Small Cell Lung Cancer Transformation as a Resistance Mechanism to Osimertinib in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review

Low UPB1 Level Correlates With Poor Prognosis in Lung Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a critical cancer with high mortality, worse prognosis, and crucial lymphatic metastasis. Consequently, prognostic biomarkers for LUAD are truly required. β-Ureidopropionase (UPB1) is abnormally expressed in various cancers. However, the function of UPB1 in LUAD is still ambiguous. This study aimed to explore the expression profile and prognostic significance of UPB1 in LUAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The differential UPB1 levels in pan cancers and their prognostic significance were comprehensively investigated through Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis, UALCAN, Tumor Immune Estimation Resource, and Kaplan-Meier plotter platform. The correlation between UPB1 and tumor infiltration immune cells was explored using Tumor Immune Estimation Resource, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis, and Tumor-Immune System Interactions and Drug Bank database databases.

RESULTS

The UPB1 level was abnormally expressed in pan-tumor tissue than in adjacent tissue from The Cancer Genome Atlas tool. Low UPB1 level was correlated with poor overall survival in patients with LUAD. Furthermore, a comparison of the various pathologic characteristics of LUAD between high and low UPB1 level subgroups revealed that low UPB1 expression was correlated with lymph node metastasis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that a low UPB1 level was associated with worse progression‑free survival and overall survival in patients with LUAD. Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that UPB1 could be a useful prognostic indicator for LUAD. Abnormal UPB1 may be correlated with aberrant LUAD immune infiltration, prompting a worse survival outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed that low UPB1 is correlated with a worse prognosis of LUAD and may be a valuable prognostic indicator for LUAD.

Resistance to osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC: a prospective study of molecular genotyping on tissue and liquid biopsies

BACKGROUND

Resistance to osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes a significant challenge for clinicians either in terms of molecular diagnosis and subsequent therapeutic implications.

METHODS

This is a prospective single-centre study with the primary objective of characterising resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated both in first- and in second-line. Next-Generation Sequencing analysis was conducted on paired tissue biopsies and plasma samples. A concordance analysis between tissue and plasma was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib in first- (n = 56) or in second-line (n = 9) were included. We managed to perform tissue and liquid biopsies in 65.5% and 89.7% of patients who experienced osimertinib progression, respectively. Acquired resistance mechanisms were identified in 80% of 25 patients with post-progression samples, with MET amplification (n = 8), EGFR C797S (n = 3), and SCLC transformation (n = 2) the most frequently identified. The mean concordance rates between tissue and plasma for the EGFR activating mutation and for the molecular resistance mechanisms were 87.5% and 22.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Resistance to osimertinib demonstrated to be highly heterogeneous, with MET amplification the main mechanism. Plasma genotyping is a relevant complementary tool which might integrate tissue analysis for the study of resistance mechanisms.

Adaptive therapy: a tumor therapy strategy based on Darwinian evolution theory

Cancer progression is a dynamic process of continuous evolution, in which genetic diversity and heterogeneity are generated by clonal and subclonal amplification based on random mutations. Traditional cancer treatment strategies have a great challenge, which often leads to treatment failure due to drug resistance. Integrating evolutionary dynamics into treatment regimens may be an effective way to overcome the problem of drug resistance. In particular, a potential treatment is adaptive therapy, which strategy advocates containment strategies that adjust the treatment cycles according to tumor evolution to control the growth of treatment-resistant cells. In this review, we first summarize the shortcomings of traditional tumor treatment methods in evolution and then introduce the theoretical basis and research status of adaptive therapy. By analyzing the limitations of adaptive therapy and exploring possible solutions, we can broaden people's understanding of adaptive therapy and provide new insights and strategies for tumor treatment.

