1
|
Ji WJ, Lu X, Wang YG, Chen LW. A comprehensive clinical evaluation of HER2-TKIs in patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2024; 35:584-596. [PMID: 38518088 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HER2-TKIs) have been extensively utilized for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with numerous clinical trial reports available. We aim to systematically perform a comprehensive clinical evaluation on HER2-TKIs, provide a reference for the clinical rational use of drugs, and serve for the decision-making of the national drug policy. We performed comprehensive clinical evaluation in six dimensions including safety, effectiveness, economy, suitability, accessibility, and innovation through meta-analysis, literature review, drug administration websites, and other relevant medication data to analyze HER2-TKIs in treating HER2-positive MBC. For safety, the risk of ≥ grade 3 adverse events among pyrotinib, lapatinib, and neratinib is not significantly different. Furthermore, pyrotinib and neratinib were found to be higher in the risk of ≥ grade 3 diarrhea than lapatinib, however the risk could be reversed and prevented with loperamide. Regarding effectiveness and economy, pyrotinib was confirmed to have the best efficacy and cost-utility value, neratinib the second, and lapatinib the third. As regards innovation and suitability, pyrotinib showed better than other HER2-TKIs. In addition, pyrotinib received a higher recommendation than other HER2-TKIs in patients with HER2-positive MBC. The accessibility of pyrotinib was found to be the best with better urban, rural, and national affordability and lower annual treatment costs. Pyrotinib is more valuable in clinics with better safety, effectiveness, economy, suitability, accessibility, and innovation in HER2-positive MBC. This study could provide references for the clinical application of HER2-TKIs in treating HER2-positive MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Jun Ji
- Department of Pharmacy, the Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peng Y, Wang L, Peng L, Liu Q, Yi L, Luo X, Li S, Qin S, Wan X, Tan C, Chen G. Cost-effectiveness of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan for HER2-low Advanced Breast Cancer in the United States. Clin Ther 2023; 45:965-972. [PMID: 37537015 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Trastuzumab deruxtecan has been shown to be effective for advanced breast cancer with low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. To optimize the allocation of limited health care resources, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan from the US payer perspective. METHODS A partitioned survival model was developed to project the disease course of advanced breast cancer. Clinical efficacy, treatment utilization, safety, and cost data were gathered from the DESTINY-Breast04 (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer) trial and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Transition probabilities were obtained from the reported survival probabilities per DESTINY-Breast04 group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), the incremental monetary benefit, and the incremental net health benefit were measured. One-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis were performed to explore the uncertainty of the model. FINDINGS Trastuzumab deruxtecan had an ICER of $307,751 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, with an incremental net health benefit of -0.317 QALY and an incremental monetary benefit of -$63,313 compared with the physician's choice of alternative chemotherapy agents. Subgroup analysis indicated that trastuzumab deruxtecan had an ICER of $383,776 per QALY gained for the hormone receptor-positive subgroup and an ICER of $194,424 per QALY for the hormone receptor-negative subgroup. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of trastuzumab deruxtecan had the most impact on model outcomes. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve projected that the probability of trastuzumab deruxtecan being cost-effective was 5% in the overall population, 2% in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, and 56% in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $200,000 per QALY. IMPLICATIONS Trastuzumab deruxtecan may be a cost-effective option for hormone receptor-negative patients with advanced breast cancer with low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Peng
- Department of Pharmacy, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Liting Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Liubao Peng
- Department of Pharmacy, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qiao Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lidan Yi
- Department of Pharmacy, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xia Luo
- Department of Pharmacy, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Sini Li
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shuxia Qin
- Department of Pharmacy, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaomin Wan
- Department of Pharmacy, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chongqing Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Guochun Chen
- Department of Nephrology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China; Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Clinical Immunology Research Center of Central South University, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lu T, Huang Y, Cai Z, Lin W, Chen X, Chen R, Hu Y. The cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1171302. [PMID: 37564176 PMCID: PMC10409993 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1171302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The EMPOWER-LUNG 3 clinical trial has shown that cemiplimab plus chemotherapy (CCT) significantly extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with advanced non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) compared to placebo plus chemotherapy (PCT). However, the cost-effectiveness of this new treatment option remains unknown. Thus, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CCT versus (vs.) PCT as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: We constructed a Markov model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CCT as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. The transition probabilities were extracted from the survival data of the EMPOWER-LUNG 3 trial. The drugs' costs were referred from national tender prices, while other model input parameters were derived from the EMPOWER-LUNG 3 trial and published literature. The outcome parameters mainly included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness of the model outcomes. Results: Compared to PCT, in the CCT regimen, an additional $79,667 was spent in terms of the total cost and with an additional 0.31 QALYs, resulting in an ICER value of $253,148/QALY. