The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Combined With PD-1 Antibody for Third-Line or Further-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in locally advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who progressed on prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): a retrospective real-world study (NCT 04984096)

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors is effective for solid tumors, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, most of these studies were focused on immunotherapy-naive patients. This retrospective real-world study offers insights into the efficacy and safety of combining anlotinib with ICIs in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC patients who progressed on prior ICI.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC patients who had progressed on PD-1 inhibitor. Efficacy was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), while secondary endpoints were safety, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Baseline characteristics and adverse events (AEs) were documented throughout the study.

RESULTS

Between July 2020 and March 2022, 29 eligible patients were included in the final analysis, with 23 (79.3%) having previously undergone resection for ESCC. Of these 29 patients, 8 (27.6%) received first-line systemic therapy, 20 (69.0%) received second-line therapy, and 1 patient (3%) received third-line therapy. At the data cutoff, the ORR was 31.0%, and the DCR was 86.2%, with 9 patients achieving partial response (PR), 16 patients with stable disease (SD) and 4 patients with disease progression (PD). The median PFS was 5.33 months (95% CI: 4.28-6.38), and the median OS was 10.37 months (95% CI: 6.26-14.46). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with anemia and lymphopenia being the most common. Only 2 patients (6.9%) experiencing grade 3-4 lymphopenia. All AEs were managed with symptomatic treatment and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

The combination of anlotinib and a PD-1 inhibitor demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with locally advanced/metastatic ESCC who progressed on prior ICI. This regimen represents a feasible and well-tolerated treatment option for this patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04984096.

Feasibility and Tolerability of Anlotinib Plus PD-1 Inhibitors for Previously-Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Objective

Anlotinib demonstrated encouraging therapeutic activity as third-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors also exhibited promising and durable response against previously-treated advanced NSCLC. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for previously-treated NSCLC in clinical practice.

Methods

This retrospective study included 56 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with systemic treatment previously. Patients included were treated with anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in clinical practice. Therapeutic outcomes of the patients were evaluated radiologically using target lesions, and the prognostic outcomes were generated by follow-up. Adverse reactions experienced throughout the treatment were documented and analyzed.

Results

Between August 2018 and November 2022, 56 patients with advanced NSCLC were eligible to participate in this study consecutively. Therapeutic outcomes resulted in an overall response rate of 28.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 17.3%-42.2%] and a disease control rate of 91.1% (95% CI: 80.4%-97.0%). Furthermore, this combination regimen among the 56 patients yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.81-8.19) and a median overall survival (OS) of 15.8 months (95% CI: 10.23-21.37), respectively. And the median duration of response (DoR) among patients who responded was 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.38-12.22). Additionally, adverse reactions of all grades throughout the treatment were observed in 50 patients (89.3%), and adverse reactions of grade ≥3 were detected in 23 patients (41.1%). Fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were the most common adverse reactions. Association analysis between PFS and baseline characteristic subgroups indicated that ECOG score and number of metastatic lesions might be potential predictors of PFS in the exploratory analysis.

Conclusion

Anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and encouraging therapeutic activity as subsequent-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. This conclusion should be confirmed in prospective large-scale clinical trials subsequently.

Anlotinib enhanced CD8+ T cell infiltration via induction of CCL5 improves the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy in lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and requires effective treatment strategies. Recently, the development of a novel multiple-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, anlotinib, has drawn increasing attention, especially it shows advantages when combined with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. However, the mechanism by which anlotinib improves immunotherapy and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment remains unclear. In this study, we found that anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockade significantly inhibited tumor growth and reduced tumor weight in a lung cancer xenograft model compared to any single treatment. Both immunofluorescence and flow cytometry analyses revealed that anlotinib induced a CD8+ T cell dominated tumor microenvironment, which might account for its improved role in immunotherapy. Further investigations showed that CCL5-mediated CD8+ T cell recruitment plays a critical role in anlotinib and PD-1 blockade strategies. The depletion of CD8+ T cells abrogated this process. In conclusion, our findings showed that the combination of anlotinib and PD-1 blockade produced promising effects in the treatment of lung cancer, and that the induction of CCL5-mediced CD8+ T cell recruitment by anlotinib provided a novel mechanism of action.

