Jia Y, Song G, Wu R, Hong Y, Dou W, Li A. Intravoxel incoherent motion DWI with different mathematical models in predicting rectal adenoma with and without canceration.
Eur J Radiol 2022;
155:110496. [PMID:
36030659 DOI:
10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110496]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To evaluate the clinical value of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with mono-exponential (ME), bi-exponential (BE), and stretched-exponential (SE) models for predicting rectal adenomas with canceration.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sixty patients with postoperative pathology-confirmed rectal adenoma (n = 31) and adenoma with canceration (n = 29) were enrolled and underwent IVIM-DWI scanning. The ME-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), BE-derived true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), SE-derived distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC), and water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (α) were measured. The differences in each parameter between adenoma and canceration were compared. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to establish models for predicting rectal adenomas with canceration. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was applied to evaluate diagnostic performances of each model in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS
The AUCs of ADC, D, D*, f, DDC and α were 0.851 (95 % confidence interval, CI, 0.735-0.930), 0.895 (95 % CI, 0.789-0.960), 0.720 (95 % CI, 0.589-0.828), 0.791 (95 % CI, 0.667-0.886), 0.841 (95 % CI, 0.724-0.923) and 0.738 (95 % CI, 0.608-0.834), respectively. The AUCs of BE and SE models were 0.927 (95 % CI, 0.829-0.978) and 0.874 (95 % CI, 0.763-0.946), respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the derived four values (ADC, D, f, and DDC) from the combination of three models were 0.950, 96.6 % (95 % CI, 95.3-97.6 %), 80.6 % (95 % CI, 78.0-82.9 %), and 88.3 % (95 % CI, 86.2-90.2 %), respectively.
CONCLUSION
ADC can easily and effectively predict rectal adenomas with canceration. The BE model has a better combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of rectal adenoma canceration.
Collapse