1
|
Iwamura H, Hatakeyama S, Narita T, Ozaki Y, Konishi S, Horiguchi H, Kodama H, Kojima Y, Fujita N, Okamoto T, Tobisawa Y, Yoneyama T, Yamamoto H, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Ohyama C. Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:9675. [PMID: 35690635 PMCID: PMC9188590 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13651-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (< cT4N0M0) who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy plus estramustine phosphate followed by RP between January 2010 and March 2020. Since we stopped limited PLND for such patients in October 2015, we compared the surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) between the limited-PLND group (before October 2015, n = 283) and the non-PLND group (after November 2015, n = 233). The rate of node metastases in the limited-PLND group were 0.8% (2/283). Operation time was significantly longer (176 vs. 162 min) and the rate of surgical complications were much higher (all grades; 19 vs. 6%, grade ≥ 3; 3 vs. 0%) in the limited-PLND group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox analysis revealed limited PLND had no significant impact on BCR-FS (hazard ratio, 1.44; P = 0.469). Limited PLND during RP after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy showed quite low rate of positive nodes, higher rate of complications, and no significant impact on BCR-FS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromichi Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
| | - Takuma Narita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yusuke Ozaki
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Sakae Konishi
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Horiguchi
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hirotake Kodama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yuta Kojima
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Naoki Fujita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Teppei Okamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yuki Tobisawa
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Tohru Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.,Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.,Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ge Q, Xu H, Yue D, Fan Z, Chen Z, Xu J, Zhou Y, Zhang S, Xue J, Shen B, Wei Z. Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy in Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:906370. [PMID: 35646683 PMCID: PMC9130750 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.906370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) on patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy (RP) and attempt to provide meaningful evidence. Methods A systematic search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases in February 2022 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The relevant studies were critically screened and we extracted the data of demography, postoperative pathology, and survival to calculate the pooled effect sizes. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Results Six identified studies involving 1717 subjects were included according to the selection criteria. There was no significant difference between NCHT plus RP and RP alone groups regarding lymph node involvement (risk ratio [RR]=1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-1.87, P=0.92). However, NCHT prior to RP significantly decreased the rates of positive surgical margin (PSM, RR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.22-0.55, P<0.0001) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI, RR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.95, P=0.01), and increase pathological downstaging (RR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.17-2.29, P=0.004). Additionally, biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly prolonged under the administration of NCHT (HR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.85, P=0.008 and HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.94, P=0.02, respectively). Conclusions Compared to the RP alone group, patients with NCHT plus RP showed significant improvements in PSM, SVI, pathological downstaging, BRFS, and OS, whereas further multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to consolidate this concept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyu Ge
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hewei Xu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Dezhou Yue
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zongyao Fan
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhengsen Chen
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Xu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yiduo Zhou
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sicong Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Xue
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Baixin Shen
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhongqing Wei
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feasibility and outcome of radical prostatectomy following inductive neoadjuvant therapy in patients with suspicion of rectal infiltration. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:59.e7-59.e12. [PMID: 34456124 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility and outcome of radical prostatectomy (RP) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with initial inoperable, rectum-infiltrating cT4 prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS From 01/2018 to 12/2020, 26 patients with clinical (DRE) or radiographical (mpMRI) suspicion of rectum infiltrating PCa at diagnosis and NAT prior to RP were retrospectively identified from our prospective institutional database. Two patients were still inoperable after NAT. Downsizing was administered for at least 20 weeks and RP was performed after excluding ongoing rectal infiltration. RESULTS At diagnosis, median PSA was 42.5 ng/ml (IQR: 23.0-66.1). Inductive NAT consisted of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with chemotherapy (n = 9) or without chemotherapy (n = 14). Median preoperative PSA was 0.93 ng/ml (IQR: 0.24-0.40). Median time from NAT to RP was 6 months (IQR: 5-7). Two patients were still inoperable after NAT. Of 24 patients undergoing RP, abortion of surgery due to inoperability was observed in 2 patients (8.4%), demonstrating a total failure rate of NAT in 4 out of 26 patients (15.4%). One patient suffered a rectal injury with consecutive colostomy (4.2%). No Clavien-Dindo complication Grade IV or V were observed. Urinary continence was achieved in 16 patients (84.2%). Sufficient erection for sexual intercourse was present in 2 patients (10.5%). All patients received adjuvant ADT with or without radiation therapy. Median PSA at 13 months was 0.08 ng/ml (IQR: 0.01-0.74). CONCLUSION RP of initially rectum infiltrating PCa is feasible and safe after inductive NAT, however complications rates tend to be higher compared to standard RP.
Collapse
|