Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy

The application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in chronic rhinosinusitis patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has become extensively practiced and has shown encouraging benefits. Within recent years, ERAS has also been increasingly performed in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). However, the actual efficacy of ERAS in CRS patients undergoing ESS is not completely clear, and the related evidence remains weak. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ERAS in the perioperative management of CRS patients receiving ESS.

METHODS

We searched randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Ovid, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, Wanfang, and VIP Database up to February 2023, to analyze the effectiveness and safety of ERAS in ESS perioperative management of CRS patients. We appraised the methodological quality in the included RCTs using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and assessed the quality of evidence with the Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis were carried out with the the software Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0. In addition, potential publication bias was detected by Begg's test, Egger's test, and funnel plot test.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies involving 2636 patients were included within this study. In comparison with the standard care (SC) group, the ERAS group had the advantages in the following aspects: length of stay (MD = -2.50, 95%CI: -3.04 to -1.97), pain scores (MD = -1.07, 95%CI: -1.46 to -0.67), anxiety score (SMD = -2.13, 95%CI: -2.83 to -1.44), depression score (SMD = -2.42, 95%CI: -3.13 to -1.71), hospitalization expenses, and quality of life. At the same time, the ERAS group presented a markedly lower incidence of adverse events in comparison to the SC group, such as overall complications (RR = 0.28, 95%CI:0.20 to 0.41), postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.33, 95%CI:0.21 to 0.50), facial edema (RR = 0.20, 95%CI:0.11 to 0.38), low back pain (RR = 0.28, 95%CI:0.16 to 0.49), urinary retention (RR = 0.12, 95%CI:0.05 to 0.30) and haemorrhage (RR = 0.19, 95%CI:0.07 to 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that the ERAS protocol is effective and safe in CRS patients who undergo ESS. However, Due to the limited overall methodological quality included studies, caution should be exercised in the interpretation of the results. More high-quality, multiple-centre, and large-sample studies are in demand in the future to further validate its clinical efficacy.

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Even though there isn't enough clinical evidence to demonstrate that robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is preferable to open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC has become a widely used alternative. We performed the present study of RARC vs ORC with a focus on oncologic, pathological, perioperative, and complication-related outcomes and health-related quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

We conducted a literature review up to August 2022. The search included PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane controlled trials register databases. We classified the studies according to version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The data was assessed by Review Manager 5.4.0.

RESULTS

8 RCTs comparing 1024 patients were analyzed in our study. RARC was related to lower estimated blood loss (weighted mean difference (WMD): -328.2; 95% CI -463.49--192.92; p < 0.00001), lower blood transfusion rates (OR: 0.45; 95% CI 0.32 - 0.65; p < 0.0001) but longer operation time (WMD: 84.21; 95% CI 46.20 -121.72; p < 0.0001). And we found no significant difference in terms of positive surgical margins (P = 0.97), lymph node yield (P = 0.30) and length of stay (P = 0.99). Moreover, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of survival outcomes, pathological outcomes, postoperative complication outcomes and health-related QOL.

CONCLUSION

Based on the present evidence, we demonstrated that RARC and ORC have similar cancer control results. RARC is related to less blood loss and lower transfusion rate. We found no difference in postoperative complications and health-related QOL between robotic and open approaches. RARC procedures could be used as an alternate treatment for bladder cancer patients. Additional RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to validate this observation.

