1
|
Debs P, Ahlawat S, Fayad LM. Bone tumors: state-of-the-art imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2024; 53:1783-1798. [PMID: 38409548 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04621-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Imaging plays a central role in the management of patients with bone tumors. A number of imaging modalities are available, with different techniques having unique applications that render their use advantageous for various clinical purposes. Coupled with detailed clinical assessment, radiological imaging can assist clinicians in reaching a proper diagnosis, determining appropriate management, evaluating response to treatment, and monitoring for tumor recurrence. Although radiography is still the initial imaging test of choice for a patient presenting with a suspected bone tumor, technological innovations in the last decades have advanced the role of other imaging modalities for assessing bone tumors, including advances in computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, scintigraphy, and hybrid imaging techniques that combine two existing modalities, providing clinicians with diverse tools for bone tumor imaging applications. Determining the most suitable modality to use for a particular application requires familiarity with the modality in question, its advancements, and its limitations. This review highlights the various imaging techniques currently available and emphasizes the latest developments in imaging, offering a framework that can help guide the imaging of patients with bone tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Debs
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Laura M Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, 601 North Caroline Street, JHOC 3014, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D’Amuri A, Greco S, Pagani M, Presciuttini B, Ciaffi J, Ursini F. Common Non-Rheumatic Medical Conditions Mimicking Fibromyalgia: A Simple Framework for Differential Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1758. [PMID: 39202246 PMCID: PMC11354086 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic non-inflammatory disorder mainly characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and a constellation of other symptoms. For this reason, delineating a clear distinction between pure FM and FM-like picture attributable to other common diseases can be extremely challenging. Physicians must identify the most significant confounders in individual patients and implement an appropriate diagnostic workflow, carefully choosing a minimal (but sufficient) set of tests to be used for identifying the most plausible diseases in the specific case. This article discusses prevalent non-rheumatological conditions commonly observed in the general population that can manifest with clinical features similar to primary FM. Given their frequent inclusion in the differential diagnosis of FM patients, the focus will be on elucidating the distinctive clinical characteristics of each condition. Additionally, the most cost-effective and efficient diagnostic methodologies for accurately discerning these conditions will be examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea D’Amuri
- General Medicine Unit, Medical Department, ASST Mantova, Ospedale Carlo Poma, Str. Lago Paiolo 10, 46100 Mantova, Italy; (A.D.); (M.P.); (B.P.)
| | - Salvatore Greco
- Internal Medicine Unit, Medical Department, Ospedale del Delta, Via Valle Oppio 2, Lagosanto, 44023 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Mauro Pagani
- General Medicine Unit, Medical Department, ASST Mantova, Ospedale Carlo Poma, Str. Lago Paiolo 10, 46100 Mantova, Italy; (A.D.); (M.P.); (B.P.)
| | - Barbara Presciuttini
- General Medicine Unit, Medical Department, ASST Mantova, Ospedale Carlo Poma, Str. Lago Paiolo 10, 46100 Mantova, Italy; (A.D.); (M.P.); (B.P.)
| | - Jacopo Ciaffi
- Medicine & Rheumatology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy;
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Ursini
- Medicine & Rheumatology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy;
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, O’Dwyer E, Martinez Zuloaga J, Subramanian K, Hu JC, Jhanwar YS, Nagar H, RoyChoudhury A, Babich J, Huicochea Castellanos S, Osborne JR, Margolis DJA. Reasons for Discordance between 68Ga-PSMA-PET and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2056. [PMID: 38893178 PMCID: PMC11171071 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PSMA PET has emerged as a "gold standard" imaging modality for assessing prostate cancer metastases. However, it is not universally available, and this limits its impact. In contrast, whole-body MRI is much more widely available but misses more lesions. This study aims to improve the interpretation of whole-body MRI by comparing false negative scans retrospectively to PSMA PET. METHODS This study was a retrospective sub-analysis of a prospectively collected database of patients who participated in a clinical trial of PSMA PET/MRI comparing PSMA PET and whole-body MRI from 2018-2021. Subjects whose separately read PSMA PET and MRI diagnostic reports showed discrepancies ("false negative" MRI cases) were selected for sub-analysis. The cases were reviewed by the same attending radiologist who originally read the scans. The radiologist noted specific features on MRI indicating metastatic disease that were initially missed. RESULTS Of 263 cases, 38 (14%) met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Six classes of mpMRI false negatives were identified: anatomically normal (18, 47%), atypical MRI appearance (6, 16%), mischaracterization (1, 3%), undercall (6, 16%), obscured (4, 11%), and no abnormality on MRI (3, 8%). Considering that the atypical and undercalled cases could have been adjusted in retrospect, and that 4 additional cases had positive lesions to the same extent and 11 further cases had disease confined to the pelvis, only 11 (4%) of the original 263 would have had disease outside of a conventional radiation treatment plan. CONCLUSION Notably, almost 50% of the cases, including most lymph node metastases, were anatomically normal using standard criteria. This suggests that current anatomic criteria for evaluating prostate cancer lymph node metastases are not ideal, and there is a need for improved criteria. In addition, 32% of cases involved some element of human interpretive error, and, therefore, improving reader training may lead to more accurate results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jade Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Elisabeth O’Dwyer