Anlotinib plus Sintilimab achieved in an antitumor effect of complete remission in a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report

Systemic therapies-based combination treatments have been developed rapidly in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are still a few patients not applicable to any recommended therapies, making it considerable to try new therapeutic options. Among them, anlotinib, a new oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is being widely used for many advanced malignancies. We present the first case of the antitumor effect of complete remission by anlotinib combined with an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, sintilimab, in a patient with advanced HCC. In April 2020, a 51-year-old male patient was diagnosed with large HCC and underwent hepatectomy with R0 resection. Two months later, he was admitted to our hospital because of a tumor relapse with multiple liver and lung metastases. After the failure of comprehensive treatment containing sorafenib, camrelizumab and transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization, 2 months after tumor relapse, the patient started to receive anlotinib and sintilimab. The multiple tumor nodules were remarkable repressed both in the liver and lung. Six months after anlotinib plus sintilimab treatment, there were no residual tumors, and the alpha-fetoprotein level was decreased from 2310.9 mg/L to normal. Also, the patient continued to receive anlotinib to date. In subsequent follow-up visits until now, there was no sign of recurrence found on imaging. Anlotinib is a promising alternative for patients insensitive to the first-line targeted drugs. More clinical studies should be conducted to further broaden the clinical indications of anlotinib and immunotherapy in patients with HCC.

Effectiveness and Safety of Anlotinib Combined with PD-1 Blockades in Patients with Previously Immunotherapy Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in patients with previously immunotherapy treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 67 patients with previously immunotherapy treated advanced NSCLC who received anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice were screened retrospectively. All the PD-1 blockades used in this study were approved in China and consisted of sintilimab, camrelizumab, tislelizumab and pembrolizumab. Effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades were assessed, and all patients were followed up regularly. Clinical significance between response status to previous immune-related treatment regimens and therapeutic outcomes of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades was further explored.

Results

The best overall response among the 67 patients suggested that a partial response was observed in 16 patients, stable disease was noted in 41 patients and progressive disease was found in 10 patients, which yielded an objective response rate of 23.9% (95% CI: 14.3-35.9%) and a disease control rate of 85.1% (95% CI: 74.3-92.6%). Prognostic outcomes indicated that the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.1 months (95% CI: 2.37-9.83) and the median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 months (95% CI: 10.73-22.27). Exploratory analysis highlighted that patients who were intolerant to previous immune-related regimens (17 patients) might have a superior prognosis (median OS: 22.3 months vs 12.5 months, P=0.024). Additionally, adverse reactions with any grades during anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades administration were observed in 62 patients (92.5%), of which 31 patients (46.3%) had ≥grade 3 adverse reactions. Most common adverse reactions were fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea and hepatotoxicity.

Conclusion

Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades demonstrated promising effectiveness and tolerable safety in patients with previously immunotherapy treated advanced NSCLC. Those who were intolerant to previous immune-related regimens might benefit significantly from treatment with anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades. This conclusion should be confirmed in future studies.

A phase Ib/II study of cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) plus anlotinib as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Cadonilimab is a bispecific antibody that simultaneously targets programmed cell death receptor-1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of cadonilimab plus anlotinib for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without sensitizing EGFR/ALK/ROS1 mutations.

METHODS

Patients received cadonilimab 15 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg every three weeks (Q3W) plus anlotinib at doses of 10 or 12 mg once daily for two weeks on a one-week-off schedule. The primary endpoints included safety and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine treatment-naïve patients received cadonilimab 15 mg/kg Q3W combination (n = 49) and 10 mg/kg Q3W combination (n = 20). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 48 (98.0%) and 19 (95.0%) patients, with grade ≥3 TRAEs occurring in 29 (59.2%) and five (25.0%) patients, respectively. TRAEs leading to cadonilimab discontinuation occurred in eight (16.3%) and one (5.0%) patients in the cadonilimab 15 mg/kg Q3W and 10 mg/kg Q3W dosing groups. The confirmed ORRs were 51.0% (25/49) and 60.0% (12/20) accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

Cadonilimab 10 mg/kg Q3W plus anlotinib showed manageable safety and promising efficacy as a first-line chemo-free treatment for advanced NSCLC.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT04646330.

