1
|
Sharma D, Khosla D, Meena BL, Yadav HP, Kapoor R. Exploring the Evolving Landscape of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2025; 15:102386. [PMID: 39282593 PMCID: PMC11399579 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries significant morbidity and mortality. Management of the HCC requires a multidisciplinary approach. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are the gold standard options for the appropriate settings. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality in managing HCC; its use is more studied and well-established in advanced HCC (aHCC). Current clinical guidelines universally endorse SBRT as a viable alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), and transarterial radioembolisation (TARE), a recommendation substantiated by literature demonstrating comparable efficacy among these modalities. In early-stage HCC, SBRT primarily manages unresectable tumours unsuitable for ablative procedures such as microwave ablation and RFA. SBRT has been incorporated as a modality to downstage tumours or as a bridge to transplant. In the case of intermediate or advanced HCC, SBRT offers excellent results either as a single modality or adjunct to other locoregional modalities such as TACE/TARE. Recent data from late-stage HCC patients illustrate the effectiveness of SBRT in achieving local tumour control while minimising damage to surrounding healthy liver tissue. It has promising local control of approximately 80-90% in managing HCC. Additional prospective data comparing the efficacy of SBRT with the first-line recommended therapies such as RFA, TACE, and surgery are essential. The standard of care for patients with advanced/metastatic disease is systemic therapy (immunotherapy/tyrosine kinase inhibitors). SBRT, in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, has an immune-modulatory effect that results in a synergistic effect. Recent findings indicate that the combination of immunotherapy and SBRT in HCC is well-tolerated and exhibits synergistic effects. Further exploration of diverse immunotherapy and radiotherapy strategies is essential to identify the appropriate time for combination treatments and to optimise dose and fraction regimens. Prospective, randomised studies are imperative to establish SBRT as the primary treatment for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepti Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Divya Khosla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Babu L Meena
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Hanuman P Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rakesh Kapoor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Podesta C, Kayani M, Goody R, Samson A. Combination treatment of HCC with SBRT and immune checkpoint inhibition. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 192:104191. [PMID: 37865277 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of unresectable or metastatic HCC has been significantly advanced in recent years by developments in both radiotherapy and systemic cancer therapies. Independently, both Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are licensed for the treatment of these tumours. Building on the successes seen in other solid tumours, there is significant interest in exploring combination treatments. In this review article we briefly present the evidence base for the use of these treatments in patients with HCC. With reference to our current understanding of the immuno-oncology and radiobiology of HCCs, we demonstrate why combining these two modalities is of interest. Finally, we discuss the clinical trials that are currently underway or planned and the direction that future research may take.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Podesta
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK
| | - Mahaz Kayani
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK.
| | - Rebecca Goody
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK
| | - Adel Samson
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fonseca LG, Chen AT, de Oliveira IS, Chagas AL, Kruger JA, Carrilho FJ. Brazilian Landscape of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2200416. [PMID: 37348031 PMCID: PMC10497258 DOI: 10.1200/go.22.00416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is expected to increase in the coming years, and strategies to mitigate the burden of this disease are needed in different regions. Geographic variations in epidemiology and risk factors, such as viral hepatitis and metabolic disease, pose challenges in adopting programs for early detection programs and management of patients with HCC. Brazil, like other countries, has high economic and social inequality, with heterogeneous access to health care. Viral hepatitis is the main risk factor but there is growing awareness of fatty liver disease. Risk factor monitoring and screening programs are unmet priorities because patients are often diagnosed at later stages. Advances in the management of patients with HCC have been made in recent years, including new tools for selecting patients for liver transplantation, sophisticated surgical techniques, and new systemic agents. High-volume academic centers often achieve favorable results through the adoption and application of established treatments, but this is not a reality in most regions of Brazil, because of disparities in wealth and resources. As HCC management requires a coordinated and multidisciplinary team, the role of local referral centers in decentralizing access to treatments and promoting health education in different regions should be encouraged and supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo G. Fonseca
- Medical Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Andre T.C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Irai S. de Oliveira
- Department of Radiology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Aline L. Chagas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jaime A.P. Kruger
