. Overall survival (OS) was 93% (95% CI 89-96%) at 1 year, 81% (95% CI 72-88%) at 2 years. The rate of any grade 2 or 3 toxicity was 4.1 % (95% CI 0.1-5%), and 0.7% (0-1%), respectively. In the meta-regression analysis, only prospective design (p = 0.001) and bone-only metastases (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with better OS. In the subgroup analysis, the OS at 2y were significantly different comparing HER2+, HR+/HER2(-) and triple negative breast cancer 100%, 86% and 32%, p = 0.001. For local control outcomes, hormone receptor status (p = 0.01) was significantly associated on meta-regression analysis. CONCLUSION SABR for oligometastatic breast cancer is safe and associated with high rates of local control. Longer follow-up of existing data and ongoing prospective trials will help further define the role of this management strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo A Viani
- Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Department of Medical Imagings, Hematology and Oncology of University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil; Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
| | - Andre G Gouveia
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Radiation Oncology Department - Americas Centro de Oncologia Integrado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Martin Korzeniowski
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Juliana F Pavoni
- Faculty of Philosophy, Letters and Natural Sciences, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Ana Carolina Hamamura
- Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Department of Medical Imagings, Hematology and Oncology of University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Fabio Y Moraes
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Franceschini D, Teriaca MA, Dominici L, Franzese C, Scorsetti M. Knowing When to Use Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:7009-7031. [PMID: 34522143 PMCID: PMC8434826 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s294116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Oligometastatic patients are a heterogeneous and yet not well-defined population. The actual definition identifies as oligometastatic, patients with 1-5 metastases in 1-3 different organs. However, only a proportion of these patients are "true" oligometastatic and therefore derive some kinds of benefit from local ablative approaches like stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Since SABR is an easily accessible, effective and well-tolerated treatment, it is widely employed in the oligometastatic scenarios, without a particular focus on selection criteria. However, it should be crucial to identify predictive and prognostic features that could be clinically implemented. Therefore, we conducted this narrative review of the available literature to summarize all clinical, radiomic, genetic and epigenetic features found to be predictive of overall survival, progression-free survival or local control of oligometastatic patients treated with SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Ausilia Teriaca
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Dominici
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Significance of liver metastasis volume in breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:247-253. [PMID: 34477885 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01845-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study analyzed the impact of liver metastasis (LM) volume on treatment outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS This single-institution retrospective analysis included 40 oligometastatic (≤ 5 metastases) BC patients with 58 liver metastases treated with SBRT between April 2013 and March 2021. The prognostic factors for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were assessed. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 28.1 months. Isolated and solitary LM were seen in 26 (65%) and 24 (60%) patients, respectively. Median time to disease recurrence was 10.7 months post liver SBRT. The 2‑year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 71.4%, 27.5%, and 86.8%, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with a gross tumor volume (GTV) of ≤ 6 cc and a planning target volume (PTV) of ≤ 38 cc demonstrated a significantly better median OS than those with GTV > 6 cc and PTV > 38 cc. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors for worse OS were GTV > 6 cc (HR = 3.07 [95% CI, 1.14-8.22; p = 0.03]) and PTV > 38 cc (HR = 5.91 [95% CI, 1.92-18.21; p = 0.002]). No significant factor for PFS was found. Only 2 patients experienced rib fracture at 4 and 6 months post treatment, and 1 patient had a grade II duodenal ulcer. CONCLUSION Liver SBRT is an effective and safe treatment option for oligometastatic BC patients with excellent LC, promising survival, and limited toxicity. Patients with smaller tumors displayed better OS than their counterparts, validating the effectiveness of a local treatment for this group.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tan H, Cheung P, Louie AV, Myrehaug S, Niglas M, Atenafu EG, Chu W, Chung HT, Poon I, Sahgal A, Soliman H. Outcomes of extra-cranial stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Treatment indication matters. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:159-165. [PMID: 34119585 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To summarize the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) from a large institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with mBC who received extra-cranial SBRT to metastatic lesions from 2011 to 2017 were identified. Treatment indications were: oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumor (CDT). Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and cumulative incidence of starting/changing chemo or hormonal therapy (SCT). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictive factors. RESULTS We analyzed 120 patients (193 treated metastatic lesions) with a median follow up of 15.25 months. 1-and 2-year LC rates were 89% and 86.6%, respectively. 1-and 2-year OS rates were 83.5% and 70%, respectively, with treatment indication and molecular subtype being the predictive factors on MVA. 1-year OS was 91.0%, 78.5% and 63.9% for oligometastases, oligoprogression and CDT, respectively (p = 0.003). The worst OS was seen in basal subtype with 1-and 2-year OS rates of 59.2% and 39.5% (p = 0.01). Treatment indication was found to be predictive for PFS and lower rates of SCT on MVA. 1-and 2-year PFS rates were 45% and 32%, respectively. The 1-year PFS for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and CDT was 66%, 19.6%, and 14.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of SCT at 1-year was 12% for oligometastases, 39.7% for oligoprogression and 53.3% for CDT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients treated for oligometastases have better OS and PFS than those treated for oligoprogression or CDT. SBRT may delay SCT in mBC patients, particularly those with oligometastases. SBRT provided an excellent LC in mBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrick Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark Niglas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RS Mclaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|