Anti-Angiogenic Agents Combined with Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiogenic agents could enhance tumor immunity response, and anti- angiogenesis plus immunotherapy has become a novel treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy of this combination therapy remains controversial and obscure.

AIM

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced NSCLC and provide more guidance for treating NSCLC clinically.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases to identify relevant studies published up to December 2021. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Second endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 AEs adverse events (AEs). The sensitivity analysis was conducted to confirm the stability of the results. STATA 15.0 was utilized for all pooled analyses.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were eventually included in the meta-analysis, involving 533 patients with advanced NSCLC. The pooled ORR rate was 27% (95% CI 18% to 35%; I2 =84.2%; p<0.001), while the pooled median PFS and OS was 5.84 months (95% CI 4.66 to 7.03 months; I2=78.4%; p<0.001) and 14.20 months (95% CI 11.08 to 17.32 months; I2=82.2%; p=0.001), respectively. Most common grade ≥3 AEs included hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, adrenal insufficiency, hyponatremia, proteinuria, rash, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Anti-angiogenesis combined with immunotherapy demonstrated satisfactory antitumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with advanced NSCLC. The pooled results of our meta-analysis provided further evidence supporting the favorable efficacy and safety of this therapeutic strategy.

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective, single-arm, phase II study in China

PURPOSE

Although immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy has been used as a second-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) remains unsatisfactory. We investigated the feasibility of sintilimab plus chemotherapy as a second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

This was a phase II, single-arm, prospective study in advanced NSCLC patients who had failed standard platinum-based chemotherapy (ChiCTR1900027634, Registered 22 November 2019). Eligible patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m² (day 1) plus sintilimab 200 mg (day 3) Q3W. Those did not progress after 4-6 cycles received sintilimab 200 mg Q3W as maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint was PFS.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled between October 2019 and October 2020. With a median follow-up of 12.2 months, the median PFS was 5.8 months, and the PFS rates at 6 and 12 months were 48% and 30%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months, with a 12-month OS rate of 62.0%. The overall response rate was 32.4%, and the disease control rate was 89.2%. The incidence of all and ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were 65% (26/40) and 17.5% (7/40), respectively. No TRAEs-related permanent treatment discontinuation or death occurred. bTMB reduction at 6 weeks was associated with a longer PFS (NR vs 3.0 months, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This prospective phase II study in China suggested that sintilimab plus docetaxel might improve PFS and tumor response with good tolerability for Chinese patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. bTMB reduction at 6 weeks could serve as a potential predictive biomarker for this regimen.

Low-dose anlotinib confers improved survival in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiogenic drugs increase anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the optimal dose of anti-angiogenic drugs remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed efficacy and safety data from patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that received PD-1 blockade with low-doses of anlotinib, a highly selective receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor mainly targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, as second or later line therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety profile. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 40 eligible patients were included. The median PFS was 11.4 months. The median OS of the entire cohort was 27.0 months. ORR was achieved in 16 patients (40.0%) and DCR was maintained in 33 patients (82.5%). The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 52.5%, and the most common all grade AE was gastrointestinal reactions, which occurred in four patients (10.0%). Treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicity was observed in one patient (2.5%). Conclusions Low-dose anlotinib may be an effective and well-tolerated anti-angiogenesis partner for combination therapy with ICIs in second-line and later settings for advanced NSCLC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenic inhibitors in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