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Flair J. Carrilho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Y, Chou B, Yalamanchili A, Lim SN, Dawson LA, Thomas TO. Local Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Role of MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103517. [PMID: 37240623 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver tumor, with a continually rising incidence. The curative treatment for HCC is surgical resection or liver transplantation; however, only a small portion of patients are eligible due to local tumor burden or underlying liver dysfunction. Most HCC patients receive nonsurgical liver-directed therapies (LDTs), including thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) is a specific type of EBRT that can precisely deliver a high dose of radiation to ablate tumor cells using a small number of treatments (or fractions, typically 5 or less). With onboard MRI imaging, MRI-guided SABR can improve therapeutic dose while minimizing normal tissue exposure. In the current review, we discuss different LDTs and compare them with EBRT, specifically SABR. The emerging MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy has been reviewed, highlighting its advantages and potential role in HCC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yirong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Brian Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | - Amulya Yalamanchili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Sara N Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Tarita O Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Birgin E, Hetjens S, Tam M, Correa-Gallego C, Rahbari NN. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Surgical Resection for Stage I/II Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082330. [PMID: 37190258 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
SBRT is an emerging locoregional treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although local tumor control rates seem encouraging, large-scale survival data comparing SBRT to surgical resection are lacking. We identified patients with stage I/II HCC from the National Cancer Database amenable for potential surgical resection. Patients undergoing hepatectomy were matched by propensity score (1:2) with patients who underwent SBRT as primary treatment. A total of 3787 (91%) and 366 (9%) patients underwent surgical resection or SBRT between 2004 and 2015, respectively. After propensity matching, the 5-year overall survival was 24% (95% CI 19-30%) in the SBRT group versus 48% (95% CI 43-53%) in the surgery group (p < 0.001). The association of surgery with overall survival was consistent in all subgroups. In patients treated with SBRT, a biologic effective dose (BED) of ≥100 Gy (31%, 95% CI 22%-40%) compared with BED < 100 Gy (13%, 95% CI 8-22%) was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival rate (hazard ratio of mortality of 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.77; p < 0.001). Surgical resection may be associated with prolonged overall survival compared with SBRT in patients with stage I/II HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Svetlana Hetjens
- Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Moses Tam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | | | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wong JK, Lim HJ, Tam VC, Burak KW, Dawson LA, Chaudhury P, Abraham RJ, Meyers BM, Sapisochin G, Valenti D, Samimi S, Ramjeesingh R, Mujoomdar A, Martins I, Dixon E, Segedi M, Liu DM. Clinical consensus statement: Establishing the roles of locoregional and systemic therapies for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in Canada. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 115:102526. [PMID: 36924644 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and approximately one-third of patients present with intermediate-stage disease. The treatment landscape of intermediate-stage HCC is rapidly evolving due to developments in local, locoregional and systemic therapies. Treatment recommendations focused on this heterogenous disease stage and that take into account the Canadian reality are lacking. To address this gap, a pan-Canadian group of experts in hepatology, transplant, surgery, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, interventional radiology, and medical oncology came together to develop consensus recommendations on management of intermediate-stage HCC relevant to the Canadian context. METHODS A modified Delphi framework was used to develop consensus statements with strengths of recommendation and supporting levels of evidence graded using the AHA/ACC classification system. Tentative consensus statements were drafted based on a systematic search and expert input in a series of iterative feedback cycles and were then circulated via online survey to assess the level of agreement. RESULTS & CONCLUSION The pre-defined ratification threshold of 80 % agreement was reached for all statements in the areas of multidisciplinary treatment (n = 4), intra-arterial therapy (n = 14), biologics (n = 5), radiation therapy (n = 3), surgical resection and transplantation (n = 7), and percutaneous ablative therapy (n = 4). These generally reflected an expansion in treatment options due to developments in previously established or emergent techniques, introduction of new and more active therapies and increased therapeutic flexibility. These developments have allowed for greater treatment tailoring and personalization as well as a paradigm shift toward strategies with curative intent in a wider range of disease settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason K Wong
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Howard J Lim
- BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.
| | - Vincent C Tam
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, 1331 29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada.
| | - Kelly W Burak
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada.
| | | | - Robert J Abraham
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, 6299 South St, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | - Brandon M Meyers
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada.
| | | | - David Valenti
- McGill University, 845 Rue Sherbrooke O, Montréal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
| | - Setareh Samimi
- Hopital Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, University of Montreal, 5400 Boul Gouin O, Montréal, QC H4J 1C5, Canada.