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Kritika Subramanian
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Yuliya S. Jhanwar
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Arindam RoyChoudhury
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - John Babich
- Ratio Therapeutics, Inc., Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | | | - Joseph R. Osborne
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oldan JD, Almaguel F, Voter AF, Duran A, Gafita A, Pomper MG, Hope TA, Rowe SP. PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceuticals for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Cancer J 2024; 30:176-184. [PMID: 38753752 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous malignancy in men. Until recent years, accurate imaging of men with newly diagnosed PCa, or recurrent or low-volume metastatic disease, was limited. Further, therapeutic options for men with advanced, metastatic, castration-resistant disease were increasingly limited as a result of increasing numbers of systemic therapies being combined in the upfront metastatic setting. The advent of urea-based, small-molecule inhibitors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has partially addressed those shortcomings in diagnosis and therapy of PCa. On the diagnostic side, there are multiple pivotal phase III trials with several different agents having demonstrated utility in the initial staging setting, with generally modest sensitivity but very high specificity for determining otherwise-occult pelvic nodal involvement. That latter statistic drives the utility of the scan by allowing imaging interpreters to read with very high sensitivity while maintaining a robust specificity. Other pivotal phase III trials have demonstrated high detection efficiency in patients with biochemical failure, with high positive predictive value at the lesion level, opening up possible new avenues of therapy such as metastasis-directed therapy. Beyond the diagnostic aspects of PSMA-targeted radiotracers, the same urea-based chemical scaffolds can be altered to deliver therapeutic isotopes to PCa cells that express PSMA. To date, one such agent, when combined with best standard-of-care therapy, has demonstrated an ability to improve overall survival, progression-free survival, and freedom from skeletal events relative to best standard-of-care therapy alone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant PCa who are post chemotherapy. Within the current milieu, there are a number of important future directions including the use of artificial intelligence to better leverage diagnostic findings, further medicinal chemistry refinements to the urea-based structure that may allow improved tumor targeting and decreased toxicities, and the incorporation of new radionuclides that may better balance efficacy with toxicities than those nuclides that are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge D Oldan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Frankis Almaguel
- Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Andrew F Voter
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alfonso Duran
- Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Andrei Gafita
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Martin G Pomper
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Steven P Rowe
- From the Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karaarslan E, Alis D, Basar Y, Kumbasar B, Kalayci CB, Alpan B, Ozger H. The Role of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Extrapulmonary Metastases in Osteosarcoma Staging and Restaging: A Pilot Study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2023:00004728-990000000-00148. [PMID: 36944103 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to investigate the role of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing extrapulmonary metastases in primary osteosarcoma staging. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed medical data to identify primary osteosarcoma patients with available preoperative whole-body MRI obtained in the staging or restaging. Histopathology was the reference test for assessing the diagnostic performance, if available. Otherwise, oncology board decisions were used as the reference. In addition, the benefits of whole-body MRI to F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) and bone scintigraphy were investigated. RESULTS In all, 36 patients with osteosarcoma (24 staging, 12 restaging) with a mean age of 16.36 ± 5.63 years (range, 9-29 years) were included in the study. The median follow-up duration was 26.61 months (interquartile range, 33.3 months). Of 36 patients, 8 had skeletal, 1 had a lymph node, and 1 had a subcutaneous metastasis. Whole-body MRI correctly identified all patients with metastatic disease but incorrectly classified a bone infarct in one patient as a skeletal metastasis, equating a scan-level sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 100%, 96.3%, 97.3%, 100%, and 90.91%. Whole-body MRI contributed to bone scintigraphy by identifying a skeletal metastasis in one patient and positron emission tomography-computed tomography by ruling out a skeletal metastasis in another. CONCLUSIONS Whole-body MRI could accurately identify extrapulmonary metastases in primary osteosarcoma patients for staging or restaging. In addition, it might contribute to the standard whole-body imaging methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ercan Karaarslan
- From the Department of Radiology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine
| | - Deniz Alis
- From the Department of Radiology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine
| | - Yeliz Basar
- Department of Radiology, Acibadem Healthcare Group
| | | | | | - Bugra Alpan
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Harzem Ozger