Resistance of Lung Cancer to EGFR-Specific Kinase Inhibitors: Activation of Bypass Pathways and Endogenous Mutators

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have changed the landscape of lung cancer therapy. For patients who are treated with the new TKIs, the current median survival exceeds 3 years, substantially better than the average 20 month survival rate only a decade ago. Unfortunately, despite initial efficacy, nearly all treated patients evolve drug resistance due to the emergence of either new mutations or rewired signaling pathways that engage other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), such as MET, HER3 and AXL. Apparently, the emergence of mutations is preceded by a phase of epigenetic alterations that finely regulate the cell cycle, bias a mesenchymal phenotype and activate antioxidants. Concomitantly, cells that evade TKI-induced apoptosis (i.e., drug-tolerant persister cells) activate an intrinsic mutagenic program reminiscent of the SOS system deployed when bacteria are exposed to antibiotics. This mammalian system imbalances the purine-to-pyrimidine ratio, inhibits DNA repair and boosts expression of mutation-prone DNA polymerases. Thus, the net outcome of the SOS response is a greater probability to evolve new mutations. Deeper understanding of the persister-to-resister transformation, along with the development of next-generation TKIs, EGFR-specific proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), as well as bispecific antibodies, will permit delaying the onset of relapses and prolonging survival of patients with EGFR+ lung cancer.

Current Knowledge of Small Cell Lung Cancer Transformation from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death, and is divided into two major histological subtypes, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Histological transformation from NSCLC to SCLC has been reported as a mechanism of treatment resistance in patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR, ALK and ROS1 or immunotherapies. The transformed histology could be due to therapy-induced lineage plasticity or clonal selection of pre-existing SCLC cells. Evidence supporting either mechanism exist in the literature. Here, we discuss potential mechanisms of transformation and review the current knowledge about cell of origin of NSCLC and SCLC. In addition, we summarize genomic alterations that are frequently observed in both "De novo" and transformed SCLC, such as TP53, RB1 and PIK3CA. We also discuss treatment options for transformed SCLC, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, TKIs, immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic agents.

Acquired resistance mechanisms to osimertinib: The constant battle

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Detectable driver mutations have now changed the course of lung cancer treatment with the emergence of targeted therapy as a novel strategy that widely improved lung cancer prognosis, especially in metastatic patients. Osimertinib (AZD9291) is an irreversible third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) used to treat stage IV EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. It was initially designed to target both EGFR-activating mutations and the EGFR T790M mutation as well, which is the most common resistance mechanism to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Following the FLAURA trial, osimertinib is now widely used in the first-line setting. However, resistance to osimertinib inevitably develops, with numerous mechanisms leading to its resistance, classified into two main categories: EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent mechanisms. While EGFR-dependent mechanisms consist mainly of the C797S EGFR mutation, EGFR-independent mechanisms include bypass pathways, oncogenic fusions, and phenotypic transformation, among others. This review summarizes the molecular resistance mechanisms to osimertinib, with the aim of identifying novel therapeutic approaches to overcome osimertinib resistance and improve patient outcome.

Exon-18-EGFR Mutated Transformed Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation from EGFR mutant adenocarcinoma is a rare entity that is considered to be a new phenotype of SCLC. While transformation from adenocarcinoma (ADC) with EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R point mutations has been described, to our knowledge, no cases of transformation to SCLC from exon-18-mutated ADC have been reported. We reported a clinical case of a patient with exon-18-EGFR-transformed SCLC, and we performed a systematic review of the literature.

Patient-derived spheroids and patient-derived organoids simulate evolutions of lung cancer

Cancer cells harbor many genetic mutations and gene expression profiles different from normal cells. Patient-derived cancer cells (PDCC) are preferred materials in cancer study. We established patient-derived spheroids (PDSs) and patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from PDCCs isolated from the malignant pleural effusion in 8 patients. The morphologies suggested that PDSs may be a model of local cancer extensions, while PDOs may be a model of distant cancer metastases. The gene expression profiles differed between PDSs and PDOs: Gene sets related to inflammatory responses and EMT were antithetically regulated in PDSs or in PDOs. PDSs demonstrated an attenuation of the pathways that contribute to the enhancement of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) induced epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), while PDOs demonstrated an attenuation of it. Taken together, PDSs and PDOs have differences in both the interaction to the immune systems and to the stroma. PDSs and PDOs will provide a model system that enable intimate investigation of the behavior of cancer cells in the body.