| | - Ravi Ramjeesingh
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 6299 South St, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | - Amol Mujoomdar
- Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.
| | - Ilidio Martins
- Kaleidoscope Strategic, Inc. 1 King Street W, Suite 4800 - 117, Toronto, ON M5H 1A1, Canada.
| | - Elijah Dixon
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Maja Segedi
- Department of Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Jim Pattison Pavilion, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| | - David M Liu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matsuo Y. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Brief Overview. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2493-2500. [PMID: 36826151 PMCID: PMC9956001 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a type of external beam radiotherapy, yields local control of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at rates as high as 90%. SBRT has been recognized as an alternative therapy for patients for whom standard modalities such as surgery (resection or transplantation) or ablation are deemed unsuitable. SBRT has the potential to improve the prognosis of HCC, as it can be used as an adjunct to other treatment modalities. The assessment of post-SBRT images of the treated tumor and surrounding normal liver tissue requires special attention. Future research is warranted to determine how best to use SBRT versus other therapies and how to combine them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang D, Lin K, Wang Y, Xie X, Xie X, Zhuang B. Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma: an up-date meta-analysis. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2023; 48:399-410. [PMID: 36287228 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03690-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are available locoregional curative treatments for nonsurgical Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of SBRT versus RFA for HCC. METHODS A computerized bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science to identify comparative studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were freedom from local progression (FFLP) and treatment-related complications. RESULTS In total, there were 17 trials involving 22,180 patients. Patients receiving RFA showed significantly better 1-, 2- year OS (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.96, P = 0.141,OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.89, P = 0.082), whereas SBRT resulted in significantly better 1-, 2-, 3- year FFLP (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.44-3.34, P = 0.303; OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.12-2.19, P = 0.268; OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.70-2.90, P = 0.470). There were no significant differences for 3-, 5- year OS in both groups (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65-1.38, P = 0.001; OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68-1.34, P = 0.016). The overall treatment-related complication rate did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms, while SBRT was significantly associated with Child-Pugh worsening. CONCLUSIONS Though SBRT has excellent FFLP, RFA yields superior short-term survival for HCC. But the discrepancy between FFLP and OS requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daopeng Yang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.,Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ke Lin
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Xiaohua Xie
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Xiaoyan Xie
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Bowen Zhuang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zaki P, Chuong MD, Schaub SK, Lo SS, Ibrahim M, Apisarnthanarax S. Proton Beam Therapy and Photon-Based Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Next Frontiers of Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2023; 22:15330338231206335. [PMID: 37908130 PMCID: PMC10621304 DOI: 10.1177/15330338231206335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has increasingly been utilized in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to technological advances with positive clinical outcomes. Innovations in EBRT include improved image guidance, motion management, treatment planning, and highly conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Moreover, proton beam therapy (PBT) and magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) have expanded the capabilities of EBRT. PBT offers the advantage of minimizing low- and moderate-dose radiation to the surrounding normal tissue, thereby preserving uninvolved liver and allowing for dose escalation. MRgRT provides the advantage of improved soft tissue delineation compared to computerized tomography (CT) guidance. Additionally, MRgRT with online adaptive therapy is particularly useful for addressing motion not otherwise managed and reducing high-dose radiation to the normal tissue such as the stomach and bowel. PBT and online adaptive MRgRT are emerging technological advancements in EBRT that may provide a significant clinical benefit for patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Zaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael D. Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Stephanie K. Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mariam Ibrahim