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the hazard ratio (HR) of OS, the cost of cemiplimab (100 mg), and the HR of PFS, all significantly impacted the model's results. The probability of CCT (vs. PCT) being cost-effective was 0% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,201/QALYs in China. The scenario analysis showed that when the price of cemiplimab was reduced to less than $184.09/100 mg, the CCT regimen could be considered cost-effective as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC compared to the PCT. Conclusion: In China, the CCT was not cost-effective as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Lu
- Department of Pharmacy, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Ningde, Fujian, China
| | - Yufan Huang
- Department of Pharmacy, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Ningde, Fujian, China
| | - Zhongjie Cai
- Department of Pharmacy, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Ningde, Fujian, China
| | - Wangchun Lin
- Department of Pharmacy, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Ningde, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Ningde, Fujian, China
| | - Ruijia Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yingying Hu
- Department of Pharmacy, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie J, Li S, Li Y, Li J. Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:706. [PMID: 37386633 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09728-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been reported in recent research, however, the value of the effectiveness and cost of sacituzumab govitecan is still unclear. METHODS A microsimulation model was developed using data from the ASCENT trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan for patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic TNBC over a lifetime. Model inputs, including clinical data, patient characteristics, and direct medical costs, were based on the ASCENT trial, public databases, and published literature. The primary outcomes of the model were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and multiple scenario analyses were performed to address the uncertainty of the model. RESULTS Our results revealed that sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy costs $293,037 and yielded an additional 0.2340 of QALYs in the whole population with metastatic TNBC, leading to an ICER of $1,252,295 gained. And in the population with metastatic TNBC without brain metastasis, the sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy costs $309,949 and obtained an extra 0.2633 of QALYs, which resulted in an ICER of $1,177,171/QALYs. Univariate analyses indicated that the model outcomes were most sensitive to the drug cost of sacituzumab govitecan, the utility of progression-free disease, and the utility of progressed disease. CONCLUSION From the US payer perspective, sacituzumab govitecan is unlikely to be a cost-effective option for patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic TNBC compared with chemotherapy. Based on the value standpoint, a price decrease of sacituzumab govitecan is expected to increase the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with metastatic TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiao Xie
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
- Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - SiNi Li
- Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
- Present Address: The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
| | - YaMin Li
- Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - JianHe Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li XG, Niu C, Lu P, Wan HW, Jin WD, Wang CX, Mao WY, Zhang ZP, Zhang WF, Li B. Screening and identification of hub-gene associated with brain metastasis in breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e32771. [PMID: 36800575 PMCID: PMC9935999 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of breast cancer in the brain, also known as brain metastasis (BMS), is the primary reason for a bad prognosis in cases of breast cancer. Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumor seen in women in developing nations. At present, there is no effective method to inhibit brain metastasis of breast cancer. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a systematic study on BMS of breast cancer, which will not provide ideas and sites for follow-up studies on the treatment and inhibition of BMS. METHODS In this study, data set GSE43837 was screened from gene expression omnibus database, and then R language tool was used for differential analysis of its expression spectrum, The gene ontology functional enrichment and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes signal pathway enrichment analyses, as well as the interactive gene retrieval tool for hub-gene analysis, were performed. RESULTS According to the findings, the primary genes linked to breast cancer brain metastases are those that involve interactions between cytokines and their respective receptors and between neuroactive ligands and their respective receptors. The majority of the gene ontology enrichment took place in the extracellular structural tissues, the extracellular matrix tissues, and the second message-mediated signaling. We were able to identify 8 genes that are linked to breast cancer spreading to the brain. The gene score for matrix metallopeptidase1 (MMP-1) was the highest among them, and the genes MMP10, tumor necrosis factor alpha-inducible protein 8, collagen type I alpha 2 chain, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and TNF superfamily member 11 were all connected to 1 another in an interaction way. CONCLUSIONS There is a possibility that the 8 key genes that were identified in this research are connected to the progression of BMS in breast cancer. Among them, MMP1 is 1 that has the potential to have a role in the diagnosis and treatment of BMS in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Gang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Chao Niu
