Validated Prognostic Nomograms for Patients With Parotid Carcinoma Predicting 2- and 5-Year Tumor Recurrence-Free Interval Probability

Nomogram based on immune-inflammatory indicators and age-adjusted charlson comorbidity index score to predict prognosis of postoperative parotid gland carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Parotid gland carcinoma (PGC) is a rare malignant tumor. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of immune-inflammatory-nutrition indicators and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score (ACCI) of PGC and develop the nomogram model for predicting prognosis.

METHOD

All patients diagnosed with PGC in two tertiary hospitals, treated with surgical resection, from March 2012 to June 2018 were obtained. Potential prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The nomogram models were established based on these identified independent prognostic factors. The performance of the developed prognostic model was estimated by related indexes and plots.

RESULT

The study population consisted of 344 patients with PGC who underwent surgical resection, 285 patients without smoking (82.8%), and 225 patients (65.4%) with mucoepidermoid carcinoma, with a median age of 50.0 years. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p < 0.001), pathology (p = 0.019), tumor location (p < 0.001), extranodal extension (ENE) (p < 0.001), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (p = 0.004), prognostic nutrition index (PNI) (p = 0.003), ACCI (p < 0.001), and Glasgow prognostic Score (GPS) (p = 0.001) were independent indicators for disease free survival (DFS). Additionally, the independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) including AJCC stage (p = 0.015), pathology (p = 0.004), tumor location (p < 0.001), perineural invasion (p = 0.009), ENE (p < 0.001), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (p = 0.001), PNI (p = 0.001), ACCI (p = 0.003), and GPS (p = 0.033). The nomogram models for predicting DFS and OS in PGC patients were generated based on these independent risk factors. All nomogram models show good discriminative capability with area under curves (AUCs) over 0.8 (DFS 0.802, and OS 0.825, respectively). Decision curve analysis (DCA), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification index (NRI) show good clinical net benefit of the two nomograms in both training and validation cohorts. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed superior discrimination of DFS and OS in the new risk stratification system compared with the AJCC stage system. Finally, postoperative patients with PGC who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy had a better prognosis in the high-, and medium-risk subgroups (p < 0.05), but not for the low-risk subgroup.

CONCLUSION

The immune-inflammatory-nutrition indicators and ACCI played an important role in both DFS and OS of PGC patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy had no benefit in the low-risk subgroup for PGC patients who underwent surgical resection. The newly established nomogram models perform well and can provide an individualized prognostic reference, which may be helpful for patients and surgeons in proper follow-up strategies.

Surgery of major salivary gland cancers: REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of surgery of the primary tumor site in the management of primary major salivary gland cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group, which drafted a non-systematic narrative review of the literature published on Medline, and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method.

RESULTS

Treatment of salivary gland tumor is mainly surgical. The gold standard for parotid cancer is a total parotidectomy, to obtain clear margins and remove all intraparotid lymph nodes. For low-grade tumors, partial parotidectomy with wide excision of the tumor is acceptable in the case of postoperative diagnosis on definitive histology. In the event of positive margins on definitive analysis, revision surgery should be assessed for feasibility, and performed if possible.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of primary major salivary gland cancer is based on surgery with clear resection margins, as far away as possible from the tumor. The type of surgery depends on tumor location, pathologic type and extension.

Salvage total laryngectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx: Validated prognostic nomograms predicting oncological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Salvage total laryngectomy (STL) is a preferred treatment for patients with residual, recurrent, and second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx/hypopharynx after (chemo)radiation. To individually estimate postoperative oncological outcomes, we designed and validated prognostic nomograms.

METHODS

We used a dataset of 290 patients who underwent STL. Nomograms predicting 2- and 5-year OS, DFS, and DSS were developed, using variables which are identified pre- or postoperatively. The nomograms were externally validated on a dataset of 109 patients.

RESULTS

The nomograms based on postoperative variables performed better than those based on preoperative variables (OS: C = 0.68 vs. 0.64; DFS: C = 0.70 vs. 0.64; DSS: C = 0.74 vs. 0.64). The nomogram predicting DSS based on postoperative variables performed best.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented prognostic nomograms for predicting oncological outcomes in patients who undergo STL are tools which allow for a reliable prognostic assessment.