- School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Knavel Koepsel EM, Smolock AR, Pinchot JW, Kim CY, Ahmed O, Chamarthy MRK, Hecht EM, Hwang GL, Kaplan DE, Luh JY, Marrero JA, Monroe EJ, Poultsides GA, Scheidt MJ, Hohenwalter EJ. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Management of Liver Cancer: 2022 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S390-S408. [PMID: 36436965 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The treatment and management of hepatic malignancies can be complex because it encompasses a variety of primary and metastatic malignancies and an assortment of local and systemic treatment options. When to use each of these treatments is critical to ensure the most appropriate care for patients. Interventional radiologists have a key role to play in the delivery of a variety of liver directed treatments including percutaneous ablation, transarterial embolization with bland embolic particles alone, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with injection of a chemotherapeutic emulsion, and transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Based on 9 clinical variants, the appropriateness of each treatment is described in this document. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amanda R Smolock
- Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Charles Y Kim
- Panel Vice-Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Osmanuddin Ahmed
- Vice-Chair of Wellness, Director of Venous Interventions, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Murthy R K Chamarthy
- Vascular Institute of North Texas, Dallas, Texas; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Elizabeth M Hecht
- Vice-Chair of Academic Affairs, Professor of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; RADS Committee; Member of Appropriateness Subcommittees on Hepatobiliary Topics; Member of LI-RADS
| | - Gloria L Hwang
- Associate Chair of Clinical Performance Improvement, Stanford Radiology, Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - David E Kaplan
- Section Chief of Hepatology at the University of Pennsylvania Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
| | - Join Y Luh
- Providence Health Radiation Oncology Focus Group Chair, Providence St. Joseph Health, Eureka, California; Commission on Radiation Oncology; ACR CARROS President; ACR Council Steering Committee; California Radiological Society Councilor to ACR
| | - Jorge A Marrero
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; American Gastroenterological Association
| | | | - George A Poultsides
- Chief of Surgical Oncology and Professor of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Society of Surgical Oncology
| | - Matthew J Scheidt
- Program Director of Independent IR Residency, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Eric J Hohenwalter
- Specialty Chair; Chief, MCW VIR, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kimura T, Fujiwara T, Kameoka T, Adachi Y, Kariya S. The Current Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184383. [PMID: 36139545 PMCID: PMC9496682 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which can deliver high radiation doses to focal tumors, has greatly increased in not only early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but also in portal vein or inferior vena cava thrombi, thus expanding this therapy to pre-transplantation and the treatment of oligometastases from HCC in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In early-stage HCC, many promising prospective results of SBRT have been reported, although SBRT is not usually indicated as a first treatment potion in localized HCC according to several guidelines. In the treatment of portal vein or inferior vena cava tumor thrombi, several reports using various dose-fraction schedules have shown relatively good response rates with low toxicities and improved survival due to the rapid advancements in systemic therapy. Although SBRT is regarded as a substitute therapy when conventional bridging therapies to transplantation, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), are not applicable or fail in controlling tumors, SBRT may offer advantages in patients with borderline liver function who may not tolerate TACE or RFA, according to several reports. For oligometastases, the combination of SBRT with ICI could potentially induce an abscopal effect in patients with HCC, which is expected to provide the rationale for SBRT in the treatment of oligometastatic disease in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoki Kimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nangoku-shi 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
- Correspondence:
| | - Toshiki Fujiwara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nangoku-shi 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
| | - Tsubasa Kameoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nangoku-shi 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Adachi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nangoku-shi 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6 Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima 730-8619, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shinji Kariya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nangoku-shi 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Efficacy and Safety. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163892. [PMID: 36010885 PMCID: PMC9405555 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This study aimed to describe treatment efficacy and safety in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In one of the largest retrospective studies to date, we analyzed the data of 318 patients. The median follow-up period was 70.2 months. The local control rate at 24 and 60 months was 94% (91–97%) and 94% (91–97%), respectively. Relapse-free survival at 12, 24, and 60 months was 62% (55–67%), 29% (23–36%), and 13% (8–19%), respectively. OS at 12, 24, and 60 months was 72% (95%CI 67–77%), 44% (38–50%), and 11% (7–15%), respectively. The outcome is highly related to the natural evolution of the underlying cirrhosis. Child-Pugh score B-C, high BCLC score, portal thrombosis, GTV volume, and higher PTV volume reported on total hepatic volume ratio were significantly associated with OS. SBRT is efficient for the management of HCC with a favorable toxicity profile. Abstract This study aimed to describe patient characteristics, treatment efficacy, and safety in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We retrospectively analyzed data of 318 patients with 375 HCC treated between June 2007 and December 2018. Efficacy (overall survival [OS], relapse-free survival, and local control) and acute and late toxicities were described. The median follow-up period was 70.2 months. Most patients were treated with 45 Gy in three fractions. The median (range) PTV volume was 90.7 (2.6–1067.6) cc. The local control rate at 24 and 60 months was 94% (91–97%) and 94% (91–97%), respectively. Relapse-free survival at 12, 24, and 60 months was 62% (55–67%), 29% (23–36%), and 13% (8–19%), respectively. OS at 12, 24, and 60 months was 72% (95%CI 67–77%), 44% (38–50%), and 11% (7–15%), respectively. Approximately 51% and 38% experienced acute and late toxicity, respectively. Child-Pugh score B-C, high BCLC score, portal thrombosis, high GTV volume, and higher PTV volume reported on total hepatic volume ratio were significantly associated with OS. SBRT is efficient for the management of HCC with a favorable toxicity profile. The outcome is highly related to the natural evolution of the underlying cirrhosis.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lewis S, Dawson L, Barry A, Stanescu T, Mohamad I, Hosni A. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: from infancy to ongoing maturity. JHEP Rep 2022; 4:100498. [PMID: 35860434 PMCID: PMC9289870 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Lewis
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Aisling Barry
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Teodor Stanescu
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Issa Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Centre, Jordan
| | - Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
- Corresponding author. Address: Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bae BK, Park HC, Yoo GS, Choi MS, Oh JH, Yu JI. The Significance of Systemic Inflammation Markers in Intrahepatic Recurrence of Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Curative Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092081. [PMID: 35565210 PMCID: PMC9102776 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This retrospective study using the prospectively collected registry data of newly diagnosed, previously untreated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) evaluates the significance of systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs) to intrahepatic recurrence (IHR) after curative treatment. Out of 4076 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 52.6% experienced IHR. SIMs, including pre-treatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), post-treatment changes of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio PLR, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio were significantly associated with the prognosis of early-stage HCC patients who received initial curative treatment. The prognostic significances of SIMs were consistent for IHR-free survival, early and late IHR, and overall survival. Abstract Systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs) are known to be associated with carcinogenesis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the significance of SIMs in intrahepatic recurrence (IHR) of early-stage HCC after curative treatment. This study was performed using prospectively collected registry data of newly diagnosed, previously untreated HCC between 2005 and 2017 at a single institution. Inclusion criteria were patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0 or A, who underwent curative treatment. Pre-treatment and post-treatment values of platelet, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) were analyzed with previously well-known risk factors of HCC to identify factors associated with IHR-free survival (IHRFS), early IHR, and late IHR. Of 4076 patients, 2142 patients (52.6%) experienced IHR, with early IHR in 1018 patients (25.0%) and late IHR in 1124 patients (27.6%). Pre-treatment platelet count and PLR and post-treatment worsening of NLR, PLR, and LMR were independently associated with IHRFS. Pre-treatment platelet count and post-treatment worsening of NLR, PLR, and LMR were significantly related to both early and late IHR. Pre-treatment values and post-treatment changes in SIMs were significant factors of IHR in early-stage HCC, independent of previously well-known risk factors of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bong Kyung Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (B.K.B.); (G.S.Y.)
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (B.K.B.); (G.S.Y.)
- Correspondence: (H.C.P.); (J.I.Y.)
| | - Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (B.K.B.); (G.S.Y.)
| | - Moon Seok Choi
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (M.S.C.); (J.H.O.)
| | - Joo Hyun Oh
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (M.S.C.); (J.H.O.)
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (B.K.B.); (G.S.Y.)