Gain of Aggressive Histological and Molecular Patterns after Acquired Resistance to Novel Anti-EGFR Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Novel anti-EGFR therapies target resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR in patients with metastatic lung cancer. We describe tumors at progression versus at the initiation of novel anti-EGFR agents in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutation. This clinical case series reports the histological and genomic features and their evolution following disease progression under amivantamab or patritumab-deruxtecan in clinical trials. All patients had a biopsy at disease progression. Four patients harboring EGFR gene mutations were included. Three of them received anterior anti-EGFR treatment. Median delay to disease progression was 15 months (range: 4-24). At progression, all tumors presented a mutation in the TP53 signaling pathway associated with a loss of heterozygosis (LOH) of the allele in 75% (n = 3), and two tumors (50%) presented an RB1 mutation associated with LOH. Ki67 expression increased above 50% (range 50-90%) in all samples compared to baseline (range 10-30%), and one tumor expressed a positive neuroendocrine marker at progression. Our work reports the potential molecular mechanisms of resistance under novel anti-EGFR in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, with the transformation to a more aggressive histology with acquired TP53 mutation and/or the increase in Ki67 expression. These characteristics are usually found in aggressive Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Monitoring EGFR-lung cancer evolution: a possible beginning of a "methylation era" in TKI resistance prediction

The advances in scientific knowledge on biological therapies of the last two decades have impressively oriented the clinical management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations is dramatically associated with an improvement in disease control. Anyhow, the prognosis for this selected group of patients remains unfavorable, due to the innate and/or acquired resistance to biological therapies. The methylome analysis of many tumors revealed multiple patterns of methylation at single/multiple cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) sites that are linked to the modulation of several cellular pathways involved in cancer onset and progression. In lung cancer patients, ever increasing evidences also suggest that the association between DNA methylation changes at promoter/intergenic regions and the consequent alteration of gene-expression signatures could be related to the acquisition of resistance to biological therapies. Despite this intriguing hypothesis, large confirmatory studies are demanded to consolidate and finalize many preliminary observations made in this field. In this review, we will summarize the available knowledge about the dynamic role of DNA methylation in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

[Two Cases of TKI-resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer Transformation in Advanced Adenocarcinoma and Literature Review]

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) can achieve good disease control, but it will inevitably produce drug resistance. About 3%-10% of the resistance mechanism is small cell transformation. Two cases of stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation were reported and the disease was controlled after EGFR-TKIs treatment. In case 1, progression-free survival (PFS) before small cell carcinoma transformation was 16 months, and in case 2, PFS before small cell carcinoma transformation was 24 months. Subsequent biopsy after disease progression indicated a shift to small cell lung cancer. Case 1 PFS after small cell carcinoma transformation was 6 months, and case 2 PFS after small cell carcinoma transformation was 8 months, and overall survival (OS) was 36 months, which significantly prolonged the patient's survival. At the same time, the literature of such drug resistance mutations was reviewed. For patients with advanced NSCLC with sensitive mutations, it is necessary to conduct secondary histopathological tests after TKIs treatment resistance, and select subsequent treatment according to different resistance mechanisms for the whole course of disease management.
.

New Strategies and Novel Combinations in EGFR TKI-Resistant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Osimertinib is the current standard-of-care for the first-line treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Progression after osimertinib ineluctably occurs, and standard of care treatment options beyond progression have mainly included next-line platinum doublet chemotherapy. With better understanding of the varied molecular mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib, several opportunities for the use of targeted agents are emerging that include MET amplification, observed in 15% of patients, and resistant EGFR mutations, including C797S in 7% of patients. Evidence for the use of targeted therapies in such situations is mostly based on case reports, but clinical trials are being conducted with MET inhibitors, such as amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, or next-generation EGFR inhibitors, such as patritumab-deruxtecan, a HER3 antibody drug conjugate. In this review, we outline our proposed approach to current clinical practice for patients with EGFR mutant, osimertinib-resistant NSCLC which includes the following potential strategies: - Continuation of osimertinib beyond progression following local ablative treatment of oligoprogressive disease, - Tissue rebiopsy of progressive site and possibly concurrent liquid biopsy to evaluate for mechanism of resistance utilizing comprehensive genomic profiling, -Discussion at a molecular tumor board for assessment for enrollment in clinical trials/expanded access program if available with innovative drugs or possible off-label use of available targeted agents, based on the results of molecular profiling, -If no mechanism of resistance identified, administration of platinum-based chemotherapy with antiangiogenic agents. The role of immunotherapy will also be addressed given the uncertain benefit.