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Ping Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Hong-Wei Wan
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Wen-Di Jin
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Chun-Xiao Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Wen-Yuan Mao
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Zhi-Ping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Wan-Fu Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China
- * Correspondence: Bo Li, Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming 650021, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Value of Tucatinib in Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: An Italian Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041175. [PMID: 36831518 PMCID: PMC9953803 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was aimed at estimating the appropriate price of tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine (TXC), as third-line treatment, in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) patients from the Italian National Health System (NHS) perspective. METHODS A partitioned survival model with three mutually exclusive health states (i.e., progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and death) was used to estimate the price of tucatinib vs trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1), considering a willingness to pay (WTP) of 60,000 EUR. Data from the HER2CLIMB trial, the Italian population, and the literature were used as input. The model also estimated the total costs and the life-years (LY) of TXC and TDM1. Deterministic and probabilistic (PSA) sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model. RESULTS In the base case scenario, the appropriate price of tucatinib was 4828.44 EUR per cycle. The TXC resulted in +0.28 LYs and +16,628 EUR compared with TDM-1. Results were mainly sensitive to therapy intensity variation. In PSA analysis, TXC resulted cost-effective in 53% of the simulations. Assuming a WTP ranging 20,000-80,000 EUR, the tucatinib price ranged from 4090.60 to 5197.41 EUR. CONCLUSIONS This study estimated the appropriate price for tucatinib according to different WTP in order to help healthcare decision makers to better understand the treatment value.
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhu Y, Liu K, Zhu X, Qin Q, Zhu H. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus chemotherapy for patients with HER2-low advanced breast cancer: A US-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1025243. [PMID: 36386213 PMCID: PMC9650214 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1025243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 07/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the rise of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has changed the treatment paradigm for patients with HER2-low advanced breast cancer (ABC). DESTINY-Breast04 (NCT03734029) has demonstrated the antitumor activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). However, the balance between the efficacy and cost of T-DXd remains undefined. Consequently, there is a great need to assess the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd for patients with HER2-low ABC when compared with chemotherapy. Methods: A Markov decision-analytic model with a time horizon of 15 years was employed to estimate the costs and clinical efficacy of trials with the administration of T-DXd in contrast to chemotherapy alone as a later-line therapy in a group of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) or negative (HR-) HER2-low ABC. The US payer perspective was taken into account when factors such as medical lifetime expenditure, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were used to determine the model's stability. A subgroup analysis was also conducted on the HR+/HER2-low cohort. Results: T-DXd was associated with an improvement of 0.543, 0.558, and 0.789 QALYs when compared with treatment with chemotherapy for overall, HR+, and HR- HER2-low patients, respectively. However, incorporating T-DXd into later-line therapy led to increased costs ($161,406, $177,907, and $155,757), which causes the ICER for T-DXd to be $296,873, $318,944, and $197,355 per QALY. The cost of T-DXd and the patient's weight were the most influential factors for ICER. T-DXd being the dominant strategy is about 1.5%, 0.5%, and 28.0% in overall, HR+, and HR- HER2-low ABC patients, respectively. In addition, the T-DXd regimen was not cost-effective in all subgroups. Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, T-DXd was not cost-effective for patients with HER2-low ABC in the United States. However, it can provide more health benefits to patients with HR+/HER2-low ABC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youwen Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Kun Liu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaolu Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qun Qin