To report the efficacy and safety data of immunotherapy plus angiogenic inhibitors treatment in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients with pathological or cytological confirmed locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus angiogenic inhibitors were enrolled. The primary endpoints were progressive free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 46 consecutive enrolled patients received ICI plus angiogenic inhibitor, and the median follow-up was 9.6 months (range 1.5-32.5). The ORR and DCR were 8.7% (n = 4) and 50% (n = 23), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 2.9 months (95% CI 2.1-3.7) and 12.3 months (95% CI 7.6-17.0), respectively. Patients at stage IVB had an inferior PFS than stage IIIC or IVA (2.8 months vs 4.4 months, P = 0.003). The median PFS of patients who were treated with ICI plus bevacizumab was shorter than ICI plus anlotinib or apatinib (1.2 months vs 3.3 months, P = 0.005). The occurrence of hypertension during the combination treatment has been related to a tendency for prolonged PFS (5.5 months vs 2.6 months; P = 0.05). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) was 89.1% (n = 41), and grade 3-4 TRAE was occupied 21.4% (n = 10).

CONCLUSION

This study objectively demonstrated that the treatment of ICI and antiangiogenic agents in lung adenocarcinoma could be a promising alternative therapeutic regimen, and the toxic effects were manageable. Subgroup analysis revealed that small molecular angiogenic inhibitors plus ICI and low tumor burden during treatment were better prognostic factors.

Poor correlation between preclinical and patient efficacy data for tumor targeted monotherapies in glioblastoma: the results of a systematic review

PURPOSE

Limited progress has been made in treating glioblastoma, and we hypothesise that poor concordance between preclinical and clinical efficacy in this disease is a major barrier to drug development. We undertook a systematic review to quantify this issue.

METHODS

We identified phase I trials (P1Ts) of tumor targeted drugs, subsequent trial results and preceding relevant preclinical data published in adult glioblastoma patients between 2006-2019 via structured searches of EMBASE/MEDLINE/PUBMED. Detailed clinical/preclinical information was extracted. Associations between preclinical and clinical efficacy metrics were determined using appropriate non-parametric statistical tests.

RESULTS

A total of 28 eligible P1Ts were identified, with median ORR of 2.9% (range 0.0-33.3%). Twenty-three (82%) had published relevant preclinical data available. Five (18%) had relevant later phase clinical trial data available. There was overall poor correlation between preclinical and clinical efficacy metrics on univariate testing. However, drugs that had undergone in vivo testing had significantly longer median overall survival (7.9 vs 5.6mo, p = 0.02). Additionally, drugs tested in ≥ 2 biologically-distinct in vivo models ('multiple models') had a significantly better median response rate than those tested using only one ('single model') or those lacking in vivo data (6.8% vs 1.2% vs. 0.0% respectively, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Currently used preclinical models poorly predict subsequent activity in P1Ts, and generally over-estimate the anti-tumor activity of these drugs. This underscores the need for better preclinical models to aid the development of novel anti-glioblastoma drugs. Until these become widely available and used, the use of multiple biologically-distinct in vivo models should be strongly encouraged.

Programmed cell death-1 inhibitor combination treatment for recurrent proficient mismatch repair/ miscrosatellite-stable type endometrial cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common cancers of the female reproductive tract, and the incidence is increasing rapidly. Immunotherapy using programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors is an emerging research topic and treatment strategy for refractory gynecological malignancies. However, clinical management of EC with checkpoint inhibitors requires improvement. Herein, we discuss a case of refractory proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/miscrosatellite-stable (MSS) EC treated with a combination of PD-1 and angiogenesis inhibitors and offer a review of the pathophysiology and clinical outcomes based on previous studies.

CASE SUMMARY

A 62-year-old woman diagnosed with invasive or metastatic EC in 2015 was treated with six courses of chemotherapy and refused further radiotherapy. Four years later, she developed chest pain, and lung biopsy indicated thyroid transcription factor-1 (-), Napsin A (-), estrogen receptor (+), progesterone receptor (+), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (D5F3) (-), and receptor tyrosine kinase (D4D6) (-) metastatic EC. Genetic testing results showed low tumor mutation burden, pMMR, PD ligand 1 (-), MSS, and HLA-class 1 heterogeneous disease. The patient was started on toripalimab combined with nab-paclitaxel for seven cycles (every 3 wk), but this regimen was terminated because of an intolerable chemotherapy adverse event. The disease progressed in 2020, and the patient’s treatment was switched from nab-paclitaxel to anlotinib, while immunotherapy using toripalimab was continued. The patient achieved a major partial response with well-tolerated toxicities, and treatment is ongoing.

