Clinicopathological and Prognostic Characteristics of Esophageal Spindle Cell Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of 43 Patients in a Single Center

Multiregion exome sequencing indicates a monoclonal origin of esophageal spindle-cell squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal spindle-cell squamous cell carcinoma (ESS) is a rare biphasic neoplasm composed of a carcinomatous component (CaC) and a sarcomatous component (SaC). However, the genomic origin and gene signature of ESS remain unclear. Using whole-exome sequencing of laser-capture microdissection (LCM) tumor samples, we determined that CaC and SaC showed high mutational commonality, with the same top high-frequency mutant genes, mutation signatures, and tumor mutation burden; paired samples shared a median of 25.5% mutation sites. Focal gains were found on chromosomes 3q29, 5p15.33, and 11q13.3. Altered genes were mainly enriched in the RTK-RAS signaling pathway. Phylogenetic trees showed a monoclonal origin of ESS. The most frequently mutated oncogene in the trunk was TP53, followed by NFE2L2, KMT2D, and MUC16. Prognostic associations were found for CDC27, LRP2, APC, and SNAPC4. Our data highlight the monoclonal origin of ESS with TP53 as a potent driver oncogene, suggesting new targeted therapies and immunotherapies as treatment options. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Investigating esophageal sarcomatoid carcinoma and its comparison with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and radiomics features: a retrospective study

Introduction

Esophageal sarcomatoid carcinoma (ESC) is a rare pathological subtype of esophageal carcinomas, wherein its epithelial component typically demonstrates squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, the clinicopathological features and prognosis of ESC remain unclear, alongside its unique aspects compared to esophageal SCC (ESCC).

Methods

Between January 2008 and December 2018, we retrospectively reviewed 67 ESC patients treated at West China Hospital. Among them, 51 patients with resected ESC were matched with 98 resected ESCC patients over the same period using propensity score matching at 1:2. The survival time and radiomics features of the two groups were compared.

Results

A total of 59 patients with resected ESC and eight patients with non-resected ESC were enrolled. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly different in patients with different TNM stages (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that length of tumor was an independent factor for OS in resetable ESC (p = 0.041). Among matched ESC and ESCC patients, OS was significantly longer for patients with ESC than those with ESCC (5-year OS, 61.1% vs. 43.6%; HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.96; p = 0.032). A Rad-score for discriminating ESC from ESCC containing two CT-derived radiomics features was developed [area under the curve: 0.823 (95% CI 0.732-0.913) in the training cohort and 0.828 (95% CI 0.636-1.000) in the validation cohort, respectively].

Conclusions

ESC has a better prognosis when compared with ESCC. By developing a radiomics prediction model, we provide reliability and convenience for the differential diagnosis of ESC from ESCC.

A Diagnostic Quandary: Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in a Rare Case of Carcinosarcoma of the Esophagus and Review of the Literature

Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the esophagus, a mixed tumor comprising both carcinomatous and sarcomatoid components and known as carcinosarcoma, is a rare malignancy. Clinically and radiologically, it presents like other esophageal cancers. Here we discuss the case of a 69-year-old male patient with sarcomatoid carcinoma of the esophagus who developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) after chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The patient was evaluated for dysphagia and odynophagia. He was initially misdiagnosed to have an esophageal polyp and underwent excision for the same. He presented with recurrent growth at the local site, with histopathological examination showing sarcomatoid carcinoma of the esophagus. After the development of paclitaxel-carboplatin-induced SJS, the patient was subsequently treated with palliative radiotherapy at the primary site for symptomatic relief. He underwent feeding gastrostomy as a supportive nutritional measure and was on best supportive care after a multidisciplinary tumor board discussion. Paclitaxel-carboplatin-induced SJS poses numerous diagnostic conundrums, on account of there being only one reported incident prior to this in literature, to the best of our knowledge. In this report, we explore the diagnostic and therapeutic predicaments associated with a rare disease that is under-reported and understudied in literature and delve into the various treatment modalities that can benefit the patients. The case also demonstrates the delicate balance between cancer chemotherapeutics and their Pandora's box of adverse effects.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy might be effective for locally advanced esophageal carcinosarcoma: A single center's experience and review of literature

Esophageal carcinosarcoma is a rare type of esophageal cancer; however, few studies have investigated the effects of radiotherapy in locally advanced patients. This study aimed to report experience of the safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal carcinosarcoma and review the literature. By searching the institutional database between January 2010 and December 2020, along with the literature review, 25 patients were eligible for the study. The clinical and radiologic information of all patients with esophageal carcinosarcoma who underwent radiotherapy were collected. Survival outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier plots. In our series, 5 patients were in the curative/neoadjuvant radiotherapy group and 10 patients were in the adjuvant group. Most tumors were protruding (n = 10, 66.7%). All patients underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy. In the curative/neoadjuvant radiotherapy group, 2 patients underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy before surgery, and the other three received radiotherapy alone as the initial treatment. The median follow-up time was 43.1 months. All patients showed a partial response at the efficacy evaluation. The median time of overall survival and progression-free survival were 40.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1-67.3 months) and 19.0 months (95% CI, 13.9 months-24.1 months) for the entire cohort, but were not reached for curative/neoadjuvant radiotherapy group. Overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI, 0.15-4.43; P = .805) and progression-free survival (HR 1.68, 95% CI, 0.35-8.19; P = .514) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. When considering the literature review data in the final analysis, overall survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.25-2.81; P = .779) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.26-1.76; P = .425) were also not different between the 2 groups. Treatment based on intensity-modulated radiotherapy with neoadjuvant or curative intent may be an option for patients with unresectable esophageal carcinosarcoma. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to validate the reliability.