Improving Ablation Safety for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Proximal to the Hilar Bile Ducts by Ultrasound-MR Fusion Imaging: A Preliminary Comparative Study

Ultrasound-MR fusion imaging combined with intraductal cooling via PTCD during microwave ablation of perihilar liver tumors: a retrospective pilot study

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility and safety of a microwave ablation (MWA) strategy involving intraductal chilled saline perfusion (ICSP) via percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) combined with ultrasound-magnetic resonance (US-MR) fusion imaging for liver tumors proximal to the hilar bile ducts (HBDs).

METHODS

Patients with liver tumors proximal to the HBDs (≤5 mm) who underwent MWA at our hospital between June 2020 and April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The strategy of US-MR fusion imaging combined with PTCD-ICSP was used to assist the MWA procedures. The technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor progression, intrahepatic distant recurrence and complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 12 patients with 12 liver tumors were retrospectively enrolled in this study. US-MR fusion imaging was utilized in all patients, and PTCD-ICSP assistance was successfully used for 4 nodules abutting HBDs (0 mm). The rates of technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor progression and intrahepatic distant recurrence were 91.7%, 83.3%, 0% and 8.3%, respectively. The major complication of biliary infection occurred in only one patient who had previously undergone left hemihepatectomy and bile-intestinal anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

MWA for liver tumors proximal to HBDs assisted by US-MR fusion imaging combined with PTCD-ICSP was feasible and safe. This strategy made MWA of liver tumors abutting HBDs possible.

Three-dimensional ultrasound fusion imaging in precise needle placement for thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of three-dimensional ultrasound fusion imaging (3DUS FI) technique for guiding needle placement in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) thermal ablation.

METHODS

A total of 57 patients with 60 HCCs with 3DUS FI-guided thermal ablation were retrospectively included in the study. 3DUS volume data of liver were acquired preoperatively by freehand scanning with the tumor and predetermined 5 mm ablative margin automatically segmented. Plan of needle placement was made through a predetermined simulated ablation zone to ensure a 5 mm ablative margin with the coverage rate toward tumor and ablative margin. With real-time ultrasound and 3DUS fusion imaging, ablation needles were placed according to the plan. After ablation, the ablative margin was immediately evaluated by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and 3DUS fusion imaging. The rate of adequate ablative margin, complete response (CR), local tumor progression (LTP), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) was evaluated.

RESULTS

According to postoperative contrast-enhanced CT or MR imaging, the complete response rate was 100% (60/60), and 83% of tumors (30/36) achieved adequate ablative margin (>5 mm) three-dimensionally. During the follow-up period of 6.0-42.6 months, LTP occurred in 5 lesions, with 1- and 2-year LTP rates being 7.0% and 9.4%. The 1- and 2-year DFS rates were 76.1% and 65.6%, and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 98.1% and 94.0%. No major complications or ablation-related deaths were observed in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional ultrasound fusion imaging technique may improve the needle placement of thermal ablation for HCC and reduce the rate of LTP.

Fusion imaging versus ultrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation of liver cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation has become an alternative treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent evidence suggests that fusion imaging (FI) may improve the feasibility and efficacy of thermal ablation for HCC, while the clinical evidence remains limited.

PURPOSE

To compare FI versus ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for HCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Relevant cohort or randomized controlled trials were found by searching Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The pooling of results was performed using a random-effects model incorporating heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, 15 studies involving 1472 patients (1831 tumors) for FI-guided ablation and 1380 patients (1864 tumors) for ultrasound-guided ablation were included. Pooled results showed that compared to conventional HCC ablation guided by ultrasound, the FI-guided procedure showed a similar technique efficacy rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.02, P = 0.25; I2 = 30%). However, FI-guided tumor ablation was associated with a lower incidence of overall complications (RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.50-0.97, P = 0.03; I2 = 0%). Moreover, patients receiving FI-guided tumor ablation had a lower risk of local tumor progression during follow-up than those with ultrasound-guided ablation (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.47-0.78, P < 0.001; I2 = 13%). Subgroup analysis according to FI strategy, imaging techniques in controls, and tumor diameter showed consistent results (p for subgroup difference all >0.05).

CONCLUSION

FI-guided thermal ablation may be more effective and safer than ultrasound-guided ablation for patients with HCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Fusion Imaging in Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), generally performed under real-time guidance of ultrasound which is safe and effective, is a common minimally invasive therapy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma. Fusion imaging (FI) is a newly developed imaging method, which integrates CT/MRI accurate imaging and matches the characteristics of real-time ultrasound imaging, thereby providing a new approach to guide tumor ablation therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of FI as opposed to ultrasound in tumor ablation remains unclear.

Objective: The present study sought to evaluate the difference in the efficacy and safety between FI and ultrasound in radiofrequency surgery for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma through a metaanalysis.

Materials and Methods: Searching for studies comparing the efficacy and safety of FI and ultrasound in radiofrequency of hepatocellular carcinoma in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published until April 2021. Random or fixed effect models were used for statistical analysis. Metaanalysis and sensitivity analysis were used on the included studies.

Results: A total of six studies met predefined inclusion criteria, and were finally included in the analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, based on predetermined patient characteristics, allowed minimization of bias. In the RFA of hepatocellular carcinoma, FI decreased 1-year overall survival (OS) when compared with ultrasound. But FI was not significantly different from ultrasound in terms of technical efficiency, 1-, 2-, and 3-year local tumor progression (LTP), complications, as well as 2-year OS. Subgroup analysis, based on tumor mean diameter, showed that FI reduced the rate of 1- and 2-year LTP in patients with tumors of mean diameter ≥15 mm when compared with ultrasound. Moreover, operative complications could be reduced in patients with tumor mean diameter <15 mm using FI, compared with ultrasound.

Conclusion: Overall, these results showed that FI may have some effects on improving efficacy and safety of thermal ablation in HCC patients, relative to ultrasound. However, it may be a more effective method for managing large lesions, as well as those that are difficult to ablate. Further large-scale and well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.