CONCLUSION

Molecular testing is advised for clinical classifications of EC owing to its high heterogeneity. In this case, the patient had pMMR/MSS EC and achieved a positive outcome with combination PD-1 inhibitor treatment. These results warrant further clinical exploration.

Immunotherapy and Antivascular Targeted Therapy in Patients’ Treatment with Concurrent Malignant Tumors after Organ Transplantation: Opportunity or Challenge

Objective

To analyze the therapeutic effects and organ rejection of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy or antivascular targeting therapy on patients with combined malignancies after organ transplantation.

Methods

We collected retrospective studies on “post-transplantation, cancer, immunotherapy, and vascular targeting therapy” in Embase, Wanfang database, Cochrane Library, VIP databases, CNKI, and PubMed, and the case data were organized and analyzed.

Results

Data from only 40 papers met our requirements, which included 2 literature reviews, 4 original researches, and 34 case reports from 2016 to 2020. A total of 40 studies involving 66 patients were included, who were divided into 3 groups (patients using CTLA-4 inhibitors, group 1; patients who received sequential or concurrent anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy, group 2; and patients using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, group 3). There was no statistical difference in patients' DCR between the three groups (P > 0.05). Also, compared with group 2, there was no statistically significant difference in recipient organ rejection in group 1 and group 3 (P > 0.05). The DCR rate for antivascular targeted therapy is approximately 60%.

Conclusions

Immunotherapy should be carefully selected for patients with combined malignancies after organ transplantation. Antivascular targeted therapy is one of the options worth considering; the risk of side effects of drug therapy is something that needs to be closely monitored when combined with immunotherapy.

Combination of Anti-PD-1 Antibody, Anlotinib and Pegaspargase “Sandwich” With Radiotherapy in Localized Natural Killer/T Cell Lymphoma

Asparaginase/pegaspargase containing regimens combined with radiotherapy are highly effective and considered the cornerstone of localized Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL) treatment. However, these chemotherapy regimens inevitably cause relatively high incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Herein we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combined regimen of anti-PD-1 antibody, anlotinib and pegaspargase “sandwich” with radiotherapy in localized NKTL. Anti-PD-1 antibody and pegaspargase at 2500 U/m² were administered on day 1, while anlotinib (12 mg once a day) was orally administered on days 1-14. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. All the eight patients included received 3 cycles of the regimen followed by radiotherapy and an additional 3 cycles. The overall response rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 87.5%. With a median follow-up time of 35.5 months (range, 34.03-40.90 months), median PFS and OS times were not reached. The 3-year PFS and OS rates were 100% and 100%, respectively. All patients were alive at the last follow-up. No treatment-related death and no grade 4 TRAE was reported. No grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was detected, and half of the patients didn’t report any hematological toxicity. This study indicates that anti-PD-1 antibody combined with anlotinib and pegaspargase is a promising chemoradiotherapy regimen for localized NTKL, with mild toxicity and good tolerance.

A Linear Discriminant Analysis Model Based on the Changes of 7 Proteins in Plasma Predicts Response to Anlotinib Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background

Anlotinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor mainly targeting angiogenesis signaling. The predictive marker of anlotinib’s efficacy remains elusive. This study was designed to explore the predictive marker of anlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 52 advanced NSCLC patients who underwent at least one line of targeted therapy or chemotherapy between August 2018 and March 2020. Patients were divided into durable responders (DR) and non-durable responders (NDR) based on the median progression-free survival (PFS, 176 days). The Olink Immuno-Oncology panel (92 proteins) was used to explore the predictive protein biomarkers in plasma samples before treatment (baseline) and on the first treatment evaluation (paired).

