A Novel Invadopodia-Specific Marker for Invasive and Pro-Metastatic Cancer Stem Cells

Anti-ENO1 antibody combined with metformin against tumor resistance: a novel antibody-based platform

Background

Antibody-based platforms (i.e., ADC) have emerged as one of the most encouraging tools for the cancer resistance caused by cancer stem cells (CSCs) enrichment. Our study might provide a promising therapeutic direction against drug resistance and serve as a potential precursor platform for screening ADC.

Methods

The cell migration, invasion, drug resistance, and self-renewal were assessed by the cell invasion and migration assay, wound healing assay, CCK-8 assay, colony formation assay, and sphere formation assay, respectively. The expression profiles of CSCs (ALDH+ and CD44+) subpopulations were screened by flow cytometry. The western blot and cell immunofluorescence assay were used to evaluate pathway-related protein expression in both anti-ENO1 antibody, MET combined with DPP/CTX-treated CSCs.

Results

In the present study, western blot and flow cytometry verified that anti-ENO1 antibody target the CD44+ subpopulation by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway, while metformin might target the ALDH+ subpopulation through activation of the AMPK pathway and thus reverse drug resistance to varying degrees. Subsequently, in vitro investigation indicated that anti-ENO1 antibody, metformin combined with cisplatin/cetuximab could simultaneously target ALDH+ and CD44+ subpopulations. The combination also inhibited the CSCs proliferation, migration, invasion, and sphere formation; which may result in overcoming the drug resistance. Then, molecular mechanism exploration verified that the anti-ENO1 antibody, metformin combined with cisplatin/cetuximab inhibited the Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Conclusions

The study preliminarily revealed anti-ENO1 antibody combined with metformin could overcome drug resistance against CSCs by inhibiting the Wnt//β-catenin pathway and might serve as a potential precursor platform for screening ADC. More importantly, it is reasonably believed that antibody-based drug combination therapy might function as an encouraging tool for oncotherapy.

Mechanisms and roles of podosomes and invadopodia

Cell invasion into the surrounding extracellular matrix or across tissue boundaries and endothelial barriers occurs in both physiological and pathological scenarios such as immune surveillance or cancer metastasis. Podosomes and invadopodia, collectively called 'invadosomes', are actin-based structures that drive the proteolytic invasion of cells, by forming highly regulated platforms for the localized release of lytic enzymes that degrade the matrix. Recent advances in high-resolution microscopy techniques, in vivo imaging and high-throughput analyses have led to considerable progress in understanding mechanisms of invadosomes, revealing the intricate inner architecture of these structures, as well as their growing repertoire of functions that extends well beyond matrix degradation. In this Review, we discuss the known functions, architecture and regulatory mechanisms of podosomes and invadopodia. In particular, we describe the molecular mechanisms of localized actin turnover and microtubule-based cargo delivery, with a special focus on matrix-lytic enzymes that enable proteolytic invasion. Finally, we point out topics that should become important in the invadosome field in the future.

TEM1 up-regulates MMP-2 and promotes ECM remodeling for facilitating invasion and migration of uterine sarcoma

OBJECTIVES

To explore the correlation between tumor endothelial marker 1 (TEM1) and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) in uterine sarcoma and their roles in the progression of uterine sarcoma.

METHODS

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS, n = 25) and uterine leiomyoma (n = 25) specimens were collected from a total of 50 patients. Immunohistochemistry assay was conducted to determine the expression of TEM1, MMP-2 and MMP-9. TEM1 over expression (hTEM1) and low expression (shRNA-TEM1) MES-SA cell lines were established as in vitro uterine sarcoma models. MMP-2 mRNA, protein expression and enzymatic activity were verified using qPCR, Western blot and gelatin zymography respectively. MMP-2 expression was downregulated using MMP-2 siRNA in hTEM1 MES-SA cells to better study the role of MMP-2. The invasive and migratory capacities of hTEM1, shRNA-TEM1, and hTEM1 treated with MMP-2 siRNA MES-SA cells were determined using transwell assays. Extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling mediated by TEM1 was examined using cell-ECM adhesion and fluorescent gelatin-ECM degradation assays. The immunofluorescence of F-actin was examined to analyze the formation of invadopodia. Subcutaneous and intraperitoneal xenografts were established to validate the role of TEM1 in promoting uterine sarcoma metastasis.

RESULTS

TEM1 and MMP-2 were expressed in 92% (n = 23) and 88% (n = 22) of uterine leiomyosarcoma specimens, respectively. Both TEM1 and MMP-2 were highly expressed in 100% (n = 17) of high stage (III-IV) uterine leiomyosarcoma specimens. In addition, TEM1 expression was positively correlated with MMP-2 expression in uterine leiomyosarcoma. The successful establishment of in vitro uterine sarcoma models was confirmed with qPCR and Western blotting tests. TEM1 promoted the invasion and metastasis of uterine sarcoma in vivo and in vitro. MMP-2 expression and activity were up-regulated in hTEM1 cells but down-regulated in shRNA-TEM1 cells. Importantly, MMP-2 knockdown impaired the invasive and migratory capacity of hTEM1 cells. TEM1 promoted ECM remodeling by increasing cell-ECM adhesion and ECM degradation. TEM1 overexpression also induced the formation of invadopodia.

CONCLUSION

TEM1 was co-expressed and positively correlated with MMP-2 in uterine leiomyosarcoma specimens. In addition, both TEM1 and MMP-2 were associated with tumor development. TEM1 promoted uterine sarcoma progression by regulating MMP-2 activity and ECM remodeling.

Tumor microenvironment enriches the stemness features: the architectural event of therapy resistance and metastasis

Cancer divergence has many facets other than being considered a genetic term. It is a tremendous challenge to understand the metastasis and therapy response in cancer biology; however, it postulates the opportunity to explore the possible mechanism in the surrounding tumor environment. Most deadly solid malignancies are distinctly characterized by their tumor microenvironment (TME). TME consists of stromal components such as immune, inflammatory, endothelial, adipocytes, and fibroblast cells. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) or cancer stem-like cells are a small sub-set of the population within cancer cells believed to be a responsible player in the self-renewal, metastasis, and therapy response of cancer cells. The correlation between TME and CSCs remains an enigma in understanding the events of metastasis and therapy resistance in cancer biology. Recent evidence suggests that TME dictates the CSCs maintenance to arbitrate cancer progression and metastasis. The immune, inflammatory, endothelial, adipocyte, and fibroblast cells in the TME release growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, microRNAs, and exosomes that provide cues for the gain and maintenance of CSC features. These intricate cross-talks are fueled to evolve into aggressive, invasive, migratory phenotypes for cancer development. In this review, we have abridged the recent developments in the role of the TME factors in CSC maintenance and how these events influence the transition of tumor progression to further translate into metastasis and therapy resistance in cancer.