EGFR-mutant NSCLC: monitoring the molecular evolution of tumors in 2022

INTRODUCTION

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations define a subset of advanced, metastatic non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), that was historically identified along with the clinical development of specific EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), opening the era of precision medicine in thoracic oncology.

AREAS COVERED

Progression after EGFR TKIs is a major challenge for patients, as it occurs ineluctably along with disease evolution. Osimertinib is the current standard-of-care for the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib are challenging to identify, and are dominated by MET pathway activation, and acquired EGFR mutations.

EXPERT OPINION

The current vision for clinical practice in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC developing disease progression after osimertinib includes the following 5 steps:- continuation of osimertinib beyond progression, and local treatment of oligoprogressive disease, - comprehensive genomic profiling based on tissue rebiopsy of progressing sites, - access to new treatment agents through clinical trials, - molecular tumor board to discuss the off-label use of targeted agents, depending on the availability of drugs and/or expanded access programs - chemotherapy may be the best choice, based on combination of platinum-based regimen and antiangiogenic agents and possibly immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Resistance to TKIs in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Mechanisms to New Therapeutic Strategies

Simple Summary

Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in advanced mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Resistance may occur as a result of EGFR-dependent and independent molecular pathways. The first commonly includes T790M, C797S, L792X and L718X mutations, while the latter pertains to HER2 and MET amplifications, gene rearrangements, disruption in PIK3CA, MAPK signaling and SCLC and epithelial–mesenchymal cells transformation. Liquid biopsies detecting mutant cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have a major potential in the detection of mutant clones before they become clinically apparent. Newer-generation TKIs, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates or combinations of TKIs with other TKIs or chemotherapy, immunotherapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs) are currently in use or under investigation in EGFR mutant NSCLC. In EGFR mutant NSCLC metastatic to the brain, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) decreases the ability of TKIs to reach the central nervous system (CNS), acting as an additional resistance factor, which can presently be addressed with osimertinib. The potential of rechallenging EFGR TKIs after chemotherapy and combining it with anti-PD-1 immunotherapeutics remains ambivalent. Harnessing nanocarriers to improve drug delivery in EGFR TKIs-resistant NSCLC has been promising in preclinical settings, but it is yet to be determined in a clinical context.

Abstract

Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in advanced mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) constitutes a therapeutic challenge. This review intends to summarize the existing knowledge about the mechanisms of resistance to TKIs in the context of EGFR mutant NSCLC and discuss its clinical and therapeutic implications. EGFR-dependent and independent molecular pathways have the potential to overcome or circumvent the activity of EGFR-targeted agents including the third-generation TKI, osimertinib, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. CNS metastases occur frequently in patients on EGFR-TKIs, due to the inability of first and second-generation agents to overcome both the BBB and the acquired resistance of cancer cells in the CNS. Newer-generation TKIs, TKIs targeting EGFR-independent resistance mechanisms, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates or combinations of TKIs with other TKIs or chemotherapy, immunotherapy and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors (anti-VEGFs) are currently in use or under investigation in EGFR mutant NSCLC. Liquid biopsies detecting mutant cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provide a window of opportunity to attack mutant clones before they become clinically apparent. Overall, EGFR TKIs-resistant NSCLC constitutes a multifaceted therapeutic challenge. Mapping its underlying mutational landscape, accelerating the detection of resistance mechanisms and diversifying treatment strategies are essential for the management of the disease.

Morphologic-Molecular Transformation of Oncogene Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer, especially adenocarcinomas, harbour at least one oncogenic driver mutation that can potentially be a target for therapy. Treatments of these oncogene-addicted tumours, such as the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of mutated epidermal growth factor receptor, have dramatically improved the outcome of patients. However, some patients may acquire resistance to treatment early on after starting a targeted therapy. Transformations to other histotypes—small cell lung carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and sarcomatoid carcinoma—have been increasingly recognised as important mechanisms of resistance and are increasingly becoming a topic of interest for all specialists involved in the diagnosis, management, and care of these patients. This article, after examining the most used TKI agents and their main biological activities, discusses histological and molecular transformations with an up-to-date review of all previous cases published in the field. Liquid biopsy and future research directions are also briefly discussed to offer the reader a complete and up-to-date overview of the topic.