Results

At baseline, the response to anlotinib was not significantly associated with age, gender, smoke history, histology, oligo-metastases, EGFR mutations, and other clinical characteristics. The results of PFS-related protein biomarkers at baseline were all not satisfying. Then we assessed the changes of 92 proteins levels in plasma on the first treatment evaluation. We obtained a Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model based on 7 proteins, with an accuracy of 100% in the original data and an accuracy of 89.2% in cross validation. The 7 proteins were CD70, MIC-A/B, LAG3, CAIX, PDCD1, MMP12, and PD-L2. Multivariate Cox analysis further showed that the changes of CD70 (HR 25.48; 95% CI, 4.90–132.41, P=0.000) and MIC-A/B (HR 15.04; 95% CI, 3.81–59.36, P=0.000) in plasma were the most significant prognostic factors for PFS.

Conclusion

We reported herein a LDA model based on the changes of 7 proteins levels in plasma before and after treatment, which could predict anlotinib responders among advanced NSCLC patients with an accuracy of 100%. Further studies are warranted to verify the prediction performance of the LDA model.

Novel Nanocrystal Injection of Insoluble Drug Anlotinib and Its Antitumor Effects on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The molecularly targeted agent anlotinib offers a novel therapeutic strategy against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). With this study, we aimed to solve the technical problem of anlotinib being insoluble in injectable solutions; we also aimed to assess the antitumor activity of anlotinib on hepatocellular carcinoma cells. We prepared an anlotinib nanocrystal injection by wet grinding, and we optimized the prescription process using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) and a laser particle size analyzer (LPSA). The release of anlotinib from the injected nanocrystals was evaluated using LC-MS/MS in vitro, and the drug’s anti-tumor effects were assessed in a nude mice tumor model. The anlotinib nanocrystals had a uniform particle size distribution (the average nanoparticle size was ~200 nm). The preparation of anlotinib into nanocrystals did not change the original crystal structure. The intravenous injection of anlotinib nanocrystals achieved anti-tumor activity at very low doses compared to those required for oral administration of an anlotinib suspension: anlotinib nanocrystals at a dose of 50 μg/kg inhibited the subcutaneous growth of the HCC cell line MHCC97-H; whereas the dose of anlotinib suspension required for an equivalent effect was 1 mg/kg. Therefore, our novel anlotinib nanocrystal injection preparation provides an option for achieving a safe and effective molecularly targeted therapy against advanced HCC.

Effect of prior thoracic radiotherapy on prognosis in relapsed small cell lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib: a subgroup analysis of the ALTER 1202 trial

Background

In ALTER 1202, anlotinib prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of this study was to explore the effect of front-line thoracic radiotherapy (RT) on the benefits of anlotinib as a third-line-or-beyond treatment.

Methods

This was a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (ALTER 1202). The participants were divided into RT (previous thoracic RT) and non-RT subgroups. The outcomes included PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results

In the ALTER 1202 trial, 68 participants (anlotinib, n=46; placebo, n=22) received RT and 51 participants (anlotinib, n=35; placebo, n=16) did not. PFS was longer for anlotinib versus placebo in both the RT (5.49 vs. 0.69 months; P<0.001) and non-RT (2.83 vs. 0.76 months; P<0.001) subgroups. In the RT subgroup, the OS was longer for anlotinib vs. placebo (9.49 vs. 4.90 months; P=0.039). No differences were found in the ORR, but the DCR was higher in the anlotinib arm of the RT subgroup compared with the placebo arm (73.9% vs. 9.1%, P<0.001) and the non-RT subgroup (68.6% vs. 18.8%; P=0.002).

Conclusions

In relapsed SCLC patients with previous thoracic RT, anlotinib might have DCR, PFS, and OS benefits compared with placebo. In those without previous thoracic RT patients, anlotinib might have DCR and PFS benefits compared with placebo. The safety was similar between anlotinib and placebo groups.

Anlotinib-Induced Hypertension: Current Concepts and Future Prospects

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed in China that targets the receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and stem cell factor. Therefore, anlotinib inhibits tumor angiogenesis, representing a new therapeutic alternative for lung cancer. Hypertension is one of its most common adverse effects, leading to discontinuation of the drug and limited clinical usefulness.

