1
|
Jiang T, Sun H, Li N, Jiang T. Metastasis pattern and prognosis of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a population-based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:13511-13521. [PMID: 37498395 PMCID: PMC10590330 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04975-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE As a rare type of tumor, the metastasis pattern of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is still unclear. Our aim was to investigate metastatic patterns and develop a predictive model of prognosis in patients with advanced LCNEC. METHODS Patients of LCNEC diagnosed between 2010-2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively included. Chi-square test was used for baseline characteristics analysis. Survival differences were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Independent prognostic factors identified by multivariate Cox proportional risk model were used for the construction of nomogram. RESULTS 557 eligible patients with metastasis LCNEC (median (IQR), 64 (56 to 72) years; 323 males) were included in this research. Among patients with isolated metastases, brain metastases had the highest incidence (29.4%), and multisite metastases had worse OS (HR: 2.020: 95% CI 1.413-2.888; P < 0.001) and LCSS (HR: 2.144, 95% CI 1.480-3.104; P < 0.001) in all age groups. Independent prognostic indicators including age, race, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and metastatic site were used for the construction of nomogram. Concordance index (C-index) and decision-curve analyses (DCAs) showed higher accuracy and net clinical benefit of nomogram compared to the 7th TNM staging system (OS: 0.692 vs 0.555; P < 0.001; LCSS: 0.693 vs 0.555; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We firstly established a novel comprehensive nomogram to predict the prognosis of metastasis LCNEC. The prognostic model demonstrated excellent accuracy and predictive performance. Chemotherapy and metastasis pattern were the two strongest predictive variables. Close follow-up of patients with LCNEC is necessary to make individualized treatment decisions according to different metastasis patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongchao Jiang
- Department of Radiotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China
| | - Haishuang Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China
- , Yinghua Dong Street, Hepingli, Chao Yang District, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Na Li
- Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, 81 Meishan Road, Shushan District, Hefei, 230000, Anhui, China
| | - Tongcui Jiang
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
- Biopharmaceutical Research Institute, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buium C, Negru S, Ionescu DN, Dediu M. The Unmet Diagnostic and Treatment Needs in Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:7218-7228. [PMID: 37623004 PMCID: PMC10453448 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30080523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) is currently classified as a rare lung cancer subtype, but given the high incidence of lung cancer, the overall number of cases is considerable. The pathologic diagnosis of LCNEC is mainly based on the microscopic appearance of the tumor cells, the mitotic rate, the amount of intra-tumoral necrosis, and the presence of positive neuroendocrine markers identified by immunohistochemistry. Recently, a subdivision into two main categories was proposed based on mutation signatures involving the RB1, TP53, KRAS, and STK11/LKB1 genes, into SCLC-like (small cell lung cancer-like) and NSCLC-like (non-small cell lung cancer-like) LCNEC. In terms of treatment, surgery is still the best option for resectable, stage I-IIIA cases. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have conflicting evidence. Etoposide/platinum remains the standard chemotherapy regimen. However, based on the newly proposed LCNEC subtypes, some retrospective series report better outcomes using a pathology-driven chemotherapy approach. Encouraging outcomes have also been reported for immunotherapy and targeted therapy, but the real impact of these strategies is still being determined in the absence of adequate prospective clinical trials. The current paper scrutinized the epidemiology, reviewed the reliability of pathologic diagnosis, discussed the need for molecular subtyping, and reviewed the heterogeneity of treatment algorithms in LCNEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catalin Buium
- Department of Medical Oncology, Asociatia Oncohelp, 300239 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Serban Negru
- Department of Medical Oncology, Asociatia Oncohelp, 300239 Timisoara, Romania;
- Department of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes”, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Diana N. Ionescu
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6B5M5, Canada;
| | - Mircea Dediu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sanador Clinical Hospital, 010991 Bucharest, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Altieri B, La Salvia A, Modica R, Marciello F, Mercier O, Filosso PL, de Latour BR, Giuffrida D, Campione S, Guggino G, Fadel E, Papotti M, Colao A, Scoazec JY, Baudin E, Faggiano A. Recurrence-Free Survival in Early and Locally Advanced Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung after Complete Tumor Resection. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020330. [PMID: 36836564 PMCID: PMC9965978 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of lung cancer with poor clinical outcomes. Data on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in early and locally advanced pure LCNEC after complete resection (R0) are lacking. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in this subgroup of patients and to identify potential prognostic markers. METHODS Retrospective multicenter study including patients with pure LCNEC stage I-III and R0 resection. Clinicopathological characteristics, RFS, and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS 39 patients (M:F = 26:13), with a median age of 64 years (44-83), were included. Lobectomy (69.2%), bilobectomy (5.1%), pneumonectomy (18%), and wedge resection (7.7%) were performed mostly associated with lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant therapy included platinum-based chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in 58.9% of cases. After a median follow-up of 44 (4-169) months, the median RFS was 39 months with 1-, 2- and 5-year RFS rates of 60.0%, 54.6%, and 44.9%, respectively. Median DSS was 72 months with a 1-, 2- and 5-year rate of 86.8, 75.9, and 57.4%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, age (cut-off 65 years old) and pN status were independent prognostic factors for both RFS (HR = 4.19, 95%CI = 1.46-12.07, p = 0.008 and HR = 13.56, 95%CI 2.45-74.89, p = 0.003, respectively) and DSS (HR = 9.30, 95%CI 2.23-38.83, p = 0.002 and HR = 11.88, 95%CI 2.28-61.84, p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION After R0 resection of LCNEC, half of the patients recurred mostly within the first two years of follow-up. Age and lymph node metastasis could help to stratify patients for adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Altieri
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Anna La Salvia
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, National Institute of Health (ISS), 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Modica
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Marciello
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Olaf Mercier
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Heart and Lung Transplantation, Université Paris-Saclay, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, GHPSJ, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Pier Luigi Filosso
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Turin, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Bertrand Richard de Latour
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Rennes Pontchaillou, University of Rennes, 422931 Rennes, France
| | - Dario Giuffrida
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, Mediterranean Institute of Oncology, 95029 Catania, Italy
| | - Severo Campione
- Department of Advanced Technology, Pathology Unit, Cardarelli Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Guggino
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cardarelli Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Elie Fadel
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Heart and Lung Transplantation, Université Paris-Saclay, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, GHPSJ, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Mauro Papotti
- Department of Oncology, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Annamaria Colao
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Jean-Yves Scoazec
- Department of Pathology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Baudin
- Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Antongiulio Faggiano
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|