Current management and future challenges in salivary glands cancer

Salivary gland cancers (SGCs) are rare, accounting for less than 5% of all malignancies of the head and neck region, and are morphologically heterogeneous. The diagnosis is mainly based on histology, with the complementary aid of molecular profiling, which is helpful in recognizing some poorly differentiated, borderline, or atypical lesions. Instrumental imaging defines the diagnosis, representing a remarkable tool in the treatment plan. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance are the most common procedures used to describe the primary tumour. The treatment of SGCs is multimodal and consists of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy; each treatment plan is, however, featured on the patient and disease's characteristics. On 24 June 2022, in the meeting "Current management and future challenges in salivary gland cancers" many experts in this field discussed the state of the art of SGCs research, the future challenges and developments. After the meeting, the same pool of experts maintained close contact to keep these data further updated in the conference proceedings presented here. This review collects the insights and suggestions that emerged from the discussion during and after the meeting per se.

Comparative impact of grade on mortality across salivary cancers: A novel, unifying staging system

BACKGROUND

The comparative impact of histologic variants and grade has not been well described.

METHODS

Salivary cancer histologies were profiled using hospital and population-based cancer registries. Multivariable models were employed to assess relationships between histology, grade, and survival.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, histologic variants exhibited a wide spectrum of mortality risk (5-year overall survival (OS): 86% (acinic cell carcinoma), 78% (mucoepidermoid carcinoma), 72% (adenoid cystic carcinoma), 64% (carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma), 52% (adenocarcinoma NOS), and 47% (salivary duct carcinoma) (p < 0.001). However, on multivariable analysis these differences largely vanished. Worsening grade corresponded with deteriorating survival (5-year OS: 89% [low-grade], 81% [intermediate-grade], 45% [high-grade]; p < 0.001), which was upheld on multivariable analysis and propensity score matching. Recursive partitioning analysis generated TNM + G schema (c-index 0.75) superior to the existing system (c-index 0.73).

CONCLUSION

Grade represents a primary determinant of salivary cancer prognosis. Integrating grade into stage strengthens current staging systems.

Salivary gland cancers in elderly patients: challenges and therapeutic strategies

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are the most heterogeneous subgroup of head and neck malignant tumors, accounting for more than 20 subtypes. The median age of SGC diagnosis is expected to rise in the following decades, leading to crucial clinical challenges in geriatric oncology. Elderly patients, in comparison with patients aged below 65 years, are generally considered less amenable to receiving state-of-the-art curative treatments for localized disease, such as surgery and radiation/particle therapy. In the advanced setting, chemotherapy regimens are often dampened by the consideration of cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. Nevertheless, the elderly population encompasses a broad spectrum of functionalities. In the last decades, some screening tools (e.g. the G8 questionnaire) have been developed to identify those subjects who should receive a multidimensional geriatric assessment, to answer the question about the feasibility of complex treatments. In the present article, we discuss the most frequent SGC histologies diagnosed in the elderly population and the relative 5-years survival outcomes based on the most recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Moreover, we review the therapeutic strategies currently available for locoregionally advanced and metastatic disease, taking into account the recent advances in precision oncology. The synergy between the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and the Geriatrician aims to shape the most appropriate treatment pathway for each elderly patient, focusing on global functionality instead of the sole chronological age.

Estimating survival after salvage surgery for recurrent salivary gland cancers: Systematic review

Recurrent salivary gland carcinomas (RSCs) are poorly characterized and their clinical features and treatment options have not yet been fully described. The goal of this study was to analyze the therapeutic strategies and oncological outcomes of RSC patients through a literature review analysis. This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA statements. Inclusion criteria for the systematic review were based on the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes according to (PICO) framework. Two thousand seven hundred and four records were selected and 1817 recurrences were studied. Three hundred and sixty-five patients underwent salvage surgery (20.1%) and their 5-year mortality rate, overall survival and disease-free survival were 35%, 70%, and 42%, respectively. RSCs are aggressive neoplasms with a high rate of distant metastases (28.9%). Salvage surgery can be considered in patients with limited local and/or regional recurrences, even in case of single distant relapse, appearing within the first 3 years of follow-up.

Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index Predicts Survival Outcomes of Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer Following Curative Surgery

Aim

The aim of our study was to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) and to establish prognostic nomograms for the prediction of survival outcomes in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Materials and Methods

A total of 372 patients who received primary curative surgery for OSCC during 2008–2017 at a tertiary referral center were enrolled. We used the receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the optimal cutoff point of ALI. Through a Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan–Meier analysis, we elucidated the ALI–overall survival (OS) and ALI–disease-free survival (DFS) associations. Prognostic nomograms based on ALI and the results of multivariate analysis were created to predict the OS and DFS. We used the concordance indices (C-indices) and calibration plots to assess the discriminatory and predictive ability.

Results

The results revealed that the ALI cutoff was 33.6, and 105 and 267 patients had ALI values of <33.6 and ≥33.6, respectively. ALI < 33.6 significantly indicated lower OS (44.0% vs. 80.1%, p < 0.001) and DFS (33.6% vs. 62.8%; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, ALI < 33.6 was independently associated with poor OS and DFS (both p < 0.001). The C-indices of established nomograms were 0.773 and 0.674 for OS and DFS, respectively; moreover, the calibration plots revealed good consistency between nomogram-predicted and actual observed OS and DFS.

Conclusion

ALI is a promising prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing primary surgery for OSCC; moreover, ALI-based nomograms may be a useful prognostic tool for individualized OS and DFS estimations.

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting survival and recurrence in patients with parotid gland cancer

Background

To develop nomograms for predicting recurrence risk and long-term survival in patients with parotid gland cancer (PGC).

Methods

A total of 301 consecutive patients with PGC who underwent surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into a training cohort (n=210) and a validation cohort (n=91). Predictive nomograms were constructed based on the independent indicators of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The discrimination and calibration of nomograms were evaluated using C-indices and calibration curves.

Results

Six independent predictors of OS were identified. Incorporating these factors, the nomogram showed good concordance statistics of 0.84 and 0.78 in predicting the 5-year OS in the training and validation cohorts. Five independent predictors of DFS were identified and integrated into the nomogram. The concordance statistics were 0.84 and 0.74 in predicting the 5-year DFS in the training and validation cohorts. The predictive performance of the nomograms outperformed the TNM model. Additionally, the patients were divided into two groups according to the nomogram score, and significant differences in OS and DFS were observed between the high risk and low risk groups. Finally, the role of postoperative treatments was evaluated based on the risk stratification; patients at high risk of disease recurrence showed an improvement in DFS after receiving postoperative treatments.

Conclusions

The nomogram showed good performance in predicting both OS and DFS in patients with PGC. It might be useful for selecting patients for postoperative treatments.

Long-Term Facial Nerve Outcome in Primary Parotid Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Analysis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine immediate postoperative and long-term facial nerve dysfunction after parotid cancer surgery, risk factors, and the role of facial reanimation surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Population-based long-term analysis for all new primary parotid carcinoma cases in Thuringia from 1996 to 2019.

METHODS

Data of the cancer registries of Thuringia, a federal state in Germany, were analyzed in combination with hospital-based data on facial function.

RESULTS

About 477 patients (42.3% women; median age: 68 years) were included. It was observed that 6.7% had a preoperative facial nerve dysfunction, 11.7% received a radical parotidectomy, that is, that 5% had a normal preoperative facial function but needed radical surgery because of intraoperative detection of tumor infiltration into the facial nerve. About 10.2% received facial nerve reconstruction surgery. Immediate postoperative facial nerve dysfunction in the other patients was observed in 34.4% of the patients. Advanced T classification (odds ratio [OR] = 2.140; confidence interval [CI] = 1.268-3.611; P = .004) and neck dissection (OR = 2.012; CI = 1.027-3.940; P = .041) were independent risk factors for immediate postoperative facial nerve dysfunction. In addition, 22.0% showed no recovery during follow-up. Advanced T classification (OR = 2.177; CI = 1.147-4.133; P = .017) and postoperative radiotherapy (OR = 2.695; CI = 1.244-5.841; P = .012) were independent risk factors for permanent postoperative facial nerve dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Patients with primary parotid cancer are at high risk for long-term facial nerve dysfunction. It seems that the possibilities of facial reanimation surgery needs to be utilized even more effectively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.