Quantification of Myocardial Dosimetry and Glucose Metabolism Using a 17-Segment Model of the Left Ventricle in Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy

Nuclear medicine imaging methods of early radiation-induced cardiotoxicity: a ten-year systematic review

Introduction

Radiotherapy has significantly improved cancer survival rates, but it also comes with certain unavoidable complications. Breast and thoracic irradiation, for instance, can unintentionally expose the heart to radiation, leading to damage at the cellular level within the myocardial structures. Detecting and monitoring radiation-induced heart disease early on is crucial, and several radionuclide imaging techniques have shown promise in this regard.

Method

In this 10-year review, we aimed to identify nuclear medicine imaging modalities that can effectively detect early cardiotoxicity following radiation therapy. Through a systematic search on PubMed, we selected nineteen relevant studies based on predefined criteria.

Results

The data suggest that incidental irradiation of the heart during breast or thoracic radiotherapy can cause early metabolic and perfusion changes. Nuclear imaging plays a prominent role in detecting these subclinical effects, which could potentially serve as predictors of late cardiac complications.

Discussion

However, further studies with larger populations, longer follow-up periods, and specific heart dosimetric data are needed to better understand the relationship between early detection of cardiac abnormalities and radiation-induced heart disease.

Preliminary results of reduced myocardial blood flow in the subacute phase after radiation therapy for thoracic esophageal cancer: A quantitative analysis with stress dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Late adverse cardiac events after radiation therapy (RT) for thoracic malignancies are known, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the radiation dose that can cause MBF alterations in the subacute phase after RT for thoracic esophageal cancer using stress dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging (CTP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with esophageal cancer scheduled for RT were prospectively enrolled. The quantitative analysis of MBF by CTP was performed before and 3 months after RT. The mean radiation dose and hyperemic MBF in 15 segments of the left ventricular (LV) myocardium were determined. ΔMBF was calculated in each segment as MBFafter RT - MBFbeforeRT. The myocardial segments were classified into the following 5 groups according to the mean radiation dose: group A, <10 Gy; B1, 10-15 Gy; B2, 15-20 Gy; C, 20-30 Gy; and D, >30 Gy.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 22 patients who completed pre- and post-RT CTP. A one-way analysis of variance revealed a significant difference (p=0.005) in ΔMBF among the five groups of LV segments classified by the mean radiation dose. ΔMBF was significantly lower in group C (-7.7 ± 28.9 mL/min/100 g, p=0.020) and group D (-8.4 ± 34.8 mL/min/100 g, p=0.004) in comparison to ΔMBF in group A (4.9 ± 26.1 mL/min/100 g).

CONCLUSIONS

This study using CTP early after RT demonstrated a significant reduction of the MBF in the LV segments with ≥20 Gy of radiation. The results might provide important insights into preventing radiotherapy-induced cardiac events.

Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of heart function-based volumetric modulated arc therapy planning in patients with esophageal cancer

Radiotherapy for esophageal cancer entails high-dose irradiation of the myocardium owing to its close anatomical proximity to the esophagus. This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric impact of functional avoidance planning for the myocardium with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with esophageal cancer and determine the feasibility of functional planning. Ten patients with early stage esophageal cancer were included in this study. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy administered in 30 fractions. An experienced physician contoured the left ventricle (LV) of the myocardium. For each patient, an anatomical plan (non-LV-sparing plan) and a functional plan (LV-sparing plan) were created using the VMAT. In the functional plan, the mean percentage of LV volume receiving a dose of ≥ 30 and ≥ 40 Gy was 6.0% ± 6.7% and 2.4% ± 2.7%, respectively, whereas in the anatomical plan, they were 11.7% ± 13.1% and 4.9% ± 6.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences with respect to the dose to the hottest 1 cm³ of the planning target volume (PTV) and the minimum dose of the gross tumor volume and the dosimetric parameters of other normal tissues between the anatomical and functional plans. We compared the anatomical and functional plans of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing VMAT. Our results demonstrated that the functional plan reduced the dose to the LV with no significant differences in the organs at risk and PTV, indicating that avoidance planning can be safely performed when administering VMAT in patients with esophageal cancer.