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Institution of Drug Clinical Trial, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Hong Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhu Y, Liu K, Wang M, Wang K, Zhu H. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Breast 2022; 66:191-198. [PMID: 36327624 PMCID: PMC9619174 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110) was the first global phase III study to assess the antitumor activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) compared to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in 2022. However, the balance between efficacy and cost of T-DXd remains unclear. As a result, the present study's goal is to investigate the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd vs T-DM1 as a second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive MBC from the US and Chinese payer's perspectives. METHODS A Markov model with a 20-year time horizon was developed to evaluate the overall cost of patient treatment, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and life-years (LYs) in the US and China at WTP levels of 150,000/QALY and 37,653/QALY, respectively (3 times GDP per capita in 2021). Key data were gathered from the US government's official website, the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, and published literature. To determine the model's stability, a sensitivity analysis was performed. A subgroup analysis was also implemented. RESULTS Compared with T-DM1, treatment with T-DXd generated an additional 1.672 QALYs (2.796 LYs), resulting in an ICER of $13,342/QALY (US) and $186,017/QALY (China). The cost of drugs is the most influential factor in the American and Chinese models. Subgroup analysis revealed that the T-DXd and T-DM1 regimens were more cost-effective at reducing the risk of death in the US and Chinese HER2-positive MBC patients. CONCLUSION T-DXd as second-line treatment could gain more health benefits for HER2-positive MBC patients in comparison with T-DM1, which is considered to be cost-effective in the US but not in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youwen Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China
| | - Kun Liu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China
| | - Kailing Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China
| | - Hong Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China,Corresponding author. Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China. National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang J, Yi Y, Wan X, Zeng X, Peng Y, Tan C. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan versus Trastuzumab Emtansine in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in the USA. Adv Ther 2022; 39:4583-4593. [PMID: 35943715 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02273-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Based on data from the DESTINY-Breast03 trial, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane from the US payer perspective. METHODS We conducted a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The simulation time horizon for this model was the lifetime of patients. Transition probabilities were based on data from the DESTINY-Breast03 trial. Health utility data were derived from published studies. Outcome measures were costs (in 2022 US$), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed the uncertainty of key model parameters and their joint impact on the base-case results. RESULTS The base-case results found that T-DXd provided an improvement of 3.90 QALYs compared with T-DM1, and the ICER was $220,533 per QALY. The one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the utility value of progression-free survival, hazard ratios of T-Dxd versus T-DM1, and cost of T-Dxd contributed substantial uncertainty to the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicted T-DXd being cost-effective compared to T-DM1 was 0, 1, 16, and 46% at willingness-to-pay of $50,000, $100,000, $150,000, and 200,000 per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION T-DXd was unlikely to offer a reasonable value for the money spent compared to T-DM1 in a US payer setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyan Wang
- Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, The Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Yinzhi Yi
- Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, The Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaomin Wan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaohui Zeng
- PET-CT Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Ye Peng
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Chongqing Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li JB, Lin ZC, Wong MCS, Wang HHX, Li M, Li S. A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society. BMC Med 2022; 20:320. [PMID: 36156186 PMCID: PMC9511760 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02516-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capecitabine maintenance therapy is safe and efficacious for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but the cost-effectiveness of its long-term use has not been investigated. Here, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine maintenance therapy, compared with routine follow-up, in early-stage TNBC patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society. METHODS A three-state Markov model based on the data from the SYSUCC-001 trial was constructed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine maintenance therapy in a month cycle over a period of 30-year time horizon. A 5% annual discount rate was set for all costs and benefits. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the model uncertainties. The main outcomes include quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one additional event. RESULTS Compared with routine follow-up, 1-year capecitabine maintenance therapy yielded an additional 1.29 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an additional cost of $3391.70, with an ICER of $2630.53 (95% CI: $1159.81-$5090.12) per QALY gained. The ICER was considerably lower than the recommended willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold (i.e., $28,130.00 per QALY). The results were sensitive to the discount rate, drug cost, and treatment cost after relapse. Further, the NNT to prevent one additional relapse case was 29.2 (95% CI: 13.2-196.6), 16.7 (95% CI: 8.4-111.6), and 12.0 (95% CI: 5.7-82.6) at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS One-year capecitabine maintenance therapy for early-stage TNBC after standard treatment, compared with routine follow-up, was found to be highly cost-effective with promising clinical benefits and acceptable increased costs. Real-world studies are warranted to validate our findings in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Bin Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. .,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| | - Zhuo-Chen Lin
- Department of Medical Records, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Martin C S Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.,School of Public Health, The Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Harry H X Wang
