Expression and Prognostic Significance of Metastasis-Associated Protein 1 in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Non-coding RNAs and gastrointestinal cancers prognosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies

Aim

Provide an overview and a systematic evaluation of the evidence quality on the association between non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and prognosis value for gastrointestinal cancers (GICs).

Methods

We searched the literature from three electronic databases: Pubmed, Embase, and Web of science, then carefully screened and extracted the primary information and results from the included articles. We use A measurable systematic review and meta-analysis evaluation tool (AMSTAR2) to evaluate the quality of methodology and then use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment 2, Development and Evaluation guideline (GRADE) make sure the reliability of the meta-analysis.

Results

Overall, 182 meta-analyses from 58 studies were included in this study. Most of these studies are of low or very low quality. Using the scoring tool, we found that only two meta-analyses were rated as high reliability, and 17 meta-analyses were rated as medium reliability.

Conclusions

Although ncRNA has good prognostic value in some studies, only a tiny amount of evidence is highly credible at present. More research is needed in the future.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42022382296.

Stathmin1 promotes lymph node metastasis in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma via regulation of HIF‑1α/VEGF‑A axis and MTA1 expression

Extensive neck lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important clinical feature of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC). Stathmin1 (STMN1) is closely associated with LNM in numerous human cancers. In the present study, the association between STMN1 and neck LNM in HSCC and the underlying molecular mechanisms were explored. First, postoperative samples of HSCC were screened and the association between STMN1 and neck LNM in HSCC was analyzed. Then, cell functional experiments were performed to assess the potential of STMN1 to promote invasion and migration. Subsequently, the potential target genes and pathways of STMN1 were predicted using bioinformatics analysis. Finally, the obtained target genes and pathways of STMN1 were validated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and western blot analyses to confirm the potential mechanisms by which STMN1 promotes LNM in HSCC. As a result, a total of 117 postoperative samples of HSCC were screened, and STMN1 was proven to be associated with neck LNM in HSCC. Further, cell functional experiments established that high expression of STMN1 could actually promote FaDu cell invasion and metastasis. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that high expression of STMN1 was associated with the activation of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1α) pathway and increased expression of metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1). Finally, RT-qPCR and western blot analyses confirmed that STMN1 promotes the expression levels of HIF-1α/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and MTA1 in FaDu cell lines. In conclusion, it was found that high expression of STMN1 promoted neck LNM in HSCC and the potential mechanisms may be via regulation of the HIF-1α/VEGF-A axis and MTA1 expression.

Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts the benefit of gastric cancer patients with systemic therapy

Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of inoperable gastric cancer patients with systemic therapy. However, no consensus on the association has been reached. In this study, we mainly evaluated whether pretreatment NLR predicted the benefit of inoperable gastric cancer patients with systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from inception up to September 16th, 2020. A total of 36 studies including 8614 patients were involved in the meta-analysis. Pooled data revealed that high pretreatment NLR was significantly associated with poor outcomes of OS (HR = 1.78, 95% CI = [1.59, 1.99]) and PFS (HR = 1.63, 95% CI = [1.39, 1.91]) in gastric cancer. Subgroup analyses stratified by country, study type, case load, analysis of HR, cutoff of pretreatment NLR, or treatment types arrived at the same conclusion. Pooled data based on different effect models and sensitivity analyses did not change the conclusion. Overall, high pretreatment NLR predicts the poor prognosis of inoperable gastric cancer patients with systemic therapy. Measurement of pretreatment NLR will assist clinicians with patient counseling and clinical treatment guiding accordingly.