The Impact of Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy on Surgical and Oncological Outcomes for Patients With Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy

We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (< cT4N0M0) who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy plus estramustine phosphate followed by RP between January 2010 and March 2020. Since we stopped limited PLND for such patients in October 2015, we compared the surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) between the limited-PLND group (before October 2015, n = 283) and the non-PLND group (after November 2015, n = 233). The rate of node metastases in the limited-PLND group were 0.8% (2/283). Operation time was significantly longer (176 vs. 162 min) and the rate of surgical complications were much higher (all grades; 19 vs. 6%, grade ≥ 3; 3 vs. 0%) in the limited-PLND group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox analysis revealed limited PLND had no significant impact on BCR-FS (hazard ratio, 1.44; P = 0.469). Limited PLND during RP after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy showed quite low rate of positive nodes, higher rate of complications, and no significant impact on BCR-FS.

Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy in Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

This meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) on patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy (RP) and attempt to provide meaningful evidence.

Methods

A systematic search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases in February 2022 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The relevant studies were critically screened and we extracted the data of demography, postoperative pathology, and survival to calculate the pooled effect sizes. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity.

Results

Six identified studies involving 1717 subjects were included according to the selection criteria. There was no significant difference between NCHT plus RP and RP alone groups regarding lymph node involvement (risk ratio [RR]=1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-1.87, P=0.92). However, NCHT prior to RP significantly decreased the rates of positive surgical margin (PSM, RR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.22-0.55, P<0.0001) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI, RR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.95, P=0.01), and increase pathological downstaging (RR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.17-2.29, P=0.004). Additionally, biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly prolonged under the administration of NCHT (HR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.85, P=0.008 and HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.94, P=0.02, respectively).

Conclusions

Compared to the RP alone group, patients with NCHT plus RP showed significant improvements in PSM, SVI, pathological downstaging, BRFS, and OS, whereas further multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to consolidate this concept.

Feasibility and outcome of radical prostatectomy following inductive neoadjuvant therapy in patients with suspicion of rectal infiltration

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and outcome of radical prostatectomy (RP) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with initial inoperable, rectum-infiltrating cT4 prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

From 01/2018 to 12/2020, 26 patients with clinical (DRE) or radiographical (mpMRI) suspicion of rectum infiltrating PCa at diagnosis and NAT prior to RP were retrospectively identified from our prospective institutional database. Two patients were still inoperable after NAT. Downsizing was administered for at least 20 weeks and RP was performed after excluding ongoing rectal infiltration.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, median PSA was 42.5 ng/ml (IQR: 23.0-66.1). Inductive NAT consisted of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with chemotherapy (n = 9) or without chemotherapy (n = 14). Median preoperative PSA was 0.93 ng/ml (IQR: 0.24-0.40). Median time from NAT to RP was 6 months (IQR: 5-7). Two patients were still inoperable after NAT. Of 24 patients undergoing RP, abortion of surgery due to inoperability was observed in 2 patients (8.4%), demonstrating a total failure rate of NAT in 4 out of 26 patients (15.4%). One patient suffered a rectal injury with consecutive colostomy (4.2%). No Clavien-Dindo complication Grade IV or V were observed. Urinary continence was achieved in 16 patients (84.2%). Sufficient erection for sexual intercourse was present in 2 patients (10.5%). All patients received adjuvant ADT with or without radiation therapy. Median PSA at 13 months was 0.08 ng/ml (IQR: 0.01-0.74).

CONCLUSION

RP of initially rectum infiltrating PCa is feasible and safe after inductive NAT, however complications rates tend to be higher compared to standard RP.