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Mengmeng Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Cancer Prevention Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Su Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cao X, Cai H, Li N, Zheng B, Zheng Z, Liu M. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced esophageal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221122733. [PMID: 36147862 PMCID: PMC9486256 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221122733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NC) or ipilimumab versus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the United States and China. METHODS A partitioned survival model was constructed from the perspective of the US third-party payers and Chinese healthcare system. Health states and transition probabilities were modeled based on the survival data from the CheckMate-648 clinical trial (NCT03143153). The time horizon for the model was 10 years. Only direct medical costs were considered. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS In the United States, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $155,159.82/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and $104,297.07/QALY gained in the overall population and in patients with tumor cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ⩾1% (subgroup), respectively. The ICER for the subgroup was between the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold values of $100,000/QALY and $150,000/QALY, and the other case was higher than $150,000/QALY. NC led to an ICER of $518,062.85/QALY and $193,169.49/QALY gained in the overall population and the subgroup, respectively. Both ICERs were significantly higher than the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY. In China, the ICERs for patients treated with the addition of nivolumab were >$90,000/QALY in all cases, significantly exceeding the WTP threshold of $37,654/QALY. CONCLUSIONS NI is more cost-effective than NC or chemotherapy alone for treating advanced ESCC with PD-L1 expression ⩾1% in the United States. Chemotherapy alone is the only cost-effective option in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueqiong Cao
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s Republic of ChinaThe School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s Republic of China
| | | | - Na Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical
University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s Republic of ChinaThe
School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s
Republic of China
| | - Bin Zheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical
University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s Republic of ChinaThe
School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s
Republic of China
| | - Zhiwei Zheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Cancer Hospital of
Shantou University Medical College, Raoping Load 7, Shantou, Guangdong
Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Maobai Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan road 29, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, People’s Republic of ChinaThe School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Margetuximab Versus Trastuzumab In Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:e629-e635. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
13
|
Chen J, Han M, Liu A, Shi B. Economic Evaluation of Sacituzumab Govitecan for the Treatment of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in China and the US. Front Oncol 2021; 11:734594. [PMID: 34778047 PMCID: PMC8581633 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.734594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) has been demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness on mTNBC from the Chinese and United States (US) perspective. METHODS A partitioned survival model was developed to compare the cost and effectiveness of SG versus single-agent chemotherapy based on clinical data from the ASCENT phase 3 randomized trial. Cost and utility data were obtained from the literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was measured, and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to observe model stability. A Markov model was constructed to validate the results. RESULTS In China, SG yielded an additional 0.35 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) at an additional cost of Chinese Renminbi ¥2257842. The ICER was ¥6375856 ($924037)/QALY. In the US, SG yielded the same additional QALY at an extra cost of $175393 and the ICER was $494479/QALY. Similar results were obtained from the Markov model. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that SG price had the greatest impact on the ICER. PSA showed the probability of SG to be cost-effective when compared with chemotherapy was zero at the current willing-to-pay threshold of ¥217341/QALY and $150000/QALY in China and the US, respectively. The probability of cost-effectiveness of SG would approximate 50% if its price was reduced to ¥10.44/mg in China and $3.65/mg in the US. CONCLUSION SG is unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment of mTNBC at the current price both in China and the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jigang Chen
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Mingyang Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Aihua Liu
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Shi
