1
|
Deng YY, Zhang XY, Zhu PF, Lu HR, Liu Q, Pan SY, Chen ZL, Yang L. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib and regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1097911. [PMID: 36937443 PMCID: PMC10020225 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1097911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fruquintinib and regorafenib have been approved for the third-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in China. However, at present, there is a lack of head-to-head clinical trials on the comparison of efficacy and safety between the two drugs. Materials and methods The data of patients with mCRC who were treated with fruquintinib or regorafenib after the standard chemotherapy in Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from October 2018 to November 2021 were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. The secondary endpoints were the appropriate sequence, objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of fruquintinib and regorafenib. Results A total of 105 patients were enrolled in this study. The ORR of fruquintinib group (n=55) and regorafenib group (n=50) were 6.1% and 2.0%; the DCR were 65.3% and 54.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in median OS (mOS) and PFS (mPFS) between the two groups (mOS:14.2 vs12.0 months, p=0.057; mPFS:4.4 vs 3.5 months, p=0.150). Combined immunotherapy showed a synergistic effect. The mPFS and mOS of fruquintinib combined with anti-PD-1 therapy were longer than those of fruquintinib monotherapy (mPFS:5.9 vs 3.0 months, p=0.009; mOS:17.5 vs 11.3 months, p=0.008). The mOS of patients treated with regorafenib combined with anti-PD-1 therapy was 14.8 months higher than that of regorafenib monotherapy (p=0.045). When combined with anti-PD-1 therapy, the mPFS and mOS of fruquintinib was significantly longer than regorafenib (mPFS:5.9 vs 3.8 months, p=0.018; mOS:17.5 vs 14.8 months, p=0.044). In the treatment sequence, the OS of patients treated with regorafenib and then fruquintinib was significantly longer than that of the reverse treatment sequence (15.0 vs 8.3 months, p=0.019). The adverse reactions were generally similar, but the incidence of hand-foot syndrome of regorafenib was higher than that of fruquintinib, while fruquintinib was more prone to grade 3 hypertension. Conclusion Fruquintinib monotherapy showed better disease control rate and objective remission rate in the post-line therapy of metastasis colorectal cancer. Notably, the combination of PD-1 immunotherapy brought the additional effect, especially in the fruquintinib combined with anti-PD-1 therapy. Patients treated with regorafenib and then fruquintinib was significantly longer than that of the reverse treatment sequence. The toxicity of fruquintinib and regorafenib are similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Ya Deng
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Xin-Yue Zhang
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Peng-Fei Zhu
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China
| | - Hong-Rui Lu
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China
| | - Qian Liu
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Shuang-Yue Pan
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhe-Ling Chen
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- *Correspondence: Liu Yang, ; Zhe-Ling Chen,
| | - Liu Yang
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- *Correspondence: Liu Yang, ; Zhe-Ling Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jin Y, Li J, Shen L, Xu J, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Pan H, Qu X, Chen Y, Zhang Q, Li J, Sun M, Qin S. A multi-center effectiveness comparison study of fruquintinib with constructed external control cohort of other targeted kinase inhibitors using real-world data in third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1044328. [PMID: 36505849 PMCID: PMC9730021 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1044328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to assess the comparative efficacy in third-line setting for metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients using matched population of FRESCO trial with fruquintinib and real-world data with other TKIs. Materials and methods The arm of fruquintinib from the FRESCO phase III trial (NCT02314819) included the data of patients with metastatic CRC that progressed after at least two lines of chemotherapy and received fruquintinib treatment. An external control arm was constructed using real-world data (RWD) of patients who received other TKIs based on key eligibility criteria of FRESCO. The baseline characteristics of two arms was balanced by propensity score matching (PSM). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate progression free survival (PFS) and to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Results Overall, 128 patients were successfully matched by PSM in each, fruquintinib and other TKIs group. The patients in fruquintinib group showed significant increase in median PFS than other TKIs (3.71 vs. 2.49 months, HR = 0.67, 95%CI, 0.48-0.94, p = 0.019). In the subgroup analysis, fruquintinib showed a significant benefit in PFS compared with other TKIs among patients undergoing two or three previous chemotherapy regimens (HR 0.58, 95%CI 0.40-0.84; p=0.004), with rectum as primary disease site (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.31-0.87; p=0.013), with left sided primary tumor location (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.42-0.90; p=0.011), with multiple metastasis sites (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.48-0.97; p=0.034) and with lung metastasis (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.43-0.98; p=0.042). Conclusion With the approach of establishing the external control arm from RWD, this study has demonstrated that treatment with fruquintinib significantly prolonged PFS as compared to other TKIs in patients as third-line mCRC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Jin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Oriental Hospital Affiliated Tongji University East Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yanqiao Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Jingdong Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Hongming Pan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiujuan Qu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yamin Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly China Drug Development and Medical Affairs Centre, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinnan Li
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly China Drug Development and Medical Affairs Centre, Shanghai, China
| | - Miaomiao Sun
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly China Drug Development and Medical Affairs Centre, Shanghai, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Cancer Centre of Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China,*Correspondence: Shukui Qin,
| |
Collapse
|