- Correspondence: (H.C.P.); (J.I.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sun HC, Zhou J, Wang Z, Liu X, Xie Q, Jia W, Zhao M, Bi X, Li G, Bai X, Ji Y, Xu L, Zhu XD, Bai D, Chen Y, Chen Y, Dai C, Guo R, Guo W, Hao C, Huang T, Huang Z, Li D, Li G, Li T, Li X, Li G, Liang X, Liu J, Liu F, Lu S, Lu Z, Lv W, Mao Y, Shao G, Shi Y, Song T, Tan G, Tang Y, Tao K, Wan C, Wang G, Wang L, Wang S, Wen T, Xing B, Xiang B, Yan S, Yang D, Yin G, Yin T, Yin Z, Yu Z, Zhang B, Zhang J, Zhang S, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang A, Zhao H, Zhou L, Zhang W, Zhu Z, Qin S, Shen F, Cai X, Teng G, Cai J, Chen M, Li Q, Liu L, Wang W, Liang T, Dong J, Chen X, Wang X, Zheng S, Fan J. Chinese expert consensus on conversion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (2021 edition). Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2022; 11:227-252. [PMID: 35464283 PMCID: PMC9023831 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in systemic and locoregional treatments for patients with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have resulted in improved response rates. This has provided an opportunity for selected patients with initially unresectable HCC to achieve adequate tumor downstaging to undergo surgical resection, a 'conversion therapy' strategy. However, conversion therapy is a new approach to the treatment of HCC and its practice and treatment protocols are still being developed. Review the evidence for conversion therapy in HCC and develop consensus statements to guide clinical practice. Evidence review: Many research centers in China have accumulated significant experience implementing HCC conversion therapy. Preliminary findings and data have shown that conversion therapy represents an important strategy to maximize the survival of selected patients with intermediate stage to advanced HCC; however, there are still many urgent clinical and scientific challenges for this therapeutic strategy and its related fields. In order to summarize and learn from past experience and review current challenges, the Chinese Expert Consensus on Conversion Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2021 Edition) was developed based on a review of preliminary experience and clinical data from Chinese and non-Chinese studies in this field and combined with recommendations for clinical practice. Sixteen consensus statements on the implementation of conversion therapy for HCC were developed. The statements generated in this review are based on a review of clinical evidence and real clinical experience and will help guide future progress in conversion therapy for patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Chuan Sun
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiufeng Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology of PLA Cancer Center, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Qing Xie
- Department of Infectious Disease, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weidong Jia
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinyu Bi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Gong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Ji
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dousheng Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Yajin Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongjun Chen
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaoliu Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Rongping Guo
- The Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenzhi Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Chunyi Hao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Sarcoma Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Huang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Deyu Li
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of general surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiangcheng Li
- Department of Liver Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Guangming Li
- Center of General Surgery, Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jingfeng Liu
- The United Innovation of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Fubao Liu
- Division of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Shichun Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College Bengbu, China
| | - Weifu Lv
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Yilei Mao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, PUMC & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS), Beijing, China
| | - Guoliang Shao
- Department of Intervention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yinghong Shi
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianqiang Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Guang Tan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yunqiang Tang
- Department of Hepatic-Biliary Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kaishan Tao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Chidan Wan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guangyi Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Liver Surgery Department, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shunxiang Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Tianfu Wen
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Centre, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Baocai Xing
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Bangde Xiang
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Center, Key Laboratory for High-Incidence Tumor Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Sheng Yan
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dinghua Yang
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guowen Yin
- Department of Intervention, Cancer Hospital of Jiangsu, Nanjing, China
| | - Tao Yin
- Department of Hepatic & Biliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Hubei Cancer Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhenyu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Xiamen, China
| | - Zhengping Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Bixiang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jialin Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Shuijun Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Digestive Organ Transplantation of Henan Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ti Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yamin Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yubao Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Aibin Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haitao Zhao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ledu Zhou
- Department of Liver Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wu Zhang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang Province, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhenyu Zhu
- Hepatoliliary Surgery Center, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Qinhuai Medical Area, Eastern Theater General Hospital of PLA China, Nanjing, China
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Hepatic Surgery IV, the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Gaojun Teng