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Asa S, Ozgur E, Uslu-Besli L, Ince B, Sager S, Demirdag C, Guner E, Sayman HB, Bakir B, Sonmezoglu K. Hybrid Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/MRI in the detection of skeletal metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: Contribution of each part to the diagnostic performance. Nucl Med Commun 2023; 44:65-73. [PMID: 36378618 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Bone metastasis is essential in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) as it determines prognosis and survival. Hybrid PET/MRI allows simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI data, thus combining the strength of both technologies allows the detection of bone marrow metastases that are missed by PET/CT. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of hybrid PET/MRI with Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in detecting skeletal metastases in newly diagnosed PCa patients and compared the effectiveness of stand-alone PSMA PET reviewing versus stand-alone whole-body (WB) MRI evaluation. We also investigated the effect of the interpretation of all PET/MR data together on clinical management. METHODS We studied 74 newly diagnosed PCa patients who underwent PSMA PET/MRI for staging purposes. At first, PET and MRI were evaluated separately for bone lesions on a patient-and-lesion basis and then a further joint PSMA PET/MRI interpretation was made. RESULTS Patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy analysis for bone metastasis was, respectively, 1.0, 0.83, 0.54, 1.0, 0.86 for PET; 0.75, 0.96, 0.81, 0.95, 0.93 for WB MRI and 0.91, 0.95, 0.78, 0,98, 0.94 for PET/MRI. The combined PET/MRI evaluation changed the clinical impact in 13.5% of patients (eight correct and two wrong decisions) compared to PET stand-alone interpretation. CONCLUSION PSMA PET imaging showed superior sensitivity to WB MRI in detecting bone metastases in newly diagnosed PCa patients, whereas WB MRI has superior specificity and PPV. Furthermore, the specificity and PPV of joint PET/MRI evaluation are better than PSMA PET alone. Despite the longer acquisition period, adding WB MRI sequences to PSMA PET imaging appears beneficial for PCa patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sertac Asa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
| | - Eren Ozgur
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital
| | - Lebriz Uslu-Besli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
| | - Burak Ince
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
| | - Sait Sager
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
| | - Cetin Demirdag
- Department of Urology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
| | - Ekrem Guner
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital
| | - Haluk B Sayman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
| | - Baris Bakir
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kerim Sonmezoglu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Damme J, Tombal B, Collette L, Van Nieuwenhove S, Pasoglou V, Gérard T, Jamar F, Lhommel R, Lecouvet FE. Comparison of 68Ga-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PET-CT) and Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WB-MRI) with Diffusion Sequences (DWI) in the Staging of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215286. [PMID: 34771449 PMCID: PMC8582508 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Precise staging is key for the optimal management of advanced prostate cancer. PSMA PET-CT and WB-MRI outperform standard imaging technology for staging high-risk prostate cancer, but direct comparison between both modalities is lacking. The primary endpoint of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of both techniques in the detection of lymph node, bone and visceral metastases against a best valuable comparator (BVC), defined as a consensus adjudication of all lesions on the basis of baseline and follow-up imaging, biological and clinical data and histopathologic confirmation when available. Knowing the diagnostic accuracy of both next generation imaging modalities might influence the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in prostate cancer by tailoring therapy. However, the impact on treatment and patient outcome of an improved detection of metastases has not been determined yet. Abstract Background: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) outperform standard imaging technology for the detection of metastasis in prostate cancer (PCa). There are few direct comparisons between both modalities. This paper compares the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET-CT and WB-MRI for the detection of metastasis in PCa. One hundred thirty-four patients with newly diagnosed PCa (n = 81) or biochemical recurrence after curative treatment (n = 53) with high-risk features prospectively underwent PSMA PET-CT and WB-MRI. The diagnostic accuracy of both techniques for lymph node, skeletal and visceral metastases was compared against a best valuable comparator (BVC). Overall, no significant difference was detected between PSMA PET-CT and WB-MRI to identify metastatic patients when considering lymph nodes, skeletal and visceral metastases together (AUC = 0.96 (0.92–0.99) vs. 0.90 (0.85–0.95); p = 0.09). PSMA PET-CT, however, outperformed WB-MRI in the subgroup of patients with newly diagnosed PCa for the detection of lymph node metastases (AUC = 0.96 (0.92–0.99) vs. 0.86 (0.79–0.92); p = 0.0096). In conclusion, PSMA PET-CT outperforms WB-MRI for the detection of nodal metastases in primary staging of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Van Damme
- Department of Urology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (J.V.D.); (B.T.)
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Department of Urology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (J.V.D.); (B.T.)
| | - Laurence Collette
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), B-1341 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium;
| | - Sandy Van Nieuwenhove
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-IMAG), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (S.V.N.); (V.P.)
| | - Vassiliki Pasoglou
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-IMAG), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (S.V.N.); (V.P.)
| | - Thomas Gérard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-MIRO), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (T.G.); (F.J.); (R.L.)
| | - François Jamar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-MIRO), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (T.G.); (F.J.); (R.L.)
| | - Renaud Lhommel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-MIRO), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (T.G.); (F.J.); (R.L.)
| | - Frédéric E. Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-IMAG), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (S.V.N.); (V.P.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|