OBJECTIVE

The present review aims to summarize the evidence on the prevalence, physiopathology, and management of anlotinib-induced hypertension, as well as its effect on the cancer prognosis.

METHOD

Searches in Medline, Cochrane Central Library, and Embase were performed using the following terms: anlotinib, adverse effect, hypertension, clinical trial, vascular endothelial growth factor, and antiangiogenic drugs. Citations were also identified by checking the reference sections of selected papers.

RESULTS

Except for a phase I clinical trial with a small sample size (n = 6), almost all the clinical trials on anlotinib have reported the development of anlotinib-induced hypertension. In these trials, the incidence of hypertension ranged from 13% to 67.7%, and that of grade 3/4 hypertension ranged from4.8% to 16%. Alterations in nitric oxide, endothelin-1, microvascular rarefaction, selective vasoconstrictions, and renal injury have been cited as potential mechanisms leading to anlotinib-induced hypertension. When needed, treatment may include general hygienic measures and pharmacotherapy in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

To effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension, early prevention, a reasonable dosage regimen, and appropriate treatment are critical to effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension. Additionally, anlotinib-induced hypertension may be considered a marker for predicting efficacy.

SFTPA1 is a potential prognostic biomarker correlated with immune cell infiltration and response to immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma

Pulmonary surfactant protein A1 (SFTPA1) is a member of the C-type lectin subfamily that plays a critical role in maintaining lung tissue homeostasis and the innate immune response. SFTPA1 disruption can cause several acute or chronic lung diseases, including lung cancer. However, little research has been performed to associate SFTPA1 with immune cell infiltration and the response to immunotherapy in lung cancer. The findings of our study describe the SFTPA1 expression profile in multiple databases and was validated in BALB/c mice, human tumor tissues, and paired normal tissues using an immunohistochemistry assay. High SFTPA1 mRNA expression was associated with a favorable prognosis through a survival analysis in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) samples from TCGA. Further GeneOntology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses showed that SFTPA1 was involved in the toll-like receptor signaling pathway. An immune infiltration analysis clarified that high SFTPA1 expression was associated with an increased number of M1 macrophages, CD8⁺ T cells, memory activated CD4⁺ T cells, regulatory T cells, as well as a reduced number of M2 macrophages. Our clinical data suggest that SFTPA1 may serve as a biomarker for predicting a favorable response to immunotherapy for patients with LUAD. Collectively, our study extends the expression profile and potential regulatory pathways of SFTPA1 and may provide a potential biomarker for establishing novel preventive and therapeutic strategies for lung adenocarcinoma.

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy or Anlotinib vs. Pembrolizumab Alone in Patients With Previously Treated EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

Objectives

More and more encouraging evidence revealed that immunotherapy could improve clinical outcomes in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variations. However, immunotherapy is still a controversy for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation.

Method

In this retrospective analysis, we compared the clinical efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy (PM), pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy (P+C) and pembrolizumab combined with anlotinib (P+A) in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation who had failed on EGFR-TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy.

Result

Eighty-six patients were included in this study. The overall median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.24 months. Multivariate analysis suggested that EGFR ^L858R and combined therapy were positive prognostic factors of PFS. The overall median OS was 12.28 months. Multivariate analysis found that high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) and combined therapy seemed to be positive prognostic factors of OS. Among the population, 32 patients received PM, 26 patients received P+C and 28 patients received P+A. Up to Jan 30, 2021, the median progression-free survival was 1.5 months in the PM group, 4.30 months in the P+C group and 3.24 months in the P+A group. The median OS were 7.41, 14.92 and 15.97 months, respectively. The ORR were 3.1%, 23.1% and 21.4%.

Conclusion

The addition of chemotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy to pembrolizumab resulted in significantly longer PFS, OS and ORR than pembrolizumab alone in our study. EGFR ^L858R might be a positive prognostic factor of PFS and high PD-L1 expression might be a positive prognostic factor of OS.