- Center of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Minshan Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Lianxin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Weilin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Changping, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xuehao Wang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chow R, Simone CB, Jairam MP, Swaminath A, Boldt G, Lock M. Radiofrequency ablation vs radiation therapy vs transarterial chemoembolization vs yttrium 90 for local treatment of liver cancer - a systematic review and network meta-analysis of survival data. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:484-494. [PMID: 34846988 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.2009563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The comparative effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), radiation therapy (RT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization with Yttrium-90 (Y90) relative to one another for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to compare RFA to RT to TACE to Y90 in the treatment of HCC. METHODS Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up until April 19, 2021. Observational analyses with propensity score matched (PSM) cohort analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting on two or more treatments relative to one another with respect to overall survival (OS) and/or progression free survival (PFS) were included. Survival data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and meta-analyzed using a multivariate network meta-analysis. RESULTS After exclusions, 24 RCTs or PSM observational studies reporting on 5549 patients were included. While 1-year OS was greater for Y90 than TACE (RR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-0.99), all other 1-year OS comparisons across the 4 modalities yielded similar OS, and there were no differences across any modalities in 2-year and 3-year OS. TACE had a modest PFS advantage relative to RFA (RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.95) and RT (RR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83) at 2 years. CONCLUSION All modalities assessed resulted in similar OS, which explains the current heterogenous practice patterns. This conclusion may assist in decision making based on administrative and patient costs, and implementation of these modalities. Other factors such as toxicity rate specific to individual patients could not be assessed using network meta-analysis and may also play a role in selection of modality. Further studies, ideally using PSM cohort analyses or RCT study design, reporting on OS, PFS, local control, complete response and toxicity are needed prior to drawing definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Chow
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- New York Proton Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- New York Proton Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meghan Pooja Jairam
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Gabriel Boldt
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ji R, Ng KK, Chen W, Yang W, Zhu H, Cheung TT, Chiang CL, Wong TC, Kong FM, Wu G, Lo CM. Comparison of clinical outcome between stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e28545. [PMID: 35089192 PMCID: PMC8797553 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a novel noninvasive treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether its efficacy is comparable to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a recommended therapy for unresectable HCC, is unknown. The present study aims to compare the clinical outcome between SBRT and RFA for patients with unresectable HCC.The clinical data of 60 patients with unresectable HCC from January 2018 to January 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 22 cases treated by SBRT and 38 cases by RFA. The short-term and long-term clinical outcomes were compared.There was no significant difference in the baseline demographic characteristics between two groups. The complete remission rate at 3 months was comparable between SBRT group (81.8%) and RFA group (89.4%). Local tumor control rate was also similar between two groups (90.9% vs. 94.7%). There was no severe complication (grade IIIa or above) in both groups. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 88.2% and 85.7% in SBRT group and 100% and 75% in RFA group, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between groups (P = .576).SBRT can achieve similar short and long-term clinical outcome as RFA for unresectable HCC. Future prospective clinical study is needed to justify its role in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ren Ji
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Kelvin K. Ng
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Wenqi Chen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Weihong Yang
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Hongtao Zhu
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Chi-Leung Chiang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Tiffany C.L. Wong
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Feng-Ming Kong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - G. Wu
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Chung-Mau Lo
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Heller M, Parikh ND, Fidelman N, Owen D. Frontiers of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3648-3659. [PMID: 33837453 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03065-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma continues to increase worldwide. Fortunately, there have been notable recent advances in locoregional and systemic therapy. In this current review, we will highlight these new developments and future directions of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment and address the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment.
Collapse
|
19
|
Eriguchi T, Takeda A, Tateishi Y, Tsurugai Y, Sanuki N, Ebinuma H, Horita N. Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score studies. Hepatol Res 2021; 51:813-822. [PMID: 33856722 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has shown excellent local control (LC), as has radiofrequency ablation (RFA). As no randomized controlled trial has compared SBRT and RFA for HCC, data from a propensity score matched study (PSMS) are valuable. However, the results varied greatly and depended on composing factors of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging (BCLC-factors) adjusted. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analyses of the studies focusing on BCLC-factors matching. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane database, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify studies comparing RFA and SBRT using propensity scores. The hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and LC from BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched PSMS were pooled. Heterogeneity between the data from these studies was assessed. RESULTS Three BCLC-factor-matched studies were identified. Stereotactic body radiotherapy led to comparable OS (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.08; p = 0.24; I2 = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.56) and significantly better LC (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.51; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.67). We also identified three additional BCLC-factor-unmatched studies (HR of OS, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.21-1.65; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.63). However, considerable heterogeneity was observed for HR of OS between BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched studies (I2 = 92.6%; p for heterogeneity, 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS When BCLC-factors were properly adjusted, the results of the meta-analysis revealed equivalent OS and better LC for SBRT compared with RFA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy could be an alternative treatment option for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atsuya Takeda
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Yudai Tateishi
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | | | - Naoko Sanuki