Small cell lung cancer transformation: From pathogenesis to treatment

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a type of neuroendocrine tumor with high malignancy and poor prognosis. Besides the de novo SCLC, there is transformed SCLC, which has similar characteristics of pathological morphology, molecular characteristics, clinical manifestations and drug sensitivity. However, de novo SCLC and transformed SCLC have different pathogenesis and tumor microenvironment. SCLC transformation is one of the mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy in NSCLC. Two hypotheses have been used to explain the pathogenesis of SCLC transformation. Although SCLC transformation is not common in clinical practice, it has been repeatedly identified in many small patient series and case reports. It usually occurs in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). SCLC transformation can also occur in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer after treatment with ALK inhibitors and in wild-type EGFR or ALK NSCLC treated with immunotherapy. Chemotherapy was previously used to treat transformed SCLC, yet it is associated with an unsatisfactory prognosis. We comprehensively review the advancements in transformed SCLC, including clinical and pathological characteristics, and the potential effective treatment after SCLC transformation, aiming to give a better understanding of transformed SCLC and provide support for clinical uses.

Outcomes in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma With Transformation to Small Cell Lung Cancer After EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Resistance: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Background

Lung adenocarcinoma can transform into small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) when resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) develops. Approximately 3% to 10% of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could transform to SCLC. This phenomenon has been described in several case reports and small patient series. However, the characteristics and treatment outcomes of this population have not been comprehensively reported, and their clinical course is poorly characterized.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of the published literature to summarize the clinical and pathological features and prognosis of the reported cases and analyzed the demographics, disease features, and outcomes.

Results

A total of 72 patients (50 females and 22 males) initially diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma were included. EGFR mutations included 19-deletion (75%), L858R (22%), and G719X (3%). All patients received EGFR-TKIs before SCLC transformation. The median time from diagnosis to transformation was 20.5 months (95% CI, 15.45 to 26.55 months). Of the 67 patients with post-translational gene test results, 58 maintained their EGFR mutation, and only 1 of 18 with prior T790M positivity retained T790M mutation. After the pathological transformation, both conventional chemotherapy regimen and chemotherapy combined targeted therapy yielded high response rates. The disease control rate of first-line therapy after transformation was 76%, while the objective response rate was 48%. The median overall survival (OS) since diagnosis was 27 months (95% CI, 22.90 to 31.10 months), whereas median OS since SCLC transformation was 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.50 to 11.60 months).

Conclusion

The prognosis of transformed SCLC is worse than primary SCLC. The response rate to conventional chemotherapy was high. However, the progression-free survival and OS after transformation were short and the prognosis was poor with first-line therapies. New therapies are needed in the management of transformed SCLC.

Identification of Master Regulators Driving Disease Progression, Relapse, and Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Backgrounds: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Current treatment strategies primarily involve surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, determined by TNM stages, histologic types, and genetic profiles. Plenty of studies have been trying to identify robust prognostic gene expression signatures. Even for high performance signatures, they usually have few shared genes. This is not totally unexpected, since a prognostic signature is associated with patient survival and may contain no upstream regulators. Identification of master regulators driving disease progression is a vital step to understand underlying molecular mechanisms and develop new treatments.

Methods: In this study, we have utilized a robust workflow to identify potential master regulators that drive poor prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. This workflow takes gene expression signatures that are associated with poor survival of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, EGFR-TKI resistance, and responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors, respectively, and identifies recurrent master regulators from seven public gene expression datasets by a regulatory network-based approach.

Results: We have found that majority of the master regulators driving poor prognosis in early stage LUAD are cell-cycle related according to Gene Ontology annotation. However, they were demonstrated experimentally to promote a spectrum of processes such as tumor cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance. Master regulators predicted from EGFR-TKI resistance signature and the EMT pathway signature are largely shared, which suggests that EMT pathway functions as a hub and interact with other pathways such as hypoxia, angiogenesis, TNF-α signaling, inflammation, TNF-β signaling, Wnt, and Notch signaling pathways. Master regulators that repress immunotherapy are enriched with MYC targets, E2F targets, oxidative phosphorylation, and mTOR signaling.

Conclusion: Our study uncovered possible mechanisms underlying recurrence, resistance to targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. The predicted master regulators may serve as potential therapeutic targets in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib and emerging therapeutic strategies in nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to introduce the resistance mechanisms to osimertinib, discuss the therapeutic strategies, and make clinical updates in overcoming resistance to osimertinib.

