Oncological Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery With High Dissection and Selective Ligation Technique for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer

Current status of robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration focusing on the field of urology: a clinical practice review

Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) is a highly invasive surgery associated with high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality and is commonly performed for several types of locally advanced or recurrent pelvic cancers. It involves multivisceral resection, including the rectum, sigmoid colon, bladder, prostate, uterus, vagina, or ovaries, and urologists normally perform radical cystectomy or radical prostatectomy and urinary diversion in collaboration with colorectal surgeons and gynecologists. In the urological field, robot-assisted surgeries have been widely performed as one of the main minimally invasive procedures because of their superior perioperative or oncological outcomes compared to open or laparoscopic surgeries. In pelvic exenteration (PE) surgery, laparoscopic surgeries have shown superior rates of mortality, morbidity, and R0 resection compared to open surgeries. Robot-assisted TPE for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer was first reported in 2014, and reports of its safety and usefulness have gradually increased. Robot-assisted PE, in which multivisceral resection in a narrow pelvic space is easier, will eventually be a standard minimally invasive procedure, although evidence has been limited to date. This clinical practice review summarizes the indications for surgery, perioperative complications, and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted TPE and highlights the current status of robot-assisted TPE for patients with urological malignancies and its surgical technique, focusing on the manipulation of urological organs.

Characterization of endoplasmic reticulum stress unveils ZNF703 as a promising target for colorectal cancer immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors globally, with high morbidity and mortality. Endoplasmic reticulum is a major organelle responsible for protein synthesis, processing, and transport. Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) refers to the abnormal accumulation of unfolded and misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, which are involved in tumorigenesis and cancer immunity. Nevertheless, the clinical significance of ERS remains largely unexplored in CRC.

METHODS

In present study, we performed an unsupervised clustering to identify two types of ERS-related subtypes [ERS clusters, and ERS-related genes (ERSGs) clusters] in multiple large-scale CRC cohorts. Through the utilization of machine learning techniques, we have successfully developed an uncomplicated yet robust gene scoring system (ERSGs signature). Furthermore, a series of analyses, including GO, KEGG, Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE), the Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS), were used to explore the underlying biological differences and clinical significance between these groups. And immunohistochemical and bioinformatics analyses were performed to explore ZNF703, a gene of ERSGs scoring system.

RESULTS

We observed significant differences in prognosis and tumor immune status between the ERS clusters as well as ERSGs clusters. And the ERSGs scoring system was an independent risk factor for overall survival; and exhibited distinct tumor immune status in multicenter CRC cohorts. Besides, analyses of TNM stages, CMS groups demonstrated that patients in advanced stage and CMS4 had higher ERSGs scores. In addition, the ERSGs scores inversely correlated with positive ICB response predictors (such as, CD8A, CD274 (PD-L1), and TIS), and directly correlated with negative ICB response predictors (such as, TIDE, T cell Exclusion, COX-IS). Notably, immunohistochemical staining and bioinformatics analyses revealed that ZNF70 correlated with CD3 + and CD8 + T cells infiltration.

CONCLUSION

Based on large-scale and multicenter transcriptomic data, our study comprehensively revealed the essential role of ERS in CRC; and constructed a novel ERSGs scoring system to predict the prognosis of patients and the efficacy of ICB treatment. Furthermore, we identified ZNF703 as a potentially promising target for ICB therapy in CRC.

Long-term Oncological Results After Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy for Adenocarcinoma

Purpose: Sigmoidectomy is performed in most cases for benign pathologies and mainly in cases of diverticulitis. Few studies in the literature report oncological results after sigmoidectomy for adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to report the long-term oncological outcomes after elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) for adenocarcinoma. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. From January 2003 to February 2021, 173 patients underwent elective LS for adenocarcinoma. Twenty-four patients with a diagnosis of preoperative distant metastases were excluded (13.9%). Results: Seven postoperative complications were observed (7.1%). Of these, 2 (2%) anastomotic leakages were treated surgically by the Hartmann procedure (Clavien-Dindo grade III-b). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes with the specimen was 14.2 ± 7.1. At a median follow-up of 115 months (interquartile range 133.8), 2 (2%) and 9 patients (9.2%) had developed recurrence and metastases, respectively. During follow-up, 6 patients (6.1%) with metastases died due to disease progression and 6 other patients (6.1%) died due to causes other than cancer related. At the 5- and 10-year follow-ups, the overall survival rates were 90.5% ± 3.4% and 83.8% ± 4.5%, respectively, while the disease-free survival rates were 87.1% ± 4.1% and 83.5% ± 4.7%, respectively. Conclusion: LS is a safe and feasible technique both in terms of the number of harvested lymph nodes and oncological results. The possibility of sparing the colon without mobilizing the splenic flexure and dividing the left colic artery could reduce intra- and postoperative complications. Further studies with larger samples of patients are required to confirm these data.

Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Real-World Experience over 8 Years of Multiple Institutions with High-Volume Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Simple Summary

The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RRS) in hospitals with a high-volume of robotic-assisted surgeries. This study enrolled patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing RRS from three high-volume institutions from December 2011 to June 2020. Compared with other studies, our results revealed the equivalent or superior perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes. Hence, RRS is an effective, safe, and feasible technique for patients with rectal cancers in high-volume hospitals.

Abstract

The perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RRS) are unclear. This retrospective observational study enrolled patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing RRS from three high-volume institutions in Taiwan. Of the 605 enrolled patients, 301 (49.75%), 176 (29.09%), and 116 (19.17%) had lower, middle, and upper rectal cancers, respectively. Low anterior resection (377, 62.31%) was the most frequent surgical procedure. Intraoperative blood transfusion was performed in 10 patients (2%). The surgery was converted to an open one for one patient (0.2%), and ten (1.7%) patients underwent reoperation. The overall complication rate was 14.5%, including 3% from anastomosis leakage. No deaths occurred during surgery and within 30 days postoperatively. The positive rates of distal resection margin and circumferential resection margin were observed in 21 (3.5%) and 30 (5.0%) patients, respectively. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates for patients with stage I–III rectal cancer were 91.1% and 86.3%, respectively. This is the first multi-institutional study in Taiwan with 605 patients from three high-volume hospitals. The overall surgical and oncological outcomes were equivalent or superior to those estimated in other studies. Hence, RRS is an effective and safe technique for rectal resection in high-volume hospitals.

Exploring Central Vascular Anatomy With Axial Computed Tomography During Surgery for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer: New Insights Into the Anatomical Relationship Between the Inferior Mesenteric Artery and the Duodenum

Background: In some individuals, the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) originates from the aorta above the lower edge of the duodenum. This anatomical feature has rarely been reported but may be important in guiding central vascular ligation and lymph node dissection in colorectal surgery. This retrospective study aimed to explore the anatomical relationship between the IMA and the duodenum and evaluate its potential impact on the efficacy of D3 lymph node dissection.

Methods: A total of 439 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical data from axial computed tomography (CT) scans were collected and analysed.

Results: In 27.69% of patients, the IMA originated at or above the lower edge of the duodenum (median distance: −8 mm). These patients were characterised by a shorter superior mesenteric artery to aortic bifurcation distance, a superiorly located IMA origin, and a greater distance between the IMA and both the left colic artery and the inferior mesenteric vein. The number of harvested lymph nodes was not significantly associated with the distance between the IMA and the duodenum (P = 0.858).

Conclusions: Preoperative axial CT scans can provide a great deal of information regarding central vascular anatomy in the context of sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery. Nearly one-third of patients have the IMA originating at or above the duodenum. Whether this anatomical feature affects D3 lymph node dissection warrants further investigation.

Low Ligation Plus High Dissection Versus High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Whether high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is superior in surgery for rectal and sigmoid colon cancers remains controversial. Although several meta-analyses have been conducted, the level of lymph node clearance was poorly defined. We performed a meta-analysis comparing high and low ligation of the IMA for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers, with emphasis on high dissection of the lymph node at the IMA root in all the included studies.

Methods

PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify relevant articles published until 2020. The patient’s perioperative and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software RevMan version 5.4.

Results

A total of 17 studies, including four randomized controlled trials, published between 2011 and 2020 were selected. In total, 1,846 patients received low ligation of the IMA plus high dissection of lymph nodes (LL+HD), and 2,648 patients received high ligation of the IMA (HL). LL+HD was associated with low incidence of anastomotic leakage (p < 0.001), borderline long operative time (p = 0.06), and less yields of total lymph nodes (p = 0.03) but equivalent IMA root lymph nodes (p = 0.07); moreover, LL+HD exhibited non-inferior long-term oncological outcomes.

Conclusion

In comparison with HL, LL+HD was an effective and safe oncological procedure for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers. Therefore, to ligate the IMA below the level of the left colic artery with D3 high dissection for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers might be suggested once the surgeons are familiar with this technique.

Systematic Review Registration

INPLASY.com, identifier 202190029.