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Ebinuma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan.,Center for Gastroenterology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Horita
- Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mathew AS, Dawson LA. Current Understanding of Ablative Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2021; 8:575-586. [PMID: 34164350 PMCID: PMC8214025 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s284403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of ablative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been evolving over the last few decades. SBRT has mostly been used in early stages of HCC, including few (≤ 3 in number) tumors, small tumours (< 3 cm in size), as well as larger tumours which are ineligible for other ablative modalities, mostly without vascular invasion. In early stage HCC, SBRT is used as a definitive treatment with curative intent or with intent to bridge to liver transplant. Retrospective and prospective institutional series document a high rate of local control (68–95% at 3 years) following SBRT. This coupled with a low risk of toxicity makes this non-invasive ablative treatment an attractive option for patients who are ineligible for other ablative treatments. Small randomized studies of ablative radiation have also shown non-inferiority of radiation as compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Currently, SBRT is widely available as a safe and effective liver directed therapy, although there is a need for more studies providing higher level evidence. This review gives a brief overview of SBRT and the evidence for its use in HCC patients with ablative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwathy S Mathew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Li Z, Jiao D, Han X. Commentary: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs. Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:633417. [PMID: 34084741 PMCID: PMC8168374 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.633417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaonan Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Dechao Jiao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xinwei Han
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Guan MC, Wang MD, Liu SY, Ouyang W, Liang L, Pawlik TM, Xu QR, Huang DS, Shen F, Zhu H, Yang T. Early diagnosis and therapeutic strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: From bench to bedside. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:197-215. [PMID: 33889272 PMCID: PMC8040062 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i4.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The prognosis of patients with HCC remains poor largely due to the late diagnosis and lack of effective treatments. Despite being widely used, alpha-fetoprotein serology and ultrasonography have limited diagnostic performance for early-stage HCC. The emergence of omics strategies has contributed to significant advances in the development of non-invasive biomarkers for the early diagnosis of HCC including proteins, metabolites, circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid, and circulating non-coding ribonucleic acid. Early diagnosis is beneficial to patients as it increases the proportion who can be treated with curative treatment, thus prolonging survival outcomes. Currently, multiple clinical trials involving locoregional, systemic therapies, and combinations of these modalities are changing therapeutic strategies for different stage HCC. Success in several preclinical trials that involve immunotherapeutic innovations has created the potential to complement and enforce other treatment strategies in the future. This review summarizes the most recent advances in non-invasive early molecular detection, current therapy strategies, and potential immunotherapeutic innovations of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Cheng Guan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ming-Da Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (Navy Medical University), Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Si-Yu Liu
- Department of Laboratory, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wei Ouyang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Lei Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Qiu-Ran Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Dong-Sheng Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (Navy Medical University), Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Hong Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Tian Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (Navy Medical University), Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pérez-Romasanta LA, González-Del Portillo E, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez A, Matías-Pérez Á. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Radiosensitization Strategies and Radiation-Immunotherapy Combination. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020192. [PMID: 33430362 PMCID: PMC7825787 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiotherapy is rapidly turning into a crucial component of multidisciplinary treatment for liver cancer because many patients are not surgical treatment candidates. Thanks to technical developments, radiotherapy have achieved high precision treatments, making it possible to eliminate tumor cells without severe damage to the liver and other organs. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy is an advanced radiotherapy technique able to eradicate malignant tumors wherever they are located in properly selected patients. The best use of radiotherapy, the most fruitful radiotherapy strategy, and the best way to combine it with other treatments for liver cancer are largely unknown. Radiosensitizers, agents that can potentiate radiotherapy, could broaden the radiotherapeutic landscape. Radiotherapy potentiation can be achieved with diverse treatments, not only drugs but also nanoparticles. In order to clear up the performance of radiotherapy in liver cancer management in the future and the best ways to potentiate its effects, considerable medical research is needed. Abstract Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging ablative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Most patients with HCC have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis, and therefore, are not candidates for definitive-intent therapies such as resection or transplantation. For this reason, various alternative local and regional therapies have been used to prevent disease progression, palliate symptoms, and delay liver failure. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a non-invasive technique of delivering ablative doses of radiation to tumors while sparing normal or non-tumor hepatic tissue. Incorporation of SBRT in multidisciplinary HCC management is gradual, initially applied when other liver-directed therapies have failed or are contraindicated, and tried in combination with other locoregional or systemic therapies for more unfavorable conditions by more experienced teams. In order to improve SBRT therapeutic ratio, there has been much interest in augmenting the effect of radiation on tumors by combining it with chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapeutics, nanoparticles, and immunotherapy. This review aims to synthesize available evidence to evaluate the clinical feasibility and efficacy of SBRT for HCC, and to explore novel radio-potentiation concepts by combining SBRT with novel therapeutics. It is expected that those approaches would result in improved therapeutic outcomes, even though many questions remain with regard to the optimal way to assemble treatments. Further trials are needed to evaluate and consolidate these promising therapies for HCC.
Collapse
|