RECENT FINDINGS

Osimertinib has shown favorable efficacy on second-line and first-line treatments in EGFR-mutant advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the presence of primary and acquired resistance to osimertinib restricts its clinical benefits. The primary resistance mainly consists of BIM deletion polymorphism and EGFR exon 20 insertions. Meanwhile, the heterogeneous mechanisms of acquired resistance include EGFR-dependent (on-target) and EGFR-independent (off-target) mechanisms. EGFR C797S mutation, MET amplification, HER2 amplification, and small cell lung cancer transformation were identified as frequent resistance mechanisms. Recently, more novel mechanisms, including rare EGFR point mutations and oncogenic fusions, were reported. With the results of completed and on-going clinical trials, the emerging therapeutic strategies of postosimertinib progression are summarized.

SUMMARY

The resistance mechanisms to osimertinib are heterogeneous and gradually perfected. The combination of osimertinib with bypass targeted therapy and other therapeutic approaches emerge as promising strategies.

Small cell transformation in crizotinib-resistant ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with retention of ROS1 fusion: A case report

C-ros oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) rearrangement has been detected in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) provide a survival benefit for patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC, subsequent therapy remains limited. Small cell transformation is an important mechanism of drug resistance in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant NSCLC. However, its significance in mediating ROS1 resistance has not been determined yet. Here, we present the case of a 63-year-old man with ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC who had disease progression with small cell transformation of the mediastinal lymph node after 8 months of treatment with crizotinib. More importantly, fluorescence in situ hybridization of post-progression tumor biopsy demonstrated retention of ROS1 rearrangement. Tissue biopsy remains indispensable for patients who acquire resistance to ROS1 TKIs.

Comprehensive analysis of treatment modes and clinical outcomes of small cell lung cancer transformed from epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Transformation to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a resistance mechanism of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Here, we describe the clinical characteristics and prognosis of these patients and explore the treatment modes after transformation.

Methods

EGFR‐mutant LADC patients with SCLC transformation were retrospectively included in the study. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Survival outcomes and corresponding influential factors were analyzed.

Results

Twenty‐nine patients were included in the study. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients who received first‐line EGFR‐TKIs was 13.1 months. The median time to SCLC transformation was 27.5 months. After transformation, the objective response rates of patients who received first‐line chemotherapy with or without EGFR‐TKIs were 43.8% and 37.5%, respectively. The median PFS of patients reveiving chemotherapy with EGFR‐TKIs was significantly longer than that of patients receiving chemotherapy without EGFR‐TKIs (5.2 vs. 3.0 months; HR, 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05–0.72; p = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between patients who received chemotherapy with or without EGFR‐TKIs (14.8 vs. 13.0 months; p = 0.474). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, both anti‐angiogenic treatment (HR, 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01–0.29; p = 0.001) and local radiotherapy (HR, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.08–0.97; p = 0.044) were significantly associated with better patient OS after transformation.

Conclusions

Compared with chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and EGFR‐TKIs as first‐line treatment after SCLC transformation can benefit patients in PFS but not in OS. However, anti‐angiogenic therapies and local radiotherapy can significantly prolong OS after transformation.

Hype or hope - Can combination therapies with third-generation EGFR-TKIs help overcome acquired resistance and improve outcomes in EGFR-mutant advanced/metastatic NSCLC?

Three generations of epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have been developed for treating advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR-activating mutations, while a fourth generation is undergoing preclinical assessment. Although initially effective, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs usually arises within a year due to the emergence of clones harboring multiple resistance mechanisms. Therefore, the combination of EGFR-TKIs with other therapeutic agents has emerged as a potential strategy to overcome resistance and improve clinical outcomes. However, results obtained so far are ambiguous and ideal therapies for patients who experience disease progression during treatment with EGFR-TKIs remain elusive. This review provides an updated landscape of EGFR-TKIs, along with a description of the mechanisms causing resistance to these drugs. Moreover, it discusses the current knowledge, limitations, and future perspective regarding the use of EGFR-TKIs in combination with other anticancer agents, supporting the need for bench-to-bedside approaches in selected populations.