- Department of Breast Surgery, People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang L, Li R, Song C, Chen Y, Long H, Yang L. Small-Molecule Anti-Cancer Drugs From 2016 to 2020: Synthesis and Clinical Application. Nat Prod Commun 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/1934578x211040326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant tumors have become a significant public health problem that severely threatens human health. Drug-targeting therapy is essential for tumor therapy, along with surgery and radiotherapy. Of the 378 novel drugs approved over the past five years, those for oncological therapy remains at the top (25%). These drugs are used to treat patients with various cancers by acting on corresponding targets, such as EGFR, JAK, BTK, IDH, and FLT3. This review examines anti-tumor agents approved between 2016 and 2020, classifying them according to indication (such as lung cancer, leukemia, breast cancer, and myeloma). These drugs are reviewed according to their route of administration, first-in-class designation, approval dates, and expedited review categories. Furthermore, this paper summarizes the targets and modes of action of the approved anti-tumor drugs while systematically discussing their synthetic routes for medicinal chemistry or industrial use, which will benefit next-generation drug discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rong Li
- Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chen Song
- Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yanli Chen
- Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Haiyue Long
- The Air Force Hospital of Western Theater command
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dong L, Lin S, Zhong L, Nian D, Li Y, Wang R, Zhou W, Weng X, Xu X. Evaluation of Tucatinib in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases: A United States-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:e21-e29. [PMID: 34238670 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tucatinib in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BMs) and the subgroup of active BMs from the United States (US) payer perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 3-state Markov model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 regimens in HER2-positive BC patients with BMs: (1) tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine (TTC); (2) placebo, trastuzumab, and capecitabine (PTC). And subgroup analysis of active BMs was also performed. Lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net-health benefit (INHB) were estimated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was $200,000/QALY. The robustness of the model was tested by sensitivity analyses. Additional scenario analysis was also performed. RESULTS Compared with PTC, the ICER yielded by TTC was $418,007.01/QALY and the INHB was -1.08 QALYs in patients with BMs. In the subgroup of active BMs, the ICER and the INHB were $324,465.03/QALY and -0.71 QALY, respectively. The results were most sensitive to the cost of tucatinib. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested that the cost-effective probability of TTC was low at the current WTP threshold in the patients with BMs and the subgroup of active BMs. CONCLUSION Tucatinib is unlikely to be cost-effective in HER2-positive BC patients with BMs from the US payer perspective but shows better economics in patients with active BMs. Selecting a favorable population, reducing the price of tucatinib or offering appropriate drug assistance policies might be considerable options to optimize the cost-effectiveness of tucatinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangliang Dong
- Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shen Lin
- Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, China
| | - Lixian Zhong
- College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | - Dongni Nian
- Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yiyuan Li
- Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, China
| | - Rixiong Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Department of Human Resource, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiuhua Weng
- Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Radiation Biology of Fujian higher education institutions, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, China.
| | - Xiongwei Xu
- Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ulrich L, Okines AFC. Treating Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Spotlight on Tucatinib. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2021; 13:361-381. [PMID: 34079368 PMCID: PMC8164963 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s268451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The management of HER2 positive breast cancer has been transformed by the development of targeted therapies. Dual blockade with the monoclonal antibodies, trastuzumab and pertuzumab, added to first-line taxane chemotherapy and second-line therapy with the antibody-drug conjugate, T-DM1, are internationally agreed standards of care for advanced HER2 positive breast cancer, where available. However, until recently, options for patients for third-line therapy and beyond were of modest efficacy or limited by toxicity. In 2019, the results of trials of two exciting new agents for this space were presented. A third-generation HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, tucatinib, combines the efficacy of the second-generation drug, neratinib, with a more manageable toxicity profile and has become a new standard of care after T-DM1, in combination with capecitabine and trastuzumab. The antibody-drug conjugate, trastuzumab deruxtecan, demonstrated remarkable efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients and received accelerated approval in the United States, whilst confirmatory Phase 3 trials are completed. This review will discuss the available data for the post-T-DM1 setting, focusing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors including tucatinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Ulrich
- Department of Breast Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alicia F C Okines
- Department of Breast Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
New drug approvals for 2020: Synthesis and clinical applications. Eur J Med Chem 2021; 215:113284. [PMID: 33611190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
53 New drugs including 38 chemical entities and 15 biologics were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration during 2020. Among the marketed drugs, 34 new small molecule drugs and 4 new diagnostic agents with privileged structures and novel clinical applications represent as promising leads for the development of new drugs with the similar indications and improved therapeutic efficacy. This review is mainly focused on the clinical applications and synthetic methods of 34 small-molecule drugs newly approved by the FDA in 2020.
Collapse
|