Impact of Patient, Surgical, and Perioperative Factors on Discharge Disposition after Radical Cystectomy

Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex procedure associated with lengthy hospital stays and high complication and readmission rates. We evaluated the impact of patient, surgical, and perioperative factors on discharge disposition following RC at a tertiary referral center. From 2012 to 2019, all bladder cancer patients undergoing RC at our institution were identified (n = 1153). Patients were classified based on discharge disposition: to home or to continued facility-based rehabilitation centers (CFRs, n = 180 (15.61%) patients). On multivariate analysis of patient factors only, age [Risk Ratio (RR): 1.07, p < 0.001)], single marital status (RR: 1.09, p < 0.001), and living alone prior to surgery (RR: 2.55, p = 0.004) were significant predictors of discharge to CFRs. Multivariate analysis of patient, surgical, and perioperative factors indicated age (RR: 1.09, p < 0.001), single marital status (RR: 3.9, p < 0.001), living alone prior to surgery (RR: 2.42, p = 0.01), and major post-operative (Clavien > 3) complications (RR: 3.44, p < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of discharge to CFRs. Of note, ERAS did not significantly impact discharge disposition. Specific patient and perioperative factors significantly impact discharge disposition. Patients who are older, living alone prior to surgery, and/or have a major post-operative complication are more likely to be discharged to CFRs after RC.

Risk factors of postoperative ileus following laparoscopic radical cystectomy and developing a points-based risk assessment scale

Background

Postoperative ileus (POI) is one of the most common complications after laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). Albeit its high incidence, its risk factors are obscure, and few studies have attempted to explore them. Meanwhile, risk-assessing tools for predicting its happening are lacking.

Methods

Clinical data of 197 patients who underwent LRC between March 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively collected. All cases of POI were identified and double-checked. Data pertaining to the following categories were extracted as well: patients' general characteristics, preoperative laboratory tests results and preparations, intraoperative and postoperative general items, pathological results. The correlation between candidate risk factors and ileus was analyzed by multivariable binary logistic regression. Clinical and pathophysiological explanations for those results were explored. Finally, a points-based prediction model was developed and validated for predicting the happening of POI.

Results

A total of 63 out of 197 patients (31.98%) suffered from POI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed chronic constipation, increased dosage of laxative, elevated preoperative serum creatinine level, delayed postoperative ambulation, intestine-related urine derivations were statistically significant for developing POI (P<0.05). No significant differences were found between POI and age, gender, body mass index (BMI), antibiotics, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, hard-drinking, preoperative hemoglobin level, preoperative albumin level, history of previous abdominal surgery, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, tumor size, lymph nodes yields, TNM staging and intensive care unit hospitalization. An external cohort had been used for testing the validation of the assessment scale, and the results were promising.

Conclusions

Early recognition is of great importance in protecting vulnerable patients from developing POI, knowing the above-mentioned risk factors and using the assessment scale should help to screen them better. Cases from diverse backgrounds might contribute to a more accurate and complete scale.

[Enhanced recovery after surgery-Does the ERAS concept keep its promises]

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concepts or fast-track are supposed to accelerate recovery after surgery, reduce postoperative complications and shorten the hospital stay when compared to traditional perioperative treatment.

METHODS

Electronic search of the PubMed database to identify systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SR) comparing ERAS and traditional treatment.

RESULTS

The presented SR investigated 70 randomized controlled studies (RCT) with 12,986 patients and 93 non-RCT (24,335 patients) concerning abdominal, thoracic and vascular as well as orthopedic surgery. The complication rates were decreased under ERAS following colorectal esophageal, liver and pulmonary resections as well as after implantation of hip endoprostheses. Pulmonary complications were reduced after ERAS esophageal, gastric and pulmonary resections. The first bowel movements occurred earlier after ERAS colorectal resections and delayed gastric emptying was less often observed after ERAS pancreatic resection. Following ERAS fast-track esophageal resection, anastomotic leakage was diagnosed less often as well as surgical complications after ERAS pulmonary resection. The ERAS in all studies concerning orthopedic surgery and trials investigating implantation of a hip endoprosthesis or knee endoprosthesis reduced the risk for postoperative blood transfusions. Regardless of the type of surgery, ERAS shortened hospital stay without increasing readmissions.

CONCLUSION

Numerous clinical trials have confirmed that ERAS reduces postoperative morbidity, shortens hospital stay and accelerates recovery without increasing readmission rates following most surgical operations.